AUTHOR=Reed Murray Bruce , Godbersen Godber Mathis , Vraka Chrysoula , Rausch Ivo , Ponce de León Magdalena , Popper Valentin , Geist Barbara , Nics Lukas , Komorowski Arkadiusz , Karanikas Georgios , Beyer Thomas , Traub-Weidinger Tatjana , Hahn Andreas , Langsteger Werner , Hacker Marcus , Lanzenberger Rupert
TITLE=Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [18F]FDG imaging with arterial blood sampling
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology
VOLUME=14
YEAR=2023
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1074052
DOI=10.3389/fphys.2023.1074052
ISSN=1664-042X
ABSTRACT=Introduction: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) and the application of kinetic models can provide important quantitative information based on its temporal information. This however requires arterial blood sampling, which can be challenging to acquire. Nowadays, state-of-the-art PET/CT systems offer fully automated, whole-body (WB) kinetic modelling protocols using image-derived input functions (IDIF) to replace arterial blood sampling. Here, we compared the validity of an automatic WB kinetic model protocol to the reference standard arterial input function (AIF) for both clinical and research settings.
Methods: Sixteen healthy participants underwent dynamic WB [18F]FDG scans using a continuous bed motion PET/CT system with simultaneous arterial blood sampling. Multiple processing pipelines that included automatic and manually generated IDIFs derived from the aorta and left ventricle, with and without motion correction were compared to the AIF. Subsequently generated quantitative images of glucose metabolism were compared to evaluate performance of the different input functions.
Results: We observed moderate to high correlations between IDIFs and the AIF regarding area under the curve (r = 0.49–0.89) as well as for the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) (r = 0.68–0.95). Manual placing of IDIFs and motion correction further improved their similarity to the AIF.
Discussion: In general, the automatic vendor protocol is a feasible approach for the quantification of CMRGlu for both, clinical and research settings where expertise or time is not available. However, we advise on a rigorous inspection of the placement of the volume of interest, the resulting IDIF, and the quantitative values to ensure valid interpretations. In protocols requiring longer scan times or where cohorts are prone to involuntary movement, manual IDIF definition with additional motion correction is recommended, as this has greater accuracy and reliability.