AUTHOR=Yadan Zhang , Xin Lian , Jian Wu TITLE=Solving the inverse problem in electrocardiography imaging for atrial fibrillation using various time-frequency decomposition techniques based on empirical mode decomposition: A comparative study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology VOLUME=13 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.999900 DOI=10.3389/fphys.2022.999900 ISSN=1664-042X ABSTRACT=

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) can aid in identifying the driving sources that cause and sustain atrial fibrillation (AF). Traditional regularization strategies for addressing the ECGI inverse problem are not currently concerned about the multi-scale analysis of the inverse problem, and these techniques are not clinically reliable. We have previously investigated the solution based on uniform phase mode decomposition (UPEMD-based) to the ECGI inverse problem. Numerous other methods for the time-frequency analysis derived from empirical mode decomposition (EMD-based) have not been applied to the inverse problem in ECGI. By applying many EMD-based solutions to the ECGI inverse problem and evaluating the performance of these solutions, we hope to find a more efficient EMD-based solution to the ECGI inverse problem. In this study, five AF simulation datasets and two real datasets from AF patients derived from a clinical ablation procedure are employed to evaluate the operating efficiency of several EMD-based solutions. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient (CC), the relative difference measurement star (RDMS) of the computed epicardial dominant frequency (DF) map and driver probability (DP) map, and the distance (Dis) between the estimated and referenced most probable driving sources are used to evaluate the application of various EMD-based solutions in ECGI. The results show that for DF maps on all simulation datasets, the CC of UPEMD-based and improved UPEMD (IUPEMD)-based techniques are both greater than 0.95 and the CC of the empirical wavelet transform (EWT)-based solution is greater than 0.889, and the RDMS of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based approaches is less than 0.3 overall and the RDMS of EWT-based method is less than 0.48, performing better than other EMD-based solutions; for DP maps, the CC of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based techniques are close to 0.5, the CC of EWT-based is 0.449, and the CC of the remaining EMD-based techniques on the SAF and CAF is all below 0.1; the RDMS of UPEMD-based and IUPEMD-based are 0.06∼0.9 less than that of other EMD-based methods for all the simulation datasets overall. On two authentic AF datasets, the Dis between the first 10 real and estimated maximum DF positions of UPEMD-based and EWT-based methods are 212∼1440 less than that of others, demonstrating these two EMD-based solutions are superior and are suggested for clinical application in solving the ECGI inverse problem. On all datasets, EWT-based algorithms deconstruct the signal in the shortest time (no more than 0.12s), followed by UPEMD-based solutions (less than 0.81s), showing that these two schemes are more efficient than others.