AUTHOR=Wagner Jonathan , Niemeyer Max , Infanger Denis , Pfister Otmar , Myers Jonathan , Schmidt-Trucksäss Arno , Knaier Raphael
TITLE=Comparison of V̇O2-Kinetic Parameters for the Management of Heart Failure
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology
VOLUME=12
YEAR=2021
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.775601
DOI=10.3389/fphys.2021.775601
ISSN=1664-042X
ABSTRACT=Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze whether V̇O2-kinetics during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a useful marker for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) and to determine which V̇O2-kinetic parameter distinguishes healthy participants and patients with HF.
Methods: A total of 526 healthy participants and 79 patients with HF between 20 and 90 years of age performed a CPET. The CPET was preceded by a 3-min low-intensity warm-up and followed by a 3-min recovery bout. V̇O2-kinetics was calculated from the rest to exercise transition of the warm-up bout (on-kinetics), from the exercise to recovery transition following ramp test termination (off-kinetics) and from the initial delay of V̇O2 during the warm-up to ramp test transition (ramp-kinetics).
Results: V̇O2 off-kinetics showed the highest z-score differences between healthy participants and patients with HF. Furthermore, off-kinetics was strongly associated with V̇O2peak. In contrast, ramp-kinetics and on-kinetics showed only minimal z-score differences between healthy participants and patients with HF. The best on- and off-kinetic parameters significantly improved a model to predict the disease severity. However, there was no relevant additional value of V̇O2-kinetics when V̇O2peak was part of the model.
Conclusion: V̇O2 off-kinetics appears to be superior for distinguishing patients with HF and healthy participants compared with V̇O2 on-kinetics and ramp-kinetics. If V̇O2peak cannot be determined, V̇O2 off-kinetics provides an acceptable substitute. However, the additional value beyond that of V̇O2peak cannot be provided by V̇O2-kinetics.