94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Samuel R. Weaver1,2*
Bethany D. Skinner1
Rhodri Furlong1
Rebekah A. I. Lucas1N. Timothy Cable1
Catarina Rendeiro1,2
Helen M. McGettrick3
Samuel J. E. Lucas1,2- 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- 2Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- 3College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
A Corrigendum on
Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise
by Weaver, S. R., Skinner, B. D., Furlong, R., Lucas, R. A. I., Cable, N. T., Rendeiro, C., et al. (2021). Front. Physiol. 11:609935. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.609935
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 3 as published. Parts A and B were labeled in the incorrect order, the order of these panels within the figure was altered during reviewer responses and the figure legend was not updated correctly in the process. The correct legend appears below.
Figure 3. (A) MCAv was determined continuously by transcranial doppler ultrasound (TCD) and presented as change in MCAv from rest in each protocol for each participant. (B) PETCO2 was determined by measurement of breath-by-breath respiratory gas exchange and ventilation. Data were averaged for 1 min during seated rest (Rest); over 30 s during the final minute of four 4 min high intensity (85% HRmax) interval bouts (HIIT; Ex 1 – 4); across the duration of four 30 s supramaximal (200% Wmax) sprint intervals (SIT; Ex 1 – 4), and over a 30 s period, 15 s into the recovery following each bout in both interval protocols (Reco 1 – 4). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 24). Significance (analyzed by linear mixed model, p < 0.05) between time points is denoted by * for differences from resting values;€ for differences between interval (ex) and recovery (reco). Significant differences between protocols are denoted by Ω.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: cerebrovascular, exercise, hemodynamic, neurotrophic factor, physiology
Citation: Weaver SR, Skinner BD, Furlong R, Lucas RAI, Cable NT, Rendeiro C, McGettrick HM and Lucas SJE (2021) Corrigendum: Cerebral Hemodynamic and Neurotrophic Factor Responses Are Dependent on the Type of Exercise. Front. Physiol. 12:659873. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.659873
Received: 28 January 2021; Accepted: 08 February 2021;
Published: 24 February 2021.
Edited and reviewed by: Hassane Zouhal, University of Rennes 2 – Upper Brittany, France
Copyright © 2021 Weaver, Skinner, Furlong, Lucas, Cable, Rendeiro, McGettrick and Lucas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Samuel R. Weaver, c3J3MTk5QGJoYW0uYWMudWs=