AUTHOR=Thiele Dirk , Prieske Olaf , Lesinski Melanie , Granacher Urs 

TITLE=Effects of Equal Volume Heavy-Resistance Strength Training Versus Strength Endurance Training on Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Elite Female Rowers

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology

VOLUME=11

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.00888

DOI=10.3389/fphys.2020.00888

ISSN=1664-042X

ABSTRACT=<p>Strength training is an important means for performance development in young rowers. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 9-week equal volume heavy-resistance strength training (HRST) versus strength endurance training (SET) in addition to regular rowing training on primary (e.g., maximal strength/power) and secondary outcomes (e.g., balance) in young rowers. Twenty-six female elite adolescent rowers were assigned to an HRST (<italic>n</italic> = 12; age: 13.2 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.0 ± 0.5 yrs) or a SET group (<italic>n</italic> = 14; age: 13.1 ± 0.5 yrs; maturity-offset: +2.1 ± 0.5 yrs). HRST and SET comprised lower- (i.e., leg press/knee flexion/extension), upper-limbs (i.e., bench press/pull; lat-pull down), and complex exercises (i.e., rowing ergometer). HRST performed four sets with 12 repetitions per set at an intensity of 75–95% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM). SET conducted four sets with 30 repetitions per set at 50–60% of the 1-RM. Training volume was matched for overall repetitions × intensity × training per week. Pre-post training, tests were performed for the assessment of primary [i.e., maximal strength (e.g., bench pull/knee flexion/extension 1-RM/isometric handgrip test), muscle power (e.g., medicine-ball push test, triple hop, drop jump, and countermovement jump), anaerobic endurance (400-m run), sport-specific performance (700-m rowing ergometer trial)] and secondary outcomes [dynamic balance (Y-balance test), change-of-direction (CoD) speed (multistage shuttle-run test)]. Adherence rate was &gt;87% and one athlete of each group dropped out. Overall, 24 athletes completed the study and no test or training-related injuries occurred. Significant group × time interactions were observed for maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, CoD speed, and sport-specific performance (<italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05; 0.45 ≤ <italic>d</italic> ≤ 1.11). <italic>Post hoc</italic> analyses indicated larger gains in maximal strength and muscle power following HRST (<italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05; 1.81 ≤ <italic>d</italic> ≤ 3.58) compared with SET (<italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05; 1.04 ≤ <italic>d</italic> ≤ 2.30). Furthermore, SET (<italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.01; <italic>d</italic> = 2.08) resulted in larger gains in sport-specific performance compared with HRST (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05; <italic>d</italic> = 1.3). Only HRST produced significant pre-post improvements for anaerobic endurance and CoD speed (<italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05; 1.84 ≤ <italic>d</italic> ≤ 4.76). In conclusion, HRST in addition to regular rowing training was more effective than SET to improve selected measures of physical fitness (i.e., maximal strength, muscle power, anaerobic endurance, and CoD speed) and SET was more effective than HRST to enhance sport-specific performance gains in female elite young rowers.</p>