Characterization of the Akirin Gene and Its Role in the NF-κB Signaling Pathway of Sogatella furcifera

Akirin is an essential nuclear protein involved in the regulation of NF-κB signaling pathway. In most invertebrates, Akirin regulates NF-κB-related Imd and Toll pathways, however, in Drosophila, it only controls the Imd pathway, whereas its role in NF-κB signaling pathway in other insect species is unclear. In the present study, we used white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera as a model to investigate the functional activity of Akirin in insects. The sequence of Akirin cDNA was extracted from transcriptome database of S. furcifera; it contained a 585 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding a putative protein of 194 amino acids. S. furcifera Akirin (SfAkirin) had a molecular weight of about 21.69 kDa and a theoretical pI of 8.66 and included a nuclear localization signal (NLS) of five amino acid residues at the N-terminal region. Evolutionary analysis showed that SfAkirin was evolutionary closer to Akirins of such relatively distant species as crustaceans than to those of some insect orders like Diptera and Hymenoptera. Tissue-specific expression analysis showed that the SfAkirin gene was expressed in all examined tissues, with the highest expression levels detected in the testis, followed by the ovary, whereas the lowest expression was found in the head. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed that SfAkirin mRNA was strongly induced in response to injection of heat-inactivated Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, whereas SfAkirin silencing by RNA interference significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB dependent transcription factors Dorsal and Relish after B. subtilis and E. coli challenge, respectively. Our results suggest that SfAkirin may control the immune response of S. furcifera against bacterial infection via both Imd and Toll signaling pathways.

Introduction

NF-κB is a nuclear transcription factor that activates the expression of genes involved in the immune response of insects to infections by pathogenic microorganisms and, therefore, plays a central role in the insect innate immunity (Hoffmann, 2003; Hultmark, 2003; Imler and Bulet, 2005). There are three types of NF-κB transcription factors identified in insects: Dorsal, Dif, and Relish (Eleftherianos et al., 2013; Zhong et al., 2016), which participate in immunity-related Toll and Imd signaling pathways (Lemaitre et al., 1995; Valanne et al., 2011; Myllymaki et al., 2014). Dorsal and Dif are the downstream transcription factors involved in the Toll pathway which primarily regulates the immune response to fungi and gram-positive bacteria (Valanne et al., 2011), whereas Relish acts in the Imd pathway which mainly controls the response to gram-negative bacteria (Georgel et al., 2001). In Drosophila melanogaster, Bombyx mori, and mosquitoes, the classical pathways through which NF-κB transcription factors participate in Toll and Imd signaling pathway are relatively well studied and described (Zou et al., 2011; Kuo et al., 2012; Hua et al., 2016; Salminen and Ramet, 2016). Nevertheless, an increasing number of new studies continue to contribute important data, furthering our understanding of these pathways and the related mechanisms. Wang et al. (2012) identified a novel transcription factor, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α factor (LITAF), which plays a role distinct from that of NF-κB in the Toll and Imd signaling pathways. In another study, Shi et al. (2012) demonstrated a possibility of different pairing of Toll with a cytokine-like peptide Spaztle and suggested functional roles of multiple Toll signal transduction pathways in insect immunity. The authors also showed, for the first time, that the insect myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) could have a function similar to that of the mammalian MD-2 in immune signaling and expression control of antimicrobial peptides cathelicidins and proposed a Toll-LPS signaling pathway regulating immunity in insects.

The Akirin gene was discovered by Goto et al. (2008) through whole-genome RNA interference (RNAi) screening in Drosophila. Akirin is strictly localized in the nucleus where it acts as a critical transcription factor regulating the innate immune response by controlling the expression of genes involved in the NF-κB-mediated Imd signaling pathway (Ferrandon et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2008; Bonnay et al., 2014). Previous studies have indicated that the Akirin gene exists only in animals and is not found in plants, fungi, or bacteria (Carreon et al., 2012; Manzano-Roman et al., 2012; Carpio et al., 2013; Hou et al., 2013; Moreno-Cid et al., 2013). It has been reported that the Akirin protein plays a role in transcriptional regulation of genes related to the NF-κB signaling pathway both in vertebrates such as mice and invertebrates such as D. melanogaster (insect) (Goto et al., 2008), Litopenaeus vannamei and Caligus rogercresseyi (crustaceans) (Carpio et al., 2013), and Ixodes scapularis (arachnid) (Naranjo et al., 2013). In Drosophila, Akirin downregulation can result in a major decrease in the expression of the Imd pathway genes Imd, Relish, and PGRP-LC, as well as an Imd target gene Diptericin, which corresponds to a significant increase in Drosophila sensitivity to gram-negative bacteria, as evidenced by the elevation of the mortality rate up to 100% at 24 h after bacterial infection. However, target genes of the Toll pathway, such as Toll and Drosomycin, are not affected by Akirin downregulation. These results clearly indicated that in Drosophila, Akirin plays a key role in the regulation of the Imd but not Toll signaling pathway (Goto et al., 2008; Bonnay et al., 2014), which is in contrast to its function in other invertebrates such as C. rogercresseyi and L. vannamei, where it controls both Imd and Toll pathways (Carpio et al., 2013; Hou et al., 2013; Naranjo et al., 2013). In addition to its involvement in the regulation of NF-κB-mediated signaling, Akirin takes part in biological processes unrelated to immunity. For example, Akirin gene knockdown by RNA interference in mosquitoes suggested a role for Akirin in mosquito survival and fertility. Vaccination of mice with recombinant Aedes albopictus Akirin reduced parasite infection in mosquitoes fed on immunized mice compared to controls (da Costa et al., 2014). RNAi-mediated silencing of Akirin gene expression has shown to protect against tick infestations by reducing tick fertility and vectorial capacity (de la Fuente et al., 2006, 2008, 2011; Harrington et al., 2009; Moreno-Cid et al., 2010). In Xenopus, Akirin was found to exert precise temporal control over Xenopus neural development (Liu et al., 2017). In mammals, Akirin functions as an important myogenic factor negatively regulated by myostatin, affecting biological processes such as mouse embryonic development and postnatal muscle growth, as well as intramyocellular lipid content (Sasaki et al., 2009). Akirin down-regulation increases chemosensitivity in human glioblastomas more efficiently than that by Twist-1 down-regulation (Krossa et al., 2015). Moreover, Akirin is considered to be a promising target for the development of vaccines to control mosquitoes, hard ticks, and sand flies (de la Fuente et al., 2006, 2011; Galindo et al., 2009; Harrington et al., 2009; Prudencio et al., 2010; Merino et al., 2011; Carreon et al., 2012; Manzano-Roman et al., 2012; Carpio et al., 2013).

The white–backed planthopper S. furcifera belonging to the Hemiptera order is an insect with incomplete metamorphosis, which has become one of the most destructive pests in rice production in Asia. S. furcifera can migrate over long distances in temperate and tropical regions of Asia and primarily feeds on rice plants (Shen et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2017), from which it sucks sap, causing yellowing, stunting, and hopper burn, and finally plant death (Wang et al., 2017). More importantly, S. furcifera can transmit dangerous rice viruses, further contributing to the damage of rice plants (Zhou et al., 2013; He et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017). Therefore, it is important to investigate the immune mechanisms of S. furcifera to develop effective control strategies. Among insects, Akirin regulation of the NF-κB signaling has only been reported in Drosophila, but not in other species. It has been shown that in Drosophila, Akirin is involved in the regulation of the Imd but not Toll pathway. The main objective of the present study was to investigate the association between Akirin and NF-κB signaling in S. furcifera in order to determine whether a universal regulation system similar to that in Drosophila exists in all insects or there are species-specific differences. The results of the present study should advance the knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the role of the NF-κB signaling pathway in the innate immunity of S. furcifera in particular and insects in general.

Materials and Methods

Insects

Sogatella furcifera used in this study was obtained from the Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China). The insects were maintained on rice (variety Taichung Native 1 [TN1]) for more than 30 generations under following conditions: temperature, 27 ± 0.5°C; relative humidity, 70 ± 5%; photoperiod, 16:8 h (light:dark). TN1 seedlings were grown in soil at 28–30°C under a long photoperiod (14:10 h light:dark) in an artificial-climate room and grasshoppers were transferred to fresh seedlings every 12–15 days to assure sufficient nutrition.

Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis of SfAkirin

The sequence of the SfAkirin unigene was obtained from the corresponding S. furcifera transcriptome datasets recently constructed in our laboratory. The open reading frame (ORF) was identified using the EditSeq program of DNAStar and molecular weight and theoretical pI of the SfAkirin protein were deduced using the ExPASy-ProtParam tool¹. Homologous genes from other insect species were identified by similarity search using NCBI-BLAST², and multiple sequence alignments were performed with Clustalx 1.83. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 using the Neighbor-joining method. The following Akirins were used in multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis: AmAkirin (Apis mellifera, XP_395252.2), ObAkirin (Ooceraea biroi, EZA59122.1), SiAkirin (Solenopsis invicta, XP_011169583.1), AeAkirin (Acromyrmex echinatior, XP_011066641.1), SfAkirin (S. furcifera, MG744348), ApAkirin (Acyrthosiphon pisum, XP_001943118), RpAkirin (Riptortus pedestris, BAN21089), AaAkirin (A. albopictus, ACF49499.1), AgAkirin (Anopheles gambiae, XP_308938.4), CqAkirin (Culex quinquefasciatus, XP_001863200.1), DmAkirin (D. melanogaster, NP_648113.1), BmAkirin (B. mori, NP_001243977.1), PaAkirin (Pararge aegeria, JAA80553.1), and akirins of Linepithema humile (XP_012216183.1), Trachymyrmex septentrionalis (KYN34212.1), Nasonia vitripennis (XP_008215008.1), Eriocheir sinensis (AGT21376.1), L. vannamei (AGG35614.1), Centruroides sculpturatus (XP_023221383.1), Ornithodoros moubata (AGI44628.1), I. scapularis (AGO59321.1), Haemaphysalis elliptica (AGI44626.1), Rhipicephalus microplus (AFH57345.1), Musca domestica (XP_005185646.1), Bactrocera oleae (NP_001302560.1), Ceratitis capitata (XP_004526166.1), Nicrophorus vespilloides (XP_017785343), Tribolium castaneum (XP_971340), Bos taurus (Akirin-1, NP_001094706.1, and Akirin-2, NP_001103557.1), Ovis aries (Akirin-1, NP_001121144.1, and Akirin-2, NP_001239105.1), Sus scrofa (Akirin-1, AIK19308.1, and Akirin-2, AGA94528.1), Homo sapiens (Akirin-1, NP_078871.1, and Akirin-2, NP_060534.1), and Mus musculus (Akirin-1, NP_075912.2, and Akirin-2, NP_001007590.2).

Tissue Distribution of SfAkirin mRNA

Total RNA was extracted from different tissues of individual fifth-instar S. furcifera nymphs, including the head, fat body, gut, wind, cuticle, muscle, testis, and ovary using an RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech Co, China), and 2 μg RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA with the one step SYBR PrimerScript RT-PCR Kit (Takara, Japan). Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify SfAkirin expression in different S. furcifera tissues with the actin 1-encoding gene (GenBank ID: ALO78726.1) as an internal reference control; primers (Sangon Biotech, China) are shown in Table 1. All qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate in a Bio-Rad Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad, Hercules, CAı, United States) at the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s and annealing/extension at 60°C for 30 s. The relative gene expression of SfAkirin was calculated using the comparative 2^-ΔΔCT Ct method (ΔΔCT = ΔCT _target - ΔCT _reference).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Primers used in this study.

Bacterial Induction

Gram-negative E. coli strain K12 and gram-positive B. subtilis were used to inject S. furcifera. Bacteria were cultured overnight at 37°C on LB agar plates using the streak-plate procedure. A single colony of E. coli or B. subtilis was used to inoculate 10 ml of LB broth in culture flasks, which were then incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm until optical density at 600 nm reached 0.6 and 0.75, respectively. The bacteria were then collected by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 min, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 137 mM NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na₂HPO₄, 1.47 mM KH₂PO₄, pH 7.4) to a density of 10⁶ cells/ml, and heat-killed by boiling for 30 min.

Fourth-instar S. furcifera nymphs (day 1) were evenly distributed into three injection groups: E. coli, B. subtilis, and PBS (control). The insects were anesthetized with CO₂ (pressure: 5 mPa) for 10 s and fixed on an agarose gel-casting tray in a neat array with their abdomens facing upwards. Then, 0.5 μl of inactivated bacteria or PBS was injected into the abdomen segment junction between the second and third appendages using a FemtoJet microinjection system (Eppendorf, Germany). The injected nymphs were reared in the incubation chamber, fed with fresh rice, and analyzed for Akirin gene expression by qRT-PCR as described.

RNA Interference

To synthesize dsRNA, a 310 bp fragment of SfAkirin and a 333 bp fragment of GFP-encoding gene (GenBank ID: KU306402.1) were amplified by PCR using the S. furcifera cDNA and plasmid pJV53-GFP, respectively. Akirin dsRNA was synthesized with primers Akirin-dsRNA-F, Akirin-dsRNA-T7F, Akirin-dsRNA-R, and Akirin-dsRNA-T7R, and GFP dsRNA was synthesized with primers GFP-dsRNA-F, GFP-dsRNA-T7F, GFP-dsRNA-R, and GFP-dsRNA-T7R (Table 1) using the T7 RiboMAX^TM Express RNAi System (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). The reactions were performed at the following conditions: 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The resultant dsRNA products were washed with 70% ethanol, dried, re-suspended in nuclease-free water, and quantified using a BioSpectrometer (Eppendorf, Germany). The quality and size of dsRNA were checked by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels.

In the dsRNA injection experiment, we used the rearing procedure described earlier (Waris et al., 2018). Briefly, fourth-instar S. furcifera nymphs (day 1) were equally divided into the dsAkirin injection group and dsGFP control group, anesthetized and fixed as described above, and injected with 10 ng Akirin dsRNA or GFP dsRNA, respectively, into the abdomen segment junction between the second and third appendages using the FemtoJet microinjection system. RNA was extracted from nine individual insects per group at 24 and 48 h post-injection, and RNA samples from three insects in each group were combined and used for one reaction.

Effect of SfAkirin on Dorsal and Relish Expression in vivo

To determine whether SfAkirin participates in the activation of the Toll and Imd pathways after bacterial infection, Dorsal (GenBank ID: AWT86616) mRNA expression was determined in dsAkirin-injected S. furcifera challenged or not with E. coli (dsAkirin + E. coli) or B. subtilis (dsAkirin + B. subtilis) and Relish (GenBank ID: AWT86617) mRNA expression was determined in the dsAkirin + E. coli group; dsGFP-injected S. furcifera challenged or not with E. coli (dsGFP + E. coli) or B. subtilis (dsGFP + B. subtilis) was used as control. S. furcifera nymphs were injected with dsRNA and challenged with bacteria 24 h later; Dorsal and Relish mRNA levels were determined at 24, 48, and 72 h after bacterial challenge by qRT-PCR using primers Realtime-Dorsal-F and Realtime-Dorsal-R, and Realtime-Relish-F and Realtime-Relish-F, respectively (Table 1).

Statistical Analysis

Real-time quantitative PCR statistical analysis was performed by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test using the SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States) to compare mRNA expression in different groups. Differences at P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Akirin Gene Sequence Analysis

The cDNA of SfAkirin (GenBank ID: AVW83290.1) contains an ORF of 585 bp, which encodes a putative protein of 194 amino acids. The predicted molecular weight of SfAkirin is about 21.69 kDa with a theoretical pI of 8.66. Homology analysis of insect Akirins using the clustalx software indicated that a high degree of homology (about 50–60%) existed among these proteins in insects from different orders (Figure 1). Furthermore, highly conserved amino acid motifs were found in various SfAkirin regions, including the KRR/QRC sequence at the N-terminus (residues 23–27), which was identified as a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Figure 1). The results of multiple sequence alignment among Akirins of 13 insects from orders Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera revealed conserved sequences at the extreme N-termini and C-termini (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of SfAkirin with those of other insect Akirins. A conserved nuclear localization signal (NLS) is shaded gray; identical sequences in conserved regions of Hymenoptera and Hemiptera species are shaded red and those for Diptera and Lepidoptera species are shaded blue.

Evolutionary Analysis of SfAkirin

The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 using the neighbor-joining method. Evolutionary analysis showed that Akirins were divided in two clusters: those of invertebrates (insects, crustaceans, and arachnids) and vertebrates (mammals), and mammalian Akirins were further subdivided into two groups: Akirin-1 and Akirin-2 (Figure 2). Interestingly, we found that not all insect Akirins were clustered together but were divided into two branches separated by crustacean and arachnid. Akirins of insects from orders Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, and Lepidoptera were clustered together, and insects from order Diptera was cluster in another branch. SfAkirin was clustered with the proteins of the first insect group, and was evolutionary closer to Akirins of such relatively distant species as arachnids than to those of some insect orders like Diptera and Hymenoptera. UPGMA method was also used to analyze evolutionary relationship of Akirin (date not shown), and which got the similar result.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Evolutionary analysis of SfAkirin. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 using the neighbor-joining method. SfAkirin is marked red. The number of branch lengths are shown next to the branches.

Tissue-Specific Expression of SfAkirin

The expression profile of the SfAkirin gene in S. furcifera nymphs was analyzed by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 3, SfAkirin mRNA was detected in all tested tissues (including the head, fat body, gut, wind, cuticle, muscle, testis, and ovary), with the highest expression observed in the testis and the lowest in the head. Thus, the Akirin mRNA level in the testis was 11.7 times higher and those in the fat body, gut, wind, cuticle, muscle, and ovary approximately 1.2–2.2 times higher compared to the head (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Tissue distribution of SfAkirin mRNA. The Actin 1-encoding gene was used as internal control.

Gene Expression in S. furcifera Challenged With Bacteria

To determine whether SfAkirin has immunity-related functions, S. furcifera was injected with heat-inactivated bacteria and analyzed for mRNA expression of SfAkirin, SfRelish, and SfDorsal by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 4A, there was no significant difference in SfAkirin transcription between control (PBS) and bacteria-injected groups at 6 h or between control and the E. coli group at 36 h post challenge, however, SfAkirin levels significantly increased at 12 and 24 h after E. coli challenge and increased at 12, 24, and 36 h after B. subtilis challenge. At the same time, the expression of SfRelish was significantly increased by E. coli (Figure 4B), whereas that of SfDorsal – by both E. coli and B. subtilis (Figure 4C) at 36 h post injection.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Expression profiles of SfAkirin, SfRelish, and SfDorsal mRNA in S. furcifera challenged with E. coli or B. subtilis. (A) The mRNA expression of SfAkirin post E. coli or B. subtilis injection; (B) The mRNA expression of SfRelish post E. coli or B. subtilis injection; (C) The mRNA expression of SfDorsal post E. coli or B. subtilis injection. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ^∗Above bars means a statistically significant difference between E. coli or B. subtilis injection group and control group (P < 0.05).

SfAkirin Silencing Reduced the Transcription of Relish and Dorsal

As shown in Figure 5, a significant (10-fold) decrease in SfAkirin mRNA expression was observed 24 h after S. furcifera injection with SfAkirin dsRNA (dsAkirin) compared to the control dsGFP group (P < 0.05) and the effect lasted up to 48 h post-injection (P < 0.05), indicating efficient silencing of SfAkirin expression.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. SfAkirin mRNA expression in S. furcifera injected with dsRNA specific for Akirin (dsAkirin) or GFP (dsGFP). The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3); ^∗P < 0.05 compared with dsGFP.

Silencing SfAkirin Reduced the Transcription of Relish and Dorsal

The mRNA levels of Relish and Dorsal in S. furcifera with normal and reduced SfAkirin expression were examined after challenge with bacteria. Relish was significantly downregulated in the dsAkirin + E. coli group at 48 and 72 h compared to dsGFP + E. coli groups (P < 0.05; Figure 6A), whereas Dorsal was downregulated in the dsAkirin + E. coli group at 24, 48, and 72 h compared to the dsGFP + E. coli group (P < 0.05, Figure 6B). Similar results were obtained when S. furcifera was challenged with B. subtilis: Dorsal mRNA was downregulated in the dsAkirin + B. subtilis group at 24, 48, and 72 h compared to dsGFP + B. subtilis groups (Figure 6C).

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Relative mRNA expression of Relish and Dorsal in S. furcifera with reduced SfAkirin expression after bacterial challenge. S. furcifera was first injected with dsAkirin or dsGFP and after 24 h treated with E. coli or B. subtilis and analyzed for mRNA expression at the indicated times. (A) Relish mRNA levels after E. coli injection. (B) Dorsal mRNA levels after E. coli injection. (C) Dorsal mRNA levels after B. subtilis injection. The results are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 3); ^∗Above bars indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

Discussion

The NF-κB signaling plays a central role in the innate immunity of insects, presenting the first line of defense against invading pathogens. However, to date, there were no studies on NF-κB signaling in S. furcifera. Akirin is a conserved nuclear transcription factor that regulates the NF-κB pathway in innate immune responses (Goto et al., 2008). In Drosophila, Akirin controls only the Imd pathway and is not involved in the regulation of the Toll pathway (Goto et al., 2008), which is in contrast to other invertebrates such as C. rogercresseyi and L. vannamei, where Akirin regulates both Imd and Toll pathways (Carpio et al., 2013; Hou et al., 2013). Although, sequences of the Akirin gene from many insect species have been submitted to the GenBank database, research on Akirin functional activity in insects is limited, and relevant studies have only been conducted on D. melanogaster and A. aegypti (Goto et al., 2008; da Costa et al., 2014).

In the present study, we performed homology analysis using a transcriptome database and identified conserved nucleotide and amino acid sequences in Akirin genes of insect species. Our results indicate that Akirins of insects from different orders have a high degree of homology and carry highly conserved amino acid motifs at various regions. In particular, the KRR/QRC sequence at the Akirin N-terminal region (residues 23–27) was determined as an NLS, indicating that the protein functions strictly within the cell nucleus. Phylogenetic analysis of Akirins from invertebrates (including insects, crustaceans, and arachnids) unexpectedly showed that not all insect Akirins were clustered together in the evolutionary tree but were separated into two groups with crustaceans and arachnids positioned in between. SfAkirin was clustered with the proteins of the first insect group, and was evolutionary closer to Akirins of such relatively distant species as arachnids than to those of some insect orders like Diptera and Hymenoptera. These results provide information on the phylogeny and evolution of the Akirin gene and suggest that Akirin function may have certain variations in different insects, which should be investigated in further studies on Akirin activity.

Analysis of Akirin transcription in different S. furcifera tissues indicated that although Akirin mRNA was detected in all types of tissues examined, its expression varied significantly: the highest level was observed in the testis, which exceeded that in the head by 11.7 times, and then in the ovary. These results are consistent with those obtained for Pacific white shrimp L. vannamei (Hou et al., 2013) and suggest a role of Akirin in growth and development of invertebrates, which is supported by previous findings that Akirin gene deficiency in Drosophila conferred lethality at the embryonic stage (Goto et al., 2008). Furthermore, Akirin expression in immunity-related tissues such as the fat body indicates that Akirin can be involved in the immune response of S. furcifera.

In Drosophila, Akirin acts in parallel with the NF-κB transcription factor downstream of the Imd pathway and was required for defense against gram-negative bacteria (Goto et al., 2008). In our study, SfAkirin expression significantly increased after E. coli and B. subtilis challenge, indicating that Akirin may be involved in early immune responses and is likely to regulate immune sensitivity to both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. To further investigate the functional mechanisms underlying Akirin involvement in the NF-κB immune signaling, we silenced Akirin expression in S. furcifera prior to bacterial challenge, which resulted in reduced expression of the Relish and Dorsal genes related to the NF-κB-dependent Imd and Toll pathways, respectively. These data suggest that Akirin may control the immune response of S. furcifera against bacterial infection via both Imd and Toll signaling pathways, which is in contrast to its role in Drosophila, where it is involved only in the Imd pathway (Goto et al., 2008). Our evolutionary analysis shows that SfAkirin is more closely related to L. vannamei (shrimp) Akirin than to some insect Akirin, which is consistent with a similarity in immune functions, as Akirin silencing in L. vannamei significantly reduced the expression of Dorsal and Relish following challenge with bacteria (Hou et al., 2013).

Previous studies on the regulation of NF-κB immune signaling by Akirin in insect species were performed only on Drosophila. Our findings indicate that Akirin exerts more comprehensive regulation of the NF-κB inmmune signaling in insects than previously thought and, thus, should contribute to understanding of Akirin functional activity across different species.

Conclusion

The results obtained in the present study suggested that SfAkirin is evolutionarily conserved and its expression is significantly increased after E. coli and B. subtilis challenge. RNAi mediated knockdown of SfAkirin significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB dependent transcription factors, Dorsal and Relish, post E. coli, and B. subtilis challenge, respectively. Hence, we proposed that SfAkirin might function as a positive regulator of NF-κB immune signaling in innate immunity of S. furcifera.

Ethics Statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Author Contributions

JC and XJ performed the experiments. X-LX and B-PZ analyzed the data. D-WZ and JC wrote and revised the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31640065 and 31560511), Science and Technology Program of Guizhou China (Grant [2014]2014 and KY[2017] 052).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Yanyuan Bao for providing E. coli and B. subtilis, and to Prof. Chuanxi Zhang and Haijun Xu for helpful experimental guidance.

Footnotes

1. ^http://us.expasy.org/tools/
2. ^http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

References

Bonnay, F., Nguyen, X. H., Cohen-Berros, E., Troxler, L., Batsche, E., Camonis, J., et al. (2014). Akirin specifies NF-kappaB selectivity of Drosophila innate immune response via chromatin remodeling. EMBO J. 33, 2349–2362. doi: 10.15252/embj.201488456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carpio, Y., Garcia, C., Pons, T., Haussmann, D., Rodriguez-Ramos, T., Basabe, L., et al. (2013). Akirins in sea lice: first steps towards a deeper understanding. Exp. Parasitol. 135, 188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.06.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carreon, D., de la Lastra, J. M., Almazan, C., Canales, M., Ruiz-Fons, F., Boadella, M., et al. (2012). Vaccination with BM86, subolesin and akirin protective antigens for the control of tick infestations in white tailed deer and red deer. Vaccine 30, 273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

da Costa, M., Pinheiro-Silva, R., Antunes, S., Moreno-Cid, J. A., Custodio, A., Villar, M., et al. (2014). Mosquito Akirin as a potential antigen for malaria control. Malar. J. 13, 470. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de la Fuente, J., Almazan, C., Blas-Machado, U., Naranjo, V., Mangold, A. J., Blouin, E. F., et al. (2006). The tick protective antigen, 4D8, is a conserved protein involved in modulation of tick blood ingestion and reproduction. Vaccine 24, 4082–4095. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de la Fuente, J., Maritz-Olivier, C., Naranjo, V., Ayoubi, P., Nijhof, A. M., Almazan, C., et al. (2008). Evidence of the role of tick subolesin in gene expression. BMC Genomics 9:372. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-372

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de la Fuente, J., Moreno-Cid, J. A., Canales, M., Villar, M., de la Lastra, J. M., Kocan, K. M., et al. (2011). Targeting arthropod subolesin/akirin for the development of a universal vaccine for control of vector infestations and pathogen transmission. Vet. Parasitol. 181, 17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eleftherianos, I., Atri, J., Accetta, J., and Castillo, J. C. (2013). Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: guardians of the immune system? Front. Physiol. 4:46. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferrandon, D., Imler, J. L., Hetru, C., and Hoffmann, J. A. (2007). The Drosophila systemic immune response: sensing and signalling during bacterial and fungal infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 862–874. doi: 10.1038/nri2194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galindo, R. C., Doncel-Perez, E., Zivkovic, Z., Naranjo, V., Gortazar, C., Mangold, A. J., et al. (2009). Tick subolesin is an ortholog of the akirins described in insects and vertebrates. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 33, 612–617. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2008.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Georgel, P., Naitza, S., Kappler, C., Ferrandon, D., Zachary, D., Swimmer, C., et al. (2001). Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD) is a death domain protein that activates antibacterial defense and can promote apoptosis. Dev. Cell 1, 503–514. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00059-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goto, A., Matsushita, K., Gesellchen, V., El Chamy, L., Kuttenkeuler, D., Takeuchi, O., et al. (2008). Akirins are highly conserved nuclear proteins required for NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression in drosophila and mice. Nat. Immunol. 9, 97–104. doi: 10.1038/ni1543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harrington, D., Canales, M., de la Fuente, J., de Luna, C., Robinson, K., Guy, J., et al. (2009). Immunisation with recombinant proteins subolesin and Bm86 for the control of Dermanyssus gallinae in poultry. Vaccine 27, 4056–4063. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, K., Lin, K., Wang, G., and Li, F. (2016). genome sizes of nine insect species determined by flow cytometry and k-mer analysis. Front. Physiol. 7:569. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffmann, J. A. (2003). The immune response of Drosophila. Nature 426, 33–38. doi: 10.1038/nature02021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, F., Wang, X., Qian, Z., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., He, S., et al. (2013). Identification and functional studies of Akirin, a potential positive nuclear factor of NF-kappaB signaling pathways in the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 41, 703–714. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua, X. T., Ma, X. J., Xue, R. J., Cheng, T. C., Wang, F., and Xia, Q. Y. (2016). Characterization of the Bombyx mori Cecropin A1 promoter regulated by IMD pathway. Insect Sci. 23, 297–304. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hultmark, D. (2003). Drosophila immunity: paths and patterns. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15, 12–19. doi: 10.1016/S0952-7915(02)00005-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imler, J. L., and Bulet, P. (2005). Antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila: structures, activities and gene regulation. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 86, 1–21. doi: 10.1159/000086648

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krossa, S., Schmitt, A. D., Hattermann, K., Fritsch, J., Scheidig, A. J., Mehdorn, H. M., et al. (2015). Down regulation of Akirin-2 increases chemosensitivity in human glioblastomas more efficiently than Twist-1. Oncotarget 6, 21029–21045. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, T. H., Handa, A., and Williams, J. A. (2012). Quantitative measurement of the immune response and sleep in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. 70:e4355. doi: 10.3791/4355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lemaitre, B., Kromer-Metzger, E., Michaut, L., Nicolas, E., Meister, M., Georgel, P., et al. (1995). A recessive mutation, immune deficiency (imd), defines two distinct control pathways in the Drosophila host defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 9465–9469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Xia, Y., Tang, J., Ma, L., Li, C., Ma, P., et al. (2017). Dual roles of Akirin2 protein during Xenopus neural development. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 5676–5684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.777110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, M., Wu, Y., Peng, Z., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Liao, G., et al. (2017). Migration analysis of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in the Northeastern Hunan Province in June. Environ. Entomol. 46, 757–765. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvx092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manzano-Roman, R., Diaz-Martin, V., Oleaga, A., Siles-Lucas, M., and Perez-Sanchez, R. (2012). Subolesin/akirin orthologs from Ornithodoros spp. soft ticks: cloning, RNAi gene silencing and protective effect of the recombinant proteins. Vet. Parasitol. 185, 248–259. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merino, O., Almazan, C., Canales, M., Villar, M., Moreno-Cid, J. A., Galindo, R. C., et al. (2011). Targeting the tick protective antigen subolesin reduces vector infestations and pathogen infection by Anaplasma marginale and Babesia bigemina. Vaccine 29, 8575–8579. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreno-Cid, J. A., Jimenez, M., Cornelie, S., Molina, R., Alarcon, P., Lacroix, M. N., et al. (2010). Characterization of Aedes albopictus akirin for the control of mosquito and sand fly infestations. Vaccine 29, 77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreno-Cid, J. A., Perez de la Lastra, J. M., Villar, M., Jimenez, M., Pinal, R., Estrada-Pena, A., et al. (2013). Control of multiple arthropod vector infestations with subolesin/akirin vaccines. Vaccine 31, 1187–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Myllymaki, H., Valanne, S., and Ramet, M. (2014). The Drosophila imd signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 192, 3455–3462. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303309

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naranjo, V., Ayllon, N., Perez de la Lastra, J. M., Galindo, R. C., Kocan, K. M., Blouin, E. F., et al. (2013). Reciprocal regulation of NF-kB (Relish) and Subolesin in the tick vector, Ixodes scapularis. PLoS One 8:e65915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prudencio, C. R., Perez de la Lastra, J. M., Canales, M., Villar, M., and de la Fuente, J. (2010). Mapping protective epitopes in the tick and mosquito subolesin ortholog proteins. Vaccine 28, 5398–5406. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salminen, T. S., and Ramet, M. (2016). Pickle flavors relish in drosophila immunity. Cell Host Microbe 20, 273–274. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sasaki, S., Yamada, T., Sukegawa, S., Miyake, T., Fujita, T., Morita, M., et al. (2009). Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism in akirin 2 gene with marbling in Japanese Black beef cattle. BMC Res. Notes 2:131. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, J., Li, P., and Liu, G. (2005). Virulence of Sogatella furcifera field populations to rice varieties: a determination with electronic monitoring system. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 16, 1090–1094.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shi, X. Z., Zhong, X., and Yu, X. Q. (2012). Drosophila melanogaster NPC2 proteins bind bacterial cell wall components and may function in immune signal pathways. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42, 545–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valanne, S., Wang, J. H., and Ramet, M. (2011). The Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 186, 649–656. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002302

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Tang, N., Gao, X., Chang, Z., Zhang, L., Zhou, G., et al. (2017). Genome sequence of a rice pest, the white-backed planthopper (Sogatella furcifera). Gigascience 6, 1–9. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giw004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P. H., Wan, D. H., Pang, L. R., Gu, Z. H., Qiu, W., Weng, S. P., et al. (2012). Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily gene, TNF receptor superfamily gene and lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor (LITAF) gene from Litopenaeus vannamei. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 36, 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waris, M. I., Younas, A., Ul Qamar, M. T., Hao, L., Ameen, A., Ali, S., et al. (2018). Silencing of chemosensory protein gene NlugCSP8 by RNAi induces declining behavioral responses of Nilaparvata lugens. Front. Physiol. 9:379. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Zhang, G., Chen, X., Li, X. J., Xiong, K., Cao, S. P., et al. (2017). The influence of Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) migratory events on the southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus epidemics. J. Econ. Entomol. 110, 854–864. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, X., Rao, X. J., Yi, H. Y., Lin, X. Y., Huang, X. H., and Yu, X. Q. (2016). Co-expression of dorsal and Rel2 negatively regulates antimicrobial peptide expression in the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Sci. Rep. 6:20654. doi: 10.1038/srep20654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, G., Xu, D., Xu, D., and Zhang, M. (2013). Southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus: a white-backed planthopper-transmitted fijivirus threatening rice production in Asia. Front. Microbiol. 4:270. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00270

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, Z., Souza-Neto, J., Xi, Z., Kokoza, V., Shin, S. W., Dimopoulos, G., et al. (2011). Transcriptome analysis of Aedes aegypti transgenic mosquitoes with altered immunity. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002394. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar