Mirella Meregalli
Andrea Farini
Clementina Sitzia
Yvan Torrente- Stem Cell Laboratory, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Centro Dino Ferrari, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders, in which progressive muscle wasting and weakness is often associated with exhaustion of muscle regeneration potential. Although physiological properties of skeletal muscle tissue are now well known, no treatments are effective for these diseases. Muscle regeneration was attempted by means transplantation of myogenic cells (from myoblast to embryonic stem cells) and also by interfering with the malignant processes that originate in pathological tissues, such as uncontrolled fibrosis and inflammation. Taking into account the advances in the isolation of new subpopulation of stem cells and in the creation of artificial stem cell niches, we discuss how these emerging technologies offer great promises for therapeutic approaches to muscle diseases and muscle wasting associated with aging.
Introduction
Skeletal muscle is a highly complex system formed by thousands of contractile units called muscle fibers. Each muscle fiber is limited by a plasma membrane called sarcolemma and by a basal lamina, that are surrounded by an extra cellular matrix constituted of connective tissue (Buckingham et al., 2003). Muscle remodeling occurs throughout the entire life although at different rate considering the developmental stages. Starting from embryo until childhood, protein synthesis is upregulated and satellite cells (SCs) actively develop new muscle fibers while in adults cellular turnover is strongly reduced (Schiaffino et al., 2007). In response to exogenous stimuli or to biological factors such as age or nutrition, the muscle increases its size, the amount of contractile proteins and consequently force production. The regulation of muscle cell size is a tightly regulated phenomena, and it is a balance between muscle proliferation and degradation of pre-existing proteins. Uncontrolled events, often associated with diseases, lead to hypertrophy or atrophy, respectively (Sandri, 2008). The complex hierarchy of events that triggers muscle remodeling is often unbalanced in muscular diseases. For instance, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most frequent among all the dystrophies, is characterized by a rapid atrophy in youth, muscular wasting and inability to walk in adolescence and premature death for cardiorespiratory failure by the age of 30. As the genetic nature of these pathologies leads to uncontrolled fiber degeneration, different treatments were proven to delay the progression of the diseases. The main goal was to retard the atrophy and replace diseased muscle with new healthy and functional muscle fibers by using myogenic stem cells (Brunelli and Rovere-Querini, 2008). Unfortunately, the use of stem cell in regenerative medicine is limited by the poor engraftment and persistence of transplanted cells and the risk of neoplastic formation (Suuronen et al., 2008; Kuraitis et al., 2012). Due to these findings, other aspects were deeply investigated to increase the survival of injected stem cells into pathological muscle. Modulation of the inflammatory reaction is a key step for stem cell transplantation (Smythe et al., 2000): myeloid cells (Suzuki et al., 1999; Mcnally et al., 2000), macrophages (Wehling et al., 2001; Villalta et al., 2009), neutrophils (Hodgetts et al., 2006) and eosinophils (Cai et al., 2000) actively contribute to development of pathogenesis in several myophaties but only macrophages and sometimes eosinophils play a role in muscle regeneration (Tidball and Villalta, 2010). Pathological conditions modify the microenvironment of stem cells (the so-called niche) preventing the activation of resident stem cells and reducing the success of exogenous cell therapies. Tissue engineering technologies may create a novel in vitro niche allowing the maintenance and propagation of SCs and enhancing their muscular potential.
In this review, we will describe the efforts that are necessary to design a successful therapeutic approach for muscular diseases, relating to find a functional stem cell population, to identify feasible matrix/polymer to engineer stem cells' niche and to modulate secondary—but relevant—effects of impaired muscle regeneration, as fibrosis and inflammation.
Myogenic Stem Cells
Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs)
Introduction to ESCs
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are pluripotent cells derived from the early embryo that are characterized by the ability to proliferate over prolonged periods of culture remaining undifferentiated and maintaining a stable karyotype (Amit and Itskovitz-Eldor, 2002; Carpenter et al., 2003; Hoffman and Carpenter, 2005). ESCs differentiate into cells forming all 3 embryonic germ layers, and are characterized by self-renewal, immortality, and pluripotency (Strulovici et al., 2007). As ESCs possess the potential to differentiate into all normal tissues, the ability to derive and maintain these cells in culture opened the possibility to have an unlimited supply of differentiated cells to replace pathological tissues (Moon et al., 2006; Skottman et al., 2006).
Markers of ESCs
Cell origins are often defined by one or more cell-surface markers and intracellular epitopes unique to that particular cell type. hESCs are maintained in culture on feeder layers of heterologous cells and then differentiated into specific cell lineages (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006; Conrad et al., 2008). Stage-specific embryonic antigen citation(SSEA) markers are used to distinguish early stages of cell development and to denote pluripotency: hESCs express SSEA-3 and -4 during pluripotency and only SSEA-1 upon differentiation (Andrews et al., 1996; Thomson and Marshall, 1998; Thomson et al., 1998; Reubinoff et al., 2001). Nanog is a NK-2-type homeodomain gene encoding for a transcription factor that is critically involved in the self-renewal of stem cells. In 2005, Lin's group demonstrated that the tumor suppressor p53 binds to the promoter of Nanog, stimulating p53 (Lin et al., 2005). Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4) down-regulation is observed in differentiating cells (Rosner et al., 1990). It was suggested that only Oct-4 was necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency, but its expression level governed three cell fates once differentiation occurs. Similarly, Xu et al. published that the catalytic component of telomerase, telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), was expressed in undifferentiated cells and down-regulated upon differentiation (Xu et al., 2001).
Limits of ESCs
Although the attentions that received, scientific and medical issues need to be addressed before hESCs can be considered safe for clinical applications (Leist et al., 2008). The American federal government severely restricted access and use of hESCs in 2001 but they were largely overturned by the Obama administration. Many organizations and countries have already banned reproductive cloning of human beings. As this procedure can be used to generate stem cells for therapeutic purposes, in countries where this type of cloning is legal, such as Australia and the United Kingdom, the created embryos must be destroyed within 14 days. Guidelines in using ESCs were proposed by the International Society of Stem Cell Research citation (http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/index.htm).
Myogenic potential of ESCs
Several lineages (blood, cardiac muscle and endothelial cells) were obtained by in vitro differentiation of ESCs, however for skeletal muscle several drawbacks arose, especially for the difficulty to identify a temporal expression of myogenic regulatory factors (Rohwedel et al., 1994). This way, in 2005 Bhagavati et al. co-cultured ESCs derived from normal mice with a preparation from mouse muscle enriched for myogenic stem and precursor cells. They transplanted ESCs into dystrophic mdx mice but unfortunately newly-formed muscle was occasionally seen (Bhagavati and Xu, 2005). Similarly, Barberi et al. described a stroma-free induction system to derive mesenchymal precursors and skeletal myoblast from hESCs. Following in vitro maturation, these cells were injected into tibialis anterior of immunodeficient scid mice and it was observed a long-term myoblast engraftment and the lack of teratomas (Barberi et al., 2007). As it was suggested that the lack of myogenic differentiation of ESCs was due to the impairment of myogenic signals in the mesoderm (Darabi et al., 2008a), Darabi et al. transiently expressed paired box 3 (Pax3) and paired box 7 (Pax7) during early mesoderm development and obtained several early embryonic skeletal myogenic progenitors (Darabi et al., 2008b, 2011). These cells were also implanted into mdx mice and gave rise to large numbers of skeletal muscle fibers and SCs, so that muscle force was ameliorated (Darabi et al., 2009, 2011). More recently, Sakurai et al. described that the elimination of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) from serum-free ESC cultures together with the implementation of lithium chloride (LiCl) allowed the differentiation of these cells to myogenic progenitors cells. hESCs-derived progenitors showed a notable capacity of differentiation into skeletal muscle cells (Sakurai et al., 2009).
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
Generation of iPSCs
Recent advances in the understanding of ESC biology included the identification of several master regulators of ESC pluripotency and differentiation (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006). Intensive study of ESC growth conditions has not yet produced a complete picture of the unique transcriptional and epigenetic state that is responsible for pluripotency and self-renewal in ESCs. Yamanaka's group identified four factors (Oct3/4, Klf4, Sox2, and c-myc) whose expression is sufficient to produce cells similar to ESCs, called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The same factors were used to reprogram human fibroblasts to an ESC-like pluripotent state.
The new era of iPSCs
Now that embryonic tissue is no longer required to make a pluripotent cell, investigators have the ability to create tissue-based models of human disease based on cells derived from individual patients (Dimos et al., 2008; Park et al., 2008; Ebert et al., 2009; Soldner et al., 2009). Accordingly, iPSCs were efficiently used in murine models of sickle cells anemia and Parkinson's disease. Even if these cells were showed to be suitable for cell therapy, it has to be yet demonstrated the possibility to generate human iPSCs without introduction of DNA into the genome (to avoid oncogenic potential of undifferentiated iPSCs following the unsafe reintroduction of these genes), to ameliorate the efficiency of manipulation of human iPSCs and the capacity to obtain any desired cell types.
iPSCs and human disease
Since the work of Yamanaka was published, reprogramming of cells provided a realistic way not only to obtain lines from patients with incurable pathologies to investigate disease mechanisms and drug screening but to generate sufficient numbers of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells (Egawa et al., 2012). The generation of patient-specific iPSCs has the advantage of avoiding many of the ethical concerns associated with the use of embryonic or foetal material, and have no risk of immune rejection. Many cell types like motor neurons (Dimos et al., 2008), hepatocytes (Song et al., 2009), pancreatic insulin producing cells (Zhang et al., 2006), hematopoietic cells (Hanna et al., 2007), retinal cells (Carr et al., 2009), cardiomyocyte (Zwi et al., 2009) and mesenchymal stem cells (Lian et al., 2010), have been successfully derived from human iPSCs. Nelson et al. reported the use of iPSCs for myocardial repair in animal models of acute myocardial infarction (Nelson et al., 2009) while Ye used iPSCs in different hematological disorders (Ye et al., 2009).
Myogenic potential of iPSCs
As described above, to be used for clinical applications, iPSCs need to be generated in large amount in safety; this way, protocols to isolate and characterize these cells were largely improved. Mizuno et al. identified iPS-derived satellite-like cells by means the expression of the SM/C-2.6 antibody (Mizuno et al., 2010) while Darabi purified PDGFαR+Flk−1− murine iPS cells that expressed the myogenic factor Pax7 (Darabi et al., 2008a, 2011). In fact, the group of Perlingeiro recently isolated large quantity of Pax7+ human iPSCs (and ESCs) that, transplanted into dystrophic mice, engrafted well producing high amount of dystrophin and replenishing the satellite cell compartment (Darabi et al., 2012). Similarly, the expression of MyoD and Myf5 allowed the purification of myogenic iPS cells (Iacovino et al., 2011; Goudenege et al., 2012). Filareto et al. successfully obtained iPSCs from fibroblast of dystrophin/utrophin double knockout mice and engineered them with the micro-dystrophin gene. Injected into dystrophic mice, these cells engrafted well and improved muscle strength (Filareto et al., 2013). In parallel, Tedesco et al. generated mesoangioblast/mesenchymal-like cells from iPSCs of healthy and dystrophic patients: these cells were also modified to express constitutively the MyoD gene. Transplanted into model mice of LGMD-2A, iPSCs cells ameliorated their dystrophic phenotype (Tedesco et al., 2012).
Satellite Cells (SCs)
SCs are small progenitor cells originating from somites that lie between the basement membrane and sarcolemma of individual muscle fibers (Shi and Garry, 2006; Sambasivan and Tajbakhsh, 2007). SCs are normally present in healthy adult mammalian muscle as quiescent cells and are characterized by the expression of Pax7, that is fundamental for their maintenance and self-renewal, and by the absence of Myogenic differentiation 1 (MyoD) and myogenin, that conversely are necessary for myogenic differentiation. Once activated in response to specific stimuli such as oxidative stress, SCs up-regulate the expression of Myf5 to start their proliferation so that they differentiate into new myofibers, driven by specific factors such as MyoD, myogenin and myosin heavy chain (Whalen et al., 1990). Since the work of Montarras and colleagues (Montarras et al., 2005), different techniques for SCs isolation were assessed. Sacco et al. derived SCs from transplantation of one intact myofiber and demonstrated that once transplanted into dystrophic mice, SCs proliferated and contributed to form new muscle fibers (Sacco et al., 2008). Cerletti et al. isolated the skeletal muscle precursors (SMPs): injected into animal models, these SC-like cells restored dystrophin expression and, more importantly, were positioned into the SC niche, where they regulated the subsequent rounds of injury and repair (Cerletti et al., 2008). Similarly, the muscle side-population cells (mSP) isolated by Tanaka et al. engrafted into host SC niche, giving rise both to SCs and myonuclear population (Tanaka et al., 2009).
Autologous transplantation of genetically corrected SCs into patients suffering from muscular diseases could be our ideal approach (Price et al., 2007): unfortunately, it was demonstrated that the growth of SCs in vitro significantly reduced their in vivo myogenic potential, rendering their transplantation an inefficient technique (Tremblay et al., 1993; Mendell et al., 1995; Gussoni et al., 1997). To overcome these problems, several studies investigated the SC niches, as described in detail in section Satellite cells niche.
Muscle-Derived Stem Cells (MDSCs)
Besides SCs, muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) were isolated within the muscle, with the capacity of self-renewal and mesodermal differentiation. Sarig et al. identified a subpopulation of MyoD+ stem cells that formed muscle fibers but also osteogenic and adipogenic cells (Sarig et al., 2006). Tamaki et al. purified a subpopulation of CD34-CD45- cells that proliferated into myogenic, vasculogenic and neural cell lineages (Tamaki et al., 2007). Sca−1+CD34+ stem cells purified from murine muscle differentiated into myogenic and multimyeloid lineages in vitro and regenerated muscle in vivo (Torrente et al., 2001). Alessandri et al. showed that muscle-derived stem cells positive for desmin and vimentin differentiated in vitro into skeletal muscle fibers and neurons (Alessandri et al., 2004). Notably, Rouger et al. identified early myogenic progenitors that originated from SC niche, the MuStem cells; transplanted into Golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs, these cells allowed the re-expression of dystrophin (Rouger et al., 2011).
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are clonogenic and adherent cells, isolated from adult and foetal bone marrow and from other tissues and organs (Alhadlaq and Mao, 2004; Le Blanc and Pittenger, 2005; Beyer Nardi and Da Silva Meirelles, 2006): they are able to differentiate into several lineages (Zheng et al., 2007; Nesti et al., 2008). As MSCs were identified into muscle tissue biopsies, it was suggested that skeletal muscle could be an important source of MSCs for therapeutic interventions (Jackson et al., 2010). Transplanted into DMD patients, MSCs fused with host fibers and enhanced the activity of endogenous stem cells through the secretion of trophic factors (Ichim et al., 2010). Interestingly, De Bari et al. described the in vitro myogenic potential of MSCs isolated from adult human synovial membrane (De Bari et al., 2001). Following injection into dystrophic mice, these cells formed new myofibers, re-expressed the dystrophin and contributed to SCs replenishment (De Bari et al., 2003). Gang et al. showed that MSCs from umbilical cord blood differentiated into skeletal muscle, expressing late myogenic markers as MyoD (Gang et al., 2004). Riordan et al. described that hematopoietic precursors present in the bone marrow were protected from inflammatory damage by MSCs (Riordan et al., 2007) while Nemeth et al. demonstrated that MSCs can modulate the activity of macrophages and consequently inhibit inflammatory processes (Nemeth et al., 2009). The capacity of MSCs to modulate inflammation could be an important feature in the perspective of cell therapy in dystrophic patients as inflammation is a prominent component of the disease (as reviewed in detail in section Inflammation and repair mechanisms in skeletal muscle). Following these evidences, MSCs injection were proven to reduce inflammation in animal models for several human diseases, such as autoimmune arthritis and diabetes (Fiorina et al., 2009; Madec et al., 2009), multiple sclerosis (Constantin et al., 2009; Rafei et al., 2009a), lupus (Zhou et al., 2008), rheumatoid arthritis (Song et al., 2010) and autoimmune encephalomyelitis (Rafei et al., 2009b). Although all these encouraging results, several problems need to be solved. First of all, more efforts are needed to elucidate the origin of MSCs; moreover, protocols for isolation of the cells and their expansion in vivo have to be standardized.
Muscle-Derived CD133+ Stem Cells
Torrente et al. isolated stem cells from human normal and DMD biopsies expressing the glycoprotein CD133. CD133+ stem cells co-expressed CD34, CD45, and kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) and differentiated into muscle (Torrente et al., 2007). Moreover, Negroni et al. found that muscle-derived CD133+ stem cells co-expressed the satellite cell marker CD56 and eventually formed myosin heavy chain (MyHC)+ multinucleated myotubes (Negroni et al., 2009). As Phase I clinic trial demonstrated that infusion of these cells was safe and feasible (Torrente et al., 2007), muscle-derived dystrophic CD133+ stem cells were engineered to express a shorter but still functional dystrophin. Transplanted into dystrophic mice, CD133+ stem cells allowed the expression of dystrophin and the formation of new myofibers, improving murine muscular force. Interestingly, some of injected CD133+ stem cells were identified beneath the basal lamina, in SC-like position, thus expressing M-Cadherin (Benchaouir et al., 2007).
Mesoangioblasts
Physically associated with the embryonic dorsal aorta in avian and mammalian species, mesoangioblasts are multipotent progenitors of mesodermal tissues, expressing α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and retaining myogenic capacity (Tagliafico et al., 2004). Cossu et al. engineered these cells with human microdystrophin and demonstrated that they improved muscle function after injection into GRMDs (Sampaolesi et al., 2006; Cossu and Sampaolesi, 2007). In order to ameliorate their ability of migration, mesoangioblasts were exposed to Stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α so that, following transplantation into α-sarcoglycan KO mice, the large majority of α-sarcoglycan-expressing myofibers was reconstituted (Galvez et al., 2006). Similarly, Tedesco et al. transduced mdx-derived mesoangioblasts with a vector carrying the entire human dystrophin genetic locus. Injected into scid/mdx mice, these cells formed several muscle fibers expressing dystrophin and replenished the SC compartments (Tedesco et al., 2011). More recently, Cossu's group obtained mesoangioblasts from iPSCs of LGMD-2D patients that rescued the expression of α-sarcoglycans in dystrophic mice (Tedesco et al., 2012). According to these evidences, mesoangioblasts seemed to be feasible to treat MDs and they are currently being utilized in a phase I/II clinical trial (EudraCT no. 2011-000176-33).
Artificial Stem Cell Niche
Satellite Cells Niche
SCs behavior is influenced by factors that are secreted by myofibers. SDF-1 can bind to receptor CXCR4 on the surface of SC activating a migratory response (Sherwood et al., 2004; Ratajczak et al., 2006) while M-cadherin enhance the adhesion of SC to myofibers allowing their fusion (Irintchev et al., 1994). Interestingly, SCs can regulate their own quiescence and self-renewal according to the expression of ligands for the Notch receptor family (Conboy and Rando, 2002; Conboy et al., 2003; Kuang et al., 2007). Like other stem cells, SCs can proliferate in a asymmetric manner, giving rise to one stem cell and one differentiated cell; and in a symmetric manner, originating two daughter cells retaining full stem cell potential (Morrison and Kimble, 2006). Asymmetric self-renewal is preferred in quiescient conditions while the other is typical in case of injury or disease. Each tissue-specific stem cell is located inside anatomically-defined microenvironment, called niche, surrounded by extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of a network of fibrillar proteins, growth factors, chemokines, cytokines and proteins that are present on the surface of neighboring cells. According to the interactions with these components, the cell choose self-renewal or a pathway of differentiation, following specific stimuli (Lutolf and Hubbell, 2005; Cosgrove et al., 2009). SCs reside in the niches that are positioned in a compartment between the myofiber plasma membrane and the basal lamina that surrounds the myofiber so that in the apical part of the niche they receive the signals from the myofibers while on their basal surface they are influenced by basal lamina signals (Collins et al., 2005; Kuang et al., 2008). SCs express several molecules to interact with the basal lamina and all its components (collagen, laminin, fibronectin) (Burkin and Kaufman, 1999). Conversely, the proteoglycan components of the basal lamina bind growth factors secreted by SCs such as basic Fibroblast Growth Factors (bFGF), and Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) that regulate SC survival and proliferation (Golding et al., 2007; Le Grand et al., 2009). Other factors derived from cells that are not proximal to the niches or from the systemic circulation can influence SCs, such as myostatin, and wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3a (Wnt3a) (Mccroskery et al., 2003; Brack and Rando, 2007). These extrinsic factors play a fundamental role in aging, when the regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle declines (Grounds, 1987): for example, increased levels of circulating Wnt3a allowed the activation of β-catenin pathway in SCs, so that muscle regeneration is reduced and fibrosis is enhanced (Brack et al., 2008). The incredible complexity of niche regulation is the reason why, after removal from their in vivo localization, SCs—and other adult stem cells—rapidly lost their myogenic ability (Dykstra et al., 2006) so that they cannot be used in clinical trials (Farini et al., 2009). As Kuang and collaborators suggested, the balance among the signals deriving from the various components of the niche is necessary to maintain the myogenic potential of the SCs (Kuang et al., 2008).
Recent studies have focused on imitate the regulatory machinery of the in vivo SC niche, as a powerful tool to control stem cell function. Three dimensional (3-D) matrices are the model system that mimics the in vivo microenvironment, allowing the investigation of these physiologic events (Cukierman et al., 2001; Abbott, 2003). They can derive from cells or tissues while others can be composed of ECM proteins. Natural ECMs can be formed by various protein fibrils and fibers interwoven within a hydrated network of glycosaminoglycan chains, providing a structural scaffold. Fibrils, pores, elastin and collagen can be present and alter the biophysical properties of ECMs. Moreover, artificial synthetic materials were produced with similar structure. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels were used for the maintenance of SCs in vitro (Lutolf and Hubbell, 2005) while, recently, Kloxin and colleagues developed PEG hydrogels that controlled matrix stiffness without toxicity to cells (Kloxin et al., 2009). As these matrices were able to alter biophysical properties in a non-invasive manner, they were used to investigate the progression of biophysical changes associated with muscle fibrosis or disease (Engler et al., 2004). Moreover, Lutolf et al. demonstrated that PEG hydrogels were suitable for single-stem cell clonal assays and resistant to non-specific cell adhesion mediated by protein adsorption (Lutolf et al., 2009a). However, further studies are necessary to define exactly all the components that constitute the microenvironment of the SCs and the molecular steps that regulate the transition between SCs quiescence and proliferation.
Tem Cell Fate in vitro
In vitro stem-cell colture is carried out on flat coated with different substrates like collagen or laminin, on feeder-cell layers and within hydrogels synthetized from ECM components (for example collagen or Matrigel). Most frequently culture of stem cells was performed on rigid polystyrene tissue-culture plastic exposing cells to soluble factors in liquid media (Lutolf et al., 2009b).
These culture conditions are far from resemble the in vivo condition, where cells live in close proximity to each other and in contact with the ECM. Recently, 3D niche are still being explored and should be considered. Blau's group are studying the two-dimensional (2D) biomaterial culture systems deconstructing the niche and identifying and assessing the effects of individual niche components on stem-cell fate (Lutolf et al., 2009b). Normally, the effects of cell–cell interactions are studied by co-culturing; this strategy makes it difficult to discriminate the role of particular molecules.
In vivo, secreted growth factors and cytokines are mostly tethered to ECM components like proteoglycans. At the same time, receptor ligands are presented to stem cells surface and to nearby support cells. In both cases, molecule immobilization probably has the critical role of increasing protein stability, promoting persistent signaling and inducing receptor clustering (Irvine et al., 2002). A covalent binding of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) to a synthetic polymer stabilized the growth factor and increased its potency 100-fold relative to FGF2 in solution. Similarly, the epidermal growth factor (EGF) covalently tethered to a biomaterial scaffold, was shown to be more effective than its soluble counterpart in inducing mesenchymal stem cells differentiation and preventing Fas-ligand-induced death (Fan et al., 2007). Natural and synthetic matrices can be used to create cell-culture substrates with known elastic modulus providing diffusion of soluble molecules to the basal surface and the apical one, and can be used to test the relevance of homeostatic and disease related matrix stiffness to stem-cell behavior. Soluble factors in culture media used in combination with the tissue-culture matrix affect cell fate. Human MSCs expressed genes consistent with differentiation into distinct tissue-specific cell types when exposed to polyacrylamide gels with a range of stiffness typical of brain, muscle and bone (Engler et al., 2006). The effects of the physical properties of culture substrate on stem-cell fate are fully appreciated, culture platforms based on soft biomaterials are likely to replace, rigid, tissue-culture plastic. Within the niche, cells dialog with the surrounding ECM during development and in adulthood (Folkman and Moscona, 1978). Although some of these effects are probably due to alterations in the adhesive interactions and crosstalk between the ECM and the cell as they work to define each other, there is ample evidence suggesting that physical control of cell shape alone can act as a potent regulator of cell signaling and fate determination (Wozniak and Chen, 2009).
Stem Cell Fate in vivo
Biomaterials technologies offer great opportunities to control the stem cell fate in vivo, especially in case of tissue damage. Two main modes of application have been proposed: one in which biomaterials are used as carriers for introducing stem cells into damaged, diseased or aged tissue, and one in which biomaterials are used to augment endogenous stem-cell function (Lutolf et al., 2009b). In regenerative medicine, stem cell transplantation has some limitations: survival and engraftment of transplanted stem cells and the disrupted biological environment characterized by abundant cell and tissue necrosis. Biomaterials have to be designed to act as carriers for local delivery of stem cells, supporting cells or molecular niche cues. Biomaterials may improve the effect of stem cell transplantation; they may be used as multifunctional stem-cell microenvironments. They have to increase the delivering and enhancing the viability of the cells, to function as support in order to increase the numbers of the cells and stimulate the function of endogenous stem cells. Moreover, biomaterials can deliver diffusible cytokines in order to promote the mobilization of endogenous cells involved in repair, to enhance survival and to stimulate self-renewal and expansion of the transplanted cells. Materials would enhance tissue regeneration, tissue function and overcome the adverse effects of disease or ageing (Conboy et al., 2005; Adams et al., 2007). Therefore, they could permit local and specific delivery of bioactive niche components able to inhibit and stimulate molecules and drugs that have to increase the number and the functions of transplanted stem cells. In order to obtain these benefits in vivo, materials have to be achieved by forming a scaffold that deliver biomolecules near the stem-cell niche or by targeted delivery of soluble microparticles or as carriers of such bioactive niche components (Adams et al., 2007). Recently, Rothenfluh et al. isolated polymer nanoparticles, sufficiently small to enter the matrix of the targeted tissues; then, they modified them with a biomolecular ligand for matrix binding. This way, the modified the matrix into a source of nanoparticles (Gu et al., 2008; Rothenfluh et al., 2008). Similarly, Gu and co-workers modified existing nanoparticles so that they were used for differential delivery and controlled release of drugs (Gu et al., 2008). Biomaterials aim is not only to create materials to control spatially and temporally the components of the niche but also to study microenvironmental regulation of stem cell proliferation and fate (Conboy et al., 2005). Artificial niches could incorporate appropriate “homing” signals that would attract endogenous stem cells and localize them by means of known cell—cell or cell—matrix adhesive interactions. Biomaterial research is focused on create artificial niche where cells could to be exposed to tethered signals that control stem-cell function and expansion by self-renewal division.
Muscle Pathophysiology
Muscle Fibrosis
Following injury, a cascade of events starts to repair damaged tissues. First of all, inflammatory cells phagocyte the cell debris and secrete growth factors and cytokines that allow the proliferation of other cell types in the site of injury, as described in details below (see section Inflammation and repair mechanisms in skeletal muscle). Then, SCs start to proliferate and differentiate, a process which ultimately ends with the formation of new muscle fibers. Unfortunately, in muscular pathologies, the deficiency of structural proteins leads to continuous cycles of myofiber degeneration and regeneration, so that the damaged muscle fibers cannot be replaced by new fibers, causing myofiber degeneration, inflammation and fibrosis (Grounds et al., 2005; Serrano and Munoz-Canoves, 2010). In particular, the inflammatory cells eliminate the basement membranes of necrotic fibers that cannot be used to build the new fibers: this condition leads to abnormal muscle fiber arrangement in dystrophic muscles. Due to the chronic persistence of inflammatory cells, dystrophic muscles are characterized by higher concentration of growth factors and cytokines, that induce the massive proliferation and activation of fibroblasts. Their activity causes the accumulation of fibrotic elements that are responsible for uncontrolled events such as remodeling of the basal lamina and formation of collagenous tissues (Serrano and Munoz-Canoves, 2010). Normally, the events of muscle regeneration are tightly controlled by the interplay among different molecules. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) is a key element in controlling tissue activity: it binds to cell surface receptors and to IGF-binding proteins, exerting a fundamental role in modulating myofibroblast and SCs proliferation. The matrix metallo-proteases (MMPs) have the function to degrade the ECM and to recruit inflammatory and myogenic cells in the site of injury while Sca-1 inhibits myoblast proliferation, preserving the progenitor cells (Serrano and Munoz-Canoves, 2010). Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is highly expressed in regenerating muscle and it is a key regulator of fibrosis' development (Zhou et al., 2006); often, it functions in synergy with connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), inducing fibrosis and promoting dedifferentiation of myoblasts (Vial et al., 2008). CTGF binds to IGF-binding proteins and it is associated with fibrotic remodeling.
In the case of MDs, especially in DMD, membranes lacking the members of the dystroglycan complex are vulnerable to mechanical and oxidative stress. Due to myofiber breakdown, myofibroblasts remained activated: these phenomena are associated with altered production of ECM components and the accumulation of these molecules that lead to muscle cell necrosis and fibrosis (Klingler et al., 2012). Fibrosis development was considered a progressive and irreversible pathologic phenomenon, but recent advances in knowledge of its development steps render this pathological feature amenable for clinical treatments. A better understanding of the factors that participate in fibrosis may help identify pharmacological targets capable of attenuating the progression of untreatable muscular diseases.
Muscular Hypertrophy and Atrophy: Two Opposites of the Same Phenomenon
Skeletal muscle is the most abundant tissue in mammals and muscle remodeling occurs throughout the entire life. A fine regulated pathway determines the balance between new protein accumulation and degradation of pre-existing ones (Sandri, 2008). Different stimuli, originated by functional overload or aging, can modulate this pathway causing a shift in this balance toward one side. Besides of physiological conditions, this pathway is influenced by lots of inherited and acquired disorders such as MDs, cancer cachexia and commons drugs as glucocorticoids (Cassano et al., 2009). Among signals that can produce hypertrophy, IGF1 pathway is one of the best characterized. IGF-1Ec is expressed in response to mechanical stimuli and cellular damage and promotes both proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells, while in adult myofibers it increases DNA content per myofiber and can influence myosin phenotype (Bamman et al., 2001). The binding of IGF-1 to its receptor IGF1R, triggers the activation of several kinases including phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), the consequent production of PIP3 recruits protein kinase B (AKT). AKT plays a central role in muscle remodeling: it acts by either activating positive signal (mTor) or blocking negative pathway (Myostatin, apoptotic cascade, GSK3β). A trophy results from degradation of both myofiber number and protein contents, through calpain system, lysosomal and the ubiquitin-proteasoma pathways (Voisin et al., 1996; Lecker et al., 1999). Two genes were found up-regulated in atrophy models: muscle-specific ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 (MAFbx) and muscle RING-finger protein-1 (MURF1); further studies showed that they were ubiquitin-ligase expressed only in skeletal and cardiac muscle (Bodine et al., 2001). Another important factor is nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) which is involved in inflammatory pathway leading to TNF-α and INF-γ expression and it can induce the degradation of MyoD. Moreover, knock out of myostatin, a member of the TGF-β family, can lead to an enormous enlargement of skeletal muscle mass (Mcpherron et al., 1997). Myostatin is in fact the most important negative regulatory element of fiber synthesis and it is strictly regulated during myogenesis thanks to the presence of E-boxes, MEF2 and GRE binding sites (Spiller et al., 2002). In particular, myostatin is synthesized as a precursor, that is processed by furin proteases to generate a dimer composed by an N-terminal pro-peptide, bound to biologically active C-terminal fragment. When the pro-peptide is cleaved, myostatin is activated and interact with several proteins, such as follistatin. Interestingly, mice without the expression of this protein have a reduced body mass (Matzuk et al., 1995) while follistatin forced expression leads to muscular hyper-growth (Nakatani et al., 2008). To test whether lack of myostatin could ameliorate the symptoms of muscular diseases, Whittemore et al. demonstrated that in wild type mice the blocking of the protein increased muscle mass (Whittemore et al., 2003) while Bogdanovich et al. showed that this condition in mdx mice improved myofibers size and muscular force (Bogdanovich et al., 2002). According to these studies, Wagner et al. described a phase I/II clinical trial of MYO-029 (a neutralizing antibody to myostatin) in dystrophic patients. This trial did not demonstrate any improvement in muscle strength, but no side effects were assessed, except for hypersensitivity skin reactions. This trial was originally designed to test safety so that a bigger cohort of patient or different choice of samples are required to detect arrest of disease progression or minimal improvements in strength. Furthermore, results could be explained by the fact that the patients were selected at late stage of the disease when the regenerative response is exhausted and the myostatin substrate was eliminated (Wagner et al., 2008). Similar studies were conducted also with animal models of other muscular diseases but opposite results were obtained (Li et al., 2005; Ohsawa et al., 2006). Further works demonstrated that myostatin not only downregulates the expression of several myogenic genes (Amthor et al., 2002; Mcfarlane et al., 2008) but efficiently inhibits the proliferation of muscle progenitor cells (Thomas et al., 2000). The complexity of mechanism involving muscle growth and regeneration is further increased by the discovery of microRNA. Recently, skeletal muscle specific microRNAs able to interact with master regulatory genes in muscle development were found (O'rourke et al., 2007). As an example, miRNA206 can influence satellite cells behavior by modulating Pax3 and MET transforming gene (cMet) (Clop et al., 2006; Mccarthy et al., 2007).
Inflammation and Repair Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle
Injuries affecting skeletal muscle determine the activation of the immune system and activate a cascade of events that are required to clean cellular debris and to allow the replacement of lost fibers with new ones. Furthermore, immune cells promote regeneration through the release of growth factors (Brunelli and Rovere-Querini, 2008). After acute muscular damage neutrophils rapidly appear, followed by phagocytic macrophages which continue to increase in numbers until about 2 days post-injury. A second population of macrophages develops at about 4 days post-injury and it is characterized by a non-phagocytic phenotype (Tidball and Villalta, 2010). In parallel, myogenic precursors start to proliferate and differentiate by recapitulating developmental steps. Firstly, response to injury is mediated by Th1 cytokines (INFγ and TNFα) which trigger the activation of classic M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages (Gordon and Taylor, 2005). At a second stage, a population of M2 anti-inflammatory macrophages is predominant thanks to Th2 cytokines stimulation, such as interleukin (IL)−4, −10, −13. This phenotype-switch is required to stop inflammation and to permit the differentiation and fusion of satellite cells. This process is strictly regulated and several signals are known to be involved (Fadok et al., 2001; Arnold et al., 2007) but further studies are needed to better understand each phase. In MDs, skeletal muscles are subjected to chronic injuries that maintain a continue activation of the immune system. In fact, inflammatory infiltrates consisting of both macrophages and lymphocytes are present and elevated serum cytokines levels are detectable. Furthermore, a partial adaptive response to treatment with corticosteroid supports a role for the immune system in exacerbating muscular wasting (Backman and Henriksson, 1995). Progressive MDs like DMD are characterized by an initial phase that recapitulates the event observed in acute injury and repair. A second phase is dominated by chronic inflammation which triggers fibrosis deposition and atrophy. In fact in adult mdx mice a transition from M2a macrophages to M2c macrophages occurs in an attempt to control M1 cytolitic macrophages and to promote muscle regeneration through the release of IL-10 and IL-4 (Gordon, 2003; Horsley et al., 2003). M2 macrophages may also partecipate in activation of cytotoxic T-cells (which promote muscle damage through perforin-mediate process) and promote muscle fibrosis through arginase metabolism of arginine (Villalta et al., 2009; Tidball and Villalta, 2010).
The importance of modulating immune system cells was proven in different animal model of MDs, for example depletion of macrophages from mdx mice resulted in reduced muscle membrane lysis (Petrof et al., 1993). Furthermore, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment was effective both in ameliorating muscle morphology and reducing macrophage infiltration (Serra et al., 2012) and anti-oxidant drugs (N-acetylcysteine) in mdx mice reduced necrosis by regulating TNF-α level (De Senzi Moraes Pinto et al., 2013). Recently an important role for acquired immunity in DMD pathogenesis has been pointed out by (Mendell et al., 1995; Hemmati et al., 2003; Flanigan et al., 2013) opening new perspectives in treatment of MDs.
Conclusions
Skeletal muscle emerged as a promising tissue source for stem and progenitor cells that can be used in a variety of therapeutic applications. Skeletal muscle constitutes around one third of body weight in a healthy subjects (Gates et al., 2008). Muscle has an high capacity to repair itself after injury; this characteristic suggests that it serves as a reservoir for cells that participate in tissue regeneration processes (Usas and Huard, 2007). Several works described the ability of different muscle-derived stem cell populations to differentiate into multiple cell types, including osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes, myoblasts and endothelial cells. In addition, these cells showed regenerative, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties. Each of these cell types is characterized primarily on the basis of their in vitro characteristics after they have been isolated from the body. In vivo they exhibited the capacity to migrate through different tissues where they are exposed to different extracellular and environmental signals. While rudimentary models were developed to describe the in vivo relationship among these stem cell populations, substantial additional studies are needed to refine and verify these relationships.
New approaches using organisms genetically modified and transgenic mouse models proposed the importance of the microenvironment—like the niche and the extrinsic factors—to be a key component in stem cell regulation. Particularly, significant progress has been made in understanding how satellite cells can act as tissue-specific adult stem cells in skeletal muscle. In the same time, many studies investigated the satellite cell properties in term of efficacy after in vivo transplantation using novel approaches such as non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. These tools provided information for assessing not only satellite cell function but, in general, stem cell function. Investigations on the molecular nature of stem cell niche signals on in vivo models and short-term cultures of isolated myofibers, are now on-going. Bioengineering offers significant tools for the development of strategies to mimic biochemical and biophysical features of the in vivo niche microenvironment (Lutolf et al., 2009b). We hope that the synthesis of biomaterials, micro-fabrication technology and stem cell biology will provide systems potentially innovative to better understand how stem cell fate is controlled. The analysis of the niche and the dynamic responses of stem cells to well-defined artificial microenvironments, might give us the possibility to understand the role of specific niche components and niche architecture in regulating fundamental cellular mechanisms such as cellular division, self-renewal, and differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Development of biomaterials able to re-create an in vitro SCs niche could give rise to novel insights into understanding the molecular cues, critical for the in vitro maintenance and expansion of muscle stem cells. Above all, these in vitro systems can well lead to the generation of adequate numbers of stem cells and the ability to control their differentiation in order to maximize their utility, not only as cell-based therapeutics for tissue regeneration and replacement, but also as the control of inflammation after muscle damage (Cosgrove et al., 2009). In conclusion, all these considerations will be important not only to better characterize satellite cell biology and therapeutic approaches to treat muscle diseases and aging-related muscle wasting, but also to give necessary information for the study of adult tissue-specific stem cells.
Author Contributions
Mirella Meregalli and Yvan Torrente designed the approach, Andrea Farini and Clementina Sitzia wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Associazione La Nostra Famiglia Fondo DMD Gli Amici di Emanuele, Associazione Amici del Centro Dino Ferrari, Ministry of Health (RF-2009-1547384).
References
Adams, G. B., Martin, R. P., Alley, I. R., Chabner, K. T., Cohen, K. S., Calvi, L. M., et al. (2007). Therapeutic targeting of a stem cell niche. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 238–243. doi: 10.1038/nbt1281
Alessandri, G., Pagano, S., Bez, A., Benetti, A., Pozzi, S., Iannolo, G., et al. (2004). Isolation and culture of human muscle-derived stem cells able to differentiate into myogenic and neurogenic cell lineages. Lancet 364, 1872–1883. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17443-6
Alhadlaq, A., and Mao, J. J. (2004). Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation and therapeutics. Stem Cells Dev. 13, 436–448. doi: 10.1089/scd.2004.13.436
Amit, M., and Itskovitz-Eldor, J. (2002). Derivation and spontaneous differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J. Anat. 200, 225–232. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00032.x
Amthor, H., Huang, R., Mckinnell, I., Christ, B., Kambadur, R., Sharma, M., et al. (2002). The regulation and action of myostatin as a negative regulator of muscle development during avian embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 251, 241–257. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0812
Andrews, P. W., Casper, J., Damjanov, I., Duggan-Keen, M., Giwercman, A., Hata, J., et al. (1996). Comparative analysis of cell surface antigens expressed by cell lines derived from human germ cell tumours. Int. J. Cancer 66, 806–816. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960611)66:6<806::AID-IJC17>3.0.CO;2-0
Arnold, L., Henry, A., Poron, F., Baba-Amer, Y., Van Rooijen, N., Plonquet, A., et al. (2007). Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1057–1069. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070075
Backman, E., and Henriksson, K. G. (1995). Low-dose prednisolone treatment in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 5, 233–241. doi: 10.1016/0960-8966(94)00048-E
Bamman, M. M., Shipp, J. R., Jiang, J., Gower, B. A., Hunter, G. R., Goodman, A. Jr., et al. (2001). Mechanical load increases muscle IGF-I and androgen receptor mRNA concentrations in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 280, E383–E390.
Barberi, T., Bradbury, M., Dincer, Z., Panagiotakos, G., Socci, N. D., and Studer, L. (2007). Derivation of engraftable skeletal myoblasts from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Med. 13, 642–648. doi: 10.1038/nm1533
Benchaouir, R., Meregalli, M., Farini, A., D'antona, G., Belicchi, M., Goyenvalle, A., et al. (2007). Restoration of human dystrophin following transplantation of exon-skipping-engineered DMD patient stem cells into dystrophic mice. Cell Stem Cell 1, 646–657. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.09.016
Beyer Nardi, N., and Da Silva Meirelles, L. (2006). Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, in vitro expansion and characterization. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 174, 249–282. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-77855-4_11
Bhagavati, S., and Xu, W. (2005). Generation of skeletal muscle from transplanted embryonic stem cells in dystrophic mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 333, 644–649. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.135
Bodine, S. C., Latres, E., Baumhueter, S., Lai, V. K., Nunez, L., Clarke, B. A., et al. (2001). Identification of ubiquitin ligases required for skeletal muscle atrophy. Science 294, 1704–1708. doi: 10.1126/science.1065874
Bogdanovich, S., Krag, T. O., Barton, E. R., Morris, L. D., Whittemore, L. A., Ahima, R. S., et al. (2002). Functional improvement of dystrophic muscle by myostatin blockade. Nature 420, 418–421. doi: 10.1038/nature01154
Brack, A. S., Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Shen, J., and Rando, T. A. (2008). A temporal switch from notch to Wnt signaling in muscle stem cells is necessary for normal adult myogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 2, 50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.006
Brack, A. S., and Rando, T. A. (2007). Intrinsic changes and extrinsic influences of myogenic stem cell function during aging. Stem Cell Rev. 3, 226–237. doi: 10.1007/s12015-007-9000-2
Brunelli, S., and Rovere-Querini, P. (2008). The immune system and the repair of skeletal muscle. Pharmacol. Res. 58, 117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.06.008
Buckingham, M., Bajard, L., Chang, T., Daubas, P., Hadchouel, J., Meilhac, S., et al. (2003). The formation of skeletal muscle: from somite to limb. J. Anat. 202, 59–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00139.x
Burkin, D. J., and Kaufman, S. J. (1999). The alpha7beta1 integrin in muscle development and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 296, 183–190. doi: 10.1007/s004410051279
Cai, B., Spencer, M. J., Nakamura, G., Tseng-Ong, L., and Tidball, J. G. (2000). Eosinophilia of dystrophin-deficient muscle is promoted by perforin-mediated cytotoxicity by T cell effectors. Am. J. Pathol. 156, 1789–1796. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65050-X
Carpenter, M. K., Rosler, E., and Rao, M. S. (2003). Characterization and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 5, 79–88. doi: 10.1089/153623003321512193
Carr, A. J., Vugler, A. A., Hikita, S. T., Lawrence, J. M., Gias, C., Chen, L. L., et al. (2009). Protective effects of human iPS-derived retinal pigment epithelium cell transplantation in the retinal dystrophic rat. PLoS ONE 4:e8152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008152
Cassano, M., Quattrocelli, M., Crippa, S., Perini, I., Ronzoni, F., and Sampaolesi, M. (2009). Cellular mechanisms and local progenitor activation to regulate skeletal muscle mass. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 30, 243–253. doi: 10.1007/s10974-010-9204-y
Cerletti, M., Jurga, S., Witczak, C. A., Hirshman, M. F., Shadrach, J. L., Goodyear, L. J., et al. (2008). Highly efficient, functional engraftment of skeletal muscle stem cells in dystrophic muscles. Cell 134, 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.049
Clop, A., Marcq, F., Takeda, H., Pirottin, D., Tordoir, X., Bibe, B., et al. (2006). A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nat. Genet. 38, 813–818. doi: 10.1038/ng1810
Collins, C. A., Olsen, I., Zammit, P. S., Heslop, L., Petrie, A., Partridge, T. A., et al. (2005). Stem cell function, self-renewal, and behavioral heterogeneity of cells from the adult muscle satellite cell niche. Cell 122, 289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010
Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Smythe, G. M., and Rando, T. A. (2003). Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 302, 1575–1577. doi: 10.1126/science.1087573
Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Wagers, A. J., Girma, E. R., Weissman, I. L., and Rando, T. A. (2005). Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature 433, 760–764. doi: 10.1038/nature03260
Conboy, I. M., and Rando, T. A. (2002). The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell 3, 397–409. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00254-X
Conrad, S., Renninger, M., Hennenlotter, J., Wiesner, T., Just, L., Bonin, M., et al. (2008). Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis. Nature 456, 344–349. doi: 10.1038/nature07404
Constantin, G., Marconi, S., Rossi, B., Angiari, S., Calderan, L., Anghileri, E., et al. (2009). Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Stem Cells 27, 2624–2635. doi: 10.1002/stem.194
Cosgrove, B. D., Sacco, A., Gilbert, P. M., and Blau, H. M. (2009). A home away from home: challenges and opportunities in engineering in vitro muscle satellite cell niches. Differentiation 78, 185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2009.08.004
Cossu, G., and Sampaolesi, M. (2007). New therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: challenges, prospects and clinical trials. Trends Mol. Med. 13, 520–526. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.10.003
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., and Yamada, K. M. (2001). Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294, 1708–1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1064829
Darabi, R., Arpke, R. W., Irion, S., Dimos, J. T., Grskovic, M., Kyba, M., et al. (2012). Human ES- and iPS-derived myogenic progenitors restore DYSTROPHIN and improve contractility upon transplantation in dystrophic mice. Cell Stem Cell 10, 610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.015
Darabi, R., Baik, J., Clee, M., Kyba, M., Tupler, R., and Perlingeiro, R. C. (2009). Engraftment of embryonic stem cell-derived myogenic progenitors in a dominant model of muscular dystrophy. Exp. Neurol. 220, 212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.08.002
Darabi, R., Gehlbach, K., Bachoo, R. M., Kamath, S., Osawa, M., Kamm, K. E., et al. (2008a). Functional skeletal muscle regeneration from differentiating embryonic stem cells. Nat. Med. 14, 134–143. doi: 10.1038/nm1705
Darabi, R., Santos, F. N., and Perlingeiro, R. C. (2008b). The therapeutic potential of embryonic and adult stem cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. 4, 217–225. doi: 10.1007/s12015-008-9023-3
Darabi, R., Santos, F. N., Filareto, A., Pan, W., Koene, R., Rudnicki, M. A., et al. (2011). Assessment of the myogenic stem cell compartment following transplantation of Pax3/Pax7-induced embryonic stem cell-derived progenitors. Stem Cells 29, 777–790. doi: 10.1002/stem.625
De Bari, C., Dell'accio, F., Tylzanowski, P., and Luyten, F. P. (2001). Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum. 44, 1928–1942. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1928::AID-ART331>3.0.CO;2-P
De Bari, C., Dell'accio, F., Vandenabeele, F., Vermeesch, J. R., Raymackers, J. M., and Luyten, F. P. (2003). Skeletal muscle repair by adult human mesenchymal stem cells from synovial membrane. J. Cell Biol. 160, 909–918. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212064
De Senzi Moraes Pinto, R., Ferretti, R., Moraes, L. H., Neto, H. S., Marques, M. J., and Minatel, E. (2013). N-acetylcysteine treatment reduces TNF-alpha levels and myonecrosis in diaphragm muscle of mdx mice. Clin. Nutr. 32, 472–475. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.001
Dimos, J. T., Rodolfa, K. T., Niakan, K. K., Weisenthal, L. M., Mitsumoto, H., Chung, W., et al. (2008). Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science 321, 1218–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.1158799
Dykstra, B., Ramunas, J., Kent, D., Mccaffrey, L., Szumsky, E., Kelly, L., et al. (2006). High-resolution video monitoring of hematopoietic stem cells cultured in single-cell arrays identifies new features of self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8185–8190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602548103
Ebert, A. D., Yu, J., Rose, F. F. Jr., Mattis, V. B., Lorson, C. L., Thomson, J. A., et al. (2009). Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient. Nature 457, 277–280. doi: 10.1038/nature07677
Egawa, N., Kitaoka, S., Tsukita, K., Naitoh, M., Takahashi, K., Yamamoto, T., et al. (2012). Drug screening for ALS using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 145ra104. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004052
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bonnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., and Discher, D. E. (2004). Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J. Cell Biol. 166, 877–887. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200405004
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., and Discher, D. E. (2006). Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044
Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., Guthrie, L., and Henson, P. M. (2001). Differential effects of apoptotic versus lysed cells on macrophage production of cytokines: role of proteases. J. Immunol. 166, 6847–6854.
Fan, V. H., Tamama, K., Au, A., Littrell, R., Richardson, L. B., Wright, J. W., et al. (2007). Tethered epidermal growth factor provides a survival advantage to mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25, 1241–1251. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0320
Farini, A., Razini, P., Erratico, S., Torrente, Y., and Meregalli, M. (2009). Cell based therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Physiol. 221, 526–534. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21895
Filareto, A., Parker, S., Darabi, R., Borges, L., Iacovino, M., Schaaf, T., et al. (2013). An ex vivo gene therapy approach to treat muscular dystrophy using inducible pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 4, 1549. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2550
Fiorina, P., Jurewicz, M., Augello, A., Vergani, A., Dada, S., La Rosa, S., et al. (2009). Immunomodulatory function of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in experimental autoimmune type 1 diabetes. J. Immunol. 183, 993–1004. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900803
Flanigan, K. M., Campbell, K., Viollet, L., Wang, W., Gomez, A. M., Walker, C. M., et al. (2013). Anti-dystrophin T cell responses in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: prevalence and a glucocorticoid treatment effect. Hum. Gene Ther. 24, 797–806. doi: 10.1089/hum.2013.092
Folkman, J., and Moscona, A. (1978). Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 273, 345–349. doi: 10.1038/273345a0
Galvez, B. G., Sampaolesi, M., Brunelli, S., Covarello, D., Gavina, M., Rossi, B., et al. (2006). Complete repair of dystrophic skeletal muscle by mesoangioblasts with enhanced migration ability. J. Cell Biol. 174, 231–243. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512085
Gang, E. J., Jeong, J. A., Hong, S. H., Hwang, S. H., Kim, S. W., Yang, I. H., et al. (2004). Skeletal myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 22, 617–624. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-617
Gates, C. B., Karthikeyan, T., Fu, F., and Huard, J. (2008). Regenerative medicine for the musculoskeletal system based on muscle-derived stem cells. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 16, 68–76.
Golding, J. P., Calderbank, E., Partridge, T. A., and Beauchamp, J. R. (2007). Skeletal muscle stem cells express anti-apoptotic ErbB receptors during activation from quiescence. Exp. Cell. Res. 313, 341–356. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.10.019
Gordon, S. (2003). Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 23–35. doi: 10.1038/nri978
Gordon, S., and Taylor, P. R. (2005). Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 953–964. doi: 10.1038/nri1733
Goudenege, S., Lebel, C., Huot, N. B., Dufour, C., Fujii, I., Gekas, J., et al. (2012). Myoblasts derived from normal hESCs and dystrophic hiPSCs efficiently fuse with existing muscle fibers following transplantation. Mol. Ther. 20, 2153–2167. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.188
Grounds, M. D. (1987). Phagocytosis of necrotic muscle in muscle isografts is influenced by the strain, age, and sex of host mice. J. Pathol. 153, 71–82. doi: 10.1002/path.1711530110
Grounds, M. D., Sorokin, L., and White, J. (2005). Strength at the extracellular matrix-muscle interface. Scand J Med Sci Sports 15, 381–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00467.x
Gu, F., Zhang, L., Teply, B. A., Mann, N., Wang, A., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., et al. (2008). Precise engineering of targeted nanoparticles by using self-assembled biointegrated block copolymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2586–2591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711714105
Gussoni, E., Blau, H. M., and Kunkel, L. M. (1997). The fate of individual myoblasts after transplantation into muscles of DMD patients. Nat. Med. 3, 970–977. doi: 10.1038/nm0997-970
Hanna, J., Wernig, M., Markoulaki, S., Sun, C. W., Meissner, A., Cassady, J. P., et al. (2007). Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science 318, 1920–1923. doi: 10.1126/science.1152092
Hemmati, H. D., Nakano, I., Lazareff, J. A., Masterman-Smith, M., Geschwind, D. H., Bronner-Fraser, M., et al. (2003). Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 15178–15183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2036535100
Hodgetts, S., Radley, H., Davies, M., and Grounds, M. D. (2006). Reduced necrosis of dystrophic muscle by depletion of host neutrophils, or blocking TNFalpha function with Etanercept in mdx mice. Neuromuscul. Disord. 16, 591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.06.011
Hoffman, L. M., and Carpenter, M. K. (2005). Characterization and culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 699–708. doi: 10.1038/nbt1102
Horsley, V., Jansen, K. M., Mills, S. T., and Pavlath, G. K. (2003). IL-4 acts as a myoblast recruitment factor during mammalian muscle growth. Cell 113, 483–494. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00319-2
Iacovino, M., Bosnakovski, D., Fey, H., Rux, D., Bajwa, G., Mahen, E., et al. (2011). Inducible cassette exchange: a rapid and efficient system enabling conditional gene expression in embryonic stem and primary cells. Stem Cells 29, 1580–1588. doi: 10.1002/stem.715
Ichim, T. E., Alexandrescu, D. T., Solano, F., Lara, F., Campion Rde, N., Paris, E., et al. (2010). Mesenchymal stem cells as anti-inflammatories: implications for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Immunol. 260, 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.10.006
Irintchev, A., Zeschnigk, M., Starzinski-Powitz, A., and Wernig, A. (1994). Expression pattern of M-cadherin in normal, denervated, and regenerating mouse muscles. Dev. Dyn. 199, 326–337. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001990407
Irvine, D. J., Hue, K. A., Mayes, A. M., and Griffith, L. G. (2002). Simulations of cell-surface integrin binding to nanoscale-clustered adhesion ligands. Biophys. J. 82, 120–132. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75379-4
Jackson, W. M., Nesti, L. J., and Tuan, R. S. (2010). Potential therapeutic applications of muscle-derived mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 10, 505–517. doi: 10.1517/14712591003610606
Klingler, W., Jurkat-Rott, K., Lehmann-Horn, F., and Schleip, R. (2012). The role of fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acta Myol. 31, 184–195.
Kloxin, A. M., Kasko, A. M., Salinas, C. N., and Anseth, K. S. (2009). Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324, 59–63. doi: 10.1126/science.1169494
Kuang, S., Gillespie, M. A., and Rudnicki, M. A. (2008). Niche regulation of muscle satellite cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.012
Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., and Rudnicki, M. A. (2007). Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129, 999–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044
Kuraitis, D., Giordano, C., Ruel, M., Musaro, A., and Suuronen, E. J. (2012). Exploiting extracellular matrix-stem cell interactions: a review of natural materials for therapeutic muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 33, 428–443. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.078
Le Blanc, K., and Pittenger, M. (2005). Mesenchymal stem cells: progress toward promise. Cytotherapy 7, 36–45. doi: 10.1080/14653240510018118
Lecker, S. H., Solomon, V., Price, S. R., Kwon, Y. T., Mitch, W. E., and Goldberg, A. L. (1999). Ubiquitin conjugation by the N-end rule pathway and mRNAs for its components increase in muscles of diabetic rats. J. Clin. Invest. 104, 1411–1420. doi: 10.1172/JCI7300
Le Grand, F., Jones, A. E., Seale, V., Scime, A., and Rudnicki, M. A. (2009). Wnt7a activates the planar cell polarity pathway to drive the symmetric expansion of satellite stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 4, 535–547. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.013
Leist, M., Bremer, S., Brundin, P., Hescheler, J., Kirkeby, A., Krause, K. H., et al. (2008). The biological and ethical basis of the use of human embryonic stem cells for in vitro test systems or cell therapy. ALTEX 25, 163–190.
Li, Z. F., Shelton, G. D., and Engvall, E. (2005). Elimination of myostatin does not combat muscular dystrophy in dy mice but increases postnatal lethality. Am J Pathol 166, 491–497. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62271-7
Lian, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, H. K., Wu, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2010). Functional mesenchymal stem cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells attenuate limb ischemia in mice. Circulation 121, 1113–1123. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.898312
Lin, T., Chao, C., Saito, S., Mazur, S. J., Murphy, M. E., Appella, E., et al. (2005). p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 165–171. doi: 10.1038/ncb1211
Lutolf, M. P., Doyonnas, R., Havenstrite, K., Koleckar, K., and Blau, H. M. (2009a). Perturbation of single hematopoietic stem cell fates in artificial niches. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 1, 59–69. doi: 10.1039/b815718a
Lutolf, M. P., Gilbert, P. M., and Blau, H. M. (2009b). Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate. Nature 462, 433–441. doi: 10.1038/nature08602
Lutolf, M. P., and Hubbell, J. A. (2005). Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 47–55. doi: 10.1038/nbt1055
Madec, A. M., Mallone, R., Afonso, G., Abou Mrad, E., Mesnier, A., Eljaafari, A., et al. (2009). Mesenchymal stem cells protect NOD mice from diabetes by inducing regulatory T cells. Diabetologia 52, 1391–1399. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1374-z
Matzuk, M. M., Lu, N., Vogel, H., Sellheyer, K., Roop, D. R., and Bradley, A. (1995). Multiple defects and perinatal death in mice deficient in follistatin. Nature 374, 360–363. doi: 10.1038/374360a0
Mccarthy, J. J., Esser, K. A., and Andrade, F. H. (2007). MicroRNA-206 is overexpressed in the diaphragm but not the hindlimb muscle of mdx mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 293, C451–C457. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00077.2007
Mccroskery, S., Thomas, M., Maxwell, L., Sharma, M., and Kambadur, R. (2003). Myostatin negatively regulates satellite cell activation and self-renewal. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1135–1147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207056
Mcfarlane, C., Hennebry, A., Thomas, M., Plummer, E., Ling, N., Sharma, M., et al. (2008). Myostatin signals through Pax7 to regulate satellite cell self-renewal. Exp. Cell Res. 314, 317–329. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.09.012
Mcnally, E. M., Ly, C. T., Rosenmann, H., Mitrani Rosenbaum, S., Jiang, W., Anderson, L. V., et al. (2000). Splicing mutation in dysferlin produces limb-girdle muscular dystrophy with inflammation. Am. J. Med. Genet. 91, 305–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000410)91:4%3C305::AID-AJMG12%3E3.0.CO;2-S
Mcpherron, A. C., Lawler, A. M., and Lee, S. J. (1997). Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 387, 83–90. doi: 10.1038/387083a0
Mendell, J. R., Kissel, J. T., Amato, A. A., King, W., Signore, L., Prior, T. W., et al. (1995). Myoblast transfer in the treatment of Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 832–838. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509283331303
Mizuno, Y., Chang, H., Umeda, K., Niwa, A., Iwasa, T., Awaya, T., et al. (2010). Generation of skeletal muscle stem/progenitor cells from murine induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J. 24, 2245–2253. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-137174
Montarras, D., Morgan, J., Collins, C., Relaix, F., Zaffran, S., Cumano, A., et al. (2005). Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science 309, 2064–2067. doi: 10.1126/science.1114758
Moon, S. Y., Park, Y. B., Kim, D. S., Oh, S. K., and Kim, D. W. (2006). Generation, culture, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells for therapeutic applications. Mol. Ther. 13, 5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.09.008
Morrison, S. J., and Kimble, J. (2006). Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 441, 1068–1074. doi: 10.1038/nature04956
Nakatani, M., Takehara, Y., Sugino, H., Matsumoto, M., Hashimoto, O., Hasegawa, Y., et al. (2008). Transgenic expression of a myostatin inhibitor derived from follistatin increases skeletal muscle mass and ameliorates dystrophic pathology in mdx mice. FASEB J. 22, 477–487. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8673com
Negroni, E., Riederer, I., Chaouch, S., Belicchi, M., Razini, P., Di Santo, J., et al. (2009). In vivo myogenic potential of human CD133+ muscle-derived stem cells: a quantitative study. Mol. Ther. 17, 1771–1778. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.167
Nelson, T. J., Martinez-Fernandez, A., Yamada, S., Perez-Terzic, C., Ikeda, Y., and Terzic, A. (2009). Repair of acute myocardial infarction by human stemness factors induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 120, 408–416. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865154
Nemeth, K., Leelahavanichkul, A., Yuen, P. S., Mayer, B., Parmelee, A., Doi, K., et al. (2009). Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat. Med. 15, 42–49. doi: 10.1038/nm.1905
Nesti, L. J., Jackson, W. M., Shanti, R. M., Koehler, S. M., Aragon, A. B., Bailey, J. R., et al. (2008). Differentiation potential of multipotent progenitor cells derived from war-traumatized muscle tissue. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90, 2390–2398. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00049
Ohsawa, Y., Hagiwara, H., Nakatani, M., Yasue, A., Moriyama, K., Murakami, T., et al. (2006). Muscular atrophy of caveolin-3-deficient mice is rescued by myostatin inhibition. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2924–2934. doi: 10.1172/JCI28520
O'rourke, J. R., Georges, S. A., Seay, H. R., Tapscott, S. J., Mcmanus, M. T., Goldhamer, D. J., et al. (2007). Essential role for Dicer during skeletal muscle development. Dev. Biol. 311, 359–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.032
Park, I. H., Zhao, R., West, J. A., Yabuuchi, A., Huo, H., Ince, T. A., et al. (2008). Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141–146. doi: 10.1038/nature06534
Petrof, B. J., Shrager, J. B., Stedman, H. H., Kelly, A. M., and Sweeney, H. L. (1993). Dystrophin protects the sarcolemma from stresses developed during muscle contraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 3710–3714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3710
Price, F. D., Kuroda, K., and Rudnicki, M. A. (2007). Stem cell based therapies to treat muscular dystrophy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1772, 272–283. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.08.011
Rafei, M., Birman, E., Forner, K., and Galipeau, J. (2009a). Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Mol. Ther. 17, 1799–1803. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.157
Rafei, M., Campeau, P. M., Aguilar-Mahecha, A., Buchanan, M., Williams, P., Birman, E., et al. (2009b). Mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting CD4 Th17 T cells in a CC chemokine ligand 2-dependent manner. J. Immunol. 182, 5994–6002. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803962
Ratajczak, J., Miekus, K., Kucia, M., Zhang, J., Reca, R., Dvorak, P., et al. (2006). Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia 20, 847–856. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404132
Reubinoff, B. E., Itsykson, P., Turetsky, T., Pera, M. F., Reinhartz, E., Itzik, A., et al. (2001). Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 1134–1140. doi: 10.1038/nbt1201-1134
Riordan, N. H., Chan, K., Marleau, A. M., and Ichim, T. E. (2007). Cord blood in regenerative medicine: do we need immune suppression? J. Transl. Med. 5, 8. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-5-8
Rohwedel, J., Maltsev, V., Bober, E., Arnold, H. H., Hescheler, J., and Wobus, A. M. (1994). Muscle cell differentiation of embryonic stem cells reflects myogenesis in vivo: developmentally regulated expression of myogenic determination genes and functional expression of ionic currents. Dev. Biol. 164, 87–101. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1182
Rosner, M. H., Vigano, M. A., Ozato, K., Timmons, P. M., Poirier, F., Rigby, P. W., et al. (1990). A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 345, 686–692. doi: 10.1038/345686a0
Rothenfluh, D. A., Bermudez, H., O'neil, C. P., and Hubbell, J. A. (2008). Biofunctional polymer nanoparticles for intra-articular targeting and retention in cartilage. Nat. Mater. 7, 248–254. doi: 10.1038/nmat2116
Rouger, K., Larcher, T., Dubreil, L., Deschamps, J. Y., Le Guiner, C., Jouvion, G., et al. (2011). Systemic delivery of allogenic muscle stem cells induces long-term muscle repair and clinical efficacy in duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 2501–2518. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.07.022
Sacco, A., Doyonnas, R., Kraft, P., Vitorovic, S., and Blau, H. M. (2008). Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature 456, 502–506. doi: 10.1038/nature07384
Sakurai, H., Inami, Y., Tamamura, Y., Yoshikai, T., Sehara-Fujisawa, A., and Isobe, K. (2009). Bidirectional induction toward paraxial mesodermal derivatives from mouse ES cells in chemically defined medium. Stem Cell Res. 3, 157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2009.08.002
Sambasivan, R., and Tajbakhsh, S. (2007). Skeletal muscle stem cell birth and properties. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 870–882. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.09.013
Sampaolesi, M., Blot, S., D'antona, G., Granger, N., Tonlorenzi, R., Innocenzi, A., et al. (2006). Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature 444, 574–579. doi: 10.1038/nature05282
Sandri, M. (2008). Signaling in muscle atrophy and hypertrophy. Physiology (Bethesda) 23, 160–170. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00041.2007
Sarig, R., Baruchi, Z., Fuchs, O., Nudel, U., and Yaffe, D. (2006). Regeneration and transdifferentiation potential of muscle-derived stem cells propagated as myospheres. Stem Cells 24, 1769–1778. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0547
Schiaffino, S., Sandri, M., and Murgia, M. (2007). Activity-dependent signaling pathways controlling muscle diversity and plasticity. Physiology (Bethesda) 22, 269–278. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00009.2007
Serra, F., Quarta, M., Canato, M., Toniolo, L., De Arcangelis, V., Trotta, A., et al. (2012). Inflammation in muscular dystrophy and the beneficial effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Muscle Nerve 46, 773–784. doi: 10.1002/mus.23432
Serrano, A. L., and Munoz-Canoves, P. (2010). Regulation and dysregulation of fibrosis in skeletal muscle. Exp. Cell Res. 316, 3050–3058. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.05.035
Sherwood, R. I., Christensen, J. L., Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Rando, T. A., Weissman, I. L., et al. (2004). Isolation of adult mouse myogenic progenitors: functional heterogeneity of cells within and engrafting skeletal muscle. Cell 119, 543–554. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.021
Shi, X., and Garry, D. J. (2006). Muscle stem cells in development, regeneration, and disease. Genes Dev. 20, 1692–1708. doi: 10.1101/gad.1419406
Skottman, H., Dilber, M. S., and Hovatta, O. (2006). The derivation of clinical-grade human embryonic stem cell lines. FEBS Lett. 580, 2875–2878. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.083
Smythe, G. M., Fan, Y., and Grounds, M. D. (2000). Enhanced migration and fusion of donor myoblasts in dystrophic and normal host muscle. Muscle Nerve 23, 560–574. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(200004)23:4%3C560::AID-MUS16%3E3.3.CO;2-7
Soldner, F., Hockemeyer, D., Beard, C., Gao, Q., Bell, G. W., Cook, E. G., et al. (2009). Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136, 964–977. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.013
Song, H. Y., Lee, M. J., Kim, M. Y., Kim, K. H., Lee, I. H., Shin, S. H., et al. (2010). Lysophosphatidic acid mediates migration of human mesenchymal stem cells stimulated by synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1801, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.08.011
Song, Z., Cai, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, D., Yong, J., Duo, S., et al. (2009). Efficient generation of hepatocyte-like cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res. 19, 1233–1242. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.107
Spiller, M. P., Kambadur, R., Jeanplong, F., Thomas, M., Martyn, J. K., Bass, J. J., et al. (2002). The myostatin gene is a downstream target gene of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MyoD. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 7066–7082. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7066-7082.2002
Strulovici, Y., Leopold, P. L., O'connor, T. P., Pergolizzi, R. G., and Crystal, R. G. (2007). Human embryonic stem cells and gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 15, 850–866.
Suuronen, E. J., Kuraitis, D., and Ruel, M. (2008). Improving cell engraftment with tissue engineering. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 20, 110–114. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.03.005
Suzuki, K., Totsuka, M., Nakaji, S., Yamada, M., Kudoh, S., Liu, Q., et al. (1999). Endurance exercise causes interaction among stress hormones, cytokines, neutrophil dynamics, and muscle damage. J. Appl. Physiol. 87, 1360–1367.
Tagliafico, E., Brunelli, S., Bergamaschi, A., De Angelis, L., Scardigli, R., Galli, D., et al. (2004). TGFbeta/BMP activate the smooth muscle/bone differentiation programs in mesoangioblasts. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4377–4388. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01291
Takahashi, K., and Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
Tamaki, T., Okada, Y., Uchiyama, Y., Tono, K., Masuda, M., Wada, M., et al. (2007). Clonal multipotency of skeletal muscle-derived stem cells between mesodermal and ectodermal lineage. Stem Cells 25, 2283–2290. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0746
Tanaka, K. K., Hall, J. K., Troy, A. A., Cornelison, D. D., Majka, S. M., and Olwin, B. B. (2009). Syndecan-4-expressing muscle progenitor cells in the SP engraft as satellite cells during muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 4, 217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.01.016
Tedesco, F. S., Gerli, M. F., Perani, L., Benedetti, S., Ungaro, F., Cassano, M., et al. (2012). Transplantation of genetically corrected human iPSC-derived progenitors in mice with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 140ra189. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003541
Tedesco, F. S., Hoshiya, H., D'antona, G., Gerli, M. F., Messina, G., Antonini, S., et al. (2011). Stem cell-mediated transfer of a human artificial chromosome ameliorates muscular dystrophy. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 96ra78. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002342
Thomas, M., Langley, B., Berry, C., Sharma, M., Kirk, S., Bass, J., et al. (2000). Myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle growth, functions by inhibiting myoblast proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40235–40243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004356200
Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., and Jones, J. M. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
Thomson, J. A., and Marshall, V. S. (1998). Primate embryonic stem cells. Curr. Top Dev. Biol. 38, 133–165. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60246-X
Tidball, J. G., and Villalta, S. A. (2010). Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 298, R1173–R1187. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00735.2009
Torrente, Y., Belicchi, M., Marchesi, C., Dantona, G., Cogiamanian, F., Pisati, F., et al. (2007). Autologous transplantation of muscle-derived CD133+ stem cells in Duchenne muscle patients. Cell Transplant. 16, 563–577. doi: 10.3727/000000007783465064
Torrente, Y., Tremblay, J. P., Pisati, F., Belicchi, M., Rossi, B., Sironi, M., et al. (2001). Intraarterial injection of muscle-derived CD34(+)Sca-1(+) stem cells restores dystrophin in mdx mice. J. Cell Biol. 152, 335–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.152.2.335
Tremblay, J. P., Malouin, F., Roy, R., Huard, J., Bouchard, J. P., Satoh, A., et al. (1993). Results of a triple blind clinical study of myoblast transplantations without immunosuppressive treatment in young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Transplant. 2, 99–112.
Usas, A., and Huard, J. (2007). Muscle-derived stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative therapy. Biomaterials 28, 5401–5406. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.008
Vial, C., Zuniga, L. M., Cabello-Verrugio, C., Canon, P., Fadic, R., and Brandan, E. (2008). Skeletal muscle cells express the profibrotic cytokine connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2), which induces their dedifferentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 215, 410–421. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21324
Villalta, S. A., Nguyen, H. X., Deng, B., Gotoh, T., and Tidball, J. G. (2009). Shifts in macrophage phenotypes and macrophage competition for arginine metabolism affect the severity of muscle pathology in muscular dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 482–496. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn376
Voisin, L., Gray, K., Flowers, K. M., Kimball, S. R., Jefferson, L. S., and Vary, T. C. (1996). Altered expression of eukaryotic initiation factor 2B in skeletal muscle during sepsis. Am. J. Physiol. 270, E43–E50.
Wagner, K. R., Fleckenstein, J. L., Amato, A. A., Barohn, R. J., Bushby, K., Escolar, D. M., et al. (2008). A phase I/IItrial of MYO-029 in adult subjects with muscular dystrophy. Ann. Neurol. 63, 561–571. doi: 10.1002/ana.21338
Wehling, M., Spencer, M. J., and Tidball, J. G. (2001). A nitric oxide synthase transgene ameliorates muscular dystrophy in mdx mice. J. Cell Biol. 155, 123–131. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200105110
Whalen, R. G., Harris, J. B., Butler-Browne, G. S., and Sesodia, S. (1990). Expression of myosin isoforms during notexin-induced regeneration of rat soleus muscles. Dev. Biol. 141, 24–40. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90099-5
Whittemore, L. A., Song, K., Li, X., Aghajanian, J., Davies, M., Girgenrath, S., et al. (2003). Inhibition of myostatin in adult mice increases skeletal muscle mass and strength. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 300, 965–971. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02953-4
Wozniak, M. A., and Chen, C. S. (2009). Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 34–43. doi: 10.1038/nrm2592
Xu, C., Inokuma, M. S., Denham, J., Golds, K., Kundu, P., Gold, J. D., and Carpenter, M. K. (2001). Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 971–974. doi: 10.1038/nbt1001-971
Ye, L., Chang, J. C., Lin, C., Sun, X., Yu, J., and Kan, Y. W. (2009). Induced pluripotent stem cells offer new approach to therapy in thalassemia and sickle cell anemia and option in prenatal diagnosis in genetic diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9826–9830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904689106
Zhang, X., Stojkovic, P., Przyborski, S., Cooke, M., Armstrong, L., Lako, M., et al. (2006). Derivation of human embryonic stem cells from developing and arrested embryos. Stem Cells 24, 2669–2676. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0377
Zheng, B., Cao, B., Crisan, M., Sun, B., Li, G., Logar, A., et al. (2007). Prospective identification of myogenic endothelial cells in human skeletal muscle. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1025–1034. doi: 10.1038/nbt1334
Zhou, K., Zhang, H., Jin, O., Feng, X., Yao, G., Hou, Y., et al. (2008). Transplantation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell ameliorates the autoimmune pathogenesis in MRL/lpr mice. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 5, 417–424. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2008.52
Zhou, L., Porter, J. D., Cheng, G., Gong, B., Hatala, D. A., Merriam, A. P., et al. (2006). Temporal and spatial mRNA expression patterns of TGF-beta1, 2, 3 and TbetaRI, II, III in skeletal muscles of mdx mice. Neuromuscul. Disord. 16, 32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2005.09.009
Keywords: muscle wasting, stem cell niche, fibrosis, inflammation, myogenic stem cell
Citation: Meregalli M, Farini A, Sitzia C and Torrente Y (2014) Advancements in stem cells treatment of skeletal muscle wasting. Front. Physiol. 5:48. doi: 10.3389/fphys2014.00048
Received: 23 October 2013; Accepted: 25 January 2014;
Published online: 12 February 2014.
Edited by:
Carlos Hermano J. Pinheiro, University of São Paulo, BrazilReviewed by:
Carmen Bertoni, University of California Los Angeles, USAAshok Kumar, University of Louisville, USA
Copyright © 2014 Meregalli, Farini, Sitzia and Torrente. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yvan Torrente, Stem Cell Laboratory, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy e-mail: yvan.torrente@unimi.it
† These authors have contributed equally to this work.