AUTHOR=Grant Catharina C., Murray Carien , Janse Van Rensburg Dina C., Fletcher Lizelle 

TITLE=A comparison between heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of cardiac health and fitness

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology

VOLUME=4

YEAR=2013

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2013.00337

DOI=10.3389/fphys.2013.00337

ISSN=1664-042X

ABSTRACT=<p>Quantification of cardiac autonomic activity and control via heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) is known to provide prognostic information in clinical populations. Issues with regard to standardization and interpretation of HRV data make the use of the more easily accessible HR on its own as an indicator of autonomic cardiac control very appealing. The aim of this study was to investigate the strength of associations between an important cardio vascular health metric such as VO<sub>2</sub>max and the following: HR, HRV indicators, and HR normalized HRV indicators. A cross sectional descriptive study was done including 145 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 22 years. HRV was quantified by time domain, frequency domain and Poincaré plot analysis. Indirect VO<sub>2</sub>max was determined using the Multistage Coopers test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to quantify the strength of the associations. Both simple linear and multiple stepwise regressions were performed to be able to discriminate between the role of the individual indicators as well as their combined association with VO<sub>2</sub>max. Only HR, RR interval, and pNN50 showed significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.03) correlations with VO<sub>2</sub>max. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that, when combining all HRV indicators the most important predictor of cardio vascular fitness as represented by VO<sub>2</sub>max, is HR. HR explains 17% of the variation, while the inclusion of HF (high frequency HRV indicator) added only an additional 3.1% to the coefficient of determination. Results also showed when testing the normalized indicators, HR explained of the largest percentage of the changes in VO<sub>2</sub>max (16.5%). Thus, HR on its own is the most important predictor of changes in an important cardiac health metric such as VO<sub>2</sub>max. These results may indicate that during investigation of exercise ability (VO<sub>2</sub>max) phenomena, quantification of HRV may not add significant value.</p>