
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Phys.
Sec. Social Physics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphy.2025.1578995
This article is part of the Research Topic Finance and Production Complex Systems View all 10 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In the e-commerce supply chain, many risk-averse suppliers face the dilemma of capital constraints. Bank financing helps to alleviate these financing difficulties, and blockchain trust mechanisms can optimize bank financing strategies. To address the issue of capital constraints for suppliers, based on the two operating modes of Consignment and Direct Selling in the e-commerce supply chain, using the Stackelberg game, considering the company's risk-averse behavior and consumers' green preferences, a game model is constructed to explore the impact of factors such as blockchain, risk aversion, product greenness, information verification efforts, and guarantee interest rates on bank financing strategies. Studies have shown that when blockchain technology is adopted within a certain threshold range, suppliers adopting the Consignment method can achieve higher financing returns than the Direct Selling method. Compared to the Direct Selling method, under the Consignment method, the blockchain trust mechanism can better function to improve the supplier's financing efficiency, and managers can choose a more optimal sales model based on actual circumstances. The supplier's financing efficiency also decreases with an increase in the risk aversion coefficient, and under the scenario of using blockchain, the effect of risk aversion on suppliers is greater. However, blockchain trust increases with the increase in the risk aversion coefficient, and managers can optimize internal risk management mechanisms and take measures to reduce the negative effects of excessive risk aversion. Product greenness will increase the selling price of the e-commerce supply chain under the Consignment method, and enhancing product greenness helps to improve corporate cash flow. However, under the Direct Selling method, the impact on price is minimal, and the impact on financing strategies will differ. Information verification efforts will lead to an increase in product greenness and the green preference coefficient, and the improvement in information transparency makes e-commerce more willing to provide guarantees for suppliers. Although the guaranteed interest rate will increase financing costs, it will make banks more willing to provide financing for suppliers with capital constraints, and in practice, managers should comprehensively consider the balance between guaranteed interest rates and financing returns. This study aims to provide decision-making references for managers.
Keywords: Blockchain, risk aversion, Green preference, E-commerce supply chain, Bank financing
Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 06 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang and Hou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
ming qiao Hou, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.