Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys.

Sec. Nuclear Physics​

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphy.2025.1539148

This article is part of the Research Topic Modern Advances in Direct Reactions for Nuclear Structure View all 7 articles

Direct reactions with the AT-TPC

Provisionally accepted
Yassid Ayyad Yassid Ayyad 1*Daniel Bazin Daniel Bazin 2,3Francesca Bonaiti Francesca Bonaiti 2,4Jie Chen Jie Chen 5Xiaobin Li Xiaobin Li 5Tan Ahn Tan Ahn 6Adam Anthony Adam Anthony 7Melina Avila Melina Avila 8Saul Beceiro Saul Beceiro 9Khushi Bhatt Khushi Bhatt 8Cristina Cabo Cristina Cabo 1Tatsuya Furuno Tatsuya Furuno 10Valdir Guimaraes Valdir Guimaraes 11Alex Hall-Smith Alex Hall-Smith 8Curtis Hunt Curtis Hunt 2Heshani Jayatissa Heshani Jayatissa 8Takahiro Kawabata Takahiro Kawabata 10Harriet Kumi Harriet Kumi 9Jose Manuel López-González Jose Manuel López-González 1Juan Lois-Fuentes Juan Lois-Fuentes 2Augusto Macchiavelli Augusto Macchiavelli 4Gordon Mccann Gordon Mccann 2Claus MÜller-Gatermann Claus MÜller-Gatermann 8Alicia MuÑoz-Ramos Alicia MuÑoz-Ramos 1Wolfgang Mittig Wolfgang Mittig 2,3Bruno Olaizola Bruno Olaizola 12Zarif Rahman Zarif Rahman 2,3Daniel Regueira Daniel Regueira 1Javier Rufino Javier Rufino 6Soki Sakajo Soki Sakajo 10Clementine Santamaria Clementine Santamaria 2Michael Z Serikow Michael Z Serikow 2,3Tianxudong Tang Tianxudong Tang 2,3Ivan Tolstukhin Ivan Tolstukhin 8Nathan Turi Nathan Turi 2,3Nathan Watwood Nathan Watwood 8Juan Zamora Juan Zamora 2
  • 1 University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • 2 Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
  • 3 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
  • 4 Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States
  • 5 Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • 6 University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States
  • 7 High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, United States
  • 8 Argonne National Laboratory (DOE), Lemont, Illinois, United States
  • 9 University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
  • 10 Osaka University, Suita, Ōsaka, Japan
  • 11 Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 12 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Direct reactions are crucial tools for accessing properties of the atomic nucleus. Fundamental and exotic phenomena such as collective modes, pairing, weak-binding effects and evolution of single-particles energies can be investigated in peripheral collisions between a heavy nucleus and a light target. The necessity of using inverse kinematics to reveal how these structural properties change with isospin imbalance renders direct reactions a challenging technique when using 1 Y. Ayyad et al.the missing mass method. In this scenario, Active Target Time Projection Chambers (AT-TPC) have demonstrated an outstanding performance in enabling these types of reactions even under conditions of very low beam intensities.The AT-TPC of the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) is a next-generation multipurpose Active Target. When operated inside a solenoidal magnet, direct reactions benefit from the measurement of the magnetic rigidity that enables particle identification and the determination of the excitation energy with high resolution without the need of auxiliary detectors. Additionally, the AT-TPC can be coupled to a magnetic spectrometer improving even further its spectroscopic investigation capability. In this contribution, we discuss inelastic scattering and transfer reaction data obtained via the AT-TPC and compare them to theory. In particular, we present the results for the 14 C(p,p') and 12 Be(p,d) 11 Be reactions. For 14 C, we compare the experimental excitation energy of the first 1 -excited state with coupled-cluster calculations based on nuclear interactions from chiral effective field theory and with available shell-model predictions. For 12 Be, we determine the theoretical spectroscopic factors of the 12 Be(p,d) 11 Be transfer reaction in the shell model and compare them to the experimental excitation spectrum from a qualitative standpoint.

    Keywords: Direct reactions, transfer, inelastic scattering, Active target, Time projection chamber, solenoidal spectrometer

    Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ayyad, Bazin, Bonaiti, Chen, Li, Ahn, Anthony, Avila, Beceiro, Bhatt, Cabo, Furuno, Guimaraes, Hall-Smith, Hunt, Jayatissa, Kawabata, Kumi, López-González, Lois-Fuentes, Macchiavelli, Mccann, MÜller-Gatermann, MuÑoz-Ramos, Mittig, Olaizola, Rahman, Regueira, Rufino, Sakajo, Santamaria, Serikow, Tang, Tolstukhin, Turi, Watwood and Zamora. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yassid Ayyad, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more