Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Phys., 10 October 2024
Sec. Medical Physics and Imaging
This article is part of the Research Topic Prompt-gamma Imaging in Particle Therapy View all 6 articles

Editorial: Prompt-gamma imaging in particle therapy

  • 1Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 2Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, United States
  • 3Department of Hadron Physics, M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Editorial on the Research Topic
Prompt-gamma imaging in particle therapy

Prompt gamma imaging (PGI) is a promising technique to tackle range uncertainties in particle therapy with protons, helium and carbon ions. Several concepts have been investigated since PGI was first proposed in 2003 [1]. Real-time tracking of the particle beams within the human body via PGI may represent a new leap into a more accurate method of dose delivery to tumors.

A young investigator’s workshop was organized by the editors of this Research Topic to attract young investigators to this field and give them the opportunity to present their work and hear the insights from the pioneers and top experts. This workshop was held in July 2023 and attracted over 80 attendees from 18 countries (4 continents).

Following the workshop, we received 8 submissions and accepted 5 manuscripts for publication within the Frontiers in Physics Prompt-gamma Imaging in Particle Therapy Research Topic. Cheon and Min published a mini-review detailing several PGI systems currently under development, such as the knife-edge slit camera [2], the Compton camera [3, 4], the multi-array collimator camera [5], PGI with coded aperture [6], and the gamma electron vertex imaging [7]. The authors outlined several advantages and pitfalls of each system in verifying the beam range and suggested further improvements in detection efficiency, spatial resolution, and background reduction for integration in clinical practice.

He et al. developed a Monte Carlo study for prompt gamma timing (PGT) to explore a non-linear correlation between the PGT spectral width and range. The authors demonstrated a functional relationship between both for homogeneous materials as well as for simulated range shifts through the insertion of air cavities. Such results should offer new prospects for monitoring proton therapy range through PGT. Further studies will validate the contribution of the actual temporal structure of the proton beam and the temporal resolution of the detectors to the broadening of the time spectrum’s width [8].

Nutter et al. suggested a modified Compton camera to infer the dose delivered to the patient via boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). The authors proposed a LaBr3 array and presented results simulated with Geant4. In such an array, all detectors may act as absorbers or scatterers, thus increasing the number of channels available for image reconstruction. The effect of shielding, also commonly used in SPECT cameras [9], was evaluated indicating a significantly lower background noise with 6Li neutron shielding and significant 511 keV background associated to heavy element shielding. A source of the 478 keV photons was successfully identified in a simple water phantom containing a tumor region of 400 ppm 10B for a neutron fluence of 1.0 × 1011 cm−2. Such a feasibility study may open new avenues into PGI research for BNCT dosimetry.

Schellhammer et al. proposed a hybrid treatment verification using two radiation types: prompt gammas and neutrons. Employing machine-learning-based feature selection and multivariate modelling in the analysis of GATE-simulated data of a lung cancer case, they showed that such an approach leads to an improved precision of beam range verification by 30%–50%. The study constitutes an interesting alternative to other multi-modal approaches, e.g., PET-PGI [10].

Everaere et al. presented a novel prompt gamma detection technique, referred to as prompt gamma energy integration (PGEI), which is derived from prompt gamma peak integration [11]. PGEI involves the measurement of the energy deposited by all secondary particles emitted from proton or ion beam interactions. GATE simulations in a PMMA phantom surrounded by LaBr3 crystals illustrated correlation between energy deposition and target position, while experimental measurements have allowed for the characterization of a PbWO4 scintillator which can withstand clinical beam intensities without readout system saturation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of this novel method and lays the groundwork for further advancement of PGEI for online range verification.

These manuscripts illustrate the depth and breadth of technology currently under development to advance PGI and improve our abilities to accurately deliver proton and ion beam therapies. However, these authors also demonstrate the difficulties and challenges that still exist with PGI. It is crucial for young investigators and experts within the field to continue to collaborate to push the boundaries of PGI and continue to advance these techniques to further improve treatment accuracy and patient outcomes in particle therapy. PGI has advanced significantly since it was first proposed and, with further development, may soon re-define how particle therapy treatments are delivered.

Author contributions

PM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. ED: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. AW: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Stichelbaut F, Jongen Y. “Verification of the proton beam position in the patient by the detection of prompt gamma-rays emission,” in 39th Meeting of the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (2003).

Google Scholar

2. Smeets J, Roellinghoff F, Prieels D, Stichelbaut F, Benilov A, Busca P, et al. Prompt gamma imaging with a slit camera for real-time range control in proton therapy. Phys Med Biol (2012) 57:3371–405. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Draeger E, Mackin D, Peterson S, Chen H, Avery S, Polf JC, et al. 3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification. Phys Med Biol (2018) 63. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aaa203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kasper J, Rusiecka K, Hetzel R, Kozani MK, Lalik R, Magiera A, et al. The SiFi-CC project – feasibility study of a scintillation-fiber-based Compton camera for proton therapy monitoring. Phys Med (2020) 76:317–25. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Min CH, Kim CH, Youn MY, Kim JW. Prompt gamma measurements for locating the dose falloff region in the proton therapy. Appl Phys Lett (2006) 89:2–5. doi:10.1063/1.2378561

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hetzel R, Urbanevych V, Bolke A, Kasper J, Kercz M, Kołodziej M, et al. Near-field coded-mask technique and its potential for proton therapy monitoring. Phys Med Biol (2023) 68:245028. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad05b2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hyeong Kim C, Hyung Park J, Seo H, Rim Lee H. Gamma electron vertex imaging and application to beam range verification in proton therapy. Med Phys (2012) 39:1001–5. doi:10.1118/1.3662890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jacquet M, Ansari S, Gallin-Martel ML, André A, Boursier Y, Dupont M, et al. A high sensitivity Cherenkov detector for prompt gamma timing and time imaging. Sci Rep (2023) 13(1):3609. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30712-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Caracciolo A, Di Vita D, Buonanno L, Carminati M, Protti N, Altieri S, et al. Experimental validation of a spectroscopic gamma-ray detector based on a LaBr3 scintillator towards real-time dose monitoring in BNCT. Nucl Instr Meth (2022) 1041:167409. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.167409

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Llosá G, Rafecas M. Hybrid PET/Compton-camera imaging: an imager for the next generation. Eur Phys J Plus (2023) 138:214. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03805-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Krimmer J, Angellier G, Balleyguier L, Dauvergne D, Greud N, Hérault J, et al. A cost-effective monitoring technique in particle therapy via uncollimated prompt gamma peak integration. Appl Phys Lett (2017) 110:110. doi:10.1063/1.4980103

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: prompt gamma imaging (PGI), particle therapy, range verification, medical physics, editorial, Research Topic

Citation: Magalhaes Martins P, Draeger E and Wrońska A (2024) Editorial: Prompt-gamma imaging in particle therapy. Front. Phys. 12:1502908. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1502908

Received: 27 September 2024; Accepted: 30 September 2024;
Published: 10 October 2024.

Edited and reviewed by:

Federico Giove, Centro Fermi—Museo storico della fisica e Centro studi e ricerche Enrico Fermi, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Magalhaes Martins, Draeger and Wrońska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Paulo Magalhaes Martins, pjmartins@ciencias.ulisboa.pt; Emily Draeger, emily.draeger@yale.edu; Aleksandra Wrońska, aleksandra.wronska@uj.edu.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.