Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Phys., 20 September 2022
Sec. Interdisciplinary Physics
This article is part of the Research Topic Taking Stock in Econophysics View all 5 articles

New developments in econophysics: Option pricing formulas

  • Department of Economics, UWI, St Augustine, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago

We synthesize and discuss some new developments in econophysics. In doing so, we focus on option pricing. We relax the assumptions of constant volatility and interest rate. In doing so, we rely on the square root of the Brownian motion. We also provide simple, closed-form pricing formulas for the American and Bermudan options.

Introduction

In previous decades, some obstacles existed in econophysics and finance. For example, the free-boundary problem created a serious challenge to pricing American options and related derivatives. Consequently, the previous literature did not offer an explicit, simple formula to price these derivatives (see, for example, Merton [1] and Heston [2]). A similar challenge was evident under the assumption of stochastic volatility or stochastic interest rate.

Furthermore, in theoretical physics and econophysics, some researchers sought the introduction of a new stochastic process. The process is the square root of the Brownian motion. The usefulness of this process was demonstrated by Frasca and Farina [3] and Frasca [4]. In this review, we will briefly discuss the contributions that overcame these obstacles.

Review

Alghalith [5,6] introduced this PDE for the price of the American call options under the assumption of constant volatility and interest rate

Ct+rSCSC+12σ2S2CSS+1rc=0,CT,ST=gS,(1)

where c is the consumption at time zero, r is the interest rate, σ is the volatility, S is the price of the underlying asset, g is the payoff, t is time, and C is the price of the option. This can be expressed as

Ct+rSCS+12σ2S2CSSαC=0,CT,ST=gS,(2)

where αrΨ1r and Ψ is a constant. The inclusion of consumption allowed us to circumvent the free-boundary problem. Eq. 2 is a generalized Black-Scholes PDE Black and Scholes [7]; its solution is

Ct,S=eΨ1rTtSNd1erTtKNd2=eΨ1rTtCBS,(3)

where CBS is the Black-Scholes price of the equivalent European call option, d1=lnS/K+r+σ2/2TtσTt, d2=d1σTt and K is the strike price.

The price of the American put option is given by

Pt,S=eΨ1rTterTtKNd2SNd1=eΨ1rTtPBS,(4)

where PBS is the Black-Scholes price of the equivalent European put option.

Alghalith [8] showed that the price of the Bermudan put option is given by

P=e.5er(TT̂)11rTerTKNd2SNd1=e.5er(TT̂)11rTPBS,(5)

where T̂ is the first possible exercise date. We note that the Bermuda option is a restricted form of the American option.

A limitation of the Black-Scholes model is the assumption of constant volatility. However, the empirical evidence indicates that the volatility changes with time. There is evidence of leptokurtosis and volatility clustering. Similarly, in the real world, the interest rate is not constant.

In order to obtain a (simple) pricing formula under stochastic volatility, Alghalith [9] assumed that the dynamics of the price of the underlying asset are given by

dSu=Suμdu+βdW1u+dSuλωudW2u,(6)

where Wu is a Brownian motion λ is a constant, ωu and dBu are independent random variables with zero means; the process dBu was introduced by Frasca and Farina [3] and Frasca [4]. Later, Frasca et al [10] formally developed the process of the square root of the Brownian motion. Consequently, the price of the option is

Ct,S=SNd1erTtKNd2,(7)

where d1=lnS/K+r+β2/2Ttβ2Tt, d2=d1β2Tt, and β is a constant. It is worth emphasizing that β here is not the volatility of the return rate; it is a component of the volatility.

Alghalith [11] offered a similar formula under the assumption of a stochastic interest rate.

Conclusion

To conclude, the above-mentioned contributions substantially generalized and extended the Black-Scholes model, while maintaining simple pricing formulas. These contributions are expected to open new paths in econophysics, especially in the area of derivatives. These methods can also be applied to other derivatives, such as the Asian options.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

Author very grateful to Editor SS and the reviewers for their excellent and fast comments.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Merton RC. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J Financial Econ (1976) 3:125–44. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90022-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Heston SL. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud (1993) 6(2):327–43. doi:10.1093/rfs/6.2.327

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Frasca M, Farina A. Numerical proof of existence of fractional powers of Wiener processes. Signal Image Video Process (2017) 11(7):1365–70. doi:10.1007/s11760-017-1094-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Frasca M. Noncommutative geometry and stochastic processes. In: F Nielsen, and F Barbaresco, editors. Geometric science of information. GSI lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer (2017). p. 10589.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Alghalith M. Pricing the American options using the Black–Scholes pricing formula. Physica A: Stat Mech its Appl (2018) 507:443–5. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Alghalith M. Pricing the American options: A closed-form, simple formula. Physica A: Stat Mech its Appl (2020) 548:123873. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123873

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Black F, Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Economy (1973) 81:637–54. doi:10.1086/260062

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Alghalith M. The price of the bermudan option: A simple, explicit formula. Commun Stat - Theor Methods (2021) 2021, 1–4. doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1969407

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Alghalith M. Pricing options under simultaneous stochastic volatility and jumps: A simple closed-form formula without numerical/computational methods. Physica A: Stat Mech its Appl (2020) 540:123100. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123100

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Frasca M, Farina A, Alghalith M. Quantized noncommutative Riemann manifolds and stochastic processes: The theoretical foundations of the square root of Brownian motion. Physica A: Stat Mech its Appl (2021) 577:126037. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Alghalith M. Pricing options under stochastic interest rate and the frasca–farina process: A simple, explicit formula. Ann Finan Econ (2021) 16:2150003. doi:10.1142/S2010495221500032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: European option, free boundary, American option, stochastic volatility, stochastic interest rate

Citation: Alghalith M (2022) New developments in econophysics: Option pricing formulas. Front. Phys. 10:1036571. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.1036571

Received: 04 September 2022; Accepted: 08 September 2022;
Published: 20 September 2022.

Edited by:

Sergio Da Silva, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Joao Plinio Juchem Neto, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Iram Gleria, Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil

Copyright © 2022 Alghalith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Moawia Alghalith, malghalith@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.