Multiphase CO2-dependent photosynthesis in marine diatoms

Diatoms, one of the most ubiquitous phytoplankton in the oceans, have evolved a pyrenoid-based CO₂-concentrating mechanism (CCM) to utilize limited CO₂ in seawater for photosynthesis. Recent proteomics analyses and molecular biological tools have deepened our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in diatom chloroplast architecture and the CCM. Here, we provide an update to our knowledge of the processes involved in high affinity photosynthesis for dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in diatoms. Based on the phenotype of genome-edited mutants, we propose a model of the diatom CCM composed of four phases of CO₂-dependent photosynthesis at (I) less than 0.1 mM, (II) 0.1–2 mM, (III) 2–10 mM, and (IV) more than 10 mM of DIC concentrations, in which the rate-determining steps are the capture of unfixed CO₂ in the chloroplast stroma at Phases I and II, the evolution of CO₂ in the pyrenoid-penetrating thylakoid lumen at Phase III, and DIC transport to the stroma at Phase IV. Under natural seawater containing 2 mM DIC mainly in the form of HCO₃⁻, the photosynthesis of marine diatoms is likely primarily in Phase III, shifting to Phase II when available CO₂ is limited.

Introduction

Marine diatoms are widely distributed and highly diversified phytoplankton group in the global oceans. They are among the most productive phytoplankton groups, with their photosynthesis contributing nearly half of oceanic primary production (Falkowski et al., 1998). Since dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) mainly exists in the ionic form in natural seawater (ca. 2 mM of HCO₃⁻ >> ca. 16 μM of CO₂ at 20°C), marine diatoms have evolved a system to utilize this large HCO₃⁻ pool for photosynthesis, the so-called biophysical CO₂-concentrating mechanism (CCM) (Kaplan et al., 1980; Matsuda et al., 2001). The pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and the centric Thalassiosira pseudonana are model species for which a variety of genetic engineering techniques have been developed. To date, molecular studies of these species have revealed the functions of many CCM components (Figure 1). In both species, extracellular CO₂ is directly taken up by diatom cells. In P. tricornutum, external HCO₃⁻ is also directly taken up to the cytoplasm by active transporters such as solute carrier four family proteins (SLC4-1, SLC4-2, and SLC4-4) (Nakajima et al., 2013; Nawaly et al., 2023a), while T. pseudonana in contrast indirectly uptakes external HCO₃⁻ via dehydration by extracellular carbonic anhydrases (CA) (Tsuji et al., 2017a). Cytosolic pH was estimated to be 7.4 in Thalassiosira weissflogii (Hervé et al., 2012) and 7.9 in P. tricornutum (Shimakawa et al., 2023b), and at this pH DIC should be kept mainly as HCO₃⁻ in the cytosol. Diatom chloroplasts are comprised of four-layered membranes (Keeling, 2010; Flori et al., 2016; Cavalier-Smith, 2018). Chloroplast intermembrane CAs have been found in both P. tricornutum and T. pseudonana (Tachibana et al., 2011; Jensen et al., 2019). The periplastidal compartment (PPC) between the two outer and two inner membranes is maintained at an acidic pH, implying that cytosolic HCO₃⁻ is actively transported into PPC and then converted to CO₂ by intermembrane CAs to be passively diffused across the two inner chloroplast envelopes to the stroma (Shimakawa et al., 2023b). Meanwhile, it is also possible that intermembrane CAs rather convert CO₂ to HCO₃⁻ to suppress CO₂ leakage from the chloroplast stroma (Tsuji et al., 2017b; Jensen et al., 2019). Assuming the four-layer membrane system is beneficial to the diatom CCM, the CA-dependent CO₂ diffusion barrier would be located between the cytosol and PPC, i.e., chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum (CER) lumen, although this model of DIC dynamics across the chloroplast membranes still remains to be demonstrated (Figure 1). Stromal pH is 8.0 or higher (Anning et al., 1996; Shimakawa et al., 2023b), and CO₂ is trapped there in the form of HCO₃⁻, presumably via hydration by stromal CAs (Tsuji et al., 2017b; Nawaly et al., 2023b). Overall, extracellular DIC in alkaline seawater is taken up across the plasma membrane with a strategy either extracellular-CA mediated CO₂ diffusion or direct HCO₃⁻ transport, and they are finally pumped into the chloroplast stroma mainly via active transport across chloroplast membranes (Hopkinson et al., 2011). The HCO₃⁻ pumping process across chloroplast membranes is likely to be fast enough to maintain the cytosolic CO₂ lower than external CO₂, thus enabling the influx of external CO₂ even without plasma membrane HCO₃⁻ transporter (Hopkinson et al., 2011). In either case, external DIC acquisition across the plasma membrane is, in principle, not the rate-determining step for diatom photosynthesis.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Multiphase CO₂-dependent photosynthesis in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Cytoplasmic membranes (grey line), chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum (CER) envelopes (wine red dashed line), periplastidal membranes (red line), outer and inner plastid membranes (dashed and solid green lines), thylakoid membranes (brown line), and pyrenoid shells (blue dotted line) are drawn to separate each compartment. P. tricornutum possesses carbonic anhydrases (CAs) in the cytosol (θ-type), periplastidal compartment (PPC; α- and possibly ℩-types), stroma (β-type), and the lumen of pyrenoid-penetrating thylakoid membranes (θ-type; Tachibana et al., 2011; Kikutani et al., 2016; Tsuji et al., 2017b). Solute carrier four family proteins (SLC4), stromal β-CAs, and the major bestrophin-like protein (BST1) are highly expressed in low dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations. Thickness of each arrow roughly indicates the flux of diffusion, transport, and reaction. Phase I could be illustrated similarly to Phase II. Dynamics of DIC across four-layer chloroplast membranes (sky blue shadings) still remains to be demonstrated.

In diatom chloroplasts, there is a triple-layered thylakoid membrane called the girdle lamella with a layered stromal thylakoid in its interior, where the photosynthetic electron transport chain produces NADPH and ATP for CO₂ assimilation in the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle. In this process, H₂O is oxidized with O₂ evolution at the luminal side of photosystem II (PSII), and the electrons passed to the PSII reaction center are transported to photosystem I (PSI) through plastoquinone, cytochrome (Cyt) b₆f complex, and Cyt c₆. This linear electron transport process is accompanied by the generation of a proton concentration gradient (ΔpH) and an electric field gradient (ΔΨ) across the thylakoid membranes, which both function in the proton motive force driving ATP production by chloroplast ATP synthase (Witt, 1979). In P. tricornutum, the bestrophin-like protein (BST) is widely distributed throughout the stroma thylakoid, playing a role in transporting HCO₃⁻ into the lumen (Nigishi et al., 2024). In the middle of the stroma, there is a phase-separated proteinaceous body called the pyrenoid (Bedoshvili et al., 2009), which is a condensate body of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) interlinked by a intrisically disorder protein, PYCO1 (Oh et al., 2023). Two layered thylakoid membranes traverse along with the long axis of the oval shaped pyrenoid (Flori et al., 2016), which are termed the pyrenoid-penetrating thylakoid (PPT) membrane (Nigishi et al., 2024). The θ-type CA exists on the luminal side of PPT to convert HCO₃⁻ to CO₂ in the low pH of the PPT lumen under illumination (Kikutani et al., 2016; Shimakawa et al., 2023a). Due to the high membrane permeability of CO₂, evolved luminal CO₂ quickly effluxes to the pyrenoid and is fixed by Rubisco. This system was previously defined as the “CO₂-evolving machinery” (Shimakawa et al., 2023a). Further, unfixed CO₂ should be converted back to HCO₃⁻ by stromal CAs and transported again into the lumen of stroma thylakoid membranes by BST. It has been shown recently that the pyrenoid is surrounded by a sheet composed of a lattice-like protein sheath named Pyrenoid-Shell (PyShell) (Shimakawa et al., 2024a). It is possible that the PyShell sheet functions as a part of CO₂ diffusion barrier between the chloroplast stroma and the pyrenoid matrix. The strategy to utilize external DIC for photosynthesis should be diversified among diatom species dependent on their ecological niche. Nevertheless, central CCM components in the chloroplast, including stromal/luminal CA, BST, and PyShell are widely conserved in diatoms at the genetic level. Indeed, the centric diatom T. pseudonana also possesses stromal CA, thylakoid-luminal CA, thylakoid-localized BST, and PyShell proteins (Nawaly et al., 2023b; Nam et al., 2024; Nigishi et al., 2024). Overall, we speculate that the “CO₂-evolving machinery” we modeled in P. tricornutum and T. pseudonana is a central and evolutionary-conserved system of the diatom CCM.

Photosynthetic affinity for DIC in the genome editing mutants for CCM components

The efficiency of the algal CCM can be evaluated by measuring the dependency of photosynthetic activity (O₂ evolution rate) on total external DIC concentrations ([DIC]) reflected in the so-called “P-DIC curve” (Figure 2). The wild type P. tricornutum (PtWT) shows the maximum photosynthetic activity (P_max) even at very low [DIC], and the [DIC] giving half of P_max (K_0.5) is ca. 0.01–0.05 mM (Matsuda et al., 2001; Shimakawa et al., 2023a; Nigishi et al., 2024). This order of K_0.5 value is also observed in other marine diatoms fully acclimated to low CO₂ conditions (Tsuji et al., 2017a; Tsuji et al., 2021; Shimakawa et al., 2024a). In P. tricornutum, several CCM components, including plasma membrane-localized SLC4s, stromal β-CAs, and BST1, are highly downregulated at the transcript levels in 1–5% CO₂ conditions (high CO₂) (Ohno et al., 2011; Nakajima et al., 2013; Nigishi et al., 2024), resulting in the higher K_0.5 (approximately 0.2–0.8 mM) in PtWT when the cells are grown in high CO₂ bubbling (Matsuda et al., 2001; Shimakawa et al., 2023a; Nigishi et al., 2024). This indicates that CCM is repressed by high CO₂ growth conditions.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Photosynthetic affinity with dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the wild type (PtWT) and the genome editing mutants (ΔPtBST1 and ΔPtθ-CA1) in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The representative data in Shimakawa et al. (2023a) and Nigishi et al. (2024) are used after normalization of net O₂ evolution rates (µmol mg⁻¹ Chl a h⁻¹) to P_max as 100%. Grey circles, atmospheric CO₂ (air)-grown PtWT; black stars, 1% (high) CO₂-grown PtWT; light purple triangles, air-grown ΔPtBST1; purple inverted triangles, high CO₂-grown ΔPtBST1; light green squares, air-grown ΔPtθ-CA1; green diamonds, high CO₂-grown ΔPtθ-CA1.

Recent advances in molecular biology make it possible to isolate genome-edited mutants deficient in CCM components in P. tricornutum and T. pseudonana. We have found notable differences in P-DIC curve in two mutants defective of BST1 and PPT luminal θ-CA in P. tricornutum. The knock-out mutants of BST1 (ΔPtBST1) showed the higher K_0.5 (around 0.2 mM) than that in PtWT (Figure 2). This value is close to K_0.5 in high-CO₂ grown PtWT, suggesting that the BST is the important component that contributes to the induced-level DIC affinity in PtWT grown in sub-atmospheric CO₂ conditions. Meanwhile, the K_0.5 in ΔPtBST1 slightly increased when the cells were grown under high CO₂, indicating that other low CO₂ inducible CCM components such as plasma membrane-localized SLC4s and stromal β-CAs also contribute to the CCM induction (Nigishi et al., 2024). In the knock-out mutants of the PPT luminal θ-CA (ΔPtθ-CA1), we observed the extremely low photosynthetic affinity for DIC than that in PtWT, giving K_0.5 exceeding 2 mM in both air- and high CO₂-grown cells of ΔPtθ-CA1 (Figure 2) (Shimakawa et al., 2023a), indicating that low CO₂ inducible CCM components cannot rescue the deficit of the CA localized in the PPT lumen. Importantly, a very similar null CCM phenotype was also observed in the genome edited knock-out mutant of PyShells in T. pseudonana, a strain that fails to construct a proper pyrenoid structure with PPT at the core (Shimakawa et al., 2024a). We thus model that pyrenoid structure harboring the right arrangement of PPT is a critical factor for the CO₂ evolving machinery and that PPT luminal CA is a pivotal component in this machinery operation.

Based on the [DIC] required for P_max in P-DIC curves shown in Figure 2, we defined several phases of CO₂-dependent photosynthesis in diatoms: Phase I, less than 0.1 mM; Phase II, 0.1–2 mM; Phase III, 2–10 mM; and Phase IV, more than 10 mM of [DIC], which differ in their rate-determining steps of CO₂ utilization for photosynthesis (Figure 1).

Phase I: photosynthesis is limited even in the presence of fully functional CCM

At Phase I, photosynthesis is limited by very low levels concentrations of DIC (∼0.1 mM), which are much smaller than the abundance of DIC in natural seawater (ca. 2 mM). Such a strong CO₂ limitation may arise in natural tide pools and artificial culture tanks containing heavily concentrated cells. Less than 0.1 mM DIC in natural seawater contains less than 0.001 mM CO₂ which is far lower than the Michaelis constant for the carboxylation reaction of Rubisco (0.052 mM and 0.036 mM with and without atmospheric O₂) (Young et al., 2016). This indicates that CO₂ in the pyrenoid matrix is higher than the external one. Thus, CO₂ is literally “concentrated” by a factor way exceeding 50, perhaps approaching 100 times. In this situation, HCO₃⁻ is actively pumped first into the chloroplasts by chloroplast membrane transporters and finally to the thylakoid lumen, while CO₂ leakage is strictly prevented in the chloroplast stroma. During the operation of the chloroplastic CCM, a steep drawdown of cytosolic DIC occurs, but it is replenished quickly by efficient HCO₃⁻ transport across plasma membrane from the environment. Overall, maximum photosynthesis is fulfilled by CCM components in PtWT grown in atmospheric CO₂ conditions (Figure 1), and the range of [DIC] giving Phase I defines the exact limit of CCM. The rate-determining step of photosynthesis in diatom cells at Phase I is not yet evidenced, but it is presumably the same as that at Phase II (described below). We note that P. tricornutum has relatively higher photosynthetic affinity for DIC (lower K_0.5) even among diatom species (Tsuji et al., 2017a), which could be due to the high ability to prevent CO₂ leakage from chloroplasts.

Phase II: photosynthesis is limited by restoration of stromal DIC into the thylakoid lumen

The P-DIC curve in ΔPtBST1 (Figure 2) suggests that the transport of HCO₃⁻ from the chloroplast stroma into the lumen of thylakoid membranes is a major rate-determining step for cells in a DIC range between 0.1 and 2 mM. The HCO₃⁻ transport by BST should depend on (i) the permeability of HCO₃⁻, (ii) the gradient of HCO₃⁻ concentrations, and (iii) ΔΨ across thylakoid membranes. Thylakoid HCO₃⁻ permeability is determined by the abundance of channels, corresponding to the balance of synthesis and degradation of BST. Indeed, PtWT grown under 1% CO₂ showed little expression of BST1 and exhibited a similar affinity for DIC during CO₂ assimilation to that in the ΔPtBST1 mutants (Nigishi et al., 2024). In P. tricornutum, the active DIC pumping into chloroplasts would be powerful enough to supply the chloroplast stroma with enough HCO₃⁻ to provide a saturating concentration of CO₂ for Rubisco, at least, where the external [DIC] is more than 0.1 mM. Additionally, stromal CA is expected to play an important role in preventing CO₂ leakage and maintaining adequate levels of stromal DIC. Without the leakage barrier, CO₂ could quickly diffuse out of the chloroplast, reducing the efficiency of the CCM. In the CCM model in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the occurrence of a leakage barrier at the pyrenoid could account for their role of CCM in the cells grown in the atmospheric CO₂ (Fei et al., 2022). Perhaps, the leakage barrier model could be applicable to the CCM at Phase II in diatoms. In these contexts, stromal CA would mainly play a CO₂-leakage resistant role in diatom chloroplasts at Phase II. Furthermore, PyShell and the stroma-thylakoid membranes surrounding the pyrenoid could be a physical barrier against the diffusion of CO₂. It should be noted that such physical barrier could also prevent O₂ influx into the pyrenoid. In diatoms, there is also an additional system that could work as a leakage barrier of CO₂ from the chloroplast; that is, the four-layered membrane system of chloroplast. This complicated membrane system comprises two additional matrices specific to chloroplasts derived from secondary endosymbiotic events (like diatoms) but absent in chloroplasts of primary endosymbionts, that is the CER lumen and PPC. Indeed, there are numerous CAs located in these membrane matrices even though the exact matrix that each CA is present in has not yet been determined (Tachibana et al., 2011; Samukawa et al., 2014; Jensen et al., 2019). The active HCO₃⁻ transporters on the plasma membrane and the chloroplast membranes are less critical in Phase II relative to Phase I, but still important to maintain DIC levels against the drawdown in the cytosol and the stroma. In thylakoid membranes, photosynthetic electron transport is driven by light energy to generate ΔΨ as a component of the proton motive force, implying that the HCO₃⁻ transport via PtBST1 is promoted under illumination. In nature, marine diatoms could be easily exposed to the low [DIC] characteristic of Phase II, either where the cell concentrations are high or where the DIC supply is limited.

Phase III: photosynthesis is limited by CO₂ evolution inside the pyrenoid

Here, we defined the [DIC] at Phase III as 2–10 mM, which is equal to or more than the [DIC] in natural seawater. In Phase III, ΔPtθ-CA1 does not achieve P_max (Figure 2), indicating that the CO₂-evolving machinery in PPT membranes is a rate-determining step for photosynthesis at these levels. In other words, CO₂ is not supplied quickly enough to Rubisco in the pyrenoid matrix without the CO₂-evolving machinery even at mM-order stromal [DIC]. The DIC equilibration should be largely shifted to HCO₃⁻ in the stroma (pH 8.0), resulting in 0.077 mM CO₂ even for 10 mM total DIC at 20°C, in which the Rubisco carboxylation would show only 60–70% activity of V_max (Young et al., 2016). Additionally, Rubisco is densely packed in the pyrenoid. Because of this, in the absence of the CO₂ evolving machinery, CO₂ diffusing into the pyrenoid from the surrounding stroma is quickly fixed by Rubisco on the periphery of the pyrenoid. This may be especially true in the case of P. tricornutum, where the pyrenoid is expected to be immobile (Oh et al., 2023). Nevertheless, the CO₂-dependent photosynthesis in ΔPtθ-CA1 almost reaches P_max at 10 mM DIC, indicating that the stromal [DIC] should be maintained much higher than extracellular [DIC] in P. tricornutum also at Phase III owing to the function of CO₂-evolving machinery. The difference in K_0.5 between atmospheric and high CO₂ grown ΔPtθ-CA1 (Figure 2) (Shimakawa et al., 2023a) would be derived from low CO₂ inducible components for the HCO₃⁻ transport (Nakajima et al., 2013). We mention again that neither the PPT luminal CA nor the proper pyrenoid structure with PPT are dispensable for marine diatoms to achieve P_max within 10 mM of [DIC] (Shimakawa et al., 2023a; Shimakawa et al., 2024a). Overall, under DIC conditions generally found in nature, the CO₂ substrate for diatom Rubisco is dominantly supplied from the lumen of PPT membranes at the pyrenoid core.

Phase IV: photosynthesis is limited by DIC transport to the chloroplast stroma

At Phase IV (more than 10 mM external [DIC]), extracellular CO₂ should be directly taken up to the cells and passively diffused to the chloroplast stroma. Additionally, external HCO₃⁻ is actively pumped into chloroplasts to keep the stromal [DIC] higher than the outside of cells. We note that the CO₂-evolving machinery is dispensable at Phase IV, and CO₂ directly delivered from the stroma to Rubisco in the pyrenoid matrix is enough to produce P_max in P. tricornutum. Such extremely high DIC concentration likely does not occur in much of the present ocean environment, but it does describe some unique situations such as an artificial culture tank bubbled with high CO₂ gas and (potentially) a future high CO₂ world of more than 5 times current pCO₂. Approximately 0.3 mM CO₂ can fulfill the maximum turnover of Rubisco carboxylation (Young et al., 2016), which corresponds to 40 mM total DIC at pH 8.0. In such an absolutely unnatural situation, CO₂ could be supplied via passive diffusion, and marine diatoms would not require the use of a CCM. Nevertheless, the pyrenoid structure is maintained even when bubbling in 1% CO₂ in P. tricornutum (Kikutani et al., 2016).

Conclusion and perspectives

Here, we defined multiple phases of CO₂-dependent photosynthesis in marine diatoms, based on the phenotype of genome-edited mutants deficient in pyrenoid structure and CO₂-evolving machinery. In natural marine environments containing 2 mM DIC, Phase II and Phase III are, respectively, assumed to be the conditions with and without the limitation of CO₂ availability, in which the incorporation of HCO₃⁻ into the thylakoid lumen and the PPT architecture mainly support photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation. The CO₂-evolving machinery should be functionally coupled with photosynthetic electron transport on thylakoid membranes, because lumen acidification is theoretically essential for the conversion of HCO₃⁻ to CO₂. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that alternative electron transports promote the formation of ΔpH to support CCM in C. reinhardtii (Burlacot et al., 2022), although it is unclear if this occurs in diatoms. On the contrary, the HCO₃⁻ transport into the thylakoid lumen may indirectly decrease ΔpH to relieve heat dissipation of excess light energy (the so-called qE quenching), which is a possible combination of light and CO₂ utilization by diatom cells (Nigishi et al., 2024). It should be also noted that diatom cells evolve CO₂ also at tricarboxylic acid cycle and urea cycle in mitochondria (Allen et al., 2011). However, restoration of DIC from mitochondria to chloroplasts is still elusive in diatoms (Shimakawa et al., 2024b).

The green alga C. reinhardtii, another well studied algal species in CCM research, shows some similarities to the diatom CCM in its DIC utilization strategy for photosynthesis, which suggests convergent evolution of the pyrenoid-based CCM in a variety of algae. For example, the LCIB-LCIC complex, which is a most probably θ-type CA complex, and BST function in blocking leakage and recycling the unfixed CO₂ in chloroplasts (Yamano et al., 2010; Mukherjee et al., 2019), and the α-type CA evolves CO₂ in the lumen of pyrenoid tubules (Raven, 1997), which can be defined as functional analogs to the essential components for Phase II and Phase III in the photosynthesis of P. tricornutum. In C. reinhardtii, the pyrenoid disperses at Phase IV, which may have the advantage for Rubisco to utilize CO₂ in the stroma. Importantly, the chloroplast and pyrenoid architecture are likely to be largely different among different eukaryotic algal species (He et al., 2023). Pyrenoids lacking thylakoid-penetrating membranes are observed in many algae, and the existence of genes encoding CA and BST is also varied. Although the multiphase model of CCM fits to P. tricornutum, T. pseudonana, and presumably C. reinhardtii, it still remains to be seen if it accurately describes the CO₂-concentrating and -evolving strategies of other phytoplankton on the earth.

Author contributions

GS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. YM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (24H02102 to GS; 19H01153 to YM) and by JST CREST “Cell dynamics” (JPMJCR20E1 to YM).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Matthew B. Brown (Kwansei Gakuin University) for kindly proofreading our English writing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Allen, A. E., Dupont, C. L., Oborník, M., Horák, A., Nunes-Nesi, A., McCrow, J. P., et al. (2011). Evolution and metabolic significance of the urea cycle in photosynthetic diatoms. Nature 473, 203–207. doi:10.1038/nature10074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anning, T., Nimer, N., Merrett, M. J., and Brownlee, C. (1996). Costs and benefits of calcification in coccolithophorids. J. Mar. Syst. 9, 45–56. doi:10.1016/0924-7963(96)00015-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bedoshvili, Y. D., Popkova, T. P., and Likhoshway, Y. V. (2009). Chloroplast structure of diatoms of different classes. Cell Tissue Biol. 3, 297–310. doi:10.1134/S1990519X09030122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burlacot, A., Dao, O., Auroy, P., Cuiné, S., Li-Beisson, Y., and Peltier, G. (2022). Alternative photosynthesis pathways drive the algal CO₂-concentrating mechanism. Nature 605, 366–371. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04662-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cavalier-Smith, T. (2018). Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla: a new synthesis emphasising periplastid protein targeting, cytoskeletal and periplastid evolution, and ancient divergences. Protoplasma 255, 297–357. doi:10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., and Smetacek, V. (1998). Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281, 200–207. doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fei, C., Wilson, A. T., Mangan, N. M., Wingreen, N. S., and Jonikas, M. C. (2022). Modelling the pyrenoid-based CO₂-concentrating mechanism provides insights into its operating principles and a roadmap for its engineering into crops. Nat. Plants 8, 583–595. doi:10.1038/s41477-022-01153-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flori, S., Jouneau, P.-H., Finazzi, G., Maréchal, E., and Falconet, D. (2016). Ultrastructure of the periplastidial compartment of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Protist 167, 254–267. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2016.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, S., Crans, V. L., and Jonikas, M. C. (2023). The pyrenoid: the eukaryotic CO₂-concentrating organelle. Plant Cell 35, 3236–3259. doi:10.1093/plcell/koad157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hervé, V., Derr, J., Douady, S., Quinet, M., Moisan, L., and Lopez, P. J. (2012). Multiparametric analyses reveal the pH-dependence of silicon biomineralization in diatoms. PLoS One 7, e46722. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hopkinson, B. M., Dupont, C. L., Allen, A. E., and Morel, F. M. M. (2011). Efficiency of the CO₂-concentrating mechanism of diatoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3830–3837. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018062108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, E. L., Clement, R., Kosta, A., Maberly, S. C., and Gontero, B. (2019). A new widespread subclass of carbonic anhydrase in marine phytoplankton. ISME J. 13, 2094–2106. doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0426-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, A., Badger, M. R., and Berry, J. A. (1980). Photosynthesis and the intracellular inorganic carbon pool in the blueren alga Anabaena variabilis: response to external CO₂ concentration. Planta 149, 219–226. doi:10.1007/BF00384557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keeling, P. J. (2010). The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 729–748. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kikutani, S., Nakajima, K., Nagasato, C., Tsuji, Y., Miyatake, A., and Matsuda, Y. (2016). Thylakoid luminal θ-carbonic anhydrase critical for growth and photosynthesis in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 9828–9833. doi:10.1073/pnas.1603112113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsuda, Y., Hara, T., and Colman, B. (2001). Regulation of the induction of bicarbonate uptake by dissolved CO₂ in the marine diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 611–620. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00702.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukherjee, A., Lau, C. S., Walker, C. E., Rai, A. K., Prejean, C. I., Yates, G., et al. (2019). Thylakoid localized bestrophin-like proteins are essential for the CO₂ concentrating mechanism of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 16915–16920. doi:10.1073/pnas.1909706116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakajima, K., Tanaka, A., and Matsuda, Y. (2013). SLC4 family transporters in a marine diatom directly pump bicarbonate from seawater. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1767–1772. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216234110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nam, O., Musiał, S., Demulder, M., McKenzie, C., Dowle, A., Dowson, M., et al. (2024). A protein blueprint of the diatom CO₂-fixing organelle. Cell 187, 5935–5950.e18. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nawaly, H., Matsui, H., Tsuji, Y., Iwayama, K., Ohashi, H., Nakajima, K., et al. (2023a). Multiple plasma membrane SLC4s contribute to external HCO₃^– acquisition during CO₂ starvation in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 296–307. doi:10.1093/jxb/erac380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nawaly, H., Tanaka, A., Toyoshima, Y., Tsuji, Y., and Matsuda, Y. (2023b). Localization and characterization θ carbonic anhydrases in Thalassiosira pseudonana. Photosynth. Res. 156, 217–229. doi:10.1007/s11120-023-01007-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nigishi, M., Shimakawa, G., Yamagishi, K., Amano, R., Ito, S., Tsuji, Y., et al. (2024). Low-CO₂-inducible bestrophins outside the pyrenoid sustain high photosynthetic efficacy in diatoms. Plant Physiol. 195, 1432–1445. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiae137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, Z. G., Ang, W. S. L., Poh, C. W., Lai, S.-K., Sze, S. K., Li, H.-Y., et al. (2023). A linker protein from a red-type pyrenoid phase separates with Rubisco via oligomerizing sticker motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2304833120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2304833120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohno, N., Inoue, T., Yamashiki, R., Nakajima, K., Kitahara, Y., Ishibashi, M., et al. (2011). CO₂-cAMP-responsive cis-elements targeted by a transcription factor with CREB/ATF-like basic zipper domain in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Plant Physiol. Plant Physiol. 158, 499–513. doi:10.1104/pp.111.190249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raven, J. A. (1997). CO₂-concentrating mechanisms: a direct role for thylakoid lumen acidification? Plant Cell Environ. 20, 147–154. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-67.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samukawa, M., Shen, C., Hopkinson, B. M., and Matsuda, Y. (2014). Localization of putative carbonic anhydrases in the marine diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana. Photosynth. Res. 121, 235–249. doi:10.1007/s11120-014-9967-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimakawa, G., Demulder, M., Flori, S., Kawamoto, A., Tsuji, Y., Nawaly, H., et al. (2024a). Diatom pyrenoids are encased in a protein shell that enables efficient CO₂ fixation. Cell 187, 5919–5934.e19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimakawa, G., Matsuda, Y., and Burlacot, A. (2024b). Crosstalk between photosynthesis and respiration in microbes. J. Biosci. 49, 45. doi:10.1007/s12038-023-00417-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimakawa, G., Okuyama, A., Harada, H., Nakagaito, S., Toyoshima, Y., Nagata, K., et al. (2023a). Pyrenoid-core CO₂-evolving machinery is essential for diatom photosynthesis in elevated CO₂. Plant Physiol. 193, 2298–2305. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiad475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimakawa, G., Yashiro, E., and Matsuda, Y. (2023b). Mapping of subcellular local pH in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Physiol. Plant. 175, e14086. doi:10.1111/ppl.14086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tachibana, M., Allen, A. E., Kikutani, S., Endo, Y., Bowler, C., and Matsuda, Y. (2011). Localization of putative carbonic anhydrases in two marine diatoms, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Photosynth. Res. 109, 205–221. doi:10.1007/s11120-011-9634-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsuji, Y., Kusi-Appiah, G., Kozai, N., Fukuda, Y., Yamano, T., and Fukuzawa, H. (2021). Characterization of a CO₂-concentrating mechanism with low sodium dependency in the centric diatom Chaetoceros gracilis. Mar. Biotechnol. 23, 456–462. doi:10.1007/s10126-021-10037-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsuji, Y., Mahardika, A., and Matsuda, Y. (2017a). Evolutionarily distinct strategies for the acquisition of inorganic carbon from seawater in marine diatoms. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3949–3958. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsuji, Y., Nakajima, K., and Matsuda, Y. (2017b). Molecular aspects of the biophysical CO₂-concentrating mechanism and its regulation in marine diatoms. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3763–3772. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Witt, H. T. (1979). Energy conversion in the functional membrane of photosynthesis. Analysis by light pulse and electric pulse methods. The central role of the electric field. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 505, 355–427. doi:10.1016/0304-4173(79)90008-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamano, T., Tsujikawa, T., Hatano, K., Ozawa, S.-i., Takahashi, Y., and Fukuzawa, H. (2010). Light and low-CO₂-dependent LCIB–LCIC complex localization in the chloroplast supports the carbon-concentrating mechanism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 1453–1468. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcq105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, J. N., Heureux, A. M. C., Sharwood, R. E., Rickaby, R. E. M., Morel, F. M. M., and Whitney, S. M. (2016). Large variation in the Rubisco kinetics of diatoms reveals diversity among their carbon-concentrating mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 3445–3456. doi:10.1093/jxb/erw163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar