Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1590371

Corrigendum: Development and validation a methodology model for traditional Chinese medicine good practice recommendation: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study

Provisionally accepted
Su Li Su Li 1,2,3Zhang Luan Zhang Luan 4yang Yang Wang yang Yang Wang 1,3sheng Run Xie sheng Run Xie 1,3jia Wen Chen jia Wen Chen 1,3Myeong Soo Lee Myeong Soo Lee 5Yasser Sami Amer Yasser Sami Amer 6,7,8Amin Sharifan Amin Sharifan 9Heba Hussein Heba Hussein 10Hui Li Hui Li 1,11,3*
  • 1 The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 2 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 3 Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 4 The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 5 KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 6 Department of Pediatrics, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 7 Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, Family and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Ribeirão Preto, Saudi Arabia
  • 8 Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
  • 9 Department for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria
  • 10 Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
  • 11 State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Research Group of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Corrigendum on: Li S, Zhang L, Wang Y, Xie R, Chen W, Lee MS, Amer YS, Sharifan A, Hussein H and Li H (2025) Development and validation a methodology model for traditional Chinese medicine good practice recommendation: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1501634. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1501634 In the published article, there was an error in affiliations 1, 2, and 10. Instead of " 1 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China," " 2 The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China" and " 10 Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Giza,

    Keywords: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), guidelines, Good Practice Recommendation (GPR), Methodology model, mixed method

    Received: 09 Mar 2025; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Li, Luan, Wang, Xie, Chen, Lee, Amer, Sharifan, Hussein and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hui Li, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510170, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more