ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1590167
This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Therapeutic Strategies: A Focus on Pharmacovigilance in New Wave Antidepressants and AntipsychoticsView all 6 articles
Evaluation of drug interactions in outpatients taking antipsychotic medications
Provisionally accepted- Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of antipsychotic medications are clinically significant as they can result in toxicity or treatment failure.This study aims to assess the potential drug-drug and drug-tobacco interactions associated with antipsychotic medications in an outpatient setting. Predictors of antipsychotic DDIs and the impact of potential DDIs on patients' clinical outcomes were also evaluated in this study.A cross-sectional study was conducted on outpatients in King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between October 25, 2020, and November 26, 2020, who received antipsychotic medications. Data were collected using medical record review. Potential DDIs were assessed using electronic Lexicomp®. The identified potential DDIs were categorized based on risk rating, severity, and reliability rating. Potential adverse effects from interactions were classified by mechanism into pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic.The study included 220 patients who received 804 drug combinations (i.e., ≥2 drugs concomitantly administered) between antipsychotics and other concomitant drugs.The rate of potential DDIs was 71% (n=574/804).Of the DDIs identified, 92% and 7% were rated C (require monitor therapy) and D (require modify regimen), respectively. In terms of severity level, the majority (n=552, 96%) of interactions were considered moderate and only 9 interactions were categorized as major. The level of scientific evidence was classified as fair in 64% and as good in 36% of interactions.The most frequent potential adverse effects were increased sedation (36%), hyperglycemia (15%) and decreased blood pressure (14%). Receiving polypharmacy (i.e., ≥5 drugs concomitantly administered) was significantly associated with an increased probability of drug interaction occurrence (OR=42, P=0.0026). Uncontrolled disease state was slightly higher in patients with potential DDIs compared to those with no DDIs (24% vs 22%, P=1).Likewise, adverse drug effects were significantly more common in patients with potential DDIs (89% vs 72%, P=0.014).The rate of potential drug-tobacco interactions was 6% of patients.Potential DDIs of antipsychotic drugs were frequent and were associated with increased adverse effects. It is crucial for the clinicians to be aware of DDIs, monitor patients closely, and make the appropriate interventions. This emphasizes the importance of enhancing the knowledge about DDIs and the use of reliable AI machines, such as clinical decision support systems, to prevent medication errors.
Keywords: Antipsychotics, Drug-Drug Interaction, drug-tobacco interactions, potential DDIs, psychiatric
Received: 08 Mar 2025; Accepted: 23 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alsfouk, Aljanadi and Almutairi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bshra A. Alsfouk, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.