
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Neuropharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1586098
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with epileptic encephalopathies of Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Method: We performed a computerized literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify eligible randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) until December 2024. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for efficacy of responder rate, and tolerability profiles in terms of serious adverse event (SAE) and dropout for adverse events as well as the most common side effects. Quality assessment of included RCTs was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: A total of 3 RCTs with 553 patients were included in the current study. Pooled RR for responder was 3.88 (95% CI 1.78-8.49, P=0.001) among patients with DS, and for patients with LGS was 1.56 (95% CI 0.91-2.68, P=0.11). Significantly more patients receiving soticlestat experienced discontinuation than placebo (RR 2.82 1.49-5.33, P=0.001) because of adverse events. No significant difference in SAE was observed between the two treatment groups with RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.39, P=0.57). Among the most common AE, only constipation occurred more often in the soticlestat group (RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.22-11.31, P=0.02). Conclusions: Soticlestat showed significantly higher efficacy in reducing convulsive seizures in patients with DS. Nonetheless, for patients with LGS, the difference between soticlestat and placebo was not statistically significant. The incidence of SAE in patients receiving soticlestat was similar to those receiving placebo; however, substantially more patients allocated to soticlestat discontinued prematurely because of side effects.
Keywords: soticlestat, Meta-analysis, DRAVET syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, randomized controlled trial
Received: 02 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lanlan, Nana and Chengzhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wang Chengzhong, The Affiliated Maternity & Child Health Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yancheng, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.