
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1585862
This article is part of the Research Topic Genomic Discoveries and Pharmaceutical Development in Urologic Tumors - Volume II View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The introduction of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKIs) such as axitinib, lenvatinib, sorafenib, and sunitinib has greatly broadened the available treatment options for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). The study aims to compare the nature of the adverse reactions associated with these four MTKIs to identify which medication poses the least risk for personalized patient management, thus enabling more accurate clinical drug oversight.Methods: Employing a retrospective descriptive analysis methodology, this research concentrated on four commercially available MTKIs. reports pertaining to these medications were sourced from the WHO-VigiAccess database. The data gathering process involved collecting comprehensive information on various parameters, such as age demographics, gender, and the geographical distribution of patients associated with the ADR reports. Furthermore, the study explored disease systems and symptoms that were documented alongside the adverse reactions, as outlined in the annual ADR reports produced by the WHO. To assess the relationship between these four MTKIs and the linked AEs, both the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) and the Reported Odds Ratio (ROR) were utilized.Results: At the time of the search, a total of 123,818 AEs associated with the four MTKIs had been documented in the VigiAccess database. The common ADRs for these four MTKIs include diarrhoea, fatigue, death, hypertension, nausea, asthenia, weight decreased, and vomiting. Gastrointestinal disorders and general disorders and administration site conditions emerged as the SOCs with the highest number of adverse signals, both ranking first in terms of frequency. The elevated ROR (1.08) and PRR (1.06) values associated with gastrointestinal disorders in patients treated with sorafenib suggest a higher incidence of such adverse events compared to those observed with axitinib, lenvatinib, and sunitinib.Recent comparative observational research suggests that the ADR reports submitted to the WHO and the FDA for these medications highlight both common and specific ADRs. It is essential for clinical practitioners to develop personalized treatment strategies that consider the adverse effects linked to different medications, alongside the unique circumstances of their patients, thus encouraging the responsible use of these MTKIs.
Keywords: MTKIs, Renal cell carcinoma, adverse drug reactions, WHO-Vigiaccess, ROR
Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Bai, Wen and Zeng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lijun Li, Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, China
Xuefan Zeng, Chongqing Medical University, No.21, Mid University Town Road, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.