data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1583986
This article is part of the Research Topic Metabolic reprogramming in cancer View all 13 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In their review article Chen et al. summarized the main features of metabolic reprogramming in tumors, addressing different aspects including increased glycolytic metabolism, lipid synthesis, alteration in amino acids production, and the relationship between altered metabolism and immune response. Then, they focused the paper on the roles played by metabolic adaptation mechanisms in the prognosis and progression of kidney cancer, discussing recent advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of renal cancer targeting metabolic vulnerabilities. The role of metabolic reprogramming was also emphasized in the systematic review by Li et al. analyzing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a cancer with high morbidity and mortality. The authors selected from 2011 to 2023 a total of 575 publications on this field to identify the hotspots and frontiers of metabolic reprogramming research in HCC and to provide future directions for novel scientific research and decision-making in HCC therapeutic strategies. In the context of metabolic rewiring serine hydroxymethyltransferases (SHMTs) and methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases (MTHFDs) are recognized as important one-carbon metabolic enzymes for regulating tumor initiation and development, representing potential therapeutic targets for anti-tumor strategies, as illustrated in Zhang et al. MTHFD1/2 have been identified as oncogenic enzymes upregulated in various tumors, involved in metastasis formation and chemoresistance. Cytoplasmic SHMT1 and mitochondrial SHMT2 provide one-carbon units for nucleotide biosynthesis, regulating DNA methylation and NADPH generation, altered during cancer development. Wang et al. discuss how esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells adapt to a hypoxic, nutrient-deprived microenvironment by rewiring glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. This metabolic shift ensures survival and proliferation despite adverse conditions, highlighting new avenues for therapeutic intervention. The study identifies metabolic vulnerabilities in ESCC, suggesting that disrupting these adaptive pathways could improve treatment efficacy. Xie et al. further explore how hypoxia-related genes influence prognosis and immunotherapeutic outcomes in ESCC. They establish an HPRscore based on hypoxia phenotype-related genes, demonstrating its predictive power for patient survival and response to treatment. Notably, the study identifies PKP1 as a potential therapeutic target, showing that its knockdown reduces tumor proliferation and migration. These findings provide valuable insight into how hypoxia-driven metabolic changes affect tumor behavior and immune evasion. Peppicelli et al. focused their research on melanoma cells resistant to anoikis, to investigate the metabolic reprogramming within circulating tumor cells (CTCs), with the aim of identifying new metabolic targets of CTCs. They discovered that anoikis-resistant melanoma cells in suspension show a metabolic rewiring from a characteristic glycolytic pathway toward a more oxidative metabolism based on the use of glutamine and fatty acids, while re-adhesion of CTCs on the dishes reversed the metabolism to glycolysis. The inhibition of the metabolic switch of CTCs led to a reduction of cell viability and colony formation ability of cells capable of surviving in suspension, offering novel and future strategies of treatment of CTCs and melanoma metastases. Similar metabolic adaptations are evident in colorectal cancer (CRC), where immune evasion is closely tied to metabolic shifts in the tumor microenvironment. Nicolini et al. examine how CRC cells undergo metabolic reprogramming-from enhanced glycolysis to increased lipid synthesis-to create an immunosuppressive microenvironment. They discuss how lactate acidification, driven by the Warburg effect, impairs anti-tumor immune cells and promotes tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs). The study also explores the role of genetic mutations (e.g., RAS, EGFR) and microbiota in shaping CRC metabolism, emphasizing the potential for metabolic-targeted therapies in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Gao et al. provide a broader perspective on metabolic reprogramming as a key tool for predictive and precision medicine. They highlight how different cancer types rely on distinct metabolic adaptations, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches. The study underscores the growing importance of metabolic profiling in developing personalized treatments, optimizing immune responses, and overcoming drug resistance. Ferroptosis, a non-apoptotic form of cell death driven by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, plays a paradoxical role in cancer. Complex metabolic changes within tumor cells and in the tumor microenvironment further influence the response of tumor cells to ferroptosis. As explored by Zhao et al. ferroptosis can both suppress and promote tumor growth depending on cellular context and regulatory mechanisms. The study highlights potential therapeutic strategies for enhancing ferroptosis sensitivity in cancer cells while also addressing resistance mechanisms. Understanding ferroptosis is critical for optimizing cancer treatments, particularly in combination with immunotherapies and metabolic interventions. Of note, one driver of ferroptosis is lipid metabolism, which also plays a vital role in cancer stem cell (CSC) maintenance. Du et al. examine how CSCs manipulate lipid metabolism to sustain their stemness, resist therapy, and adapt to environmental stress. They describe how CSCs increase fatty acid content for energy, engage in β-oxidation to optimize utilization, and enhance cholesterol synthesis through the mevalonate pathway. Additionally, lipid droplets serve as alternative energy reservoirs, protecting CSCs from oxidative stress. This study underscores the need to target lipid metabolism to weaken CSC resilience and improve treatment outcomes. Lastly, Ping et al. in their original article using a retrospective analysis described the predictive value of altered plasma omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs) levels for early treatment response, progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that pretreatment plasma omega-3 PUFAs level, may be a promising biomarker for predicting recent response in CSCC, increasing the prognostic significance of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC)-Ag level alone, opening to create new prognostic tools for clinicians in CSCC.Together, these studies reveal how metabolic reprogramming drives tumor growth and progression, contributes to metastasis formation and chemoresistance, and is interconnected with ferroptosis and lipid metabolism. Targeting these metabolic vulnerabilities holds great promise for improving cancer treatment, particularly in combination with immunotherapy and precision medicine strategies.
Keywords: metabolic reprogramming, Cancer, Tumor Microenvironment, Metabolic pathways, Metabolites, tumorigenesis, metabolic plasticity
Received: 26 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Audrito and Giovannetti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Valentina Audrito, Department of Science and Technological Innovation, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy
Elisa Giovannetti, Cancer Pharmacology Lab, Fondazione Pisana Per La Scienza,, Pisa, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.