Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1563566

Correlation between UGT1A1 polymorphism and efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in Chinese cancer patients

Provisionally accepted
Shuai Geng Shuai Geng 1Yulong Shen Yulong Shen 1Chen Zhang Chen Zhang 1Nan Wang Nan Wang 2Xinyue Gao Xinyue Gao 2Xinyu Luo Xinyu Luo 2Shuai Jiang Shuai Jiang 2*Ning Shi Ning Shi 1*
  • 1 The Ninth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2 Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective To assess the association between UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms and Irinotecan (IRI) efficacy/toxicity in Chinese cancer patients. Method We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. Two investigators independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and meta-analysis using Revman 5.4. Results This study included 19 clinical trials or case-control studies, with a total of 1698 patients. Meta-analysis showed that, ① There was no correlation between UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28 gene polymorphism and IRI efficacy; ② UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28 gene polymorphisms are associated with grade 3-4 diarrhea, grade 3-4 neutropenia, and grade 3-4 leukopenia, and the above-mentioned toxic reactions are more common in wild types (GG and TA6/6). ③ There was no correlation between UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 mutations and the efficacy of IRI; ④ The double wild type was more prone to grade 0-2 neutropenia, the single-site variant was more prone to grade 0-2 diarrhea, and the double-site variant was more prone to grade 3-4 neutropenia, but none of them were related to leukopenia.Conclusions UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms predict IRI-induced toxicity severity but not therapeutic efficacy in Chinese patients. These variants may serve as predictive biomarkers for personalized IRI chemotherapy.

    Keywords: gene polymorphism, UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, irinotecan, efficacy, Toxicity, Systematic review

    Received: 21 Jan 2025; Accepted: 26 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Geng, Shen, Zhang, Wang, Gao, Luo, Jiang and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Shuai Jiang, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
    Ning Shi, The Ninth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more