
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Infectious Diseases
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1545108
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background/aim: Tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) has demonstrated significant antiviral activity and safety in individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in randomized clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety disparities between TMF and Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in treating elderly patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis in real-world settings.A retrospective cohort analysis of elderly patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis who were treated with TMF or TAF in our hospital's outpatient department between January 2022 and December 2023 was the focus of this study.Following a 24-week treatment period, this study evaluated the disparities between the TMF and TAF groups in terms of primary efficacy endpoints (virologic response rate, VR rate), secondary efficacy endpoints (normalization rate of ALT, HBsAg and HBeAg clearance rate, HBsAg and HBeAg seroconversion rates), as well as safety endpoints related to renal function and blood lipids.The study included 171 patients (93 in the experimental group and 78 in the control group). Following a 24-week treatment period, HBV DNA, HBsAg, ALT, AST, and TBIL had significantly decreased compared to the baseline level, and the differences were statistically difference. Cr, eGFR, TC, and TG had no significant changes compared with the baseline level, and the differences were no statistical difference. The VR rate in the experimental group was 70.97% (33/93), and that in the control group was 73.08% (57/78), with no statistical difference observed between the two groups (P=0.760). ALT normalization rate was 83.33% in the experimental group and that was 100% in the control group, and there was not a statistically significant distinction between the two groups (P=0.229). Compared with baseline data, Cr and eGFR of the experimental group increased (2.97±14.66μmol/L, P=0.867; 0.29±6.76ml/min/1.72m 2 , P=0.680), TC and TG decreased (-0.5±1.30mmol/L, P=0.589; -0.006±0.23 mmol/L, P=0.986), however, no statistical difference was observed. Compared with the control group, the change of safety dates was also no statistical difference.TMF treatment in elderly patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis had a good antiviral effect, no adverse drug reaction on renal function and blood lipids, and high safety. TMF is not inferior to TAF in antiviral efficacy and safety.
Keywords: tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF), Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), elderly patients, decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis, virologic response (VR)
Received: 14 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Qiu, Yin, Zhang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wei Liu, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, Shaanxi Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.