![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Inflammation Pharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1539756
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory condition resulting in severe, often treatment-refractory inflammation. Currently, there are no established treatment guidelines for VEXAS syndrome. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) in a cohort of VEXAS patients. Methods: Data from VEXAS patients were obtained from the International AIDA Network VEXAS registry. Results: Data from 36 VEXAS patients were evaluated, with 28 (77.8%) treated with cDMARDs as monotherapy - and concomitant glucocorticoids (GC) - and 8 (22.2%) receiving a combination of different cDMARDs plus GC. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and failure to cDMARDs monotherapy were reported in 4/22 (18.2%), 11/22 (50%), and 7/22 (31.8%) courses, respectively. All patients were treated with GCs at the start of cDMARD monotherapy, and no GC discontinuation was observed later. No significant differences were observed in the GC dosage from the start of cDMARDs to the 3-month (p=0.43), 6-month (p=0.31), and 12-month (p=0.21) visits. Conversely, the GC sparing resulted to be statistically significant when using methotrexate (p=0.02). As for cDMARDs combinations, no cases achieved CR, while PR was observed in 5/9 (55.6%). Seventeen adverse events were reported, seven of which led to discontinuation. Conclusions: many VEXAS patients report a partial benefit from cDMARDs, while a smaller yet not negligible number of patients exhibit a CR; cDMARDs remain a viable option for this disorder, especially when the initial GC dosage is low and the need for a steroid-sparing effect is not immediately urgent.
Keywords: cDMARDs, clinical outcomes, Autoinflammatory diseases, diagnosis, Treatment
Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vitale, Leone, Caggiano, Hinojosa-Azaola, Martin-Nares, Guaracha-Basañez, Torres-Ruiz, Ayumi Kawakami- Campos, Hissaria, Callisto, Beecher, Dagna, Tomelleri, Campochiaro, Frassi, Crisafulli, Franceschini, Hernández-Rodríguez, Gomez-Caverzaschi, Araújo, Sfriso, Bindoli, Baggio, Sbalchiero, Sota, Tufan, Vasi, Piga, Cauli, D'Agostino, De Paulis, Mormile, Giardini, Alves Cordeiro, Gavioli, Lopalco, Iannone, Montecucco, Monti, Ruiz-Irastorza, Soto Peleteiro, Triggianese, Gurnari, Viapiana, Bixio, Vitetta, Conticini, La Torre, Ragab, Batu, González-García, Peña Rodríguez, Bocchia, Wiesik-Szewczyk, Jahnz-Różyk, de-la-Torre, Balistreri, Frediani, Fabiani and Cantarini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Luca Cantarini, University of Siena, Siena, 53100, Tuscany, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.