SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1539246
Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy or antiangiogenic agents-based treatment strategies versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China., Jinan, Shandong, China
- 2Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China., Qingdao, Shandong, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide-platinum are recommended as the standard first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Despite the potential of antiangiogenic agents to enhance treatment efficacy, the optimal combination pattern remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to explore the existing treatment strategies involving ICIs or antiangiogenic agents in ES-SCLC.Methods: Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated by the ‘R’ software. The outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥3 AEs) were analyzed. The included trials were classified into groups in terms of different treatment strategies, including ICI + Chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo), ICI + ICI + Chemotherapy (ICI + ICI + Chemo), ICI + Antiangiogenic agent + Chemotherapy (ICI + Antiangio + Chemo), Antiangiogenic agent + Chemotherapy (Antiangio + Chemo) and Chemotherapy (Chemo).Results: Totally 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 6822 patients were included. The drug combination patterns included ipilimumab, durvalumab, adebrelimab, atezolizumab, socazolimab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, durvalumab + tremelimumab, tiragolumab + atezolizumab, benmelstobart + anlotinib, bevacizumab + atezolizumab, anlotinib, bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. The antiangiogenic agent containing regimen benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy demonstrated the highest potential to achieve superior PFS and OS versus chemotherapy. The group meta-analysis also showed that ICI + Chemo, ICI + ICI + Chemo and ICI + Antiangio + Chemo presented significantly better OS. Additionally, ICI + Antiangio + Chemo achieved better PFS with the lowest HR of 0.37 and the best ORR of 2.08 versus chemotherapy. Patients treated with benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy, durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy and anlotinib + chemotherapy suffered higher likelihood of grade ≥3 AEs without unexpected AEs.Conclusion: For individuals with ES-SCLC, ICI + Antiangio + Chemo was identified as optimal treatment options on account of better OS, PFS and ORR. Benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy demonstrated best survival benefit compared to chemotherapy. The toxicity of ICI + Antiangio + Chemo was acceptable but needed careful attention. These findings clarified the roles of ICIs and antiangiogenic agents-based treatment strategies in this population.
Keywords: Small Cell Lung Cancer, Immunotherapy, antiangiogenesis, Network meta-analysis, chemotherapy
Received: 04 Dec 2024; Accepted: 25 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, yang, zhao, Zhang, Xuan and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jisheng Li, Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China., Jinan, Shandong, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.