Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Neuropharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1529932

Levodopa-induced motor complications associated with benserazide and carbidopa in Parkinson's disease: A disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Yixing Second People’s Hospital, Yixing, China
  • 2 Nanjing Normal University of Special Education, Nanjing, Liaoning Province, China
  • 3 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Levodopa-induced motor complications are a significant concern in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Dopamine decarboxylase inhibitors (DCIs) such as benserazide (BSZ) and carbidopa (CD) are commonly used in conjunction with levodopa to manage PD symptoms. However, their association with motor complications remains unclear.Methods: We performed a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data from Q1 2004 to Q2 2024. The study included only adverse event reports (AERs) related to oral administration of drugs indicated for PD. We concentrated on motor complications, selecting two system organ classes (SOCs) associated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia: nervous system disorders and general disorders/administration site conditions. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian methods were utilized to identify and assess motor complication signals associated with BSZ and CD. A signal was deemed significant if it met the following criteria: reporting odds ratio (ROR) ≥ 3 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound > 1, information component (IC) 95% CI lower bound > 0, and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) 95% CI lower bound > 2.Results: The analysis identified 8,744 AERs related to motor complications, recording 19,482 adverse events (AEs). The study highlighted motor complications such as dyskinesia, the on-off phenomenon, freezing episodes, and wearing-off, linked to the oral use of both BSZ and CD. Dyskinesia showed high RORs for both BSZ (16.5,). The on-off phenomenon demonstrated a more pronounced ROR for compared to CD at ). Wearing-off was notably higher for CD, with an ROR of 7.66 (95% CI 7.08-8.28), compared to BSZ's ROR of 3.03 (95% CI 2.37-3.88).The findings indicate that the choice of DCI affects the risk profile of motor complications in PD. BSZ is associated with increased risks of dyskinesia and the on-off phenomenon, whereas CD is linked to a higher risk of wearing-off. Future research should explore the mechanisms underlying these differences to guide the selection of the most appropriate DCI for individual patients.

    Keywords: Parkinson's disease, motor complications, Levodopa, Benserazide, Carbidopa

    Received: 18 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Qiu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Zhixiang Wang, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more