The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1522124
This article is part of the Research Topic Enzyme Inhibition as a Tool in Natural Products Research and Ethnopharmacology: Challenges, Advances and Recent Outcomes View all 3 articles
Inhibition of Carbohydrate Digestive Enzymes by a Complementary Essential Oil Blend: In Silico and Mixture Design Approaches
Provisionally accepted- 1 Euromed University, Fez, Fes-Meknes, Morocco
- 2 Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes, Morocco
- 3 Mohamed Premier University, Oujda, Morocco
- 4 Université Ibn Zohr, Agadir, Souss-Massa, Morocco
- 5 King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 6 UniLaSalle, Beauvais, Hauts-de-France, France
- 7 University of Pécs, Pécs, Baranya, Hungary
- 8 Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The increasing demand for natural alternatives in diabetes treatment has focused attention on plant-derived metabolites, particularly essential oils (EOs) with bioactive properties. This study aims to optimize an EO mixture to inhibit two key enzymes involved in glucose digestion: pancreatic α-amylase and intestinal α-glucosidase. The EOs tested were extracted from three Moroccan medicinal plants: false yellowhead (Inula viscosa L.), rose geranium (Pelargonium graveolens L'Hér.), and lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf.). The Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis identified 32 metabolites in P. graveolens, with citronellol (18.67 %), eucalyptol (13.30 %), and 2-octen-1-ol (8.12 %) as the major metabolites . In I. viscosa, 18 metabolites were found, dominated by 2-camphanol acetate (51.12 %) and camphol (19.32 %). C. citratus, contained 23 metabolites, with α-citral (24.70 %) and 2-isopropenyl-5-methylhex-4-enal (29.25 %) being the key metabolites. Using a statistical mixture design, different EO ratios were evaluated for their inhibitory effects on these enzymes, which play crucial roles in glucose absorption and postprandial glucose regulation. A complementary action was observed in specific EO combinations, significantly enhancing enzyme inhibition compared to individual oils. The optimal formulation for α-glucosidase inhibition was a binary mixture of 73 % C. citratus and 27 % P. graveolens. In comparison, the best blend for α-amylase inhibition consisted of 56 % P. graveolens and 44 % I. viscosa. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations supported these findings by elucidating the electronic properties of the key volatile metabolites and confirming their electrophilic nature and interaction potential with the enzymes. Molecular docking simulations further provided preliminary theoretical insights, suggesting that these phytochemicals may exhibit more substantial inhibitory effects than acarbose, a widely used antidiabetic drug. These findings suggest that optimized EO formulations hold significant potential as natural alternatives for managing hyperglycemia and developing novel therapies for diabetes.
Keywords: DFT, diabetes management, molecular docking, Volatile substances, pancreatic-αamylase, intestinal-α-glucosidase
Received: 03 Nov 2024; Accepted: 06 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Loukili, Fadil, Elrherabi, Er-Rajy, Taibi, Azzaoui, Salghi, Sabbahi, Alanazi, Rhazi, Széchenyi, Siaj and Hammouti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
El Hassania Loukili, Euromed University, Fez, Fes-Meknes, Morocco
Rachid Sabbahi, Université Ibn Zohr, Agadir, 80000, Souss-Massa, Morocco
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.