data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Neuropharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1522058
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Alzheimer's disease poses a major public health challenge, with aducanumab's approval in 2021 as the first disease-modifying therapy raising important safety considerations. This study analyzed the Food Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to evaluate aducanumab's real-world safety profile and identify potential risk factors. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database from January 2004 to June 2024, analyzing 510 aducanumab-associated reports from integrated databases containing over 18 million demographic records and 66 million drug records. Safety signals were evaluated using four complementary disproportionality methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Analyses were stratified by age and sex, with adverse events examined at both System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) levels using SAS 9.4. Results: Among 510 aducanumab-associated adverse event reports, predominantly from elderly patients (55.49% aged ≥65 years), nervous system disorders were the most frequent (53.24%, n=583). Amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion (ARIA-E) and Amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H) emerged as the most significant safety signals (ROR: 53,538.3 and 38,187.9, respectively). Sex-stratified analysis showed comparable safety profiles between males and females, with ARIA-E related events, ARIA-H related events, maintaining strong signals across all age groups, particularly in patients ≥75 years. The median time to adverse event onset was 146.0 days (IQR: 80.0-195.0). Temporal analysis revealed increasing signal strength for ARIA-related events from 2004-2024, with notable intensification during 2022-2023. Conclusions: Our real-world analysis identified ARIA-related events as the primary safety concern for aducanumab, typically occurring within 146 days of treatment initiation, with comparable safety profiles across sex but heightened risks in patients ≥75 years. These findings support aducanumab's viability as a therapeutic option while emphasizing the critical importance of rigorous monitoring protocols, particularly for ARIA events during the first year of treatment.
Keywords: Food Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), aducanumab, monoclonal antibody selectively target, Real-world study, adverse events
Received: 03 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Long and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chunyong Chen, Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.