The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1512815
This article is part of the Research Topic The Potential Relationship between Animal Gut Microbiota and Liver Disease View all articles
The association between the gut microbiome and antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury
Provisionally accepted- 1 College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
- 2 Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Background: This study aimed to explore the distinct characteristics of the gut microbiota in tuberculosis (TB) patients who experienced liver injury following anti-TB treatment compared with those who did not.We employed a nested case-control study design, recruiting newly diagnosed pulmonary TB patients at Tangshan Infectious Disease Hospital. Participants were categorized into the Antituberculosis Drug-Induced Liver Injury (ADLI) group and the Non-ADLI group based on the occurrence of liver injury after treatment. Both groups received identical anti-TB regimens. Stool samples were collected from patients who developed liver injury within 2 to 3 weeks of starting treatment, alongside matched controls during the same timeframe. The samples underwent 16S rDNA sequencing, and clinical data and blood samples were also collected for further analysis. At the same time, we constructed mouse models to explore the effects of different antituberculosis drugs on gut microbiota.Results: Following anti-TB treatment, we observed a decrease in microbial diversity and significant structural changes in the gut microbiota of TB patients (P < 0.05). At T1, the Non_ADLI_T1 group presented relatively high levels of Phascolarctobacterium, Anaerofustis and Mailhella. In contrast, the ADLI_T1 group presented elevated levels of Bacteroides, Veillonella, Clavibacter, Corynebacterium, Anaerococcus, Gardnerella, Peptostreptococcus and Lautropia. At T2, the ADLI_T2 group presented increased levels of Enterococcus, Faecalibacterium, unclassified_f__Burkholderiaceae, Cardiobacterium, Ruminococcus_gnavus_group and Tyzzerella_4 than did the Non_ADLI_T2 group. Additionally, the ADLI_T2 group presented decreased levels of Prevotella_9, Akkermansia, Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-003, Rubrobacter and norank_f__Desulfovibrionaceae than did the Non_ADLI_T2 group. In animal experiments, similar changes to those in the human population were observed in the mouse model compared to the control group. Any single anti-tuberculosis drug or two-drug combination or three-drug combination can cause dysbiosis of the mouse gut microbiota. The signature genera between groups are different and related to the type of anti-tuberculosis drug.Anti-tuberculosis treatment induces dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of TB patients. Notably, there are significant differences in microbiota characteristics between TB patients with and without liver injury at both onset and during treatment. There are some differences in the characteristics of bacterial flora in liver injury caused by different drugs.
Keywords: pulmonary tuberculosis, Anti-TB therapy, Microbiome dysbiosis, Probiotics, Drug- induced liver injury
Received: 07 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pei, Yang, Gao, Liu, Lu, Dai, Meng, Feng and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Shengfei Pei, College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
Li Yang, Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Huixia Gao, Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Yuzhen Liu, Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Jianhua Lu, Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Chunyan Meng, College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
Fumin Feng, College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
Yuling Wang, Hebei Key Laboratory of Immune Mechanism of Major Infectious Diseases and New Technology of Diagnosis and Treatment,The Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang., Shi Jia Zhuang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.