![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1510968
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
BackgroundOsteoporosis and diabetes mellitus (DM) are both prevalent chronic conditions associated with significant morbidity, particularly in aging populations. Patients with DM are at increased risk of developing osteoporosis due to complex pathophysiological interactions between glucose metabolism and bone health. Although pharmacological interventions have been used to prevent and manage osteoporosis in individuals with DM, variability in reported outcomes across studies hinders evidence synthesis and meta-analyses. A standardized Core Outcome Set (COS) is required to harmonize outcome reporting in clinical trials, improving comparability and clinical relevance. This paper outlines the protocol for developing a COS for pharmacological interventions targeting osteoporosis among patients with DM.MethodsThe development of the COS will follow a five-phase approach. Phase 1 involves a systematic review to identify key outcomes in clinical trials of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in diabetic populations. Phase 2 consists of a modified Delphi process involving international experts in endocrinology, bone metabolism, and diabetes care, as well as patients and public representatives. This will be followed by Phase 3, where consensus meetings will be held to finalize the essential outcomes for inclusion. Phase 4 will focus on identifying appropriate outcome measurement tools based on a systematic review and additional consensus-building meetings. Finally, Phase 5 will involve dissemination and implementation activities to ensure broad adoption of the COS in future research and clinical trials. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) will be integrated throughout all phases of the project to ensure the relevance of selected outcomes.ConclusionsThe resulting COS will provide a standardized framework for reporting outcomes in pharmacological intervention studies of osteoporosis in patients with DM. By facilitating meta-analyses and data pooling, this COS will improve the comparability of clinical trials, enhance research efficiency, and reduce outcome reporting bias. Ultimately, the COS will support better clinical decision-making, fostering the development of targeted and effective therapies for osteoporosis in the context of diabetes.
Keywords: Core outcome set, Osteoporosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Pharmacological interventions, Delphi Technique, Meta-analysis
Received: 14 Oct 2024; Accepted: 12 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Wang, Mei and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Zubing Mei, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
Jing Li, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.