ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1491810

Optimization and Impact of an Evidence-Based Pre-Audit Prescription Decision System in Primary Healthcare Settings

Provisionally accepted
Xiao-Hui  YueXiao-Hui Yue1Lei  YangLei Yang1Jing-Jing  ZhongJing-Jing Zhong1Hong-Mei  LiuHong-Mei Liu2Dan  WangDan Wang3Xue  TaoXue Tao2Gao-Feng  ZhengGao-Feng Zheng1*
  • 1The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Chengdu, China
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, chengdu, China
  • 3Department of Infection, Ziyang Central Hospital, ziyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective Analyze the operation mode of the prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system in a county-level hospital, evaluate its intervention effects on outpatient and emergency operations, thus providing references for similar hospitals to carry out preaudit intelligent decision system and promote rational drug use. Methods Utilizing evidence-based approaches, system rule modifications have been refined and synergized with AI-driven decision-making analytics to examine the operational framework of pre-audit prescription decision system. Additionally, retrospectively analyze the types and levels of problems triggered by outpatient and emergency prescriptions from October 2022 to August 2023, as well as the rationality of prescriptions in the system. Results According to the clinical operation of the hospital, problems triggered by unreasonable prescriptions have been finely classified into different levels according to the severity of prescription problems. From October 2022 to August 2023, the number of prescriptions triggering issues such as indications, dosage, special populations, compatibility, administration, and contraindications showed a decreasing trend compared with October 2022 before the intervention. For example, the number of prescriptions with unreasonable routes of administration decreased from 1,745 to 20, and the number of contraindicated prescriptions decreased from 1,399 to 16. The prescriptions triggering Level 5 alerts decreased from 5.609% to 1.793% and the prescription compliance rate increased from 92.20% to 95.98%.The prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system enhances patient safety and promotes rational drug use. However, the system requires fine-tuning and continuous improvement of the system rule library to effectively validate prescriptions and improve prescription accuracy. In the future, integrating big data, artificial intelligence and other technologies for secondary system development will be a model worthy of consideration. In addition, promoting this system to medical federation to establish a regional prescription review model will further promote the high-quality development of pharmaceutical services.

Keywords: Medication Errors, pre-prescription review, Prescription Pre-audit Intelligent Decision System, Evidence-Based Practice, Rational drug use

Received: 05 Sep 2024; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yue, Yang, Zhong, Liu, Wang, Tao and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Gao-Feng Zheng, The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more