ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1483669

This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacoepidemiology in Chronic DiseasesView all 10 articles

Post-marketing safety of anakinra and canakinumab: A real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system

Provisionally accepted
Hao  LiuHao Liu1Wei  YanWei Yan2Jinsong  LiJinsong Li2Dezhi  YanDezhi Yan1Di  LuoDi Luo2*
  • 1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 2Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Anakinra and canakinumab are two FDA-approved IL-1 blockers indicated for the treatment of multiple autoinflammatory diseases, yet their safety has not been comprehensively analyzed. We aimed to assess the safety signals associated with anakinra and canakinumab by conducting a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.Methods: Adverse reaction data spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 was downloaded from the FAERS database. A disproportionality analysis utilizing various methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM), was conducted.Results: Anakinra and canakinumab were identified as the primary suspect drugs for adverse events (AEs) in 7,544 and 8,044 reports, respectively. The most commonly reported SOCs for both drugs were general disorders and administration site conditions. Subgroup analyses indicated that the most commonly reported SOC signals among health professionals and non-health professionals remained consistent across both medications. At the preferred term (PT) level, consistent with the drug labeling, the common AEs for anakinra and canakinumab included injection site reactions (ISRs) and infections. Further analysis revealed a higher frequency of ISRs with anakinra, including injection site pain and erythema. In contrast, canakinumab was associated with more gastrointestinal disorders (abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, and inflammatory bowel disease) and respiratory disorders (cough, oropharyngeal pain, and rhinorrhea); these conditions predominantly occurred among minors. Notably, no significant safety signals related to tuberculosis infection or reactivation were observed, and the frequency of AEs related to hepatic injury and malignancy was low.Conclusion: This study confirms the favorable safety profiles of anakinra and canakinumab, offering critical insights into rational drug usage and safety regulations.

Keywords: anakinra, Canakinumab, IL-1, Autoinflammatory diseases, FAERS database, Real-world data analysis, adverse events, Pharmacovigilance

Received: 27 Dec 2024; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Yan, Li, Yan and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Di Luo, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, Shandong Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.