data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1469986
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The kinetics of ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important optimization parameter in drug discovery. Traditional radioligand assays are laborintensive, preventing their application at the early stages of drug discovery. Fluorescence-based assays offer several advantages including a possibility to develop a homogeneous format, continuous data collection and higher throughput. This study sought to develop a fluorescence-based binding assay to investigate ligand binding kinetics at human cannabinoid type 1 and 2 receptors (CB1R and CB2R).We synthesized D77, a novel tracer derived from the non-selective cannabinoid Δ 8 -THC. Using TR-FRET (time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer), we developed an assay to study ligand binding kinetics at physiological temperatures. For CB1R, we truncated the first 90 amino acids of its flexible N-terminal domain to reduce the FRET distance between the terbium cryptate (donor) and the fluorescent ligand (acceptor). The full-length CB2R construct was functional without modification due to its shorter N-terminus. The Motulsky-Mahan competition binding model was used to analyze the binding kinetics of the endocannabinoids and several other non-fluorescent ligands.The D77 tracer showed nanomolar-range affinity for truncated CB1R (CB1R91-472) and full length CB2R (CB2R1-360), displaying competitive binding with orthosteric ligands. D77 exhibited rapid dissociation kinetics from both CB1R and CB2R, similar to the fastest dissociating reference compounds. This was critical for accurately determining the on-and off-rates of the fastest dissociating compounds. Using D77, we measured the kinetic binding properties of various CB1R and CB2R agonists and antagonists at physiological temperature and sodium ion concentration.The kon values for molecules binding to CB1R varied by three orders of magnitude, from the slowest (HU308) to the fastest (rimonabant). A strong correlation between kon and affinity was observed for compounds binding to CB1R, indicating that the association rate primarily determines their affinity for CB1R. Unlike CB1R, a stronger correlation was found between the dissociation rate constant koff and the affinity for CB2R, suggesting that both kon and koff dictate the overall affinity for CB2R. Exploring the kinetic parameters of cannabinoid drug candidates could help drug development programs targeting these receptors.
Keywords: TR-FRET based binding assay, fluorescent ligand, kinetic ligand binding assay, CB1, CB2, Cannabinoid (CB) receptors
Received: 24 Jul 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Borrega-Roman, Hoare, Kosar, Sarott, Patej, Bouma, Scott-Dennis, Koers, Gazzi, Mach, Barrondo, Salles, Guba, Kusznir, Nazare, Rufer, Grether, Heitman, Carreira, Sykes and Veprintsev. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dmitry B. Veprintsev, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.