Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacology of Infectious Diseases

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1469681

Effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for COVID-19 due to SARS-CoV-2: a systematic literature review

Provisionally accepted
Carolina García Vidal Carolina García Vidal 1Jonathan González Jonathan González 2Carlos Lumbreras Carlos Lumbreras 3Miguel Salavert Lleti Miguel Salavert Lleti 4Antonio Castro Antonio Castro 5Darío Rubio-Rodríguez Darío Rubio-Rodríguez 6Carlos Rubio-Terrés Carlos Rubio-Terrés 6*
  • 1 Hospital Clinic, Infectious Diseases-IDIBAPS Department, UB, C/ Villarroel, 170, 08036-Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona, Spain
  • 2 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, Pharmacy Department, Carretera Ofra S/N, 38320 La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, La Laguna, Spain
  • 3 Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre”, Internal Medicine Department, Avda. de Córdoba, s/n, 28041-Madrid, Spain., Madrid, Spain
  • 4 Hospital Universitario y Politécnico “La Fe”, Avda. F. Abril Martorel, 106, 46026-Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain
  • 5 Gilead Sciences, C/ Vía de los Poblados, 3, 28033-Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
  • 6 Health Value, Madrid, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Aim: Since the first cases of the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, described in 2019, numerous drugs have been proposed for the treatment of the disease. However, studies have given contradictory or inconclusive results, making it difficult to determine which treatments are truly effective. The objective was to carry out a systematic review of the literature analyzing the effectiveness (mortality, hospitalization and clinical improvement) of COVID-19 treatments initially proposed and finally authorized in the European Union.Methods: PubMed and other electronic databases were systematically searched for meta-analyses published between January 2020 and December 2022, as well as two additional searches: one of individual clinical studies published until October 2023 and another of those drugs that were considered at the beginning and that were discarded early because the clinical results were unfavorable.Results: In the synthesis, 85 meta-analyses and 19 additional clinical studies were included (base case). All medications indicated in the treatment of COVID-19 have favorable efficacy results (mortality, hospitalization rate, clinical improvement) but these results were not confirmed in all studies carried out, being frequently contradictory (confirming or not confirming the impact of treatment on mortality). According to meta-analysis with the largest sample size, the drugs with the greatest evidence of effectiveness in reducing mortality are remdesivir (HR= 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.85) and tocilizumab (OR= 0.73; 95% CI 0.56-0.93). Regarding the composite of Covid-19–related hospitalization or death from any cause, the drugs with the greatest evidence of efficacy are remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab (although, currently the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies against the new variants of the virus has not been demonstrated).Conclusion: According to this systematic review, the treatments with the greatest evidence of reducing mortality in patients with COVID-19 are remdesivir and tocilizumab.

    Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-Cov2 treatment, efficacy, anakinra, casirivimab/imdevimab, cilgavimab/tixagevimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, Regdanvimab

    Received: 24 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 García Vidal, González, Lumbreras, Salavert Lleti, Castro, Rubio-Rodríguez and Rubio-Terrés. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Carlos Rubio-Terrés, Health Value, Madrid, Spain

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more