SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1438318

Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide versus Liraglutide, Dulaglutide or Tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  • 2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 4Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran
  • 5Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran
  • 6Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 7Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: This study seeks to compare the effectiveness of Semaglutide compared to Liraglutide, Dulaglutide, or Tirzepatide. Additionally, it aims to investigate the implications of transitioning from Dulaglutide or Liraglutide to Semaglutide.We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished records) from their inception to 5 February 2025, including observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.1 and STATA 17.The meta-analysis comprised 16 studies and 5997 patients. Semaglutide significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels compared to Liraglutide (0.56; 95% CI: 0.19-0.94; p<0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between Semaglutide and Liraglutide in terms of fasting blood sugar (FBS), body mass index (BMI), and weight change. In comparison to Dulaglutide, Semaglutide displayed superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels (3.72; 95% CI: 0.02-7.41; p=0.05) and FBS (2.66; 95% CI: 0.26-5.07; p = 0.03). However, no significant differences were found in weight and BMI change. Tirzepatide exhibited a notable advantage over Semaglutide in reducing HbA1c levels (-0.45; 95% CI: -0.88--0.02; p=0.04).However, no clear superiority was observed for weight and FBS change. Transitions from Liraglutide to Semaglutide did not significantly impact HbA1c levels. However, weight loss (2.48; 95% CI: 0.45-4.51; p = 0.02) and reduced FBS levels (10.76; 95% CI: 0.55-20; p = 0.04) were observed. Transitioning from Dulaglutide to Semaglutide did not significantly affect HbA1c levels and weight change.While the precise source of heterogeneity remains elusive across most studies, analyses consistently demonstrate Semaglutide's superior efficacy compared to Liraglutide in reducing both HbA1c levels and weight. Moreover, it presents advantages over Dulaglutide, specifically in lowering FBS levels. However, Tirzepatide surpasses Semaglutide in its efficacy for reducing HbA1c levels.

Keywords: Semaglutide, liraglutide, Dulaglutide, tirzepatide, GLP-1, rct, weight, HbA1c

Received: 31 May 2024; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dadkhah, Karimi, Sheikhzadeh, Gholami Chahkand, Yaghoubi, Esmaeilpour Moallem, Deyhimi, Arab Bafrani and Shahrokhi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Parisa Alsadat Dadkhah, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, 81745, Isfahan, Iran

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more