
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1404389
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
AbstractObjective Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (camr-rivo) can significantly improve overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CARES-310 trial. However, whether the treatment is economical remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the cost-utility of camr-rivo versus sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable or advanced HCC patients from the Chinese healthcare system perspective and the United States (US) payers' perspective. Methods According to the CARES-310 trial, a partitioned survival model was constructed to estimate economic costs and health outcomes over a 10-year lifetime horizon. Drug costs were obtained from public database, Red Book and literature. Health utility values data were derived from literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was $36,627.25/QALY in China and $150,000.00/QALY in the US. Results The camr-rivo yielded additional 0.34 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared to sorafenib for unresectable or advanced HCC patients. The incremental costs in China and the US were $4,762.10 and $92,700.49, respectively, and the incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were $14,174.40/QALY and $272,852.59/QALY, respectively. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of rivoceranib and camrelizumab had the greatest impact on the ICUR in China and the US, respectively. Scenario analyses showed that the price reduced about 30% in camrelizumab and rivoceranib could make camr-rivo economical in the US. Conclusions At the set WTP, camr-rivo is a cost-utility treatment strategy compared with sorafenib as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC in China but not in the US.
Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, camrelizumab, rivoceranib, Sorafenib, Cost-utility analysis
Received: 21 Mar 2024; Accepted: 21 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, He, Nian, Dong, Huang, Huang, Lai and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Liangliang Dong, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.