Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1519522
This article is part of the Research Topic Clinical Pharmacist Service Promotes the Improvement of Medical Quality Volume II View all 33 articles

Association between penicillin allergy labels and serious adverse events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Shipeng Zhang Shipeng Zhang 1*Tianyi Dong Tianyi Dong 1Jiawen Xian Jiawen Xian 1Xinyue Xiao Xinyue Xiao 1Jiaqing Yuan Jiaqing Yuan 1Tong Zeng Tong Zeng 1Kuan Deng Kuan Deng 1Rui Fu Rui Fu 1Wang Hanyu Wang Hanyu 1Jiang Yanjie Jiang Yanjie 2Xueying Li Xueying Li 1
  • 1 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 2 Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: To date, several studies have demonstrated that erroneous labeling of Penicillin allergy (PAL) can significantly impact treatment options and result in adverse clinical outcomes, while other studies have reported no negative effects. Therefore, to systematically evaluate these effects and investigate the association between adverse clinical outcomes and the Penicillin label, we conducted this meta-analysis. Method: Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 13, 2024. The search strategy utilized terms ("antibiotic allergy label," "penicillin allergy label," and "allergy label") and ("death," "readmission," "adverse outcome," and "clinical adverse outcome"). In the study selection process, the PICOS framework and stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. The quality of the initially included studies was independently assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Data from the included studies, including relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), were extracted and analyzed using Stata 16.0. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the results. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and Cochrane Q tests, and publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test and funnel plot analysis. Results: A total of 497 relevant studies were identified through four databases. Following a thorough screening process, 11 studies encompassing 1,200,785 participants were ultimately included. The combined evidence suggests that penicillin allergy labeling is associated with increased mortality RR=1.06 (95% CI 1.06-1.07, I²=0.00%), acute heart failure(RR=1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.30, τ²=0.00, I²=92.39%), ICU events (RR=1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, τ²=0.00, I²=57.09%), and mechanical ventilation events (RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.24, τ²=0.00, I²=23.11%). Additionally, there was no significant association with readmissions (RR=1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16, I²=0.00%). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that penicillin allergy labels are associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients, as well as being linked to acute heart failure, heightened ICU requirements, and mechanical ventilation.

    Keywords: penicillin allergy labels, adverse events, Meta, relative risk, Mortality

    Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Dong, Xian, Xiao, Yuan, Zeng, Deng, Fu, Hanyu, Yanjie and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Shipeng Zhang, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.