Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1486217
This article is part of the Research Topic Exploring Untapped Potential: Innovations in Drug Repurposing View all articles

Effect of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster in preventing chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement: protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Provisionally accepted
Junpeng Yuan Junpeng Yuan 1Huichan Xu Huichan Xu 1Jiongjiong Guo Jiongjiong Guo 1Yan Li Yan Li 2Youjia Yu Youjia Yu 2Xiaohong Jin Xiaohong Jin 1*
  • 1 The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
  • 2 Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: With an aging population, knee arthroplasty is increasingly common; however, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects up to 30% of patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (LP5) in preventing CPSP among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.Methods: This is a dual-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 128 adult patients scheduled for knee arthroplasty. Participants will be randomly assigned, stratified by center, to either the LP5 group or the placebo group (n=64 per group). The LP5 or placebo group will apply the patch 1 day before surgery and on postoperative days 1 to 3, with multimodal analgesia administered postoperatively. Multimodal analgesia will include intraoperative flurbiprofen axetil and postoperative patient-controlled sufentanil. The primary outcome is the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will include WOMAC stiffness, function, and total scales; Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale; 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); postoperative pain scores; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) sleep scores; postoperative sufentanil consumption; need for rescue analgesia; length of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) stay; length of hospital stay; and 90-day mortality. Safety outcomes will include assessments of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, arrhythmia, interventions for haemodynamic events, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, local skin allergy, wound infection, and toxic reaction. Data will be analyzed following a modified intention-to-treat approach.Discussion: This study aims to provide high-quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of LP5 in preventing CPSP in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University on July 8, 2024, and is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400086941). All participants will provide written informed consent, and the study will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings will be published in a peerreviewed journal. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=237268.

    Keywords: Chronic postsurgical pain, knee arthroplasty, 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster, randomized controlled trial, Multimodal analgesia, WOMAC Index

    Received: 25 Aug 2024; Accepted: 15 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yuan, Xu, Guo, Li, Yu and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaohong Jin, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.