Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1477889

Comparison of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa

Provisionally accepted
Jia Liang Jia Liang 1Xueping Wu Xueping Wu 2*Lu Chen Lu Chen 1Lujia Feng Lujia Feng 1*Xiangqing Hei Xiangqing Hei 1Yingying Diao Yingying Diao 1Yuke Ji Yuke Ji 1Huiyan Zheng Huiyan Zheng 1*Zhenhua Zou Zhenhua Zou 1Dong Fang Dong Fang 1Shaochong Zhang Shaochong Zhang 1*
  • 1 Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 2 Eye Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    To compare the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents with oral CAIs in treating cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to retinitis pigmentosa (RP).METHODS:This retrospective study analyzed 98 patients (98 eyes) with RP-CME: 47 (48.0%) received intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and 51 (52.0%) were treated with oral CAIs. Medical records were reviewed to BCVA, CMT, and IOP at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using Generalized Estimation Equations.Adverse events and risk factors influencing visual prognosis were also evaluated.Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA and reduction in CMT at 1 and 3 months post-treatment compared to baseline (all p < 0.001). In the oral CAIs group, these improvements persisted until 6 months. However, by 12 months, neither group exhibited significant improvements in BCVA or CMT compared to baseline (all p > 0.05). Intragroup comparisons revealed that the oral CAIs group had significantly better BCVA and CMT improvements at 3 and 6 months than intravitreal anti-VEGF group (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in BCVA and CMT at 12 months or in IOP at any time point (all p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that oral acetazolamide was more effective than methazolamide in reducing CMT and improving BCVA at 3 and 6 months (all p < 0.05).There were no significant differences in outcomes between intravitreal Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab (all p > 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that worse BCVA at 12 months was associated with older age (r = -0.202, p = 0.046),higher baseline CMT (r = 0.353, p < 0.001),poorer baseline BCVA (r = 0.579, p < 0.001), but but showed no correlation with genotype. Adverse effects from oral CAIs included tingling sensation (3.9%), altered taste (9.8%), and gastrointestinal upset (7.8%). Both intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and oral CAIs effectively improved CMT and BCVA in RP-CME patients within the first 3 months of treatment. However, oral CAIs demonstrated superior anatomic and functional improvements at 6 months. Poorer BCVA prognosis was associated with older age, higher baseline CMT, poorer baseline visual acuity. Larger, randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

    Keywords: anti-vegf, Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors, Cystoid macular edema, Retinitis Pigmentosa, clinical efficacy

    Received: 08 Aug 2024; Accepted: 26 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Liang, Wu, Chen, Feng, Hei, Diao, Ji, Zheng, Zou, Fang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xueping Wu, Eye Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China
    Lujia Feng, Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Huiyan Zheng, Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Shaochong Zhang, Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.