Skip to main content

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1464005
This article is part of the Research Topic Cannabis and Cannabinoids for Pain Treatment: Clinical and Non-Clinical Advances on Mechanisms and Applications View all articles

Edible Cannabis for Chronic Low Back Pain: Associations with Pain, Mood, and Intoxication

Provisionally accepted
Samantha Melendez Samantha Melendez 1*Marco Ortiz Torres Marco Ortiz Torres 2Jonathan K. Lisano Jonathan K. Lisano 1Gregory Giordano Gregory Giordano 1Carillon Skrzynski Carillon Skrzynski 1Kent E. Hutchison Kent E. Hutchison 3Angela D. Bryan Angela D. Bryan 1L. C. Bidwell L. C. Bidwell 1,2
  • 1 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
  • 2 Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States
  • 3 Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Cannabis, commonly known for both therapeutic and intoxicating effects, is gaining accessibility on legal markets and traction as a potential alternative therapy for pain mediation, particularly in those suffering from chronic low back pain. However, the effectiveness in this population of legal market forms of cannabis, particularly commonly used edibles, is unknown. Therefore, this study utilized a naturalistic prospective design where participants with chronic low back pain with intentions to initiate cannabis use for treatment were recruited and self-selected edible cannabis products containing varying amounts of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Products were categorized as CBD-dominant, THC-dominant, or combined THC and CBD (THC + CBD). 249 participants (140 female [56.62%], mean (SD) age of 46.30 [16.02], 90% White) were tracked over two weeks of ad libitum use and assessed during a naturalistic acute cannabis administration session on changes in pain, mood, and subjective drug effects. During acute administration, a significant correlation between THC dose and short-term pain relief was found, suggesting that higher THC doses were associated with greater pain reduction (p<.05). In addition, THC was associated with higher levels of subjective cannabis drug effects (p<.001), regardless of whether CBD was also in the edible product. Acute CBD dose was primarily associated with short-term tension relief (p<.05); however, there were no associations between CBD dose and acute pain. Over the 2-week ad libitum administration period results suggested pain reductions across participants using all forms of cannabis. However, trends suggested that more frequent use of CBD-dominant edible cannabis may be associated with greater reductions in perceived pain over the two-week observation period (p=.07). These findings support the short-term analgesic effects of THC and anxiolytic effects of CBD and further suggest that orally-administered THC and CBD should continue to be evaluated for the potential to provide both acute and extended relief from chronic low back pain.

    Keywords: Cannabinoids, Cannabis, Edibles, Chronic Pain, Observational, thc, cbd, side effects

    Received: 12 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Melendez, Ortiz Torres, Lisano, Giordano, Skrzynski, Hutchison, Bryan and Bidwell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Samantha Melendez, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, Colorado, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.