- 1School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- 2School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- 3Lunan Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Linyi, Shandong, China
- 4Shandong Engineering Research Center for New Drug Pharmaceuticals R&D in Shandong Province, Lunan Better Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Linyi, Shandong, China
Background: Triphala, is a composite of three individual botanical drugs: Terminalia chebula, Terminalia bellirica, and Emblica officinalis. It exhibits properties such as heatclearing, anti-inflammatory, anti-fatigue, antioxidant, and antibacterial effects,making it extensively utilized in India and Tibet. It has been found to exhibitinhibitory effects on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); however, further comprehensive research is still needed to elucidate its specific antibacterial mechanism. The present study investigates the in vitro antibacterial activity and antibacterial mechanism of Triphala against H. pylori.
Methods: Ours research investigates the in vitro inhibitory activity of Triphala on multiple standard and clinical strains using microdilution broth method, time-kill curve, time-bactericidal curve and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, the antibacterial mechanism of Triphala is further explored through experiments on urease activity, biofilm formation, anti-adhesion properties, virulence actor assays using RT-qPCR and Western Blotting techniques.
Results: The research findings indicate that Triphala exhibits a minimum inhibitory concentration of 80–320 μg/mL against both standard and clinical strains of H. pylori. Triphala exerts its anti-H. pylori effect by perturbing the microstructure of H. pylori, downregulating adhesion-associated genes (alpA, alpB, babA), urease-related genes (ureA, ureB, ureE, ureF), and flagellar genes (flaA, flaB); inhibiting bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, urease activity as well as CagA protein expression.
Discussion: These findings suggest that Triphala exerts inhibitory effects on H. pylori activity through multiple mechanisms, underscoring its potential as a new drug for the prevention and treatment of H. pylori infection.
1 Introduction
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a gram-negative bacterium, exhibits a slender and curved or spiral rod-shaped morphology. It thrives in microaerophilic conditions and possesses flagella at its posterior end. H. pylori has coexisted with the human host for millions of years (Hathroubi, Zerebinski, and Ottemann, 2018). However, it was not until the 1980s that researchers successfully isolated H. pylori from the gastric samples of patients, thereby obtaining initial insights into its characteristics (Hathroubi, Zerebinski, and Ottemann, 2018; Malfertheiner et al., 2023). H. pylori infection affects over half of the global population (Polk and Peek, 2010). Although the majority of cases are asymptomatic, a considerable proportion of patients manifest various gastrointestinal disorders consequent to their infection, including chronic gastritis, gastric ulcers, and duodenal inflammation. Moreover, it is also deemed to be associated with the incidence of stomach cancer (Backert et al., 2016). In the 2015 Kyoto Conference on H. pylori gastritis, H. pylori was regarded as a highly pathogenic bacterium that requires eradication in all infected people (Sugano et al., 2015). The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified it as a Group 1 carcinogen, indicating its high potential to cause gastric cancer (Ansari and Yamaoka, 2022). Approximately 10%–15% of individuals infected with H. pylori will develop peptic ulcers, and among them, 1%–2% of H. pylori-infected patients will progress to gastric cancer (Uemura et al., 2001; Wang, 2014). Therefore, the presence of H. pylori infection poses a significant threat to human health.
Currently, the predominant therapeutic regimens for H. pylori infection worldwide encompass triple therapy involving a combination of antibiotics (two distinct types) and proton pump inhibitors, as well as quadruple therapy incorporating bismuth-containing agents. Although these treatment modalities initially exhibit efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, they frequently give rise to notable adverse effects during the course of administration, including emesis, diarrhea, nausea, and perturbations in intestinal microbiota (Bayerdörffer et al., 1995; Ng et al., 2013). As the treatment progresses, H. pylori in a significant proportion of patients develop drug resistance, resulting in treatment failure and occasionally recurrence. The emergence of drug resistance poses significant challenges to the treatment of H. pylori, necessitating the development of novel anti-H. pylori drugs as an urgent priority.
Throughout history, humans have extensively utilized natural plants for medicinal purposes. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) encompasses a plethora of medicinal botanical drug s and food-medicine homologous plants that exhibit potential in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, including Syzygium aromaticum and Sanguisorba officinalis L. (Batiha et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2017). Moreover, TCM and food-medicine homologous plants exhibit predominantly mild medicinal properties, characterized by a multi-targeted therapeutic profile. Consequently, this treatment approach minimizes the likelihood of drug resistance development while presenting negligible toxic side effects. Meanwhile, certain botanical extracts also demonstrate notable anti-H. pylori activity. For instance, Chenopodium ambrosioides L. exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 μg/mL (Ye et al., 2015), Fragaria vesca displayed an MIC range of 5–12.5 mg/mL (Cardoso et al., 2018), Avocados showed an MIC range of 128–256 μg/mL (Athaydes et al., 2022), and water extracts from Senna tora (L.) Roxb and Fritillaria spp demonstrated an MIC value of 60 μg/mL (Li et al., 2005). The exploration of natural plant sources for screening bioactive metabolites against H. pylori has significant potential in drug discovery.
Triphala was composed of Terminalia chebula (Terminalia; T. chebula Retz.), Terminalia bellirica (Terminalia; T. bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb.), and Emblica officinalis (Phyllanthus; Phyllanthus emblica L.) in a 1:1:1 ratio. As a medicine that has been passed down from ancient times to the present, Triphala is renowned for its nourishing properties, exhibits potent anti-tumor, antibacterial, antioxidant properties, as well as hepatoprotective effects (Vani et al., 1997; Zhao et al., 2017; Omran et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2021). The treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, including gastric ulcer, gastritis, diarrhea, intestinal stress, etc., is accompanied by the inhibitory effect on certain gram-negative bacteria (Tarasiuk, Mosińska, and Fichna, 2018; Mukherjee et al., 2006; Bagde and Sawant, 2013; Khushtar et al., 2016). In our previous screening of ethnic drugs with anti-H. pylori, we accidently found that Triphala had an inhibitory effect on H. pylori. However, there is currently a lack of relevant literature elucidating the underlying mechanism responsible for its anti-H. pylori activity. Therefore, our research group conducted an investigation to unravel its mode of action against H. pylori and its role in combating infections. Our findings demonstrate that it exhibits a potent anti-H. pylori effect by effectively inhibiting H. pylori survival.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Reagents
Brain heart infusion (BHI) and Columbia agar base were purchased from Oxoid Ltd. (Basingstoke, Hants, United Kingdom). Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco-life Technologies LLC. (Rockville, MD, United States). Sterile-defibrinated sheep blood was purchased from Hongquan Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). Gallic acid (purity: 99%) and Ellagic acid (purity: 96%) were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Corilagin (purity: 100%) was obtained from National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, (Beijing, China). Chebulic acid (purity: 99.71%) was bought from Bokang Jingxi Huagong (Shangdong, China). Chebulagic acid (purity: 100%) was bought from PANPH (LOS Angeles, United States). 1% Crystal violet staining solution was bought from Solarbio (Beijing, China). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium 1X was obtained from KeyGEN BioTECH (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Electron microscope fixative was obtained from Servicebio (Wuhan, Hubei, China). Purelink RNA kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States). SYBR Premix Ex Tap™ kit and PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser were purchased from Takara (Minamikusatsu, Japan). DEPC water was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). BeyoECL Plus Kit, BeyoColor™ Prestained Color Protein Marker, 1% protease inhibitor cocktail, RIPA reagent, BCA protein assay kit, Antifade Mounting Medium, PMSF, SDS-PAGE Gel Preparation Kit, the second antibodies (1:2,500) against mouse (A0216) were obtained from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). PBS 1X was obtained from cytiva. Urea, acetohydroxamic acid, Clarithromycin (CLR), Amoxicillin (AMO) and metronidazole (MET) were purchased from MACKLIN (Shanghai, China). FITC, Tween-20 were purchased from Blotopped (Beijing, China). Ethanol absolute was purchased from Xilong chemical Co., Ltd. (Shantou, Guangdong, China). Phenol red was purchased from Sigma (Germany). Anti-H. pylori CagA (sc-28368) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Texas, United States).
2.2 Helicobacter pylori strains and growth conditions
The standard strains ATCC 43504 and ATCC 700392 were acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The SS1 and CS01 strains were provided by Shanghai Tech University. The clinical strain ICDC111001 was provided by Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, while QYZ001, QYZ-003, and QYZ-004 were obtained from Qingyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The strains were initially identified by the provider based on morphological observation and biochemical reactions. Subsequently, they were preserved at −80°C in a solution containing 65% BHI, 25% glycerol, and 10% FBS (v/v/v). In this study, the strains were cryopreserved, revived, and subcultured on Columbia agar plates supplemented with 5% sterile defibrinated sheep blood. Liquid cultures were conducted in BHI broth containing 10% FBS and incubated at 37°C under a tri-gas mixture of 5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2 for a duration of 72 h in a specialized tri-gas incubator.
2.3 Botanical drug materials and sample preparation
Terminalia chebula (lot: 210901) used in the experiment was purchased from Guangzhou Zhining Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. while T. bellirica (lot: 220301), and Emblica officinalis (lot: 220301) were obtained from Junyuan Shenxiangshan Chinese Medicine Drinking Tablets Co., Ltd. and have been duly identified. The botanical drug materials were stored in the International Pharmaceutical R and D Center of Lunan Pharmaceutical Group. The dried fruits of T. chebula, T. bellirica, and Emblica officinalis were finely ground and combined in equal proportions (3.3 g: 3.3 g: 3.3 g), then extracted with 10 times the volume of water at a temperature of 90°C for 1 h. This procedure was repeated thrice. Subsequently, the extract was concentrated, freeze-dried, and stored at −20°C. We obtained 4.8 g of the metabolites The experiment was replicated three times.
2.4 Phytochemical analysis
2.4.1 UPLC-MS/MS analysis
The solution of Triphala extract was prepared at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL and subsequently filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane for sample injection. The qualitative analysis was conducted by UPLC-MS/MS from Thermo Scientific. A YMC Triart C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.9 μm) was used. The column temperature was maintained at 25°C with a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Detection was performed at a wavelength of 270 nm using both positive and negative ion modes in ESI analysis. The injection volume was 5 μL. For ESI, the capillary voltage was adjusted to +3500v/-3000v, the auxiliary gas flow rate was 10 Arb and sheath gas flow rate was 50 Arb. The evaporation temperature and ion transfer tube temperature were 300°C and 325°C respectively. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid solution, mobile phase B was acetonitrile. Gradient elution parameters: 0–24 min, 97% A and 3%B; 25–35 min, 70% A and 30% B; 36 50 min, 97% A and 3% B.
2.4.2 High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis
The extract of Triphala was analyzed by HPLC with Accalim C 18 (4.6*250 mm, 5 um) column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid as solvent A and acetonitrile as solvent B. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min with a column temperature maintained at 25°C and detection wavelength at 270 nm. The injection volume was 20 μL. Gradient elution parameters: 0–39 min, 97% A and 3% B; 40 min, 70% A and 30% B; 41–50 min, 97% A and 3% B.
2.4.3 FT-IR analysis
Grind Triphala into a fine powder. Take 2 mg of the powder and blend it with potassium bromide, then compress it into tablets. Measure its infrared absorption spectrum within the range of 4,000–400 cm⁻1 (Nicolet is50 FTIR spectrometer, Thermo).
2.5 Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity assays
2.5.1 Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
The MIC of the drug was determined using the microdilution broth method (Peng et al., 2022). The mature H. pylori was harvested in PBS, and the turbidity was adjusted to 1 MCF. Then, dilute 10 times with BHI containing 20% FBS. Subsequently, a serial 2-fold dilution method was used to prepare the Triphala solution of six concentrations (1,280 μg/mL, 640 μg/mL, 320 μg/mL, 160 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL, and 40 μg/mL). For test group, 50 μL of Triphala solution of each concentrations was dispensed into each well of a 96-well plate. Then, bacterial suspension of 50 μL was added to each well and mixed by pipetting. For control group, bacterial suspension of 50 μL was added to each well; For negative control group, BHI broth with equivalent Triphala solution was added to each well; For positive control group, clarithromycin (0.128–0.004 μg/mL) and bacterial suspension of 50 μL was added to each well. Three parallel wells were set up for each group. The plates were incubated at microaerobic conditions (37°C) on a shaker at 150 rpm for a duration of 72 h. MIC values were determined by visually observing clear and transparent wells indicating drug concentration levels. This experiment was repeated three times.
2.5.2 Determination of minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)
Determine the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) by assessing the MIC value (Shen et al., 2021). Pipetted 100 μL of H. pylori bacterial suspension from the MIC determination plate (4MIC, 2MIC, MIC, control) and individually inoculated onto Columbia blood agar plates supplemented with 5% sheep blood. Ensure even spreading using a spreader stick and incubated at 37°C under microaerophilic conditions for a duration of 5 days. Counted the colonies to determine the MBC, defined as the concentration that exhibits a reduction in bacterial viability by 99.9% compared to the control group.
2.5.3 Inhibiting kinetics assay
Control group (H. pylori bacterial suspension in BHI broth containing 10% FBS), test groups (MIC, 0.5MIC, 0.25MIC) and positive control group (H. pylori bacterial suspension in 0.016 μg/mL clarithromycin) were cultured under microaerobic conditions at 150 rpm and 37°C for a duration of 3 days. During the incubation, bacterial suspensions of 100 μL were pipetted at time points of 0, 8, 12, 24, 28, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h respectively to measure absorbance values at 600 nm. This experiment was repeated three times.
2.5.4 Killing kinetics assay
Bacterial suspensions of 100 μL were pipetted at time points of 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h from Control group (H. pylori bacterial suspension in BHI broth containing 10% FBS) and test groups (8MIC, 4MIC, 2MIC), then dilute using a series of ten-fold dilutions (1:10–1:109) method. Pipette 100 μL of the diluted sample and spread it onto a blood agar plate containing sheep blood at a concentration of 5%. Incubate under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C for 5 days. Count the colonies formed on each plate and express the results as Log10 quantities (CFU/mL).
2.5.5 Reassessment of the synergistic bacteriostatic activity between Triphala and antibiotics
The combination therapy of Triphala with four commonly used antibiotics was evaluated using the microdilution checkerboard method. Mature H. pylori cells, grown for 72 h, were collected in PBS and the bacterial suspension was adjusted as described in section “2.5.1” Gradient concentrations of Triphala solution ranging from 40 μg/mL to 1,280 μg/mL were prepared using a two-fold dilution method. Additionally, amoxicillin (AMO) concentrations ranged from 8 μg/mL to 0.25 μg/mL, clarithromycin (CLR) concentrations ranged from 0.128 μg/mL to 0.004 μg/mL, metronidazole (MET) concentrations ranged from 8 μg/mL to 0.25 μg/mL, and levofloxacin (LEF) concentrations ranged from 8 μg/mL to 0.25 μg/mL. Mix Triphala solution, antibiotics, and bacterial liquid in a ratio of 1:1:2 to each well with a total volume of 200 μL. Subsequently, place the prepared plate on a shaker operating at 150 rpm under microaerobic conditions at 37°C for a duration of 72 h. The Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) can be calculated using Equation 1 (Krzyżek, Paluch, and Gościniak, 2020), which determines the interaction between Triphala and antibiotics. The FICI value ≤ 0.5 indicates a synergistic effect, 0.5∼1.0 represents an additive effect (partial synergy), and 1.0 ∼ 4 indicates neutral interactions. Conversely, if the FICI exceeds 4, it signifies an antagonistic effect between Triphala and antibiotics.
Equation 1 FICI.
2.6 Effect on morphology of Helicobacter pylori
The effects of Triphala on the ultrastructure of H. pylori were investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After incubation for 72 h, Mature H. pylori were harvested and adjusted to a turbidity of 1 MCF unit. Subsequently, incubated in 10% FBS BHI for 24 h. Afterwards, 1 mL of bacterial suspension was pipetted to 49 mL of Triphala solution (1-2 MIC) and 49 mL of 10% FBS BHI respectively, and then incubated for 12 h. The samples were then centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 3 min to discard the supernatant and collect the bacteria. After being washed twice with PBS solution, they were fixed overnight at 4°C using an electron microscopy fixative. The samples underwent initial dehydration through a graded ethanol series before being freeze-dried and fixed again. Finally, metal coating was applied to the samples prior to observation under a scanning electron microscope (SU8020, Hitachi, Japan).
2.7 Influence on virulence genes by using RT-qPCR
H. pylori samples were collected from control group and test group (MIC) after incubation of 12 h. Using the PureLink Total RNA Extraction Kit and follow the manufacturer’s instructions to extract total RNA from H. pylori. The entire process was conducted on ice, and the extracted RNA was quantified for its concentration. The cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase and stored at −80°C. Taraka TB Green® reagent and the Thermo Scientific 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (a quantitative real-time PCR system) were employed for amplification of DNA sequences, and fluorescence signal detection was used to determine the CT value. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed for data processing, and the expression levels of various genes in the treatment group were assessed by comparing them to the control group using a reference gene (16S) for normalization. The primer sequences utilized are presented in Table 1.
2.8 Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori urease in vitro
Following the method outlined in (Debowski et al., 2017), H. pylori 700392 a was collected after 72 h of incubation and adjusted the turbidity to 1 MCF. Control group and test groups (2MIC, 1MIC, 1/2MIC, 40 μg/mL AHA) were cultured in a 6-well plate for 24 h. Afterward, bacterial cells were harvested using cold PBS and their OD 600 nm was standardized to 0.4. Next, 50 μL of bacterial suspension were diluted with 50 μL of buffer solution (25 mM PBS containing 0.2% Tween-20). Pipette 25 μL of the diluted bacterial suspension into 150ul of phenol red solution (250 μM, 25 mM PBS). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 5 min before adding 75 μL of 0.5 M urea. Finally, the absorbance at 560 nm was measured every 72 s for 30 cycles. The enzyme activity measurement involved calculating the rate of change in absorbance over time and expressing it as a percentage relative to the control strain’s urease activity. All measurements were performed in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated three times.
2.9 Anti-adhesion experiment
Following the method outlined in (Xu et al., 2017). In each well of a 24-well plate, GES-1 cells (approximately 2 × 105 cells) were seeded in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Subsequently, the culture medium was discarded, and the cells were gently washed three times with PBS. Different drug concentrations (4MIC, 2MIC, 1MIC, 0) were prepared using a RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and added to the 24-well plate along the wall of the well. The cells were treated for 4 h. For H. pylori infection, ATCC 700392 bacterial was suspended in PBS and the turbidity was adjust ed to 0.5 MCF. FICI dye was added at a concentration of 1% (v/v) for staining with a ratio of 1:100 under light-avoiding conditions. Staining was conducted for 1 h within a tri-gas incubator protected from light. Following centrifugation at 5,000 g and 4°C for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the H. pylori samples were subjected to three washes with PBS (0.05% Tween-20) until unbound FITC was eliminated. The H. pylori suspension was prepared in 10% FBS 1640 medium and subsequently co-cultured with GES-1 cells for 1 h. Following this, the cells were washed for three times with PBS to eliminate non-adherent bacteria. H. pylori and gastric cells were treated by immersing them in a 4% formaldehyde solution for 20 min. The cells were Stained with DAPI dye at room temperature for 3 min, and then washed for 3 times using PBS. Subsequently, an appropriate amount of anti-fluorescence quencher was added to prevent fluorescence quenching. Images were acquired using an IM-5FLD fluorescence inverted microscope (OPTIKA, Italy) at a magnification of ×10. The FITC fluorescence area/DAPI was quantified utilizing ImageJ and subsequently normalized to the control group.
2.10 Inhibit the formation of biofilms
Assessment of biofilm formation was conducted using the crystal violet staining method (Hathroubi, Zerebinski, and Ottemann, 2018; Zou et al., 2022). The bacterial suspension was adjusted to 1 MCF and cultured for 24 h in BHI broth supplemented with 20% FBS. Triphala solutions (4MIC, 2MIC, 1MIC, and 0) was prepared with 8% FBS BHI broth. 500 μL of Triphala solution and 50 μL of bacterial suspension was added into a 24 well plate, then incubated statically in a tri-gas incubator for 72 h. The culture medium was discarded and then the plate was washed with PBS and dried at room temperature and then fixated by adding 500 μL of methanol for 10 min. After discarding methanol and air-drying, 500 μL of 0.1% (wt/vol) crystal violet was added to the well and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. After aspirating the crystal violet solution, the plate was rinsed three times with PBS and dried at room temperature. 500 μL of anhydrous ethanol was added to each well and the absorbance was tested at 560 nm for visualization of biofilm formation. The obtained data was normalized against a control group for growth, and the experiment was replicated thrice.
2.11 Experimental investigation of CagA protein expression
Control group and test groups (2MIC, MIC) were collected after incubation for 24 h 120 μL of RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 mM PMSF and 1% proteinase inhibitor was used for H. pylori cleavage for each group, then H. pylori proteins was collected. The BCA assay kit was used to determine the protein concentrations of each group, enabling accurate quantification of the protein load. 20 μg of proteins were loaded in each group and subsequently separated by SDS-PAGE gel. The separated proteins were then transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Following the transfer, the membrane was blocked using 5% skim milk. The PVDF membrane was incubate overnight with the primary antibody at 4°C, followed by subsequent incubation with the corresponding secondary antibody. The bands were exposed and imaged through BeyoECL kit (Beyotime, China) and the fully automated chemiluminescence imager (ChemScope 6200, Clinx Science Instruments). Grayscale analysis was Performed by the ImageJ software.
2.12 Statistical analysis
Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software, and statistical analyses were performed using either a two-tailed Student’s t-test or non-parametric tests, followed by post hoc testing. The observed difference exhibits statistical significance at a level of p < 0.05.
3 Result
3.1 UHPLC-MS/MS and HPLC
In this experiment, the metabolites of the extracts from Triphala were analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The total ion chromatogram is shown in Figure 1, and a total of 19 major metabolites were identified and listed in Table 1. To ensure the stability of the metabolites in the extract of Triphala, a quantitative analysis was performed using HPLC on three batches (Figure 2). Quantitative results are listed in Table 2, while linear variance and range can be found in Table 3. The findings demonstrate consistent levels of the five primary metabolites, with Chebulagic acid exhibiting the highest concentration.
3.2 FT-IR
The results show that Triphala contains a diverse range of tannin metabolites characterized by α,β-unsaturated ester bonds, glycosidic linkages, and aromatic rings (Ahmed, Ding, and Sharma, 2021). The characteristic spectral peaks are: 3355.37 cm⁻1 for O-H stretching; 1716.81 cm⁻1 for α,β-unsaturated esters; 1616.68 cm⁻1, 1537.32 cm⁻1, and 1449.26 cm⁻1 for benzene ring vibrations; 1350.92 cm⁻1 for carboxylate (COO⁻) groups; and 1212.76 cm⁻1 and 1038.34 cm⁻1 for C-O stretching (Figure 3).
3.3 Result of MIC and MBC
The MIC values were determined using a 96-well plate, as listed in Table 4. Triphala exhibited consistent MIC values across multiple strains, ranging from 80 to 320 μg/mL. However, the MBC varies among different strains. The MBCs of ATCC 43504, ATCC 700392, and ICDC 111001 clinical strains are all within a range of 1–2 times the MIC. Triphala exhibits potent bactericidal activity and is regarded as an effective bactericide. Generally, the MBC within 4 times the MIC is considered as indicative of bactericidal activity, while MBC values exceeding 4MIC are typically associated with bacteriostatic effects. In the case of clinical strains QYZ-003 and CSO1, Triphala demonstrates a bacteriostatic effect with an MBC value greater than 4MIC, thus classifying it as a bacteriostatic agent.
3.4 Inhibiting kinetics assay and killing kinetics assay
The experimental results are listed in Figure 4. The antibacterial kinetics of Triphala against ATCC 43504 and ATCC 70039 were assessed, revealing that Triphala exhibited superior antibacterial efficacy against H. pylori at the MIC level. It effectively inhibited bacterial growth within 72 h, even at concentrations ranging from 1/4MIC to 1/2MIC, thus demonstrating promising antibacterial effects. Notably, the observed antibacterial efficacy displayed a dose-dependent increase. In the bactericidal curve of H. pylori by treatment with Triphala, a significant reduction in H. pylori count was observed after 5 days of incubation at a dosage of 2–4 times the MIC, resulting in more than a thousand-fold decrease compared to the initial inoculum. Remarkably, Triphala exhibited potent bactericidal activity against H. pylori within 48 h.
Figure 4. Bacteriostatic Curve and Bactericidal Curve. (A) Time-dependent antibacterial activity of Triphala against ATCC 43504. (B) Time-dependent antibacterial activity of Triphala against ATCC 700392. (C) Time-dependent bactericidal effect of Triphala against ATCC 43504. (D) Time-dependent bactericidal effect of Triphala against ATCC 700392. Con = Control.
3.5 Combined antibacterial results
The results listed in Table 5 demonstrate the absence of any antagonistic effect when Triphala is combined with four antibiotics, instead revealing an neutral effect.
3.6 Effect of Triphala on the microscopic morphology of Helicobacter pylori
The experimental results are listed in Figure 5, illustrating the observation and analysis of the ultrastructure of H. pylori treated with 1-2MIC Triphala. Under electron microscopy, the control group of bacteria exhibited a smooth and intact surface, predominantly appearing as spiral rods. In contrast, the H. pylori-treated group displayed evident damage and shrinkage on both its surface and head, indicating a dose-dependent destructive impact on H. pylori.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscope rendering of Helicobacter pylori. (A) Control group, (B) Triphala (MIC), (C) Triphala (2MIC).
3.7 RT-qPCR results
The experimental results are listed in Figure 6, and the virulence factor within H. pylori is commonly regarded as a pivotal gene associated with H. pylori infection. The results demonstrated that, in comparison with the control group, treatment with Triphala at MIC concentration for 12 h significantly downregulated the expression of adhesin genes alpA, alpB, babA, flagellar genes flaA and flaB, as well as urease genes ureE and ureF by Triphala. Moreover, it exhibited a certain inhibitory effect on urease genes ureA and ureB.
Figure 6. Effects of Triphala on the expression of various virulence factors in Helicobacter pylori. Test groups VS control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
3.8 Anti-adhesion results
The findings from the extracellular anti-adhesion experiment are listed in Figures 7, 8. After treatment with Triphala in GES-1 cells, the adhesion efficiency of H. pylori decreased compared to the control group, and a dose-dependent increase in the inhibitory effect on adhesion was observed. This phenomenon may be attributed to the multi-target mechanism of action exhibited by traditional Chinese medicine. Specifically, Triphala is hypothesized to bind and obstruct specific binding proteins on GES-1 cells, thereby competitively inhibiting H. pylori-GES-1 cell binding and adhesion, ultimately demonstrating a preventive effect (Chen et al., 2022).
Figure 7. Triphala prevents Helicobacter pylori adhesion to GES-1 cells. (A) Control group of cells, (B) Cells + ATCC 700392, (C) Cells treated with Triphala (MIC) + ATCC 700392, (D) Cells treated with Triphala (2MIC) + ATCC 700392, and (E) Cells treated with Triphala (4MIC) + ATCC 700392. Bar = 50 μm. The blue fluorescent image represents a cellular image stained with DAPI, while the white image depicts cells under bright field illumination. Additionally, the green fluorescent image displays an Hp stain using FITC.
Figure 8. Adhesion Index of Helicobacter pylori. test groups VS control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
3.9 Urease activity results
The results of the extracellular urease experiment are presented in Figure 9. Following 24 h of drug treatment, the absorption curve of the treatment group exhibits a delayed attainment of plateau phase compared to the control group. The rate of absorption change in the treatment group demonstrates a dose-dependent reduction effect, with higher drug concentrations resulting in diminished alterations in the curve. These findings suggest a concurrent decline in urease activity. Triphala exerts significant inhibitory effects on urease activity.
Figure 9. Inhibition of Urease Activity. (A) Absorption kinetics curve of urease activity at 560 nm for ATCC 700392. (B) Normalized urease activity of ATCC 700392 after normalization by the control group. test groups vs. control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
3.10 Inhibit the formation of biofilm
The experimental results listed in Figure 10 demonstrate the effects of crystal violet staining on biofilms. Triphala was administered at concentrations of 160 μg/mL, 320 μg/mL, and 640 μg/mL for a duration of 72 h. In comparison to the control group, test groups significantly impeded biofilm formation and induced fragmentation of H. pylori biofilms. This disruption prevented H. pylori from forming intact biofilms as a defense mechanism against drug invasion, with the inhibitory effect exhibiting a dose-dependent escalation.
Figure 10. Inhibitory effect of Triphala on the biomass of Helicobacter pylori biofilm. Test groups VS control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
3.11 Inhibition of CagA protein expression
The results of the Western blot experiment are listed in Figure 11. Treatment with Triphala at concentrations of 160 μg/mL and 320 μg/mL for a duration of 24 h significantly induced a dose-dependent decrease in the expression level of CagA protein, demonstrating notable inhibitory effects.
Figure 11. Inhibits the expression of CagA protein by Triphala. (A) Fluorescent band membrane of the target protein after 24 h of treatment with ATCC 700392 was observed. (B) Comparison of target protein expression levels between the ATCC 700392. test groups VS control group, *P < 0.05.
4 Discussion
The present study conducts a comprehensive metabolite analysis of the Triphala with demonstrated anti-H. pylori activity, further elucidating and unveiling its mechanism of action in vitro against H. pylori.
We have selected the microdilution broth method to determine the MIC. The MIC values of Triphala against both standard and various clinical strains ranged from 80 to 320 μg/mL, while the MBC values for standard strains were found to be within 1–2 times the MIC, indicating its potent bactericidal effect. It is noteworthy that Triphala exhibits differential bactericidal effects on various clinical strains, acting as a bactericidal agent against ICDC 111001 while demonstrating bacteriostatic activity against clinical strains of this bacterium. This discrepancy may be attributed to subtle and unidentified variations among the clinical strains.
The combination therapy experiments demonstrated that Triphala exhibited favorable compatibility with four distinct antibiotics, devoid of any antagonistic effects. Consequently, it can be employed as an adjunct to antibiotic treatment for H. pylori infection, thereby mitigating the discomfort and side effects associated with sole antibiotic administration.
Utilizing a scanning electron microscope for the observation of morphological alterations induced by drugs on bacteria can visually exemplify the deleterious impact of drugs on H. pylori’s appearance, thereby further elucidating their inhibitory and bactericidal effects against H. pylori. Based on the antibacterial curve results, it can be inferred that a 12-h administration of Triphala does not significantly affect the logarithmic growth cycle of bacteria, thereby eliminating potential interference from bacterial quantity in the experiment. Under the influence of antibacterial drugs, bacteria undergo structural damage, resulting in the appearance of wrinkled and compromised bacterial bodies. This phenomenon leads to intracellular substance leakage and ultimately culminates in bacterial death. Moreover, this destructive effect exhibits a dose-dependent relationship, with higher doses causing more pronounced destruction of bacterial bodies.
The infectivity of H. pylori is commonly believed to be closely associated with its virulence factors within the host, encompassing flagellar, adhesion, urease genes, as well as VacA and CagA genes. H. pylori exhibits flagella-driven motility in gastric fluid, facilitating its penetration through the mucus layer and colonization of surface epithelial cells. Additionally, it secretes adhesins to firmly adhere to GES-1 cells (Johnson and Ottemann, 2018). flaA and flaB are the principal constituents of H. pylori flagella, while alpA and alpB contribute to H. pylori colonization and adhesion in conjunction with babA (Josenhans, Labigne, and Suerbaum, 1995; Borén et al., 1993; Senkovich et al., 2011) The urease enzyme of the organism continuously hydrolyzes urea and buffers gastric acid, enabling its survival under favorable conditions (Eaton et al., 1991). ureA and ureB serve as structural components of urease, while the accessory proteins ureE and ureF play pivotal roles in facilitating urease activation through nickel ion transportation and removal of non-carbamylated protein binding (Li et al., 2019). In the presence of antibacterial concentration, Triphala significantly downregulates the expression of virulence factors, including alpA, alpB, babA, flaA, flaB, ureE, and ureF. Furthermore, it exerts a discernible inhibitory effect on ureA and ureB. The characterization experiment demonstrated a significant inhibitory effect of Triphala on urease activity, as well as its ability to significantly inhibit the formation of biofilms, which is believed to be closely related to alpB and flagellar genes. These results were consistent with those obtained from RT-qPCR analysis, providing further insight into the antibacterial mechanism of Triphala.
The adherence of H. pylori to the gastric environment is robust, ensuring its resistance against washout during stomach emptying. Bacterial adhesion serves as a pivotal foundation and prerequisite for cellular infection and the generation of toxic effects. The results of the anti-adhesion test demonstrated a significant reduction in H. pylori adhesion quantity after administration to GES-1 cells, with the decreasing effect on adhesion quantity exhibiting a dose-dependent increase. It is hypothesized that Triphala may exert a preventive effect on H. pylori adhesion by inhibiting the receptor associated with adhesion in GES-1 cells, thereby impeding H. pylori-cell interaction.
CagA, also known as cytotoxin-associated gene A, is a 120–130 Kda protein encoded by cagPAI. H. pylori delivers CagA to host cells via the Cag type IV secretion system (T4SS), where it becomes phosphorylated and activates SHP-2 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, promoting inflammation and carcinogenesis (Coticchia et al., 2006; Censini et al., 1996). The experimental results demonstrate that Triphala effectively downregulates the expression level of CagA protein, exhibiting a clear dose-dependent response.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, research on the extracellular antibacterial effects of Triphala has substantiated its inhibitory and bactericidal efficacy against drug-resistant sensitive bacteria as well as standard strains. Triphala exerts a disruptive effect on the microstructure of H. pylori, thereby impacting bacterial survival and significantly suppressing the expression of diverse virulence factors within the bacteria. We further validated the inhibitory effect of Triphala on urease activity through phenotypic experiments, which is consistent with the results obtained from RT-qPCR. The above experiment provides a preliminary elucidation of the mechanism and efficacy of Triphala in combating H. pylori, necessitating further investigation into its underlying mechanisms. Meanwhile, it also demonstrates the potential of Triphala as a medicine with anti-H. pylori properties.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.
Author contributions
ZZ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. YZ: Methodology, Validation, Writing–review and editing. LO: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. MC: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. YP: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. HL: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. YH: Formal Analysis, Writing–review and editing. BS: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. YL: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. LZ: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. JJ: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. RW: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. GZ: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing. MY: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing. ZF: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Taishan Industry Leading Talents Project of Shandong Province (NO.202306086).
Conflict of interest
Authors HL, YH, LZ, JJ, RW, GZ, and ZF were employed by Lunan Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. Author ZF was employed by Lunan Better Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1438193/full#supplementary-material
References
Ahmed, S., Ding, X., and Sharma, A. (2021). Exploring scientific validation of Triphala Rasayana in ayurveda as a source of rejuvenation for contemporary healthcare: an update. J. Ethnopharmacol. 273, 113829. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2021.113829
Ansari, S., and Yamaoka, Y. (2022). Helicobacter pylori infection, its laboratory diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance: a perspective of clinical relevance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 35, e0025821. doi:10.1128/cmr.00258-21
Athaydes, B. R., Tosta, C., Carminati, R. Z., Kuster, R. M., Kitagawa, R. R., de Cássia, R., et al. (2022). Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) seeds compounds affect Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric adenocarcinoma cells growth. J. Funct. Foods 99, 105352. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2022.105352
Backert, S., Neddermann, M., Maubach, G., and Naumann, M. (2016). Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 21, 19–25. doi:10.1111/hel.12335
Bagde, A., and Sawant, R. S. (2013). Charak samhita- complete encyclopedia of ayurvedic science. Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med. 1 (1), 12–20.
Batiha, G. E., Alkazmi, L. M., Wasef, L. G., Beshbishy, A. M., Nadwa, E. H., and Rashwan, E. K. (2020). Syzygium aromaticum L. (Myrtaceae): traditional uses, bioactive chemical constituents, pharmacological and toxicological activities. Biomolecules 10, 202. doi:10.3390/biom10020202
Bayerdörffer, E., Miehlke, S., Mannes, G. A., Sommer, A., Höchter, W., Weingart, J., et al. (1995). Double-blind trial of omeprazole and amoxicillin to cure Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcers. Gastroenterology 108, 1412–1417. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90689-4
Bobasa, E. M., Phan, A. D. T., Netzel, M. E., Cozzolino, D., and Sultanbawa, Y. (2021). Hydrolysable tannins in Terminalia ferdinandiana Exell fruit powder and comparison of their functional properties from different solvent extracts. Food Chem. 358, 129833. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129833
Borén, T., Falk, P., Roth, K. A., Larson, G., and Normark, S. (1993). Attachment of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric epithelium mediated by blood group antigens. Science 262, 1892–1895. doi:10.1126/science.8018146
Cardoso, O., Donato, M. M., Luxo, C., Almeida, N., Liberal, J., Figueirinha, A., et al. (2018). Anti- Helicobacter pylori potential of Agrimonia eupatoria L. and Fragaria vesca. J. Funct. Foods 44, 299–303. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2018.03.027
Censini, S., Lange, C., Xiang, Z., Crabtree, J. E., Ghiara, P., Borodovsky, M., et al. (1996). cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14648–14653. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.25.14648
Chatterjee, J., Ul Hoda, M., and Das, S. (2024). In vitro screening of Triphala, its compositions and identification of a few phenolic compounds to determine their antioxidant, anti-malarial and hepatoprotective properties: a GC/MS-assisted metabolomics study. Chem. Pap. 78, 409–433. doi:10.1007/s11696-023-03098-3
Chen, Y., Tang, Z., Fu, L., Liu, R., Yang, L., and Wang, B. (2022). Inhibitory and injury-protection effects of O-glycan on gastric epithelial cells infected with Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 90, e0039322. doi:10.1128/iai.00393-22
Coticchia, J. M., Sugawa, C., Tran, V. R., Gurrola, J., Kowalski, E., and Carron, M. A. (2006). Presence and density of Helicobacter pylori biofilms in human gastric mucosa in patients with peptic ulcer disease. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10, 883–889. doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.009
Debowski, A. W., Walton, S. M., Chua, E. G., Tay, A. C., Liao, T., Lamichhane, B., et al. (2017). Helicobacter pylori gene silencing in vivo demonstrates urease is essential for chronic infection. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006464. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006464
Eaton, K. A., Brooks, C. L., Morgan, D. R., and Krakowka, S. (1991). Essential role of urease in pathogenesis of gastritis induced by Helicobacter pylori in gnotobiotic piglets. Infect. Immun. 59, 2470–2475. doi:10.1128/iai.59.7.2470-2475.1991
Hathroubi, S., Zerebinski, J., and Ottemann, K. M. (2018). Helicobacter pylori biofilm involves a multigene stress-biased response, including a structural role for flagella. mBio 9, e01973. doi:10.1128/mBio.01973-18
Jiang, Y., Zhao, L., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, B., Xu, J., et al. (2024). Preventive mechanisms of Chinese Tibetan medicine Triphala against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Phytomedicine 123, 155229. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155229
Johnson, K. S., and Ottemann, K. M. (2018). Colonization, localization, and inflammation: the roles of H. pylori chemotaxis in vivo. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 41, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.019
Josenhans, C., Labigne, A., and Suerbaum, S. (1995). Comparative ultrastructural and functional studies of Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter mustelae flagellin mutants: both flagellin subunits, FlaA and FlaB, are necessary for full motility in Helicobacter species. J. Bacteriol. 177, 3010–3020. doi:10.1128/jb.177.11.3010-3020.1995
Khushtar, M., Siddiqui, H. H., Dixit, R. K., Khan, M. S., Iqbal, D., and Rahman, M. A. (2016). Amelioration of gastric ulcers using a hydro-alcoholic extract of Triphala in indomethacin-induced Wistar rats. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 8, 546–551. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2016.01.004
Krzyżek, P., Paluch, E., and Gościniak, G. (2020). Synergistic therapies as a promising option for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori. Antibiot. (Basel) 9, 658. doi:10.3390/antibiotics9100658
Li, X., Zhao, S., Zheng, N., Cheng, J., and Wang, J. (2019). Progress in bacterial urease complexes and their activation mechanisms. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 35, 204–215. doi:10.13345/j.cjb.180239
Li, Y., Xu, C., Zhang, Q., Liu, J. Y., and Tan, R. X. (2005). In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori action of 30 Chinese herbal medicines used to treat ulcer diseases. J. Ethnopharmacol. 98, 329–333. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.020
Long, X. M., Li, R., Liu, H. P., Xia, Z. X., Guo, S., Gu, J. X., et al. (2023). Chemical fingerprint analysis and quality assessment of Tibetan medicine Triphala from different origins by high-performance liquid chromatography. Phytochem. Anal. 34, 476–486. doi:10.1002/pca.3228
Malfertheiner, P., Camargo, M. C., El-Omar, E., Liou, J. M., Peek, R., Schulz, C., et al. (2023). Helicobacter pylori infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 9, 19. doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00431-8
Mukherjee, P., Rai, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Debnath, P., Biswas, T., Jana, U., et al. (2006). Clinical study of 'Triphala' – a well known phytomedicine from India. Iran. J. Pharmacol. Ther. (5).
Ng, K. M., Ferreyra, J. A., Higginbottom, S. K., Lynch, J. B., Kashyap, P. C., Gopinath, S., et al. (2013). Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens. Nature 502, 96–99. doi:10.1038/nature12503
Omran, Z., Bader, A., Porta, A., Vandamme, T., Anton, N., Alehaideb, Z., et al. (2020). Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Triphala constituents and nanoformulation. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 6976973. doi:10.1155/2020/6976973
Peng, C., Sang, S., Shen, X., Zhang, W., Yan, J., Chen, P., et al. (2022). In vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of Syzygium aromaticum and the preliminary mechanism of action. J. Ethnopharmacol. 288, 114995. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2022.114995
Pfundstein, B., El Desouky, S. K., Hull, W. E., Haubner, R., Erben, G., and Owen, R. W. (2010). Polyphenolic compounds in the fruits of Egyptian medicinal plants (Terminalia bellerica, Terminalia chebula and Terminalia horrida): characterization, quantitation and determination of antioxidant capacities. Phytochemistry 71, 1132–1148. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.03.018
Polk, D. B., and Peek, R. M. (2010). Helicobacter pylori: gastric cancer and beyond. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 403–414. doi:10.1038/nrc2857
Senkovich, O. A., Yin, J., Ekshyyan, V., Conant, C., Traylor, J., Adegboyega, P., et al. (2011). Helicobacter pylori AlpA and AlpB bind host laminin and influence gastric inflammation in gerbils. Infect. Immun. 79, 3106–3116. doi:10.1128/iai.01275-10
Shen, X., Zhang, W., Peng, C., Yan, J., Chen, P., Jiang, C., et al. (2021). In vitro anti-bacterial activity and network pharmacology analysis of Sanguisorba officinalis L. against Helicobacter pylori infection. Chin. Med. 16, 33. doi:10.1186/s13020-021-00442-1
Sugano, K., Tack, J., Kuipers, E. J., Graham, D. Y., El-Omar, E. M., Miura, S., et al. (2015). Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Gut 64, 1353–1367. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252
Tarasiuk, A., Mosińska, P., and Fichna, J. (2018). Triphala: current applications and new perspectives on the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Chin. Med. 13, 39. doi:10.1186/s13020-018-0197-6
Uemura, N., Okamoto, S., Yamamoto, S., Matsumura, N., Yamaguchi, S., Yamakido, M., et al. (2001). Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 784–789. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa001999
Vani, T., Rajani, M., Sarkar, S., and Shishoo, C. J. (1997). Antioxidant properties of the Ayurvedic formulation Triphala and its constituents. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 35, 313–317. doi:10.1080/09251619708951274
Wang, Y. C. (2014). Medicinal plant activity on Helicobacter pylori related diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 10368–10382. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10368
Wei, X., Luo, C., He, Y., Huang, H., Ran, F., Liao, W., et al. (2021). Hepatoprotective effects of different extracts from Triphala against CCl(4)-induced acute liver injury in mice. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 664607. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.664607
Xu, Y. F., Lian, D. W., Chen, Y. Q., Cai, Y. F., Zheng, Y. F., Fan, P. L., et al. (2017). in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of patchouli alcohol, a naturally occurring tricyclic sesquiterpene, against Helicobacter pylori infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00122. doi:10.1128/aac.00122-17
Yan, J., Peng, C., Chen, P., Zhang, W., Jiang, C., Sang, S., et al. (2022). In-vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity and preliminary mechanism of action of Canarium album Raeusch. fruit extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 283, 114578. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2021.114578
Ye, H., Liu, Y., Li, N., Yu, J., Cheng, H., Li, J., et al. (2015). Anti-Helicobacter pylori activities of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. in vitro and in vivo. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 4178–4183. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4178
Zhao, Z., He, X., Zhang, Q., Wei, X., Huang, L., Fang, J. C., et al. (2017). Traditional uses, chemical constituents and biological activities of plants from the genus Sanguisorba L. Am. J. Chin. Med. 45, 199–224. doi:10.1142/s0192415x17500136
Keywords: Triphala, Helicobacter pylori, urease, antimicrobial efficacy, mechanism of action
Citation: Zhu Z, Zou Y, Ou L, Chen M, Pang Y, Li H, Hao Y, Su B, Lai Y, Zhang L, Jia J, Wei R, Zhang G, Yao M and Feng Z (2024) Preliminary investigation of the in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of Triphala. Front. Pharmacol. 15:1438193. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1438193
Received: 25 May 2024; Accepted: 31 October 2024;
Published: 19 November 2024.
Edited by:
Shaikh Jamal Uddin, Khulna University, BangladeshReviewed by:
Paweł Krzyżek, Wroclaw Medical University, PolandPrabhat Upadhyay, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Copyright © 2024 Zhu, Zou, Ou, Chen, Pang, Li, Hao, Su, Lai, Zhang, Jia, Wei, Zhang, Yao and Feng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guimin Zhang, lunanzhangguimin@yeah.net; Meicun Yao, lssymc@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Zhong Feng, fengzhong22@163.com