Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1411707
This article is part of the Research Topic Pharmacotherapeutics for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumours View all 11 articles

Radiological evaluation of response in patients with locally advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with trabectedin

Provisionally accepted
Serena Ceddia Serena Ceddia 1Concetta Elisa Onesti Concetta Elisa Onesti 1Sabrina Vari Sabrina Vari 1*Andrea Torchia Andrea Torchia 2Antonella Cosimati Antonella Cosimati 3Federica Riva Federica Riva 2Maria Teresa Maccalini Maria Teresa Maccalini 2Marianna Cerro Marianna Cerro 2Giovanni Benvenuti Giovanni Benvenuti 4Michelangelo Russillo Michelangelo Russillo 1Vincenzo Anelli Vincenzo Anelli 4Isabella Sperduti Isabella Sperduti 4Roberto Biagini Roberto Biagini 5Virginia Ferraresi Virginia Ferraresi 1
  • 1 Sarcomas and Rare Tumors Unit, Clinical Department and Oncological Research, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRCCS), Rome, Lazio, Italy
  • 2 Department of Radiological, Oncological, and Pathological Anatomy Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • 3 UOC Territorial Oncology, Local Health Department of Latina, Aprilia, Italy
  • 4 Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Hospital Physiotherapy Institutes (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
  • 5 Oncological Orthopaedics Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Trabectedin is an antineoplastic drug approved for patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Interestingly, the radiological evaluation of response during trabectedin therapy is peculiar.The aim of this single-center retrospective study is to analyse the concordance of response assessment according to RECIST compared with Choi criteria, in patients with STS treated with trabectedin between 2009 and 2020 at Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome.We are presenting the preliminary data collected in the last two months (mos) on 37 pts who received the diagnosis between 2015 and 2020, with median age of 52.5 years (range 32-78). Median number of trabectedin cycles administered was 4 (range 2-50), for a median follow up of 5.83 mos (range 1-60). Histological subtypes of STS were: 5 (13.5%) leiomyosarcoma, 14 (37.8%) liposarcoma, 9 (24.3%) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, 3 (8.1%) synovial sarcoma, 6 (16.2%) other rare histological subtypes. Eight pts (21.6%) received trabectedin in the first line setting, 21 pts (56.8%) in second line, 7 pts (18.9%) received it in subsequent lines. One pt received trabectedin as neoadjuvant therapy in a clinical trial (ISG-STS 1001). The median progression-free survival was 3.6 mos (CI95% 2.7-4.6); the median overall survival was 34.3 mos (CI95% 0-75.4). The radiological responses were evaluated with both RECIST and Choi criteria: in 33 pts (89.2%) responses matched; whereas in 4 pts (10.8%) did not match. The best responses obtained according to RECIST criteria were: 2 (5.4%) partial response (PR), 13 (35.1%) stable disease (SD) and 22 (59.5%) progressive disease (PD). Instead, 2 (5.4%), 13 (35.1%) and 22 (59.5%) pts obtained PR, SD and PD respectively, according to Choi criteria. Cohen's kappa coefficient of concordance was 0.792 (pvalue < 0.002). A specialized radiologist performed all the imaging examinations using a dedicated workstation in the same center.In this first analysis, the concordance between RECIST and Choi assessments demonstrates no statistically significant difference. Anyway, responses did not match for 4 pts. We are expanding the analysis to all of the pts included in the original cohort to confirm or deny these initial results.

    Keywords: Sarcoma, soft tissue, Trabectedin, response assessment, real-life

    Received: 03 Apr 2024; Accepted: 02 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ceddia, Onesti, Vari, Torchia, Cosimati, Riva, Maccalini, Cerro, Benvenuti, Russillo, Anelli, Sperduti, Biagini and Ferraresi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sabrina Vari, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors Unit, Clinical Department and Oncological Research, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRCCS), Rome, 00144, Lazio, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.