AUTHOR=Wei Na , Zheng Bin , Cai Hongfu , Li Na , Yang Jing , Liu Maobai TITLE=Systematic review and meta-analysis: de novo combination of nucleos(t)ide analogs and pegylated interferon alpha versus pegylated interferon alpha monotherapy for the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pharmacology VOLUME=15 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1403805 DOI=10.3389/fphar.2024.1403805 ISSN=1663-9812 ABSTRACT=

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a worldwide infectious disease caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). Optimizing antiviral treatment strategies could improve the functional cure (FC) rate of patients with CHB. This study aims to systematically review the FC rate of the de novo combination of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and pegylated interferon α (PEG-IFNα) versus that of PEG-IFNα monotherapy for CHB.

Methods: Databases were searched until 31 December 2023. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials on the de novo combination of NAs and PEG-IFNα versus PEG-IFNα monotherapy for 48 weeks in patients with CHB to achieve FC, which was defined as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and/or HBsAg seroconversion. Meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the efficacy at the end of treatment and different time points during follow-up.

Results: A total of 10 studies, encompassing 2,339 patients in total, were included. Subgroup analysis was conducted in accordance with whether first-line NAs were used. It found no statistically significant difference between HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion at the end of treatment. Serum HBV DNA <500 copies/mL significantly differed between the two groups at the end of treatment and did not significantly differ during follow-up. Meanwhile, HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion showed statistically significant differences at 24 weeks of follow-up. By contrast, no statistically significant difference was found in HBsAg loss at 48 weeks of follow-up.

Discussion: Without distinguishing the eligible preponderant population, the efficacy of the de novo combination of NAs and PEG-IFNα in treating patients with CHB was not superior to that of PEG-IFNα monotherapy.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022325239.