Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Infectious Diseases
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1381830
This article is part of the Research Topic Raising the bar: Advancing therapeutic strategies for fighting communicable and noncommunicable diseases View all 7 articles

Evaluating the protective effectiveness and risk factors of ursodeoxycholic acid on COVID-19 among outpatients

Provisionally accepted
Di Li Di Li 1Qimei Fang Qimei Fang 1Zhiwei Chen Zhiwei Chen 2Jing Tang Jing Tang 2Haoling Tang Haoling Tang 2Nan Cai Nan Cai 2Ke Qiu Ke Qiu 2Mingyang Zhu Mingyang Zhu 1Xuemei Yang Xuemei Yang 1Lu Yang Lu Yang 1Yujie Yang Yujie Yang 1Yong Huang Yong Huang 1Xiaomei Lei Xiaomei Lei 1Huanhuan Zhang Huanhuan Zhang 1Qiankai Lin Qiankai Lin 1Qiang Mao Qiang Mao 1Te Xu Te Xu 1Yan Li Yan Li 1Yang Zhen Yang Zhen 1Mingli Peng Mingli Peng 2*Peng Hu Peng Hu 2*
  • 1 Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study aimed to assess the chemopreventive effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) against COVID-19 and to analyze infection risk factors, symptoms, and recovery in outpatients with UDCA exposure.The study enrolled outpatients prescribed UDCA from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, between July 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and drug combinations were collected using electronic medical records. COVID-19 infection, symptoms, severity, prognosis, vaccinations, and UDCA administration were surveyed by telephone interviews. UDCA non-users served as controls and were matched in a 1:2 ratio with UDCA users using propensity score matching with the nearest neighbor algorithm. Infection rates, symptomatology, severity, and prognosis were compared between matched and control cohorts, and risk factors and infection and recovery symptoms were analyzed in UDCA-exposed outpatients.UDCA-exposed outpatients (n=778, 74.8%) and matched UDCA users (n=95, 74.2%) showed significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 infection rates than control patients (n=59, 92.2%) (p<0.05).The matched UDCA group exhibited substantially lower fever, cough, sore throat, and fatigue rates than controls (p<0.05). Participants with UDCA exposure generally experienced mild symptoms, while those without UDCA had moderate symptoms. The matched UDCA group also had significantly shorter durations of fever and cough (p<0.05). Risk factors such as age over 60, less than one month of UDCA administration, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease significantly increased SARS-CoV-2 infection rates (p<0.05), while smoking led to a decrease (p<0.05). Hypertension was associated with a prolonged COVID-19 recovery (p<0.05), while smoking, vaccination, and fatty liver disease were associated with shorter recovery periods (p<0.05). The main symptoms in the full UDCA cohort were fever, cough, and sore throat, with fatigue, cough, and hyposthenia being the most persistent.UDCA demonstrated chemopreventive effect against SARS-CoV-2 in outpatients by significantly reducing infection incidence and mitigating COVID-19 symptoms, severity, and recovery duration. Old age, short UDCA course, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and CAD increased infection rates, while hypertension prolonged recovery. Smoking, vaccination, and fatty liver disease reduced infection rates and shortened recovery. UDCA had minimal impact on symptom types. Larger and longer-term clinical studies are needed further to assess UDCA's effectiveness in COVID-19 prevention or treatment.

    Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, UDCA, Outpatients, Preventive efficacy, Risk factors

    Received: 04 Feb 2024; Accepted: 02 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Fang, Chen, Tang, Tang, Cai, Qiu, Zhu, Yang, Yang, Yang, Huang, Lei, Zhang, Lin, Mao, Xu, Li, Zhen, Peng and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mingli Peng, Department of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
    Peng Hu, Department of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Institute for Viral Hepatitis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.