This study compares the cardiovascular risk in anemic chronic kidney disease patients treated with Roxadustat versus erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs). It also explores the cardiovascular impact of Roxadustat.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to 13 August 2023, using terms such as “ESA,” “Roxadustat,” “MACE,” “stroke,” “death,” “myocardial infarction,” and “heart failure.” Two researchers independently selected and extracted data based on predefined criteria. We assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane tool and analyzed statistical heterogeneity using the Q and I2 tests. We conducted subgroup analyses by geographical region and performed data analysis with Stata 14.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. Data were sourced from the NCBI database by filtering for “Roxadustat” and “human,” and differentially expressed genes were identified using R software, setting the significance at
A total of 15 articles encompassing 1,43,065 patients were analyzed, including 1,38,739 patients treated with ESA and 4,326 patients treated with Roxadustat. In the overall population meta-analysis, the incidences of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), death, and heart failure (HF) were 13%, 8%, and 4% in the Roxadustat group, compared to 17%, 12%, and 6% in the ESA group, respectively, with
The meta-analysis suggests that the use of Roxadustat and ESA in treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease does not significantly alter the likelihood of cardiovascular events in the overall and American populations. However, Roxadustat exhibited a safer profile with respect to MACE, death, and heart failure. The bioinformatics findings suggest that Roxadustat may influence integrin adhesion and affect the TNF and NF-κB signaling pathways, along with lipid and atherosclerosis pathways, potentially reducing inflammation.