Improving glycemic control: transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis

Background: Tirzepatide—a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist—is used to treat type 2 diabetes. However, the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis who were transitioned from dulaglutide to tirzepatide. We continuously monitored glucose levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis before and after switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide.

Results: Fourteen patients (mean age: 61.9 ± 9.9 years, male: female = 11:3) were included in this study. After switching to tirzepatide, time in range increased to 50.8% from 42.7% (p = 0.02), time above range decreased to 37.8% from 48.4% (p = 0.02), and mean glucose levels decreased to 137.4 mg/dL from 156.6 mg/dL (p = 0.006). In contrast, there was no significant difference in time below range before and after tirzepatide administration (11.3% and 8.9%) (p = 0.75). Three patients experienced dyspepsia (21.4%), and one patient experienced nausea (7.1%); however, no critical adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide improved glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis for type 2 diabetes.

1 Introduction

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Patients with type 2 diabetes have a high mortality rate, mainly owing to cardiovascular diseases. This is particularly evident in patients undergoing hemodialysis (Saran et al., 2017; Ahmadmehrabi and Tang, 2018). Glycemic control is crucial to improve clinical outcomes and significantly reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality. However, anti-diabetic drugs such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be of limited use or contraindicated in ESRD (Rocco and Berns, 2012; Williams and Garg, 2014); thus, they are often treated with insulin. Glycemic control with insulin is often difficult, especially in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Insulin is partially metabolized in the kidneys, and its effects are prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency (Rave et al., 2001). Blood insulin and glucose levels fluctuate during hemodialysis and even after dialysis (Abe et al., 2007). Therefore, patients undergoing hemodialysis frequently experience large glycemic excursions that put them at a greater risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia (Galindo et al., 2023).

Incretin hormones are currently commonly used for the treatment of diabetes. The main incretin hormones are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) (Nauck and Meier, 2018).

Dulaglutide, a weekly formulation of the GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) launched in Japan in 2015, is effective in reducing body weight, controlling fasting and postprandial glycemia, and has a positive effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes (Ruda et al., 2023). The current guidelines for managing type 2 diabetes recommend GLP-1 RAs as first-line injectable therapy even before insulin initiation (American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, 2022). Moreover, dulaglutide has also been reported to be useful in glycemic control in patients undergoing hemodialysis (Yajima et al., 2018; Ugamura et al., 2022). However, some patients treated with dulaglutide have inadequate glycemic control and need more effective drugs.

Tirzepatide is a novel dual GLP-1 and GIP agonist (Coskun et al., 2018). A combination of GLP-1 and GIP can act on pancreatic beta cells synergistically and complementarily through distinct metabolic effects (Bastin and Andreelli, 2019). Moreover, GIP exerts therapeutic benefits beyond its primary incretin role by improving insulin sensitivity and lipid homeostasis in adipose tissue (Asmar et al., 2016). GLP-1 and GIP delay gastrointestinal secretion and suppress appetite, resulting in more effective glycemic control and body weight reduction (Holst, 2021). In addition, GLP-1 is reported to be cardioprotective (Mosenzon et al., 2021) and hepatoprotective (Muzurović et al., 2022), and GIP is reported to inhibit bone resorption (Nissen et al., 2014). The complementary effects of GIP and GLP-1 are shown in Figure 1. Tirzepatide significantly improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without basal insulin regimens (Dahl et al., 2022; Karagiannis et al., 2022), and a clinical trial demonstrated the superiority of tirzepatide compared with dulaglutide in terms of glycemic control (Inagaki et al., 2022).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Complementary effects of GIP and GLP-1 GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1.

However, the safety and efficacy of tirzepatide in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the glycemic control between dulaglutide and tirzepatide in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We analyzed the transition in glucose levels using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) before and after switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study design and patients

We included patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis whose prescriptions for diabetes were transitioned from dulaglutide to tirzepatide at the Nagasaki Renal Center between June 2023 and August 2023. Blood glucose levels were analyzed using CGM. Patients who changed their insulin dose or other diabetic drugs during this period were excluded.

2.2 Blood glucose measurement

Blood glucose levels were evaluated using CGM for 7 days in patients on dulaglutide and tirzepatide. Dulaglutide was dosed at 0.75 mg once a week for at least 3 months and CGM was started during the hemodialysis sessions and recorded for 7 days. After the discontinuation of CGM, tirzepatide (2.5 mg) was administered 1 week after the last dose of dulaglutide. The second CGM period started 7–14 days after initiating tirzepatide treatment and was recorded for 7 days. All patients undergoing hemodialysis at our facility did not eat during the dialysis sessions to avoid hypotension. However, the included patients were asked to eat as usual outside dialysis hours. Consequently, each CGM period included 3 days of hemodialysis days and 4 days of non-hemodialysis days. Mean blood glucose levels and time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR) were analyzed using FreeStyle Libre Pro (Abbott Japan Tokyo, Japan).

We set the TIR at 80–140 mg/dL, TAR at >140 mg/dL, and TBR at <80 mg/dL. An international expert panel published a consensus on the glycemic target range of 70–180 mg/dL and a percentage of reading time per day of over 70% (Danne et al., 2017; Battelino et al., 2019). According to the Internal Consensus on the Use of CGM 2017, 70–140 mg/dL is a secondary target range (Danne et al., 2017), and some studies show that this tight range improves the survival rate in critically ill patients (Krinsley and Preiser, 2015; Lanspa et al., 2019). Moreover, a target range of 70–140 mg/dL seems to have advantages over a 70–180 mg/dL range for assessing glycemic status and progress toward stricter glycemic control, particularly when approaching normal glucose levels (Dunn et al., 2024). However, it is crucial to prevent excessive hypoglycemia in patients with severe complications such as renal failure. Therefore, we set the threshold at 80 mg/dL.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences in TIR, TAR, TBR, and mean blood glucose levels before and after switching to tirzepatide were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP Pro 17.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States).

2.4 Ethical statements

This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Nagasaki Renal Center (Nagasaki, Japan) (approval number: 23025) and was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Nagasaki Renal Center (Nagasaki, Japan) owing to the retrospective study design.

3 Results

Sixteen patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis were transitioned from dulaglutide to tirzepatide at the Nagasaki Renal Center from June 2023 to August 2023. All the participants were prescribed 0.75 mg of dulaglutide once a week for at least 3 months and transitioned to 2.5 mg of tirzepatide once a week. Two patients were excluded because their insulin dose or other anti-diabetic drugs were changed during the study period. One patient was hospitalized owing to an infection, and his insulin dose decreased due to appetite loss during hospitalization. Another patient was prescribed liraglutide outside the facility.

Fourteen patients without other diabetes medications or insulin changes during the observation period were included in this study. All patients underwent hemodialysis three times a week for 4 h in each dialysis session. Their mean age was 61.9 ± 9.9 years; 11 were male and 3 were female. The cause of ESRD was type 2 diabetes in 13 patients and chronic glomerulonephritis in one patient. The duration of diabetes was unknown for four patients, while the mean disease duration for the other 10 patients was 25.7 ± 7.5 years, with 45.4 ± 32.2 (months) under dulaglutide. The baseline patient characteristics and data after transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide are shown in Table 1. Interdialytic weight gain and total protein declined after transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide; however, albumin and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index did not show significant changes.

Table 1

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics and data after transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide.

For each of the 14 patients, CGM was carried out during 3 dialysis days and 4 non-dialysis days before and after switching to tirzepatide, resulting in CGM data being collected for a total of 42 dialysis days and 56 non-dialysis days. Before switching to tirzepatide, TIR, TAR, and TBR values were 42.7%, 48.4%, and 8.9%, respectively. The mean glucose level was 156.6 mg/dL. After switching to tirzepatide, the TIR increased to 50.8% (p = 0.02) (Figure 2), while the TAR and mean glucose level decreased to 37.8% (p = 0.02) (Figure 3) and 137.4 mg/dL (p = 0.006) (Figure 4), respectively. In contrast, the TBR was 11.3%, and there was no significant difference in the TBR between the baseline and after tirzepatide administration (p = 0.75) (Figure 5). TIR, TAR, TBR, and mean glucose levels were also analyzed separately on hemodialysis days and non-hemodialysis days. On hemodialysis days, before and after switching to tirzepatide, TIR were 44.8% and 52.2% (p = 0.02), TAR were 40.9% and 32.6% (0.07), TBR were 13.7% and 14.3% (p = 0.76), and mean glucose levels were 144.0 mg/dL and 130.5 mg/dL (p = 0.02), respectively. (Supplementary Figure S1) On non-hemodialysis days, TIR were 47.9% and 51.7% (p = 0.25), TAR were 46.9% and 35.4% (p = 0.03), TBR were 11.6% and 8.4% (p = 0.37), and mean glucose levels were 157.9 mg/dL and 141.3 mg/dL (p = 0.08), respectively. (Supplementary Figure S2) The median and the average of the continuous blood glucose levels plots of all the included patients on hemodialysis days and non-dialysis days are shown in Figures 6A, B, 7A, B, respectively. The differences in blood glucose levels from the baseline on hemodialysis days and non-hemodialysis days are shown in Supplementary Figures S3A, B, S4A, B, respectively.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Change in time in range. The time in range significantly improved changing from dulaglutide to tirzepatide. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis. TIR, time in range.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Change in time above range. The time above range also improved changing from dulaglutide to tirzepatide. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis. TAR, time above range.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Change in mean blood glucose levels. The mean blood glucose levels were significantly lower during administrating tirzepatide than that of dulaglutide. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Change in time below range. There was no significant difference in the time below range between dulaglutide and tirzepatide. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis. TBR, time below range.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Median continuous blood glucose levels on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days (A) Median continuous blood glucose levels of all patients on hemodialysis days. The blue line shows those in periods of treatment with dulaglutide, and the red line shows those in periods of treatment with tirzepatide. (B) Median continuous blood glucose levels of all patients on non-hemodialysis days.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Average blood glucose level on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days of continuous glucose monitoring (A) Average continuous blood glucose levels of all patients on hemodialysis days. (B) Average continuous blood glucose levels of all patients on non-hemodialysis days.

Three months after switching to tirzepatide, glycemic albumin did not show significant changes compared to that before switching (21.4 ± 3.6% to 20.6 ± 5.1%), and dry weight decreased from 71.6 kg to 70.1 kg (−1.5 ± 0.3 kg, p = 0.001). Dyspepsia was observed in three patients and nausea was observed in one patient shortly after switching to tirzepatide, however; there were no critical adverse events reported for 3 months (Table 2).

Table 2

Table 2. Adverse events after transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide.

4 Discussion

This retrospective study analyzed the serum glucose levels in switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis using CGM.

A previous study on patients with type 2 diabetes who did not undergo hemodialysis revealed robust improvements in glycemic control and body weight without an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Participants were randomly assigned to four groups (1:1:1:1): one group received tirzepatide once a week at 5 mg, another group at 10 mg, a third group at 15 mg, and the fourth group received a placebo. They were then monitored for 40 weeks. The average reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels from the starting point was 1.87% for those on tirzepatide 5 mg, 1.89% for those on tirzepatide 10 mg, and 2.07% for those on tirzepatide 15 mg, in contrast to an increase of 0.04% for those on placebo. This led to estimated differences in treatment effectiveness compared with placebo of −1.91% for tirzepatide 5 mg, −1.93% for tirzepatide 10 mg, and −2.11% for tirzepatide 15 mg (all p < 0.001). Tirzepatide induced a dose-dependent reduction in body weight of 7.0–9.5 kg (Rosenstock et al., 2021). Similarly, tirzepatide improved glycemic control compared with semaglutide and insulin degludec (Frías et al., 2021; Ludvik et al., 2021). The SURPASS-4 study found that tirzepatide was more effective than glargine in reducing HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. Additionally, it resulted in fewer cases of hypoglycemia, which can raise the risk of cardiovascular events (Del Prato et al., 2021). However, there is limited information on how well tirzepatide works in type 2 diabetes patients who are on hemodialysis.

Dulaglutide improved glycemic control without inducing hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis (Yajima et al., 2018; Ugamura et al., 2022). Moreover, glycoalbumin levels (median −1.8%; p = 0.026) and the daily total insulin dose (−15.0 U/day; p = 0.002) significantly decrease (Ugamura et al., 2022). The mean and % CV of glucose levels significantly decrease after dulaglutide administration according to CGM (Yajima et al., 2018). Although the GLP-1RA dulaglutide is used in patients undergoing hemodialysis, some patients experienced inadequate glycemic control with dulaglutide.

In the general population, tirzepatide is superior to dulaglutide in terms of glycemic control (Inagaki et al., 2022; Nicholls et al., 2024). The use of tirzepatide in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) depends on three aspects. The first is the safety of GLP-1 in patients with CKD as well as the general population. A previous study showed that renal impairment did not have any clinically relevant effect on tirzepatide pharmacokinetics (Urva et al., 2020). The second is the efficacy of GLP-1 in patients with CKD as well as the general population. A previous study reported that tirzepatide is also effective in glycemic control in patients including those with CKD (Del Prato et al., 2021; Nicholls et al., 2024). The third is the protection of renal function. Tirzepatide treatment reduced albuminuria and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope in patients with type 2 diabetes having CKD (Heerspink et al., 2022; Bosch et al., 2023). Recently, the renoprotective effects of tirzepatide were demonstrated using cystatin C-derived eGFR (Heerspink et al., 2023). In patients with type 2 diabetes and at least moderately increased albuminuria, a combination treatment of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA, and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist resulted in observed gains in cardiovascular and kidney event-free and overall survival (Neuen et al., 2024). Thus, tirzepatide use seems to be reasonable in patients with CKD.

However, the efficacy of tirzepatide compared to dulaglutide in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear. Thus, using CGM, this retrospective study analyzed the effect of switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide on serum glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis.

Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time In Range state that the target range of TIR is over 70% per day (Battelino et al., 2019). However, the TIR during the period of once-weekly dulaglutide was only 42.7% in our study, indicating that additional anti-diabetic agents should be considered to achieve the target range of TIR. Furthermore, international consensus guidelines specify a target range for TBR of <4% and <1% in patients aged 60 years or those at high risk (Battelino et al., 2019). This study observed a TBR of 8.9% during the dulaglutide administration period, even in the absence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. This TBR level was significantly higher in high-risk patients, and alternative anti-diabetic agents are preferable to dulaglutide to decrease hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.

Tirzepatide is a dual GLP-1 and GIP agonist, not solely a GLP-1RA. It may achieve more favorable glycemic control than dulaglutide through three possible mechanisms. First, GLP-1 and GIP interact with each other to improve blood glucose levels more effectively compared with GLP-1 single agonists. GLP-1RA acts synergistically with GIP activation to gain a broad improvement in metabolic health with the hypothesis that enhancing insulin secretion by dual actions on pancreatic β cells improves glycemia, restores sensitivity to GIP, and involves additional mechanisms of action (Zhou et al., 2023). Second, tirzepatide could decrease blood glucose levels more effectively in the hyperglycemic state, while not affecting glucose levels in normal and/or hypoglycemic states. This is because glucagon levels are based on blood glucose levels. In contrast to GLP-1, GIP exhibits glucagonotropic effects in normal and/or hypoglycemic states; conversely, it suppresses glucagon secretion in the hyperglycemic state (Christensen et al., 2011). Moreover, GLP-1 receptor expression decreases in a hyperglycemic state, but GIP receptor expression increases under the effect of acute hyperglycemia (Willard et al., 2020). Our CGM plots also showed reduced fluctuations in blood glucose levels after switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide. In particular, post-dialysis blood glucose levels were elevated when treated with dulaglutide, whereas this elevation was suppressed after switching to tirzepatide. On the other hand, CGM plots on non-dialysis days did not show an obvious improvement. The improvement of glycemic control might be due to not on the non-hemodialysis days but on the hemodialysis days, and a longer-term study is needed to elucidate the efficacy of tirzepatide. Third, tirzepatide is an imbalanced dual agonist that favors the GIP receptor over GLP-1, and it is preferable to maximize glycemic control while suppressing gastrointestinal disorders (Finan et al., 2013). GLP-1 has multiple glucose-lowering actions, one of which is delaying gastric emptying. This effect induces gastrointestinal disorders, such as nausea and vomiting, which makes it difficult to increase the dose of GLP-1RA. However, this effect was not described for GIP. Thus, an imbalanced dual agonist favoring the GIP receptor over GLP-1 can achieve better glycemic control than GLP-1RA alone.

The most common adverse events in the patients administered tirzepatide or dulaglutide were nasopharyngitis (tirzepatide range 13.8–18.2% vs. dulaglutide 16.4%), nausea (11.9–20.0% vs. 7.5%), and constipation (13.8–17.7% vs. 10.7%) (Inagaki et al., 2022). In our study, dyspepsia and nausea were observed at 21.4% and 7.1%, respectively, which were slightly higher than the prior observation; however, nasopharyngitis and constipation were not observed, and no patient needed to stop the treatment owing to adverse events, with no critical adverse events reported.

In our study, dry weight decreased by approximately 1.5 kg after 3 months of transitioning to tirzepatide. All tirzepatide doses are superior to all comparators in terms of body weight reduction (Jastreboff et al., 2022; Karagiannis et al., 2022). This is probably because tirzepatide has the same effect on gastric emptying delay as selective GLP-1RA (Urva et al., 2020). Moreover, GIP increases lipogenesis, and enhances the lipid-buffering capacity of white adipose tissue (Samms et al., 2020). These mechanisms seem to improve obesity. In patients with early-stage CKD, a body mass index ≥35 kg/m² is associated with poorer outcomes in terms of renal function (Lu et al., 2014). However, the relationship between obesity and CKD progression is still controversial. Moreover, some reports show that obesity is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis (Schmidt and Salahudeen, 2007). Recently, the presence of both sarcopenia and obesity, termed sarcopenic obesity, has been considered to be a risk factor for mortality and cardiovascular diseases in patients undergoing hemodialysis (de Oliveira Matos et al., 2022). Tirzepatide will improve obesity, but whether it also reduces the mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis remains controversial.

Our facility routinely examines glycoalbumin instead of HbA1cas a glycemic control parameter. The standard method of monitoring glycemic control has been the periodic measurement of the level of HbA1c (Davies et al., 2018). However, HbA1c is influenced by various factors in patients undergoing hemodialysis, such as shortened erythrocyte lifespan, administration of erythropoietin as a stimulating agent for the treatment of renal anemia, the administration of iron preparations, uremia, and blood transfusion, all of which have the potential for rendering HbA1c measurements inaccurate (Abe et al., 2022). Glycoalbumin is more strongly correlated with plasma glucose levels than HbA1c in patients undergoing hemodialysis (Chen et al., 2017; Hoshino et al., 2018; Kohzuma et al., 2021). Nonetheless, glycoalbumin reflects average glucose levels and not fluctuating blood glucose levels. In patients undergoing hemodialysis, blood glucose levels tend to fluctuate, with frequent large glycemic excursions; therefore, it is crucial to use parameters that reflect fluctuations in blood glucose levels. CGM sensors continuously measure glucose concentrations in the interstitial fluid using a glucose oxidase reaction. Thus, CGM can track the fluctuation in blood glucose levels, thereby helping to provide accurate glycemic control and prevent hypoglycemia (Galindo et al., 2023). We believe that CGM is the most reliable method for effective glycemic control in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

This study has several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small. Second, we used CGM and measured glycoalbumin, although we did not measure HbA1c. Continuous glucose monitoring reflects glycemic variability more accurately; however, it cannot be compared with other studies using HbA1c. Third, according to CGM data separated into hemodialysis and non-dialysis days, blood glucose levels improved substantially on hemodialysis days; however, on non-dialysis days there was no obvious improvement. Finally, the observation period was short, and a prolonged observation period is needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness and adverse events of tirzepatide in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

5 Conclusion

In our study, TIR increased without an increase in hypoglycemic episodes after switching from dulaglutide to tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing hemodialysis. Transitioning from dulaglutide to tirzepatide can improve glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis for type 2 diabetes. A large-scale study is required to verify these results.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Nagasaki Renal Center. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because of the retrospective study design.

Author contributions

EO: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. MK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. HM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. TN: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We special thank to Masatoshi Hayashida for his special assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1362242/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1 | Change of time in range, time above range, time below range, and mean blood glucose levels on hemodialysis days. The time in range and the mean blood glucose levels improved upon changing from dulaglutide to tirzepatide on hemodialysis days. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis. (A) Change of time in range on hemodialysis days (B) Change of time above range on hemodialysis days (C) Change of time below range on hemodialysis days (D) Change of mean blood glucose levels on hemodialysis days.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S2 | Change of time in range, time above range, time below range, and mean blood glucose levels on non-hemodialysis days. The time in range did not show significant improvement upon changing from dulaglutide to tirzepatide on non-hemodialysis days. The time above range improved changing from dulaglutide to tirzepatide on hemodialysis days. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used in the analysis. (A) Change of time in range on non-hemodialysis days (B) Change of time above range on non-hemodialysis days (C) Change of time below range on non-hemodialysis days (D) Change of mean blood glucose levels on non-hemodialysis days.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S3 | The differences in median blood glucose levels from the baseline on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days of continuous glucose monitoring. The differences in median blood glucose levels of all patients from the baseline on hemodialysis are shown, and the baselines are the time of starting CGM. The blue line shows those in periods of dulaglutide treatment, and the red line shows those in periods of tirzepatide treatment. (A) The difference in median blood glucose levels from the baseline on hemodialysis (B) The difference in median blood glucose levels from the baseline on non-hemodialysis.

SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE S4 | The differences in average blood glucose levels from the baseline on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days of continuous glucose monitoring. The differences in average blood glucose levels of all patients from the baseline on hemodialysis are shown, and the baselines are the time of starting CGM. The blue line shows the average blood glucose levels during dulaglutide treatment, and the red line shows those during tirzepatide treatment. (A) The difference in average blood glucose levels from the baseline on hemodialysis (B) The difference in average blood glucose levels from the baseline on non-hemodialysis.

References

Abe, M., Kaizu, K., and Matsumoto, K. (2007). Evaluation of the hemodialysis-induced changes in plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in diabetic patients: comparison between the hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days. Ther. Apher. Dial. 11 (4), 288–295. doi:10.1111/J.1744-9987.2007.00492.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abe, M., Matsuoka, T., Kawamoto, S., Miyasato, K., and Kobayashi, H. (2022). Toward revision of the ‘best practice for diabetic patients on hemodialysis 2012. ’ Kidney Dial. 2 (4), 495–511. doi:10.3390/kidneydial2040045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmadmehrabi, S., and Tang, W. H. W. (2018). Hemodialysis-induced cardiovascular disease. Semin. Dial. 31 (3), 258–267. doi:10.1111/sdi.12694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022). 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 45 (Suppl. 1), 125–143. doi:10.2337/dc22-S009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asmar, M., Simonsen, L., Asmar, A., Holst, J. J., Dela, F., and Bülow, J. (2016). Insulin plays a permissive role for the vasoactive effect of GIP regulating adipose tissue metabolism in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101 (8), 3155–3162. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-1933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bastin, M., and Andreelli, F. (2019). Dual GIP–GLP1-receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a short review on emerging data and therapeutic potential. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 12, 1973–1985. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S191438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., et al. (2019). Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 42 (8), 1593–1603. doi:10.2337/dci19-0028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bosch, C., Carriazo, S., Soler, M. J., Ortiz, A., and Fernandez-Fernandez, B. (2023). Tirzepatide and prevention of chronic kidney disease. Clin. Kidney J. 16 (5), 797–808. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfac274

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, C. W., Drechsler, C., Suntharalingam, P., Karumanchi, S. A., Wanner, C., and Berg, A. H. (2017). High glycated albumin and mortality in persons with diabetes mellitus on hemodialysis. Clin. Chem. 63 (2), 477–485. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.258319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Christensen, M., Vedtofte, L., Holst, J. J., Vilsbøll, T., and Knop, F. K. (2011). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: a bifunctional glucose-dependent regulator of glucagon and insulin secretion in humans. Diabetes 60 (12), 3103–3109. doi:10.2337/db11-0979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coskun, T., Sloop, K. W., Loghin, C., Alsina-Fernandex, J., Urva, S., Bokvist, K. B., et al. (2018). LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: from discovery to clinical proof of concept. Mol. Metab. 18 (October), 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2018.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dahl, D., Onishi, Y., Norwood, P., Huh, R., Bray, R., Patel, H., et al. (2022). Effect of subcutaneous tirzepatide vs placebo added to titrated insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS-5 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 327 (6), 534–545. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2022.0078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Danne, T., Nimri, R., Battelino, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Close, K. L., DeVries, J. H., et al. (2017). International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 40 (12), 1631–1640. doi:10.2337/dc17-1600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2018). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American diabetes association (ada) and the European association for the study of diabetes (easd). Diabetes Care 41 (12), 2669–2701. doi:10.2337/dci18-0033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Del Prato, S., Kahn, S. E., Pavo, I., Weerakkody, G. J., Yang, Z., Doupis, J., et al. (2021). Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398 (10313), 1811–1824. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02188-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Oliveira Matos, B., da Costa Rosa, C. S., Ribeiro, H. S., Marcos, N. M., Losilla, M. P. R., Monteiro, H. L., et al. (2022). Obesity phenotypes are, in part, associated with physical activity in diabetic hemodialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 54 (7), 1751–1759. doi:10.1007/s11255-021-03060-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dunn, T. C., Ajjan, R. A., Bergenstal, R. M., and Xu, Y. (2024). Is it time to move beyond TIR to TITR? Real-world data from over 20,000 users of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 26 (3), 203–210. doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finan, B., Ma, T., Ottaway, N., Müller, T. D., Habegger, K. M., Heppner, K. M., et al. (2013). Unimolecular dual incretins maximize metabolic benefits in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 5 (209), 209ra151. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frías, J. P., Davies, M. J., Rosenstock, J., Pérez Manghi, F. C., Fernández Landó, L., Bergman, B. K., et al. (2021). Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 385 (6), 503–515. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2107519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galindo, R. J., de Boer, I. H., Neumiller, J. J., and Tuttle, K. R. (2023). Continuous glucose monitoring to optimize management of diabetes in patients with advanced CKD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18 (1), 130–145. doi:10.2215/CJN.04510422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heerspink, H. J. L., Sattar, N., Pavo, I., Haupt, A., Duffin, K. L., Yang, Z., et al. (2022). Effects of tirzepatide versus insulin glargine on kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes in the SURPASS-4 trial: post-hoc analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 10 (11), 774–785. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00243-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heerspink, H. J. L., Sattar, N., Pavo, I., Haupt, A., Duffin, K. L., Yang, Z., et al. (2023). Effects of tirzepatide versus insulin glargine on cystatin C-based kidney function: a SURPASS-4 post hoc analysis. Diabetes Care 46 (8), 1501–1506. doi:10.2337/dc23-0261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holst, J. J. (2021). Treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity on the basis of the incretin system: the 2021 banting medal for scientific achievement award lecture. Diabetes 70 (11), 2468–2475. doi:10.2337/DBI21-0026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoshino, J., Hamano, T., Abe, M., Hasegawa, T., Wada, A., Ubara, Y., et al. (2018). Glycated albumin versus hemoglobin A1c and mortality in diabetic hemodialysis patients: a cohort study. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 33 (7), 1150–1158. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inagaki, N., Takeuchi, M., Oura, T., Imaoka, T., and Seino, Y. (2022). Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 10, 623–633. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00188-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jastreboff, A. M., Aronne, L. J., Ahmad, N. N., Wharton, S., Connery, L., Alves, B., et al. (2022). Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 205–216. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2206038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karagiannis, T., Avgerinos, I., Liakos, A., Del Prato, S., Matthews, D. R., Tsapas, A., et al. (2022). Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 65 (8), 1251–1261. doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05715-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohzuma, T., Tao, X., and Koga, M. (2021). Glycated albumin as biomarker: evidence and its outcomes. J. Diabetes Complicat. 35 (11), 108040. doi:10.1016/J.JDIACOMP.2021.108040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krinsley, J. S., and Preiser, J. C. (2015). Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults. Crit. Care 19 (1), 179. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0908-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lanspa, M. J., Krinsley, J. S., Hersh, A. M., Wilson, E. L., Holmen, J. R., Orme, J. F., et al. (2019). Percentage of time in range 70 to 139 mg/dL is associated with reduced mortality among critically ill patients receiving IV insulin infusion. Chest 156 (5), 878–886. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, J. L., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Ma, J. Z., Quarles, L. D., and Kovesdy, C. P. (2014). Association of body mass index with outcomes in patients with CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 25 (9), 2088–2096. doi:10.1681/ASN.2013070754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ludvik, B., Giorgino, F., Jódar, E., Frias, J. P., Fernández Landó, L., Brown, K., et al. (2021). Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec as add-on to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398 (10300), 583–598. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01443-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mosenzon, O., Alguwaihes, A., Leon, J. L. A., Bayram, F., Darmon, P., Davis, T. M. E., et al. (2021). CAPTURE: a multinational, cross-sectional study of cardiovascular disease prevalence in adults with type 2 diabetes across 13 countries. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 20 (1), 154. doi:10.1186/s12933-021-01344-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muzurović, E. M., Volčanšek, Š., Tomšić, K. Z., Janež, A., Mikhailidis, D. P., Rizzo, M., et al. (2022). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity/metabolic syndrome, prediabetes/diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease—current evidence. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 27, 10742484221146371. doi:10.1177/10742484221146371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nauck, M. A., and Meier, J. J. (2018). Incretin hormones: their role in health and disease. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20 (Suppl. 1), 5–21. doi:10.1111/DOM.13129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neuen, B. L., Heerspink, H. J. L., Vart, P., Claggett, B. L., Fletcher, R. A., Arnott, C., et al. (2024). Estimated lifetime cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality benefits of combination treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and nonsteroidal MRA compared with conventional care in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria. Circulation 149 (6), 450–462. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicholls, S. J., Bhatt, D. L., Buse, J. B., Prato, S. D., Kahn, S. E., Lincoff, A. M., et al. (2024). Comparison of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: SURPASS-CVOT design and baseline characteristics. Am. Heart J. 267, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nissen, A., Christensen, M., Knop, F. K., Vilsbøll, T., Holst, J. J., and Hartmann, B. (2014). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide inhibits bone resorption in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99 (11), E2325–E2329. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rave, K., Heise, T., Pfützner, A., Heinemann, L., and Sawicki, P. T. (2001). Impact of diabetic nephropathy on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 24 (5), 886–890. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.5.886

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rocco, M. V., and Berns, J. S. (2012). KDOQI clinical practice guideline for diabetes and CKD: 2012 update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 60 (5), 850–886. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenstock, J., Wysham, C., Frías, J. P., Kaneko, S., Lee, C. J., Fernández Landó, L., et al. (2021). Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398 (10295), 143–155. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01324-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruda, A. I., Ciobanu, D. M., Inceu, G., Rusu, A., and Roman, G. (2023). The effect of Dulaglutide on glycemic and weight control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Med. Pharm. Rep. 96 (1), 52–57. doi:10.15386/mpr-2425

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samms, R. J., Coghlan, M. P., and Sloop, K. W. (2020). How may GIP enhance the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 31, 410–421. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saran, R., Robinson, B., Abbott, K. C., Agodoa, L. Y. C., Albertus, P., Ayanian, J., et al. (2017). US renal data system 2016 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 69 (3), A7–A8. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, D., and Salahudeen, A. (2007). The obesity-survival paradox in hemodialysis patients: why do overweight hemodialysis patients live longer? Nutr. Clin. Pract. 22 (1), 11–15. doi:10.1177/011542650702200111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ugamura, D., Hosojima, M., Kabasawa, H., Tanabe, N., Yoshizawa, Y., Suzuki, Y., et al. (2022). An exploratory clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes on maintenance hemodialysis. Ren. Replace. Ther. 8 (1), 26. doi:10.1186/s41100-022-00409-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urva, S., Coskun, T., Loghin, C., Cui, X., Beebe, E., O'Farrell, L., et al. (2020). The novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide transiently delays gastric emptying similarly to selective long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 22, 1886–1891. doi:10.1111/dom.14110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willard, F. S., Douros, J. D., Gabe, M. B., Showalter, A. D., Wainscott, D. B., Suter, T. M., et al. (2020). Tirzepatide is an imbalanced and biased dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist. CI Insight 5 (17), e140532. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.140532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, M. E., and Garg, R. (2014). Glycemic management in ESRD and earlier stages of CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 63 (2), S22–S38. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yajima, T., Yajima, K., Hayashi, M., Takahashi, H., and Yasuda, K. (2018). Improved glycemic control with once-weekly dulaglutide in addition to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on hemodialysis evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring. J. Diabetes Complicat. 32 (3), 310–315. doi:10.1016/J.JDIACOMP.2017.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Lei, X., Fu, S., Liu, P., Long, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists, in the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 15, 222. doi:10.1186/s13098-023-01198-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar