AUTHOR=Zhong Fangmin , Jiang Junyao , Yao Fang-Yi , Liu Jing , Shuai Xu , Wang Xin-Lu , Huang Bo , Wang Xiaozhong
TITLE=Development and validation of a disulfidptosis-related scoring system to predict clinical outcome and immunotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pharmacology
VOLUME=14
YEAR=2023
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1272701
DOI=10.3389/fphar.2023.1272701
ISSN=1663-9812
ABSTRACT=Background: Disulfidptosis is a metabolically relevant mode of cell death, and its relationship with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not been clarified. In this study, disulfidptosis scores were computed to examine the potential biological mechanisms.
Methods: Consensus clustering was applied to detect disulfidptosis-related molecular subtypes. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to construct a DRG prognostic model.
Results: DRGs are upregulated in AML and associated with poor prognosis. The higher the disulfidptosis activity score, the worse the clinical outcome for patients, accompanied by increased immune checkpoint expression and tumor marker pathway activity. The two molecular subtypes exhibited distinct prognoses and tumor microenvironment (TME) profiles. A prognostic risk score model was established using six DRGs, and the AML cohort was divided into high- and low-risk score groups. Patients in the high-risk group experienced significantly worse prognosis, which was validated in seven AML cohorts. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the area under the curve values for risk score prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.779, 0.714, and 0.778, respectively. The nomogram, in conjunction with clinicopathological factors, further improved the accuracy of prognosis prediction. The high-risk score group exhibited a higher somatic mutation frequency, increased immune-related signaling pathway activity, and greater immune checkpoint expression, suggesting a certain degree of immunosuppression. Patients with advanced age and higher cytogenetic risk also had elevated risk scores. According to drug prediction and AML anti-PD-1 therapy cohort analysis, the low-risk score group displayed greater sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs like cytarabine and midostaurin, while the high-risk score group was more responsive to anti-PD-1 therapy. Finally, clinical samples were collected for sequencing analysis, confirming that the progression of myeloid leukemia was associated with a higher risk score and a negative disulfidptosis score, suggesting that the poor prognosis of AML may be associated with disulfidptosis resistance.
Conclusion: In conclusion, a systematic analysis of DRGs can help to identify potential disulfidptosis-related mechanisms and provide effective new biomarkers for prognosis prediction, TME assessment, and the establishment of personalized treatment plans in AML.