AUTHOR=Olshaker Hagar , Achiron Asaf , Chorny Alexander , Hafezi Farhad , Yahalomi Tal , Kratz Assaf , Tsumi Erez , Lu Nan-Ji , Knyazer Boris
TITLE=Accelerated high fluence photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis—corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) at the slit lamp: a pilot study
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Pharmacology
VOLUME=14
YEAR=2023
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1229095
DOI=10.3389/fphar.2023.1229095
ISSN=1663-9812
ABSTRACT=Introduction: Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) has garnered substantial interest among researchers and ophthalmologists due to its high promise as a potential treatment for infectious keratitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high fluence PACK-CXL, using 10.0 J/cm2 (30 mW/cm2, 5 min, and 33 s) at the slit lamp.
Methods: This prospective interventional, nonrandomized cohort study included 20 eyes of 20 patients with bacterial, fungal, or mixed origin keratitis who underwent high fluence PACK-CXL treatment as an adjunct therapy to conventional antimicrobial therapy per American Academy of Ophthalmology treatment guidelines. The re-epithelization time was recorded, and corneal endothelial cell density was counted before and after treatment.
Results: The average re-epithelization time was 8.2 ± 2.8 days (range 3–14 days). After PACK-CXL treatment, eight patients (40%) were directly discharged, while the remained patients stayed in the hospital for an average of 5.6 ± 3.5 days. No eyes required keratoplasty. Endothelial cell density counts before and after the PACK-CXL procedure were 2,562.1 ± 397.3, and 2,564.8 ± 404.5 cells/mm2, respectively (p = 0.96).
Conclusion: although it was not a randomized control trial, we conclude that high fluence PACK-CXL as an adjuvant therapy is safe with no complications observed, and efficient as time to re-epithelization was less than 14 days for all patients and no patients underwent tectonic keratoplasties. Further research is needed to compare it to the current standard of care.