Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Pharmacol., 15 February 2023
Sec. Translational Pharmacology
This article is part of the Research Topic Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of Antibiotics: A Reality Check View all 9 articles

Editorial: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of antibiotics: A reality check

  • 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2Infectious Disease Drug Development Consulting, LLC, Easton, CT, United States
  • 3GST Micro, Henrico, VA, United States

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles have become a backbone of antibiotic drug development and dose selection for novel as well established antimicrobials (Palmer et al.). The ultimate aim obviously is to optimize treatment of patients suffering from an infection, but other goals like accelerating access to novel antibiotics and reduction of development costs as well as prevention of development of bacterial resistance and setting of appropriate breakpoints are of high relevance, too.

As seen for every novel approach it took some time to establish applicable PK/PD paradigms, but in parallel the complexity of the models (both in vitro and in vivo) and the understanding of the processes has increased dramatically. In the present Research Topic prominent experts in the field of PK/PD set out to challenge some of these paradigms, either by a reality check or by improvements of the currently used models.

Since preclinical PK/PD thresholds are a cornerstone of PK/PD studies that are used to determine the best dosing regimen in patients, two manuscripts dealt with PK/PD targets of β-Lactam antibiotics. While for meropenem 40% T > MIC is associated with optimal killing of pathogens, Nussbaumer et al. for the first time could demonstrate that the distribution of the %T > MIC periods throughout the day did impact the bacterial eradication. In line with this Berry and Kuti identified the need for targets that are specific to each antibiotic and pathogen, in particular during dosage regimen development and susceptibility breakpoint assessment. Thereby both studies demonstrated that some common paradigms of PD thresholds might be over-simplified.

Although the importance of the bacterial inoculum is well known in vitro, in another oversimplification most animal PD models use a standardized inoculum, and few in vivo studies have investigated the impact of inoculum size on survival or antibiotic efficacy. The study by Chauzy et al., therefore, set out to investigate the influence of inoculum size on polymyxin B against A. baumannii confirming an inoculum effect.

Even if appropriate PK/PD parameters are identified given all the methodological challenges mentioned above, achieving the desired exposure in individual patients remains challenging. Thus, another study on Polymyxin B addressed the problem of correctly dosing this potentially nephrotoxic drug in obese patients, Wang et al. identified an adjusted body weight (ABW)-based regimen that has a high likelihood of achieving the targeted exposure. Alternative to using body weight adapted dosing regimens, TDM (therapeutic drug monitoring) approaches can be used to individualize dosing of antibiotics. Yet, in clinical practice often only sparse PK is available and results may not be timely to impact patient care. Thus, a clinical approach was employed by Cojutti et al. to identify the best target for meropenem when given as continuous infusion for critically ill patients with Gram-negative infections. By classification and regression tree (CART) analysis the authors found that concentration (Css)-to-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (Css/MIC) ratio correlated with favorable clinical outcome.

Last but not least the information gathered by PK/PD scientists has to reach the clinical practice. Often the revision of bacterial breakpoints fail to result in clinical benefit for the patients due to logistic reasons, as demonstrated by Redell and Tillotson for carbapenems and Enterobacterales. A detailed review by Landersdorfer and Nation on MIC-based PK-PD metrics, from historical perspectives to the most modern translational models, summarized both pitfalls but also opportunities in linking antimicrobial susceptibility testing, target site exposure and bacterial response. Major shortcomings of PK/PD were identified by the authors that emphasize the need to critically appraise this field of research. Yet, we must not forget the tremendous achievements that the PK/PD field has brought to a range of patients types suffering from often life threatening infections. Importantly our understanding of PK/PD continues to develop and mathematical modelers will further refine the relationship between host, pathogen and antibiotics in complex models, with a strong focus to individualize treatment in the sense of personalized medicine.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

RE is an independent consultant, incorporated under ID3C, Infectious Disease Drug Development Consulting. GT is an employee of GST Micro LLC.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: PK/PD, antibiotic, drug develoment process, betalactam, gram negative

Citation: Zeitlinger M, Tillotson G and Echols R (2023) Editorial: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of antibiotics: A reality check. Front. Pharmacol. 14:1150472. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1150472

Received: 24 January 2023; Accepted: 30 January 2023;
Published: 15 February 2023.

Edited and reviewed by:

Alastair George Stewart, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Zeitlinger, Tillotson and Echols. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Markus Zeitlinger, markus.zeitlinger@meduniwien.ac.at

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.