Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Pharmacol., 14 April 2022
Sec. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: 2021 View all 11 articles

Editorial: Insights in Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: 2021

  • Universidad de Extremadura, Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

The main aim of this Research Topic is to shed light on recent progress in the Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics field as well as current and future challenges, aiming to provide a thorough overview of the state of the art in this field.

The research topic comprises 10 articles to which 62 authors have contributed. Throughout the research topic, different aspects related to pharmacological treatment, effectiveness in drug response, and adverse drug events, are covered. Also, relevant aspects in the design of genetic tests are analyzed, regarding the different genetic variants that should be included in pharmacogenomics testing, taking into consideration the ethnicity of the patients. Also, the effects of genetic variants of a relevant enzyme such as the Arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) in drug metabolism are reviewed, in two aspects: its enzyme activity and the putative influence on other genes that could have consequences beyond drug metabolism such as cancer risk. Finally, methods of expression of genetic variants for in vitro functional studies are also assessed.

The review of Tafazoli et al. focuses on the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in guiding drug treatment in clinical practice. It discusses both, the limitations of NGS platforms and putative solutions for solving these limitations. The reduced cost, one of the most important aspects, together with the capacity of simultaneously analyzing a large number of pharmacogenes, as well as the deep analysis it provides, makes this technology promising for routine clinical use.

The article by Sayer et al. analyzes the detection rate of currently available Combinatory Pharmacogenomics tests (tests covering multiple genes) (Wilke et al., 2005; Winner and Dechairo, 2015; Brown et al., 2017), which is widely used in recent years because of their economic utility, in this case, based on the cytochrome P450 gene variants they target. One interesting point in this study addresses the differences in the frequencies of genetic variants between different ethnic groups can make available tests less effective: The authors conclude that the detection rate of CPGx tests covering CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP2B6, show significant variation across ethnic groups, Sub-Saharian Africans and East Asians have a high rate of incorrect detection.

Two articles in this research topic addressed new clinical applications of pharmacogenetics. The work by Hongkaew et al. focuses on the treatment of autism spectrum disorder with risperidone. The authors created an algorithm to calculate the DRD2 genetic risk based on inferred protein expression. The article by Sales et al. is a systematic review assessing the utility of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of sickle cell anemia (SCA) with hydroxyurea. They analyzed more than 700 SNVs and identified 50 SNVs associated with fetal hemoglobin changes in patients with SCA treated with hydroxyurea.

Two articles on this research topic put the focus on the NAT1 (arylamine N-acetyltransferase1) enzyme. The work by Carlisle et al. studied the effect of NAT1 expression levels on the expression of other genes. They found that nearly 3,900 genes were significantly associated with NAT1 activity in breast cancer cell lines modified to have increased, decreased, and null levels of NAT1. Thus, their work shows that NAT1 activity causes expression changes in many genes, thus raising the possibility that the role of NAT1 in cancer (Hein, 2000; Agundez, 2008; Carlisle et al., 2018) could be ultimately mediated by genes other than NAT1. The study by Doll and Hein analyzes the effects of SNVs in the NAT1 coding exon on Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants for the carcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl and its N-hydroxylated metabolite, that are NAT1 substrates (Hein et al., 1993). They confirmed that some SNVs significantly reduced acetyltransferase activity. Also, they identified an SNV (rs4986782) that significantly reduced the apparent Km for these carcinogens.

The article by Muderrisoglu et al. analyzes the effects of SNVs in genes coding human nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits on nicotine addiction and the efficacy of smoking cessation therapy with varenicline, nicotine replacement therapy or bupropion. The study concludes that the response to smoking cessation treatments is independent of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α subunits genotype analyzed.

Giles et al. reviewed the applicability of several omic techniques (genomics, metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics), in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an adverse drug event that has a high mortality (Jolicoeur et al., 2009). The study covers the relevance and current knowledge on omics in HIT, and it stresses the importance of multi-omics approaches to gain ground on the pathogenesis of this adverse drug event.

The aim of the study by Gloor et al. is to identify genetic risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), aiming to improve the identification of at-risk patients. For this, they selected SNVs located around 13 different genes, including COMT, CHRM3, five 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (HTR) subunits, OPRM1, DRD2, TACR1, FAAH1, ABCB1, as well as the inferred phenotypes for the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6, CYP3A, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, and CYP2B6. Interestingly, they identified association or PONV recurrence with the CYP1A2 activity score and with TACR1 and HTR3 genotypes, and they developed a risk model based on these factors.

Finally, Miyauchi et al. analyzed the potential of the baculovirus-mammalian cell (Bac-Mam) expression system to analyze the effect of genetic variability in drug metabolism. This technique allows the transference of genes coding for drug-metabolizing enzymes into mammalian cells to obtain correct posttranslational modifications. The authors demonstrated that CYP3A4, UGT1A1, and UGT2B7 can be efficiently transfected using this procedure. The Bac-Mam expression system, therefore, holds great promise for the functional analysis of the plethora of SNVs and allelic variants present in pharmacogenes, whose list is in continuous expansion as new genetic variations are described.

In sum, this Research Topic covered interesting findings and procedures that will help to gain ground in the development of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics and their implementation in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Agúndez, J. (2008). Polymorphisms of Human N-Acetyltransferases and Cancer Risk. Curr. Drug Metab. 9 (6), 520–531. doi:10.2174/138920008784892083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, L. C., Lorenz, R. A., Li, J., and Dechairo, B. M. (2017). Economic Utility: Combinatorial Pharmacogenomics and Medication Cost Savings for Mental Health Care in a Primary Care Setting. Clin. Ther. 39 (3), 592–602.e1. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carlisle, S. M., Trainor, P. J., Doll, M. A., Stepp, M. W., Klinge, C. M., and Hein, D. W. (2018). Knockout of Human Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells Leads to Increased reserve Capacity, Maximum Mitochondrial Capacity, and Glycolytic Reserve Capacity. Mol. Carcinog. 57 (11), 1458–1466. doi:10.1002/mc.22869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hein, D. W., Doll, M. A., Rustan, T. D., Gray, K., Feng, Y., Ferguson, R. J., et al. (1993). Metabolic Activation and Deactivation of Arylamine Carcinogens by Recombinant Human NAT1 and Polymorphic NAT2 Acetyltransferases. Carcinogenesis 14 (8), 1633–1638. doi:10.1093/carcin/14.8.1633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hein, D. W. (2000). N-Acetyltransferase Genetics and Their Role in Predisposition to Aromatic and Heterocyclic Amine-Induced Carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Lett. 112–113, 349–356. doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00226-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jolicoeur, E. M., Ohman, E. M., Honeycutt, E., Becker, R. C., Crespo, E. M., Oliveira, G. B., et al. (2009). Contribution of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events to In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients with Thrombocytopenia Treated with Heparin. Am. J. Cardiol. 104 (2), 292–297. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilke, R. A., Reif, D. M., and Moore, J. H. (2005). Combinatorial Pharmacogenetics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4 (11), 911–918. doi:10.1038/nrd1874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winner, J. G., and Dechairo, B. (2015). Combinatorial versus Individual Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in Mental Health: A Perspective on Context and Implications on Clinical Utility. Yale J. Biol. Med. 88 (4), 375–382.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: Pharmacogenetics (PGx), Pharmacogenomics (PGx), combinatorial & high-throughput methods, next generating sequencing, clinical practice, NAT1 acetylation, Bac-Mam system

Citation: Agúndez JAG and García-Martín E (2022) Editorial: Insights in Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: 2021. Front. Pharmacol. 13:907131. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.907131

Received: 29 March 2022; Accepted: 31 March 2022;
Published: 14 April 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Heike Wulff, University of California, Davis, United States

Copyright © 2022 Agúndez and García-Martín. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: José A. G. Agúndez, jagundez@unex.es; Elena García-Martín, elenag@unex.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.