A correction has been applied to this article in:
Corrigendum: Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study in Turkish Hospital
Zakir Khan
Yusuf Karataş
Olcay Kıroğlu- 1Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
- 2Pharmacovigilance Specialist, Balcali Hospital, Faculty of Medicines, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Drug safety in paediatric patients is a serious public health concern around the world. The paediatric patients are more prone to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than adults. Moreover, there is a scarcity of information about ADRs in paediatric patients. This study was conducted to determine the frequency, causality, severity, preventability of paediatric patients’ ADRs reported in a tertiary care hospital in Adana, Turkey. A retrospective study was conducted on all spontaneously reported ADRs between January 01, 2020, to July 30, 2021, in paediatric patients. The ADRs reports were evaluated in terms of gender, age, ADR characteristics, suspected drugs and reporting source. All included ADRs reports were characterized according to the Naranjo Algorithm/World Health Organization (WHO) causality scales, Hartwig/Siegel and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) severity scales, the modified Schoumock and Thornton preventability scale and hospital pharmacovigilance center criteria for seriousness. Therapeutic groups were also coded using the WHO-Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification. During the study period, 8,912 paediatric patients who were admitted had 16 ADRs with 1.7 ADRs/1,000 admissions. The majority of ADRs were found in infants (31.2%) and children (56.2%) as compared to adolescents (12.5%). ADRs were observed more in females (81.2%) than males. Skin (62.5%) was the most affected organ due to the ADRs, and maculopapular rash and erythema multiforme were the most commonly reported symptoms. Most ADRs were probable/likely (93.7%), severe (50%), preventable or probably preventable (43.7%) and serious (37.5%). Antibiotics (93.7%) were found to be the most common cause of ADRs in paediatric patients. The majority of ADRs were associated with vancomycin (68.7%). Most of the ADRs were reported by a medical doctor in this study. This small sample size study highlights significant problems of ADRs in paediatric patients, mainly caused by antibiotics and with a majority of ADRs manifest as skin reactions. Furthermore, a high proportion of the identified ADRs were found to be preventable. More focused efforts are needed at the national level to avoid preventable ADRs in hospitals. Monitoring and management of ADRs and future studies would be beneficial for better patient care and safety.
Introduction
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a leading cause of illness and mortality worldwide (Giardina et al., 2018). Spontaneous reporting of ADRs is critical for effective post-marketing drug surveillance and patient safety (Noda et al., 2020). ADRs are also related to more serious cases of liver injury due to drugs as presented in different databases (Noda et al., 2020; Teschke and Danan, 2021), but many of these liver injury cases were poorly documented and used a global introspection method for causality (Teschke and Danan, 2021). The limitations of these approaches include case selection based solely on published case numbers rather than a strong causality assessment method. Changes in the method of causality assessment of ADRs are required to improve data quality and database reliability. Therefore, an objective approach like Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment method (RUCAM) should be used to assess causality of ADRs cases for the better outcomes in future studies (Danan and Teschke, 2016; Danan and Teschke, 2019; Teschke and Danan, 2021. Drug safety is an important part of health care and understanding ADRs is crucial for avoiding harmful effects (Dittrich et al., 2020). The safety of drugs in paediatric patients is a serious public health problem (Rosli et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2020a). ADRs in paediatric patients have been shown to cause not only hospital admissions or lengthy hospitalization, but also chronic disability or even death (Le et al., 2006).
The medication mistakes in paediatric patients were found to be three times higher than in adults, mostly due to considerable variation in body mass, which necessitates individual dose measurements depending on patient age, weight, or body surface as well as the clinical situation (Khan et al., 2020a). The development of renal functions and enzyme systems, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in paediatric patients also alter throughout time (Rosli et al., 2017). Paediatric patients are provided a wide range of medications, with an elevated risk of ADRs linked with off-label prescribing (Bellis et al., 2014). ADRs are responsible for an increased morbidity level in paediatric patients (Priyadharsini et al., 2011; Angamo et al., 2016; Venkatasubbaiah et al., 2018).
Paediatric patients are one of the most vulnerable populations to ADRs. It is reported that ADRs account for nearly 5% of all hospital admissions in paediatric patients (Angamo et al., 2016). A previous study revealed that ADRs affects around one out of every ten children in the hospital, with 12% of them were serious (Clavenna and Bonati, 2009). According to systematic reviews, the overall average incidence of ADRs in paediatric patients was 9.52–9.53% (Impicciatore et al., 2001; Khan et al., 2020a). ADRs also imposed a higher financial cost on patients. It is reported that the average cost of treating an ADR per patient was estimated to be United States dollars (USD) 9,491, with hospitalization or room expenditures accounting for 50% of the total cost (Ayani et al., 1999; Oshikoya et al., 2011). Another study calculated a total cost to a hospital of USD 27,358 for the hospitalization of patients with ADRs in an emergency room over 6 weeks (Patel et al., 2007).
Children rarely articulate their personal medication therapy experiences; they are more susceptible to ADRs. As a result, inappropriate drugs usage in paediatric patients has a significant chance of causing a variety of ADRs (Khan et al., 2020a; Nasso et al., 2020). The paediatric patients are considered susceptible populations and are frequently underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, there is scarce data about detecting ADRs which provides limited safety information in paediatric patients (Nor-Aripin et al., 2012). To compensate for the limitations of RCTs, spontaneous ADR reporting is an important source of medication safety data in paediatric patients that aren’t often studied in RCTs (Rosli et al., 2017; Gentili et al., 2018).
A statewide, volunteer pharmacovigilance (PV) system exists in Turkey, as in many other nations. Its primary goal is to alert the public about previously unknown risks associated with the use of medications in everyday life (Turkey pharmacovigilance center TÜFAM, 2005). Additional research is usually required to confirm these safety signals. All Health care professionals (HCPs; doctors, nurses, pharmacists, etc.), patients and caregivers are the primary source of voluntary ADRs reporting (Ergün et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2020b; Haines et al., 2020). Under-reporting of ADRs continues to be a widespread issue (Ergün et al., 2019; Güner and Ekmekci, 2019; Khan et al., 2020a). According to a recent report, Turkey submitted only 89 ADR reports per million population to the World Health Organization (WHO) Vigiflow database in 2020 (Turkey Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency TPMDA, 2020). However, the WHO recommended that ADR reports should be produced at a rate of 200 per million population per year (World health organization WHO, 2021a).
Underreporting is a well-known issue in voluntary ADRs reporting schemes (Hazell and Shakir, 2006; Khan et al., 2020b). Underreporting of ADRs in paediatric patients is also due to a lack of knowledge about adverse reactions to prescribed drugs (Rosli et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2020b; Dittrich et al., 2020). Timely reporting of ADRs and periodic monitoring are useful for improved care and safety in paediatric patients (Dittrich et al., 2020). Moreover, there is a scarcity of information about ADRs in paediatric patients in our healthcare setting and as well in Turkey. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the frequency, causality, severity, preventability of paediatric patients’ ADRs recorded in a tertiary care hospital in Adana, Turkey.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in a pharmacovigilance center of Balcalı Hospital in Adana, Turkey, to evaluate paediatric patients’ (0–17 years old) ADR reporting forms. Balcalı Hospital is a tertiary care teaching hospital with 1,171 beds that provides both in-patient and out-patient care. It offers health care facilities to the rural and urban population of Adana, (Turkey’s fifth-largest city). This research was carried out per the Helsinki Declaration’s principles. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, involvement of official member of pharmacovigilance center and examination of ADRs reporting forms, the hospital’s institutional ethics committee waived ethical approval. All paediatric patients’ ADRs reported to pharmacovigilance officer by HCPs from January 1, 2020, to July 30, 2021, were included. ADR forms with missing information with unclear causality were omitted from the analysis.
A clinical pharmacologist working at the pharmacovigilance center and researchers analyzed all individual recognized ADR reports. The ADRs reports were evaluated in terms of gender, age, ADR characteristics, suspected drugs, reporting source and outcomes were extracted. The Naranjo algorithm (the total scores range from −4 to 13, the reaction is considered Definite if score >8, probable 5–8, possible 1–4 and doubtful = 0) and WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (the suspected ADR is assessed as certain, probable, possible, unlikely and unclassified/unclassifiable) criteria were used to determine the causality of each suspected ADR (Naranjo et al., 1981; World health organization and Uppsala Monitoring Centre WH/UMC, 2013). These validated tools have been used in several studies (Dittrich et al., 2020; Nasso et al., 2020; Trubiano et al., 2016). Hartwig’s Severity Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the ADRs’ severity. ADRs were classified as mild, moderate, or severe (Hartwig et al., 1992). The severity of the ADRs was also determined by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale. For each ADR, the CTCAE displays grades 1 through 5 along with a specific clinical description of severity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE, 2017; Dittrich et al., 2020). The modified Schoumock and Thornton scale was used to assess preventability (ADRs are divided into three categories: definitely preventable, probably preventable and not preventable) (Schumock and Thornton, 1992; Al-Damen and Basheti, 2019). Hospital pharmacovigilance center criteria were used to determine the seriousness of ADR. Our hospital pharmacovigilance criteria is designed according to the Turkish pharmacovigilance center (TUFAM) recommendations. The hospital pharmacovigilance officer assessed the nature and outcome of ADR after follow-up and classify the cases as “death, life-threatening, caused hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization, caused permanent disability, Other (any other adverse effect due to a drug) and then forward the form to TUFAM and also discussed with HCPs. This form shows the outcome of ADRs experienced by patients. Therapeutic groups and drugs were also coded using the WHO-Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification (World Health organization (WHO), 2020b).
SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., SPSS Statistics) was used to perform a descriptive analysis of the data for frequency, mean, and percentage. All of the information is presented in tabular and graphical formats.
Results
A total of 29 ADRs were submitted to the hospital pharmacovigilance center during 2020–2021. Of these 17 (58.6%) were related to paediatric patients. One ADR form was excluded due to the missing information. Finally, 16 eligible ADRs forms (11 reports during 2020 and 5 in 2021) were analyzed in this study. According to the hospital data, a total of 8,912 (4,701 in 2020 and 4,211 in 2021) paediatric patients were admitted during the study period with 1.7 ADRs/1,000 admissions. These ADRs were observed during hospital admission and reported to the hospital pharmacovigilance center. The majority of ADRs were found in infants (31.2%) and children (56.2%) as compared to adolescents (12.5%). ADRs were observed more in females (81.2%) than males. The median age of the patients was 6.5 years (2 months–13.5 years).
According to the Naranjo algorithm/WHO-UMC scales, 15 of the ADRs were probable/likely (93.75%) and 1 was definite/certain (15.8%). Hartwig’s Severity Assessment Scale shows that 3 of the ADRs were mild (18.75%), 5 were moderate (31.25%) and 8 were severe (50%) requiring an intensive medical intervention. The CTCAE criteria showed that five ADRs were grade 2, four ADRs were grade 3, and seven ADRs were grade 4. According to the modified Schumock and Thornton scale, 7 ADRs were measured as preventable (43.5%) and among them, four were “definitely preventable” (25%) and three were “probably preventable” (18.75%). The remaining (n = 9; 56.25%) were “non-preventable”. Moreover, according to the hospital pharmacovigilance center criteria, 9 (56.25%) of the ADRs caused hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization and 6 (37.5%) were life-threatening (Table 1).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1. Characteristics and assessment of paediatric patients ADR reports.
Skin (62.5%) and renal system (25%) were the most affected organs due to the ADRs. The suspected medication was discontinued in 10 (62.5%) of the patients and replaced with another medication for the same indication. The dose of suspected medication was reduced in 2 (12.5%) patients to alleviate symptoms, while another drug was given to overcome adverse effects in 4 (25%) cases. The results of ADR management revealed that 87.5% had been recovered and 12.5% were in the process of recovering. No fatal case due to ADR was reported in the current study (Table 1).
In our study, ADRs were mostly associated with antibiotics (15; 93.75%) followed by antiviral (n = 1, 6.25%). Vancomycin (n = 11, 68.75%) was associated with the highest number of ADRs. The most common reported ADRs with vancomycin use were maculopapular rash (n = 5, 31.25%) and anaphylaxis (n = 2, 12.5%). Antiviral drug (Aciclovir) is associated with acute kidney failure. The most common drugs that cause ADRs, as well as associated reactions, are listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2
TABLE 2. Drugs associated with ADRs.
These ADRs were first time reported in the hospital pharmacovigilance center. All of the ADRs were reported by doctors (n = 15, 93.75%) and nurses (n = 1; 6.25%). We did not observe any ADR reported by a pharmacist and other paramedical staff in this study.
Discussion
Periodic evaluation of ADRs in paediatric patients is very important. This study explored the causality, preventability, severity of ADRs as well as therapeutic groups and reactions related to ADRs. The current retrospective study is the first attempt that has been conducted to analyze the paediatric patients’ ADRs in our healthcare setting. As a result, it could serve as a baseline for future study, as well as provide critical evidence for healthcare stakeholders and government decision-makers to take the necessary steps to reduce the burden of ADRs in paediatric patients.
In our study, out of the total reported ADRs in hospital pharmacovigilance centers, 58.6% were related to paediatric patients. Similar studies conducted in Netherlands (Dittrich et al., 2020) and Malaysia (Rosli et al., 2017) observed that 26 and 14% of admitted paediatric patients had ADRs, respectively. Moreover, the observed rate of ADR related to paediatric patients was 1.7 ADRs per 1,000 admissions. Nasso et al. also reported similar findings (1.6 ADRs/1,000 admissions) in paediatric patients (Nasso et al., 2020). However, another study conducted by Lombardi et al., observed 2.2 ADRs per 1,000 paediatric admissions, which was higher as compared to our study (Lombardi et al., 2018). These differences in ADR rates among studies may be due to variation in data collection methods, sample size, methodology, and healthcare setting.
Causality analysis is necessary to understand the factors that contribute to the occurrence of ADRs (Venkatasubbaiah et al., 2018). In the current study, the Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC scales of causality assessment observed that most of the ADRs were probable/likely categories. Similar findings were also reported by Nasso et al., 2020, Al-Damen and Basheti, 2019, and Saqib et al., 2018). Because of their simplicity, the Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC scales are also used to evaluate the causality score in paediatric patients. We used Naranjo and the WHO method because these are suitable for non-hepatic ADRs, but not for hepatic ADRs (García-Cortés et al., 2011; Teschke et al., 2013; Danan and Teschke, 2016; Lin et al., 2019). Therefore, in future studies showing paediatric patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or herb-induced liver injury (HILI), all cases should be assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM published in 2016 (Danan and Teschke, 2016; Danan and Teschke, 2019).
In the current study, according to the severity assessment of ADRs using the Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale, the majority of ADRs fell into the severe followed by moderate and mild categories. However, these findings deviated from the studies conducted in Malaysia (Rosli et al., 2017) and India (Sundaran et al., 2018) which disclosed a higher ADRs proportion as mild and moderate while a small number were severe. In addition, CTCAE criteria showed that the majority of ADRs were grade 3 (severe) and 4 (life-threatening) categories in this study. Similar findings were also reported in the Netherlands study (Dittrich et al., 2020). The severity of ADRs must be assessed to take serious steps against the drug’s continued use. Severe ADRs have been linked to a longer stay in the hospital and a higher financial cost due to the need for more intensive medical care. (Walter et al., 2017; Fasipe et al., 2019).
In this study, preventability assessment using Modified Schumock and Thornton scale showed 43.7% of ADRs were definitely and probably preventable. Supported findings were also reported in the Jordan study and reported that 44.7% of ADRs were definitely and probably preventable (Al-Damen and Basheti, 2019). Another study conducted among paediatric patients observed that 20% of ADRs were preventable or probably preventable (Nasso et al., 2020). In the current study, most of the identified ADRs were found to be preventable. The establishment of active ADR surveillance and raise awareness is important to encourage safer drug use. Periodic ADR reporting programs are required to educate and enhance awareness among all HCPs. More focused efforts are needed at the national level to avoid preventable ADRs in hospitals. Therefore, ADRs should be monitored carefully to avert hazardous effects.
In the present study, antibiotics were the most common drug class followed by antiviral reported for ADRs in paediatric patients. Similar results were detected by previously published studies (Rashed et al., 2012; Rosli et al., 2017). The most frequently involved antibiotics associated with ADRs were Vancomycin followed by Ceftriaxone, Clindamycin and Colistin-Linezolid in our study. A study conducted among paediatric patients reported Amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitors as frequently contributed to ADRs (Nasso et al., 2020). A large number of antibiotics were prescribed in the general paediatric patients, and a higher number of ADRs were reported for drugs in this treatment group (Gallo et al., 2012; Nasso et al., 2020; Priyadharsini et al., 2011). Due to the problem of antibiotic resistance, paediatric patients infections were frequently treated with a combination and broad-spectrum of antibiotics at high doses (Manan et al., 2016).
The skin was the most affected organ by ADRs in this study. Similar findings were also reported by previously published studies (Priyadharsini et al., 2011; Rosli et al., 2017; Nasso et al., 2020). However, a study conducted by Dittrich and colleagues observed that gastrointestinal disorders were more frequently seen in paediatric patients (Dittrich et al., 2020). The reason for increased cutaneous involvement of ADRs in paedriatric patients can be attributed to this age group’s unique physiology; in fact, they have a partially matured epidermis that is not fully developed (Rashed et al., 2012; Rosli et al., 2017). As a result, the skin becomes more porous and vulnerable to chemical and microbial attacks (Stamatas et al., 2011).
In this study, the majority of the antibiotics were linked to ADRs related to skin reactions, which is consistent with the findings of other studies (Priyadharsini et al., 2011; Rosli et al., 2017). Maculopapular rashes followed by anaphylaxis and redness on the whole body (erythema multiforme), acute kidney injury were the main ADRs of Vancomycin observed in our study. Al-Damen and Basheti were also reported acute kidney injury with Vancomycin use (Al-Damen and Basheti, 2019). In addition, erythema multiforme has been linked to a variety of antibiotics, including b-lactams, macrolides, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, and others (Diaz and Ciurea, 2012). According to the previously published study, the main Vancomycin-related ADRs were skin rashes and elevated serum creatinine (An et al., 2011). Another study also reported anaphylaxis to intravenous Vancomycin in paediatric patients (Xie et al., 2021). Close monitoring of laboratory testing, including complete blood counts with differential analysis, is recommended for the early and precise diagnosis of ADRs associated with Vancomycin use (An et al., 2011; Xie et al., 2021).
Antifungal antibiotic drug (Amphotericin B) caused rashes in one paediatric patient in this study. A study conducted in India observed renal failure and diarrhea as ADRs due to Amphotericin-B use (Sundaran et al., 2018). It is reported that prolonged Amphotericin-B treatment can be associated with maculopapular rash, eosinophilia and also systemic symptoms (Cesaro et al., 1999; Hagihara et al., 2015). Careful monitoring of the patient being treated for the first time is warranted in the case of Amphotericin B. Antiviral drug (Aciclovir) was responsible for Acute kidney injury-related ADR in our study. Acyclovir is an antiviral medicine that is commonly prescribed to paediatric patients, and it can cause acute kidney injury (Fleischer and Johnson, 2010). A recent study also reported that an acute renal injury occurred in 13% of parenteral Aciclovir treatment episodes (Ryan et al., 2018). Therefore, dosage adjustments for baseline renal function and optimal body weight are crucial to prevent ADRs (Yildiz et al., 2013).
In the current retrospective study, no DILI case was reported. A previously published study conducted by Zhu et al. observed serious conditions of DILI in children and antibiotics were the most commonly reported drug class with risk of liver injury (Zhu et al., 2015). Limited data is available regarding DILI cases in paediatric patients. It is reported by Shi et al. that DILI in children accounts for about 1% of all reported ADRs throughout all age groups, less than 10% of all clinical DILI cases, and around 20% of all acute liver failure cases in children. (Shi et al., 2017). DILI is one of the most serious ADRs and accounts for 13% of all cases of acute liver failure in the United States (Ostapowicz et al., 2002). Moreover, HILI also accounts for 24.2% of the study cohort consisting of both, DILI and HILI cases in China (Li et al., 2007), 11% in Spain (Andrade et al., 2005) and 0.60% in Korea (Cho et al., 2017). Various studies also reported DILI and HILI cases in adults (Mitchell and Hilmer, 2010; Cho et al., 2017; Teschke and Danan, 2017; Amadi and Orisakwe, 2018; Becker et al., 2019).
Many of the used drugs in our study also may cause DILI such as previously reported with antibiotics and other therapeutic drugs (Danan and Teschke, 2016; Teschke, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; Teschke and Danan, 2020), confirming previous data of various RUCAM based DILI cases caused by multiple drugs as published in worldwide cases (Teschke and Danan, 2017; Teschke, 2018; Teschke and Danan, 2020). The underline reasons for lack of DILI and HILI in our study may be that the reporting rate of ADRs to the pharmacovigilance center was very low. We observed all reported ADRs during the study period however no ADR case was reported due to DILI and HILI. Low reporting rate of ADRs is the main reason as indicated in previous studies (Ghabril et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2017; Teschke and Danan, 2017). The risk of liver injury due to medication in children should be taken seriously, and particular emphasis should be placed on the risk of liver injury caused by drugs (Zhang et al., 2019). Therapeutic monitoring of drugs and assessment of liver tests indicators are necessary for timely and correct diagnosis of liver injury (Lee and Senior, 2005; Avigan et al., 2014). However, liver tests were mentioned in only 3 cases of vancomycin in the reported ADR form in our study and none of the patients did have increased Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. Therefore, more active surveillance training on ADRs for all healthcare professionals (HCPs) is crucial for proper monitoring of ADRs in children to avoid the risk of liver injure and better patient safety.
Most of the ADRs were reported by a medical doctor in this study. Nurses reported only one ADR and reporting from the pharmacist was not observed. The accurate spontaneous ADRs reporting mechanisms used by prescribers, nurses, pharmacists, and other paramedical workers are critical for the detection of serious ADRs in hospitals (Giardina et al., 2018; Güner and Ekmekci, 2019). ADR underreporting is a global issue that has been documented in previous international studies (AlShammari and Almoslem, 2018; Alwhaibi and AlAloola, 2020). One of the Turkish government’s major priorities is to monitor and report ADRs (Turkey Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency TPMDA, 2014). In 2005, Turkey established the “Turkish Pharmacovigilance Center (Turkish: Türkiye Farmakovijilans Merkezine)” to coordinate PV activities across the country. In Turkey, all HCPs are expected to be vigilant in identifying and reporting ADRs to the hospital pharmacovigilance center or directly to TUFAM (Ergün et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2020b). However, despite the potential hazards of ADRs and the implementation of WHO standard pharmacovigilance in Turkey, the under-reporting of ADRs continues to be a widespread issue (Ergün et al., 2019; Güner and Ekmekci, 2019; Khan et al., 2020b; Turkey Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency TPMDA, 2020). Previously published studies in Turkey as well as at a global level reported that HCPs have insufficient knowledge about pharmacovigilance systems and ADRs reporting (Ergün et al., 2019; Güner and Ekmekci, 2019; Alwhaibi and AlAloola, 2020; Nadew et al., 2020). Lack of knowledge about adverse reactions to prescribed drugs in paediatric patients is also responsible for underreporting of ADRs (Rosli et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2020b; Dittrich et al., 2020). Therefore, the creation of a mandatory unified periodic education intervention on ADRs of drugs is crucial for better paediatric patients care. Turkish health policymakers should also emphasize the importance of adequate cooperation between international, local health authorities and manufacturers to stimulate and support regular joint training programs for all HCPs to increase ADR knowledge and reporting.
Our research contains both limitations and strengths. This is a single-center study involving only paediatric patients; therefore, it cannot be generalized to other healthcare settings across the country. Moreover, a small number of identified ADRs (n = 16) were evaluated due to a low reporting rate in hospital pharmacovigilance centers. Lack of training, inaccessibility to ADR reporting forms, poor skills, time restrictions, and a lack of incentives are all plausible reasons for HCPs underreporting (Venkatasubbaiah et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2020b). There may be also a chance of unreported mild ADRs due to the voluntarily reported system in the hospital which may pose some underestimation of ADRs. Therefore, a multicenter study and active surveillance of ADRs with a large sample size are required to further verify the current study’s findings. The retrospective nature of the study may have been limited data accuracy and information. However, almost all of the information was obtained from registered ADR reports available in a hard form in the hospital pharmacovigilance center. We did not observe any DILI cases in this study. The possible reason may be a small number of reported ADRs and a lack of information regarding liver tests on ADRs forms. However, it is confirmed that three patients had liver tests reports but none of the patients did have increased liver tests such as AST and ALT. There is a need for continuous periodic training on ADRs surveillance to monitor medication in children to avoid the risk of liver injury. Moreover, our findings on the most commonly reported drug and clinical symptoms may be divergent from other populations with different prescribing patterns, disease epidemiology, and ethnicities. On the other hand, our study highlights the importance of a pharmacovigilance monitoring system to improve quality reporting. Periodic monitoring of ADRs is useful for paediatric patients’ safety and also for additional literature data, which is currently rare. Moreover, this is the first study of ADRs among paediatric patients in our hospital. As a result, it could serve as a starting point for future research and give essential evidence for healthcare stakeholders and government decision-makers to take the required actions to lessen the burden of ADRs in paediatric patients.
Conclusion
This small-scale retrospective study revealed the current ADRs pattern in paediatric patients. Antibiotics were the leading cause of ADRs, which may reflect the widespread use of antibiotics in this population. The majority of ADRs were related to skin reactions, and a considerable proportion was preventable types. More focused efforts are needed at the national level to avoid preventable ADRs in hospitals. Monitoring and management of ADRs and future studies would be valuable for improved patient care and safety. Moreover, a large sample size and multi-central studies are needed to validate the current study results and highlight the area for further improvement in different healthcare settings.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author Contributions
Study concept and design—ZK and YK; literature search—ZK and YK; analysis and interpretation of data—ZK, YK, and OK; drafting of the manuscript—ZK; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content—YK and OK. All authors approved the version to be submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Al Damen, L., and Basheti, I. (2019). Preventability Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Jordanian Hospital: a Prospective Observational Study. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 41 (6), 1599–1610. doi:10.1007/s11096-019-00925-0
AlShammari, T. M., and Almoslem, M. J. (2018). Knowledge, Attitudes & Practices of Healthcare Professionals in Hospitals towards the Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Saudi Arabia: A Multi-centre Cross Sectional Study. Saudi Pharm. J. 26, 925–931. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2018.04.012
Alwhaibi, M., and Al Aloola, N. A. (2020). Healthcare Students' Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 15, e0233393. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233393
Amadi, C. N., and Orisakwe, O. E. (2018). Herb-Induced Liver Injuries in Developing Nations: An Update. Toxics 6 (2), 24. doi:10.3390/toxics6020024
An, S. Y., Hwang, E. K., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. E., Jin, H. J., Jin, S. M., et al. (2011). Vancomycin-associated Spontaneous Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 3 (3), 194–198. doi:10.4168/aair.2011.3.3.194
Andrade, R. J., Lucena, M. I., Fernández, M. C., Pelaez, G., Pachkoria, K., García-Ruiz, E., García-Muñoz, B., González-Grande, R., Pizarro, A., Durán, J. A., Jiménez, M., Rodrigo, L., Romero-Gomez, M., Navarro, J. M., Planas, R., Costa, J., Borras, A., Soler, A., Salmerón, J., and Martin-Vivaldi, R. (2005). Spanish Group for the Study of Drug-Induced Liver DiseaseDrug-Induced Liver Injury: an Analysis of 461 Incidences Submitted to the Spanish Registry over a 10-year Period. Gastroenterology 129 (2), 512–521. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.006
Angamo, M. T., Chalmers, L., Curtain, C. M., and Bereznicki, L. R. (2016). Adverse-Drug-Reaction-Related Hospitalisations in Developed and Developing Countries: A Review of Prevalence and Contributing Factors. Drug Saf. 39 (9), 847–857. doi:10.1007/s40264-016-0444-7
Avigan, M. I., Bjornsson, E. S., Pasanen, M., Cooper, C., Andrade, R. J., Watkins, P. B., et al. (2014). Liver Safety Assessment: Required Data Elements and Best Practices for Data Collection and Standardization in Clinical Trials. Drug Saf. 37 Suppl 1 (Suppl. 1Suppl 1), S19–S31. doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0183-6
Ayani, I., Aguirre, C., Gutiérrez, G., Madariaga, A., Rodríguez-Sasiaín, J. M., and Martínez-Bengoechea, M. J. (1999). A Cost-Analysis of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions in a Hospital Emergency ward. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 8 (7), 529–534. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199912)8:7<529:AID-PDS460>3.0.CO;2-J
Becker, M. W., Lunardelli, M. J. M., Tovo, C. V., and Blatt, C. R. (2019). Drug and Herb-Induced Liver Injury: A Critical Review of Brazilian Cases with Proposals for the Improvement of Causality Assessment Using RUCAM. Ann. Hepatol. 18 (5), 742–750. doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2019.03.010
Bellis, J. R., Kirkham, J. J., Nunn, A. J., and Pirmohamed, M. (2014). Adverse Drug Reactions and Off-Label and Unlicensed Medicines in Children: a Prospective Cohort Study of Unplanned Admissions to a Paediatric Hospital. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 77, 545–553. doi:10.1111/bcp.12222
Cesaro, S., Calore, E., Messina, C., and Zanesco, L. (1999). Allergic Reaction to the Liposomal Component of Liposomal Amphotericin B. Support Care Cancer 7 (4), 284–286. doi:10.1007/s005200050262
Cho, J. H., Oh, D. S., Hong, S. H., Ko, H., Lee, N. H., Park, S. E., et al. (2017). A Nationwide Study of the Incidence Rate of Herb-Induced Liver Injury in Korea. Arch. Toxicol. 91 (12), 4009–4015. doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2007-9
Clavenna, A., and Bonati, M. (2009). Adverse Drug Reactions in Childhood: a Review of Prospective Studies and Safety Alerts. Arch. Dis. Child. 94, 724–728. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.154377
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE (2017). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf (Accessed date August 20, 2021).
Danan, G., and Teschke, R. (2019). Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Present and Future. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 853. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00853
Danan, G., and Teschke, R. (2016). RUCAM in Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: The Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (1), 14. doi:10.3390/ijms17010014
Diaz, L., and Ciurea, A. M. (2012). Cutaneous and Systemic Adverse Reactions to Antibiotics. Dermatol. Ther. 25, 12–22. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2012.01494.x
Dittrich, A. T. M., Draaisma, J. M. T., van Puijenbroek, E. P., and Loo, D. M. W. M. T. (2020). Analysis of Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients in a university Hospital in the Netherlands. Paediatr. Drugs 22 (4), 425–432. doi:10.1007/s40272-020-00405-3
Ergün, Y., Ergün, T. B., Toker, E., Ünal, E., and Akben, M. (2019). Knowledge Attitude and Practice of Turkish Health Professionals towards Pharmacovigilance in a university Hospital. Int. Health 11, 177–184. doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihy073
Fasipe, O. J., Akhideno, P. E., and Owhin, O. S. (2019). The Observed Effect of Adverse Drug Reactions on the Length of Hospital Stay Among Medical Inpatients in a Nigerian University Teaching Hospital. Toxicol. Res. Appl. 3, 2397847319850451. doi:10.1177/2397847319850451
Fleischer, R., and Johnson, M. (2010). Acyclovir Nephrotoxicity: a Case Report Highlighting the Importance of Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of Acyclovir-Induced Nephropathy. Case Rep. Med. 2010, 602783. doi:10.1155/2010/602783
García-Cortés, M., Stephens, C., Lucena, M. I., Fernández-Castañer, A., and Andrade, R. J. (2011). Causality Assessment Methods in Drug Induced Liver Injury: Strengths and Weaknesses. J. Hepatol. 55 (3), 683–691. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.007
Gentili, M., Pozzi, M., Peeters, G., Radice, S., and Carnovale, C. (2018). Review of the Methods to Obtain Paediatric Drug Safety Information: Spontaneous Reporting and Healthcare Databases, Active Surveillance Programmes, Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 13 (1), 28–39. doi:10.2174/1574884713666180206164634
Ghabril, M., Chalasani, N., and Björnsson, E. (2010). Drug-induced Liver Injury: a Clinical Update. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 26 (3), 222–226. doi:10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283383c7c
Giardina, C., Cutroneo, P. M., Mocciaro, E., Russo, G. T., Mandraffino, G., Basile, G., et al. (2018). Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: Results of the FORWARD (Facilitation of Reporting in Hospital ward) Study. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 350. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00350
Güner, M. D., and Ekmekci, P. E. (2019). Healthcare Professionals' Pharmacovigilance Knowledge and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Behavior and Factors Determining the Reporting Rates. J. Drug Assess. 8, 13–20. doi:10.1080/21556660.2019.1566137
Hagihara, M., Yamagishi, Y., Hirai, J., Koizumi, Y., Kato, H., Hamada, Y., et al. (2015). Drug-induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome by Liposomal Amphotericin-B: a Case Report. BMC Res. Notes 8, 510. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1486-0
Haines, H. M., Meyer, J. C., Summers, R. S., and Godman, B. B. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Health Care Professionals towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Public Sector Primary Health Care Facilities in a South African District. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 76, 991–1001. doi:10.1007/s00228-020-02862-8
Hartwig, S. C., Siegel, J., and Schneider, P. J. (1992). Preventability and Severity Assessment in Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 49, 2229–2232. doi:10.1093/ajhp/49.9.2229
Hazell, L., and Shakir, S. A. (2006). Under-reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions : a Systematic Review. Drug Saf. 29 (5), 385–396. doi:10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
Impicciatore, P., Choonara, I., Clarkson, A., Provasi, D., Pandolfini, C., and Bonati, M. (2001). Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric In/out-Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 52 (1), 77–83. doi:10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01407.x
Khan, Z., Karataş, Y., and Rahman, H. (2020b). Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting in Turkey and Barriers: an Urgent Need for Pharmacovigilance Education. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 11, 2042098620922483–3. doi:10.1177/2042098620922483
Khan, Z., Muhammad, K., Karatas, Y., Bilen, C., Khan, F. U., and Khan, F. U. (2020a). Pharmacovigilance and Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: a Mini Systematic Review. Egypt Pediatr. Assoc. Gaz 68, 24. doi:10.1186/s43054-020-00038-8
Le, J., Nguyen, T., Law, A. V., and Hodding, J. (2006). Adverse Drug Reactions Among Children over a 10-year Period. Pediatrics 118 (2), 555–562. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2429
Lee, W. M., and Senior, J. R. (2005). Recognizing Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Current Problems, Possible Solutions. Toxicol. Pathol. 33 (1), 155–164. doi:10.1080/01926230590522356
Li, B., Wang, Z., Fang, J. J., Xu, C. Y., and Chen, W. X. (2007). Evaluation of Prognostic Markers in Severe Drug-Induced Liver Disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 13 (4), 628–632. doi:10.3748/wjg.v13.i4.628
Lin, N. H., Yang, H. W., Su, Y. J., and Chang, C. W. (2019). Herb Induced Liver Injury after Using Herbal Medicine: A Systemic Review and Case-Control Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 98 (13), e14992. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000014992
Lombardi, N., Crescioli, G., Bettiol, A., Marconi, E., Vitiello, A., Bonaiuti, R., et al. (2018). Characterization of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions as Cause of Emergency Department Visit in Children: a 5-years Active Pharmacovigilance Study. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 19 (1), 16. doi:10.1186/s40360-018-0207-4
Manan, M. M., Ibrahim, N. A., Aziz, N. A., Zulkifly, H. H., Al-Worafi, Y. M., and Long, C. M. (2016). Empirical Use of Antibiotic Therapy in the Prevention of Early Onset Sepsis in Neonates: a Pilot Study. Arch. Med. Sci. 12, 603–613. doi:10.5114/aoms.2015.51208
Mitchell, S. J., and Hilmer, S. N. (2010). Drug-induced Liver Injury in Older Adults. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 1 (2), 65–77. doi:10.1177/2042098610386281
Nadew, S. S., Beyene, K. G., and Beza, S. W. (2020). Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Practice and Associated Factors Among Medical Doctors in Government Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One 15, e0227712. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227712
Naranjo, C. A., Busto, U., Sellers, E. M., Sandor, P., Ruiz, I., Roberts, E. A., et al. (1981). A Method for Estimating the Probability of Adverse Drug Reactions. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 30, 239–245. doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.154
Nasso, C., Mecchio, A., Rottura, M., Valenzise, M., Menniti-Ippolito, F., Cutroneo, P. M., et al. (2020). A 7-Years Active Pharmacovigilance Study of Adverse Drug Reactions Causing Children Admission to a Pediatric Emergency Department in Sicily. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 1090. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01090
Noda, A., Sakai, T., Obara, T., Miyazaki, M., Tsuchiya, M., Oyanagi, G., et al. (2020). Characteristics of Pediatric Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 21 (1), 36. doi:10.1186/s40360-020-00412-7
Nor Aripin, K. N. B., Choonara, I., and Sammons, H. M. (2012). Systematic Review of Safety in Paediatric Drug Trials Published in 2007. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 68, 189–194. doi:10.1007/s00228-011-1112-6
Oshikoya, K. A., Chukwura, H., Njokanma, O. F., Senbanjo, I. O., and Ojo, I. (2011). Incidence and Cost Estimate of Treating Pediatric Adverse Drug Reactions in Lagos, Nigeria. Sao Paulo Med. J. 129 (3), 153–164. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802011000300006
Ostapowicz, G., Fontana, R. J., Schiødt, F. V., Larson, A., Davern, T. J., Han, S. H., et al. (2002). Acute Liver Failure Study GroupResults of a Prospective Study of Acute Liver Failure at 17 Tertiary Care Centers in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (12), 947–954. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007
Patel, K. J., Kedia, M. S., Bajpai, D., Mehta, S. S., Kshirsagar, N. A., and Gogtay, N. J. (2007). Evaluation of the Prevalence and Economic burden of Adverse Drug Reactions Presenting to the Medical Emergency Department of a Tertiary Referral centre: a Prospective Study. BMC Clin. Pharmacol. 7, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6904-7-8
Priyadharsini, R., Surendiran, A., Adithan, C., Sreenivasan, S., and Sahoo, F. K. (2011). A Study of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2 (4), 277–280. doi:10.4103/0976-500X.85957
Rashed, A. N., Wong, I. C., Cranswick, N., Tomlin, S., Rascher, W., and Neubert, A. (2012). Risk Factors Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalised Children: International Multicentre Study. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 68, 801–810. doi:10.1007/s00228-011-1183-4
Rosli, R., Dali, A. F., Aziz, N. A., Ming, L. C., and Manan, M. M. (2017). Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Infants: A Nationwide Analysis in Malaysia. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 30. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00030
Ryan, L., Heed, A., Foster, J., Valappil, M., Schmid, M. L., and Duncan, C. J. A. (2018). Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Associated with Intravenous Aciclovir in Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors in Clinical Practice. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 74, 97–99. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.002
Saqib, A., Sarwar, M. R., Sarfraz, M., and Iftikhar, S. (2018). Causality and Preventability Assessment of Adverse Drug Events of Antibiotics Among Inpatients Having Different Lengths of Hospital Stay: a Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Lahore, Pakistan. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 19 (1), 34. doi:10.1186/s40360-018-0222-5
Schumock, G. T., and Thornton, J. P. (1992). Focusing on the Preventability of Adverse Drug Reactions. Hosp. Pharm. 27, 538–542.
Shi, Q., Yang, X., Greenhaw, J. J., Salminen, A. T., Russotti, G. M., and Salminen, W. F. (2017). Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Children: Clinical Observations, Animal Models, and Regulatory Status. Int. J. Toxicol. 36 (5), 365–379. doi:10.1177/1091581817721675
Stamatas, G. N., Nikolovski, J., Mack, M. C., and Kollias, N. (2011). Infant Skin Physiology and Development during the First Years of Life: a Review of Recent Findings Based on In Vivo Studies. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 33, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00611.x
Sundaran, S., Udayan, A., Hareendranath, K., Eliyas, B., Ganesan, B., Hassan, A., et al. (2018). Study on the Classification, Causality, Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Spontaneous Reporting System in Hospitalized Patients. Pharmacy (Basel) 6 (4), 108. doi:10.3390/pharmacy6040108
Teschke, R., and Danan, G. (2017). Prospective Indian Study of DILI with Confirmed Causality Using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM): A Report of Excellence. Ann. Hepatol. 16 (3), 324–325. doi:10.5604/16652681.1235471
Teschke, R., and Danan, G. (2021). The LiverTox Paradox-Gaps between Promised Data and Reality Check. Diagnostics (Basel) 11 (10)–1754. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101754
Teschke, R., and Danan, G. (2020). Worldwide Use of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 81,856 Idiosyncratic DILI and 14,029 HILI Cases Published 1993-Mid 2020: A Comprehensive Analysis. Medicines (Basel) 7 (10), 62. doi:10.3390/medicines7100062
Teschke, R., Schwarzenboeck, A., Eickhoff, A., Frenzel, C., Wolff, A., and Schulze, J. (2013). Clinical and Causality Assessment in Herbal Hepatotoxicity. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 12 (3), 339–366. doi:10.1517/14740338.2013.774371
Teschke, R. (2018). Top-ranking Drugs Out of 3312 Drug-Induced Liver Injury Cases Evaluated by the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 14 (11), 1169–1187. doi:10.1080/17425255.2018.1539077
Turkey Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency TPDMA (2020). Administration Annual Report, Number of Adverse Reaction Reports Sent to WHO. Page 108. [Turkish: Türkiye İlaç Ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu. (2020a). İdare Faaliyet Raporu, DSÖ’ye Gönderilen Advers Reaksiyon Bildirimi Sayısı. Sayfa 108]. Retrieved from: https://www.titck.gov.tr/kurumsal/faaliyetraporu (Accessed date August 21, 2021).
Turkey Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency TPMDA (2014). Legislation on Drug Safety Official Gazette. No: 28973 [Turkish: Türkiye İlaç Ve Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu. (2014b). İlaçların Güvenliliği Hakkında Yönetmelik Resmi Gazete. Sayı : 28973]. Retrieved from: http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/04/20140415-6.htm (Accessed date August 21, 2021).
Turkey pharmacovigilance center Tüfam, (2005). Retrieved from: https://titck.gov.tr/PortalAdmin/Uploads/UnitPageAttachment/QSl4TS8m.pdf (Accessed date August 21, 2021).
Venkatasubbaiah, M., Dwarakanadha Reddy, P., and Satyanarayana, S. V. (2018). Analysis and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Alexandria J. Med. 54 (4), 597–603. doi:10.1016/j.ajme.2018.10.005
Walter, S. R., Day, R. O., Gallego, B., and Westbrook, J. I. (2017). The Impact of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions: a Population-Based Study of a Decade of Hospital Admissions in New South Wales, Australia. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 83, 416–426. doi:10.1111/bcp.13124
World health organization and Uppsala Monitoring Centre WH/UMC (2013). The Use of the WHO-UMC System for Standardised Case Causality Assessment. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/WHO-causality-assessment (Accessed date August 22, 2021).
World Health organization (Who), (2020b). Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Code (ATC) Methodology. Retrieved from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (Accessed dateA ugust 22, 2021).
World health organization (Who), (2021a). WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring. Members of the Who Programme for International Drug Monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.who-umc.org/global-pharmacovigilance/who-programme-for-international-drug-monitoring/who-programme-members/ (Accessed date August 22, 2021).
Xie, S. S., Soler, X., and Risma, K. A. (2021). Perioperative Anaphylaxis to Intravenous Vancomycin in a Pediatric Patient with Previous Topical Exposures. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunologyofficial Publ. Am. Coll. Allergy 127 (2), 264–266. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.035
Yildiz, C., Ozsurekci, Y., Gucer, S., Cengiz, A. B., and Topaloglu, R. (2013). Acute Kidney Injury Due to Acyclovir. CEN Case Rep. 2 (1), 38–40. doi:10.1007/s13730-012-0035-0
Zhang, Y. F., Guo, Y. M., Niu, M., Ge, F. L., Jing, J., Zhu, Y., et al. (2019). Drug-induced Liver Injury in children:An Analysis of Medication and Clinical Features[J]. J. Clin. Hepatol. 35 (3), 579–584. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.03.025
Keywords: adverse drug reactions, children, paediatric, antibiotics, patient safety, Turkey
Citation: Khan Z, Karataş Y and Kıroğlu O (2021) Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study in Turkish Hospital. Front. Pharmacol. 12:786182. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.786182
Received: 29 September 2021; Accepted: 25 October 2021;
Published: 12 November 2021.
Edited by:
Maxine Deborah Gossell-Williams, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, JamaicaCopyright © 2021 Khan, Karataş and Kıroğlu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zakir Khan, emFraXJraGFuMzAwQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==
†ORCID: Zakir Khan, orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-548X