Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 10 August 2021
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
This article is part of the Research Topic Evidence for Assessing Drug Safety and Drug Use in Older People View all 24 articles

Trends in Topical Prescriptional Therapy for Old Patients With Dry Eye Disease in Six Major Areas of China: 2013–2019

Zhenwei YuZhenwei Yu1Xiaoyan WuXiaoyan Wu2Jianping ZhuJianping Zhu1Jiayi Jin,Jiayi Jin2,3Yuhua Zhao
Yuhua Zhao4*Lingyan Yu
Lingyan Yu5*
  • 1Department of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Shaoxing Shangyu People’s Hospital of Shaoxing, Shaoxing, China
  • 3Biomedical Research Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Pharmacy, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

The prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) in old patients are high, corresponding to a substantial economic burden. In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the trends in the topical prescriptional treatment of old patients with DED in six major areas of China. Information on topical drug prescriptions for DED patients aged above 60 years was extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Program of China database. Trends in yearly prescriptions and cost were analyzed. The data were further stratified by patient age and sex, drug class, and specific drug. A total of 130,734 prescriptions from 52 hospitals located in six major areas of China were analyzed. The number of prescripptions per year for patients with DED increased from 13,308 in 2013 to 22,074 in 2019, with a corresponding increase in cost of all topical drugs from 1,490,014 Chinese Yuan (CNY) to 2,618,206 CNY. Drugs for the treatment of DED accounted for the largest proportion of the total cost in each year. Ocular lubricants were the main pharmacotherapy agent. Sodium hyaluronate use increased over time, and the drug was used by 65.9% of patients by the end of the study. Pranoprofen was the second most frequently used drug. The most frequently used drugs for co-incident disease were antimicrobials. Treatment patterns for DED haven’t changed, and the most frequently used drug combination was sodium hyaluronate and pranoprofen. In summary, prescription for old patients with DED and the cost of treatment are increasing. Ocular lubricants are the main treatment option, while sodium hyaluronate is the most frequently used drug. The observed trends can lead to more efficient allocation of health care resources in China.

Introduction

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial ocular surface disorder characterized by eye discomfort, disabling pain, and fluctuating vision, which can affect vision-related quality of life and reduce working time (Clayton, 2018). The precise etiology of DED is unclear, but it may be caused or exacerbated by multiple factors including medications, contact lenses, ocular surgery, computer use, and low-humidity environments (Clayton, 2018). The prevalence of DED varies by country, but all show an increasing trend (Courtin et al., 2016; Dana et al., 2019b; Siffel et al., 2020; Stapleton et al., 2017). It is reported that the prevalence of DED by symptoms and signs were 13.55% in Chinese people, corresponding to a total of 170.09 million affected individuals (Song et al., 2018). Advanced age is positively associated with an increased prevalence among people (Farrand et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018). For people aged over 60 years, the prevalence raised to 34.4% (Liu et al., 2014). Thus, DED affects the life quality of old patients substantially (McDonald et al., 2016). More public health attention and action are needed to improve the management of DED.

DED can be treated but not cured; the goal of treatment is to increase the patient’s quality of life by reducing symptoms (Marshall and Roach, 2016). Management strategies should consider the cause and severity of the disease and address the various disease components (Clayton, 2018). There are many classes of drug on the market for DED treatment including ocular lubricants, anti-inflammatory drops, essential fatty acids, and so on. Topical formulations offer several advantages such as simple, convenience and painless use (Agarwal et al., 2021). However, many treatments are poorly supported by evidence-based practices (Jones et al., 2017), and the efficacy of some (e.g., cyclosporine) is debated (Seitzman and Lietman, 2018). Pharmacotherapeutic approaches also vary by country because of differences in the understanding of DED etiology (Waduthantri et al., 2012; Watanabe, 2018). Ocular lubricant formulations such as sodium hyaluronate drops are favored by those who attribute DED to insufficient tear production (Watanabe, 2018). To date, there have been few reports on the usage of topical treatments for old patients with DED; however, greater awareness of the trends can improve health care resource utilization (McDonald et al., 2016). To address this issue, we carried out a cross-sectional study in six major areas to assess the trends in topical prescriptional pharmacotherapy for old patients with DED in China from 2013 to 2019.

Methods

Study Design

This prescription-based cross-sectional study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Reference number, 20191011–18). The requirement for informed consent was waived as part of the approval because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Source and Study Population

Prescription data were extracted from the database of the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Program, which has been widely used in Chinese pharmaco-epidemiology studies (Yu et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2020a; Yu et al., 2020b; Yu et al., 2020c; Yu et al., 2020d; Yu et al., 2020e). Participating hospitals provided data on prescriptions to the program for each sampling day. There were forty randomized sampling days per year, with 10 days in each quarter. Prescription data included the date, patients’ code, sex, age, and diagnosis, as well as the generic name and price of the prescribed drug.

Prescription data from fifty-two hospitals in Beijing, Hangzhou, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Tianjin were selected. These hospitals participated continuously in the program from 2013 to 2019 and were located in the north, west, south, and east of China, thus covering a wide geographic area and yielding data representative of the whole country. Prescriptions meeting the following criteria were included: 1) prescriptions for patients with a diagnosis of DED, with no restrictions regarding diagnostic criteria and disease severity; 2) prescriptions for patients aged 60 years old and above; 3) prescriptions written by an ophthalmologist between 2013 and 2019; and 4) prescriptions for at least one topical drug. Prescriptions with incomplete information were excluded from the analysis.

Assessment of Drug Use

Only topical ocular medications were assessed in this study. Prescriptions were divided into drugs for the treatment of DED and those for co-incident diseases. The following types of drug were used for DED treatment: 1) ocular lubricants; 2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); 3) corticosteroid; 4) vitamin A preparation; and 5) immunosuppressant (Jones et al., 2017). Drugs for the treatment of co-incident disease included the following: 1) anti-microbial agents; 2) growth factor preparations; 3) anti-allergy drugs; 4) glaucoma drugs; 5) cataract drugs; 6) complementary drugs; and 7) other.

Drug usage was assessed by prescription numbers, irrespective of whether it was new or a refill, and cost. Cost was calculated by adding the price of all analyzed drugs in Chinese Yuan (CNY). Trends in yearly prescriptions and cost were analyzed and further stratified by sex, age, drug class, and specific drug. The treatment pattern was classified as monotherapy or combined therapy with drugs for DED treatment.

Statistical Analysis

Data were processed using Access software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, United States). The rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of overall trends in prescriptions and cost; the chi-squared test was used to compare prescriptions in males vs. females in each year; and the Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to assess trends in prescribed drugs and drug classes. Trends in percentages were assessed by log-linear analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using R v.3.3.0 software (http://www.R-project. org). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Inclusion of Prescriptions and Overall Trends in Prescriptions and Cost

A total of 130,734 prescriptions from 52 hospitals were included in the analysis. All included hospitals were state owned. Of these, 48 were tertiary hospitals and eight were secondary hospitals. Yearly prescription for old patients with DED increased markedly from 13,308 in 2013 to 22,074 in 2019 (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The corresponding cost also increased from CNY 1,490,014 to CNY 2,618,206 (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Trends in prescription numbers and cost of topical drugs for DED treatment. Cost was calculated in Chinese Yuan.

The demographic information of old DED patients for the included prescriptions is shown in Table 1. Nearly half of the patients were between sixty and 70 years of age. Moreover, the proportion of patients at this age increased over time (p < 0.05). The prescriptions of female were more than the prescriptions of male in each year (Chi-square test, all p < 0.05).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Demographic information of old DED patients for the included prescriptions.

Trends in Drugs for DED Treatment

Drugs for DED treatment accounted for more than 70 percent of the total prescription cost of topical drugs prescribed to old patients with DED (Figure 2A). Yearly prescription and cost of each drug are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The main drugs were ocular lubricant formulations containing sodium hyaluronate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and polyethylene glycol (PEG). Sodium hyaluronate was the most frequently prescribed ocular lubricant formulation and was used by more than half of the patients. Prescriptions for sodium hyaluronate and the corresponding cost both showed increasing trends over time (both p < 0.05). PVA drops were the second most frequently prescribed ocular lubricant formulation at the end of study. Meanwhile, the other three lubricants (HPMC and CMC and PEG) were used by progressively lesser percentages of patients (all p < 0.05).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Trends in drug classes for DED treatment. (A) Trends in the costs of drugs for the treatment of DED and co-incident disease. (B) Trends in patterns of DED topical treatment.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Prescription for topical drugs for the treatment of dry eye disease.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Cost of topical drugs for the treatment of dry eye disease.

NSAIDs are the second largest class of drugs for DED treatment. Pranoprofen was the second most frequently used drug throughout the study, and its use increased both in terms of percentage of prescriptions (p < 0.05). Corticosteroid and vitamin A preparation were used by only a small fraction of patients. Flurometholone was the most frequently used corticosteroid, and its use increased progressively in prescriptions and cost (both p < 0.05). However, it was used by <5% of patients at the end of the study. There was no significant trend in terms of the percentage of patients using vitamin A palmitate eye gel, the only vitamin A preparation (p > 0.05). Cyclosporine and tacrolimus were seldom used.

Trends in the Use of Drugs for the Treatment of Co-incident Diseases

Yearly prescriptions and cost of drugs for treating co-incident diseases are shown in Table 4 and Figure 2A. The most frequently used drugs for co-incident diseases were antimicrobial agents and growth factor preparations. The former showed an increasing trend in visits (p < 0.05), while the latter did not (p > 0.05). Notably, the use of anti-allergy and glaucoma drugs increased over time (both p < 0.05).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 4. Prescription for specific drug classes used to treat co-incident disease.

Trends in Treatment Patterns

Trends in treatment patterns are shown in Figure 2B. Monotherapy and dual therapy were used in about 80% of prescriptions. However, the fractions of each treatment pattern showed no significant trends during the study period (all p > 0.05) and treatment patterns had changed. The most frequently used drug combination in each year of the study was sodium hyaluronate and pranoprofen.

Discussion

This is the first study evaluating the patterns and trends of DED topical presscriptional treatment in old patients. As data were derived from many hospitals located in six major areas of China, the results are representative of the aged Chinese population. We found that the prescription numbers and cost of DED treatment increased from 2013 to 2019. Ocular lubricants were the major drug used for treatment, and sodium hyaluronate eye drops were the most frequently prescribed drug.

The growing number of yearly prescriptions may reflect an increasing prevalence of DED in the Chinese population. It is reported there is no significant difference in prevalence rate of urban China and rural China (Liu et al., 2014). Although the included hospitals mainly locate in major cities, sampling bias may be neglected. Age was shown to be a risk factor for DED (Song et al., 2018; Dana et al., 2019b), and our study was focused on patients over the age of 60 years. Patients aged between 61 and 70 years were the major part and kept on increasing. This may be associated with the increased use of electronic devices (Courtin et al., 2016). Other possible reasons for the increase in yearly prescriptions include greater awareness of DED among doctors, improvements in diagnostic technologies, and higher demand for care. There were more prescriptions for female patients than for male patients, and this finding is consistent with the reported sex disparity in DED prevalence (Dana et al., 2019b; Siffel et al., 2020).

Ocular lubricants are designed to support the quality and quantity of tear film and are the first-line treatment for DED in many countries (Dogru et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2017). It was also the main drug used to treat DED in China, in contrast to the United States where the more costly cyclosporine is most frequently used (Clayton, 2018; Seitzman and Lietman, 2018). Moreover, many ocular lubricants are over-the-counter drugs and patients can get these drugs from community pharmacy, and the use rate of ocular lubricant may be higher than the result of our study. Nearly all ocular lubricant formulations can relieve DED symptoms and may improve visual acuity and protect against ocular damage (Moshirfar et al., 2014). However, randomized trials of their efficacy have been limited by a small sample size and poor study design (Pucker et al., 2012). Most ocular lubricant formulations have similar efficacy (Pucker et al., 2012), although CMC-, HPMC-, and hyaluronate-based formulations have been shown to be the most effective in improving patient comfort levels (White et al., 2014). These three formulations accounted for the majority of prescriptions in our analysis, with the hyaluronate-based formulation being the most frequently prescribed (Table 2). Ocular lubricants have good safety profiles and ophthalmologists may take this into consideration when prescribing for old patients. However, the reasons for its widespread use as well as its pharmaco-economic profile require further investigation. There is no evidence for the superior efficacy of PVA-based formulations (Nelson and Farris, 1988; McDonald et al., 2002); however, their prescription increased over the study period and ranked second in terms of cost among all DED drugs. Perhaps this growth could be attributed to more aggressive marketing efforts.

A variety of topical NSAID formulations have been used to treat DED. NSAIDs were the second largest class of drugs for DED treatment in this study, and their use increased progressively in both prescription numbers and cost. The most frequently studied NSAIDS in literatures are pranoprofen, diclofenac acid, ketorolac, and indomethacin (Rolando et al., 2002; Aragona et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2014). Only two of these—pranoprofen and diclofenac—were among the drugs prescribed in our study. Results from clinical trials have shown that some NSAIDs—especially diclofenac—can reduce corneal sensitivity in DED patients; moreover, diclofenac suppressed hyperosmolarity-induced apoptosis of corneal cells (Sawazaki et al., 2014). However, more studies are needed to determine which NSAID is the most effective (Aragona et al., 2005). The increased use of topical NSAIDs warrants attention as sporadic cases of corneal melting have been reported in DED patients (Isawi and Dhaliwal, 2007). Moreover, there is little known about the effects of long-term topical NSAID use, as the treatment duration was no more than 1 month in most studies (Jones et al., 2017). Additionally, the reason for the frequent use of pranoprofen should be investigated as it is not normally recommended in treatment guidelines.

Topical glucocorticoid eye drops can effectively relieve signs and symptoms of DED (Thulasi et al., 2017), but there are adverse effects, such as glaucoma and cataract, associated with long-term corticosteroid use. Thus, topical corticosteroid should be used cautiously, and pulse treatment is a common option. Unsurprisingly, topical corticosteroid accounted for a small fraction of prescriptions in our study. Among corticosteroids, fluorometholone, and loteprednol have a lower risk of increasing intraocular pressure and inducing cataract formation (Mataftsi et al., 2011; Sheppard et al., 2016; Jones et al., 2017). Nearly 80% of the corticosteroid prescriptions in China were for fluorometholone; thus, the current evidence supports the clinical application of corticosteroids.

Topical cyclosporine was the first drug approved for DED treatment and is widely prescribed by ophthalmologists in North America (Clayton, 2018). It was previously reported that cyclosporine accounted for 99% of the total expenditure for DED drugs (Seitzman and Lietman, 2018); however, we found that it is rarely used in China. Asian countries have a different view of DED etiology from that of the United States, recognizing tear instability rather than inflammation as the main cause for DED (Watanabe, 2018). Uncertain efficacy, side effects, and high cost also limit the use of these drugs (de Paiva et al., 2019; White et al., 2019; White et al., 2020).

In addition to drugs for DED treatment, patients may be using other drugs for co-incident disease. Our analysis showed that while drugs for DED represented the largest proportion of the total cost, anti-microbial agents, growth factor preparations, and anti-allergy agents were frequently prescribed. This result is in accordance with epidemiologic findings that microbial infection, surgery/corneal ulcer, and allergic disease are common comorbidities of DED (Shimazaki et al., 2020). The high number of visits for glaucoma drugs among DED patients may indicate the growing prevalence of this comorbidity, which should be noted by clinicians (Dana et al., 2019a).

Monotherapy was implemented in less than half of the patients observed in our study, which suggests that the standard therapeutic approach did not yield satisfactory outcomes in most cases. The level of patient-reported satisfaction with over-the-counter formulations including hyaluronate is about 64% (Gomes and Santo, 2019). However, the efficacy of hyaluronate plus pranoprofen—the most frequently used drug combination for DED treatment—is not supported by clinical evidence, despite the proven efficacy of each drug as monotherapy (McDonald et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2014). This raises a concern for the overuse of these drugs. Combinations of three or more drugs are restricted by the need for frequent administration.

This study had some limitations. Firstly, the outcomes of DED treatment with eye drops were not documented in the database used in our study. And they require more detailed investigation. Secondly, the cohort was not stratified by DED phenotype or severity. Thirdly, we were unable to determine whether the topical formulations contained preservatives based on the available information. Finally, we did not include oral drugs and non-prescription drugs for DED treatment in our analysis.

Conclusion

We analyzed trends in DED topical prescriptional treatment over a seven -year period in old Chinese patients. The prescription numbers and corresponding cost associated with DED both showed increasing trends over the study period, highlighting the need for better clinical management of old patients with DED. Ocular lubricants were the most frequently used drug for DED treatment, and this tendency may reflect the view among Chinese physicians that tear instability is main cause of DED.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Sir Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: YZ, LY; Data curation: ZY, LY. Formal analysis: LY, XW, JZ, JJ, ZY; Funding acquisition: ZY; Investigation: ZY, XW; Methodology: ZY, LY, JZ, JJ; Resources: ZY; Validation: LY, XW, JZ, JJ; Visualization: LY, JP, JJ; Writing-original draft: ZY; Writing-review and editing: YZ, LY.

Funding

This work was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (LY18H310005). The funder played no role in the research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors would thank Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Program of China for collecting and providing the data.

References

Agarwal, P., Craig, J. P., and Rupenthal, I. D. (2021). Formulation Considerations for the Management of Dry Eye Disease. Pharmaceutics 13 (2), 207. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13020207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aragona, P., Stilo, A., Ferreri, F., and Mobrici, M. (2005). Effects of the Topical Treatment with NSAIDs on Corneal Sensitivity and Ocular Surface of Sjögren's Syndrome Patients. Eye 19, 535–539. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Dong, F., Chen, W., Sun, X., Deng, Y., Hong, J., et al. (2014). Clinical Efficacy of 0.1% Pranoprofen in Treatment of Dry Eye Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 127, 2407–2412. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clayton, J. A. (2018). Dry Eye. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2212–2223. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1407936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Courtin, R., Pereira, B., Naughton, G., Chamoux, A., Chiambaretta, F., Lanhers, C., et al. (2016). Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease in Visual Display Terminal Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMJ Open 6, e009675–13. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dana, R., Bradley, J. L., Guerin, A., Pivneva, I., Evans, A. M., and Stillman, I. Ö. (2019a). Comorbidities and Prescribed Medications in Patients with or without Dry Eye Disease: A Population-Based Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 198, 181–192. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dana, R., Bradley, J. L., Guerin, A., Pivneva, I., Stillman, I. Ö., Evans, A. M., et al. (2019b). Estimated Prevalence and Incidence of Dry Eye Disease Based on Coding Analysis of a Large, All-Age United States Health Care System. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 202, 47–54. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Paiva, C. S., Pflugfelder, S. C., Ng, S. M., and Akpek, E. K. (2019). Topical Cyclosporine a Therapy for Dry Eye Syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9, CD010051. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010051.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dogru, M., Nakamura, M., Shimazaki, J., and Tsubota, K. (2013). Changing Trends in the Treatment of Dry-Eye Disease. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 22, 1581–1601. doi:10.1517/13543784.2013.838557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrand, K. F., Fridman, M., Stillman, I. Ö., and Schaumberg, D. A. (2017). Prevalence of Diagnosed Dry Eye Disease in the United States Among Adults Aged 18 Years and Older. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 182, 90–98. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomes, J. A. P., and Santo, R. M. (2019). The Impact of Dry Eye Disease Treatment on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life: A Review. Ocul. Surf. 17 (1), 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Isawi, H., and Dhaliwal, D. K. (2007). Corneal Melting and Perforation in Stevens Johnson Syndrome Following Topical Bromfenac Use. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 1644–1646. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, L., Downie, L. E., Korb, D., Benitez-del-Castillo, J. M., Dana, R., Deng, S. X., et al. (2017). TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul. Surf. 15, 575–628. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, N.-n., Liu, L., Li, J., and Sun, Y.-z. (2014). Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Symptom in mainland china: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2014/748654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marshall, L. L., and Roach, J. M. (2016). Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Consult. Pharm. 31, 96–106. doi:10.4140/TCP.n.2016.96

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mataftsi, A., Narang, A., Moore, W., and Nischal, K. K. (2011). Do reducing Regimens of Fluorometholone for Paediatric Ocular Surface Disease Cause Glaucoma? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 95, 1531–1533. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.192773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDonald, C. C., Kaye, S. B., Figueiredo, F. C., Macintosh, G., and Lockett, C. (2002). A Randomised, Crossover, Multicentre Study to Compare the Performance of 0.1% (W/v) Sodium Hyaluronate with 1.4% (W/v) Polyvinyl Alcohol in the Alleviation of Symptoms Associated with Dry Eye Syndrome. Eye (Lond) 16, 601–607. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDonald, M., Patel, D. A., Keith, M. S., and Snedecor, S. J. (2016). Economic and Humanistic Burden of Dry Eye Disease in Europe, North America, and Asia: A Systematic Literature Review. Ocul. Surf. 14, 144–167. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2015.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moshirfar, M., Pierson, K., Hanamaikai, K., Santiago-Caban, L., Muthappan, V., and Passi, S. F. (2014). Artificial Tears Potpourri: A Literature Review. Clin. Ophthalmol. 8, 1419–1433. doi:10.2147/opth.s65263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, J. D., and Farris, R. L. (1988). Sodium Hyaluronate and Polyvinyl Alcohol Artificial Tear Preparations. Arch. Ophthalmol. 106, 484–487. doi:10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130530029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pucker, A., Marrone, M., and Nichols, J. J. (2012). Over the Counter (OTC) Artificial Tear Drops for Dry Eye Syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD009729. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009729

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolando, M., Barabino, S., Alongi, S., and Calabria, G. (2002). Topical Non-preserved Diclofenac Therapy for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 506, 1237–1240. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sawazaki, R., Ishihara, T., Usui, S., Hayashi, E., Tahara, K., Hoshino, T., et al. (2014). Diclofenac Protects Cultured Human Corneal Epithelial Cells against Hyperosmolarity and Ameliorates Corneal Surface Damage in a Rat Model of Dry Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 2547–2556. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seitzman, G., and Lietman, T. (2018). Dry Eye. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, e19. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1808906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheppard, J. D., Comstock, T. L., and Cavet, M. E. (2016). Impact of the Topical Ophthalmic Corticosteroid Loteprednol Etabonate on Intraocular Pressure. Adv. Ther. 33, 532–552. doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0315-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimazaki, J., Nomura, Y., Numa, S., Murase, Y., Kakinoki, K., Abe, F., et al. (2020). Prospective, Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Survey on Dry Eye Disease in Japan. Adv. Ther. 37, 316–328. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01143-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siffel, C., Hennies, N., Joseph, C., Lascano, V., Horvat, P., Scheider, M., et al. (2020). Burden of Dry Eye Disease in Germany: a Retrospective Observational Study Using German Claims Data. Acta Ophthalmol. 98, e504–e512. doi:10.1111/aos.14300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, P., Xia, W., Wang, M., Chang, X., Wang, J., Jin, S., et al. (2018). Variations of Dry Eye Disease Prevalence by Age, Sex and Geographic Characteristics in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Glob. Health 8, 20503. doi:10.7189/jogh.08.020503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stapleton, F., Alves, M., Bunya, V. Y., Jalbert, I., Lekhanont, K., Malet, F., et al. (2017). TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul. Surf. 15, 334–365. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thulasi, P., Djalilian, A. R., Sciences, V., Eye, I., and Infirmary, E. (2017). Update in Current Diagnostics and Therapeutics of Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology 124, S27–S33. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.022.Update

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waduthantri, S., Yong, S. S., Tan, C. H., Shen, L., Lee, M. X., Nagarajan, S., et al. (2012). Cost of Dry Eye Treatment in an Asian Clinic Setting. PloS one 7 (6), e37711. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, H. (2018). Medical Treatment for Dry Eye in Japan. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, DES116–DES120. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-24130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, C. J., Thomas, C. R., and Byrne, M. E. (2014). Bringing comfort to the Masses: A Novel Evaluation of comfort Agent Solution Properties. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 37, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, D. E., Zhao, Y., Jayapalan, H., Machiraju, P., Periyasamy, R., and Ogundele, A. (2020). Physician Satisfaction with Anti-inflammatory Topical Medications for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Opth 14, 931–938. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S237832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, D. E., Zhao, Y., Ogundele, A., Fulcher, N., Acs, A., Moore-Schiltz, L., et al. (2019). Real-world Treatment Patterns of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion and Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution Among Patients with Dry Eye. Opth 13, 2285–2292. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S226168

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, L., Chen, X., and Yu, Z. (2019). Trends of Antidementia Drugs Use in Outpatients with Alzheimer's Disease in Six Major Cities of China. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 34, 312–316. doi:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, L., Ding, K., Luo, L., and Yu, Z. (2020a). Prescribing Trends of Glaucoma Drugs in Six Major Cities of China from 2013 to 2017. PLoS One 15, e0227595. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, L., Feng, J., Yu, Z., and Dai, H. (2020b). Trends of Anti-seizure Medication Use in Pediatric Patients in Six Cities in China from 2013 to 2018. Epilepsy Res. 167, 106448. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Yu, L., and Shan, C. (2020c). Trends of Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Prescription in Five Major Cities of China, 2012-2017. BMC Health Serv. Res. 20, 209. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-5072-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Yu, L., and Zhu, J. (2020d). Patterns of Polymyxin B Use in Eight Major Cities of China in its First Year of Use. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 20, 342–343. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2014.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., and Yu, L. (2020e). Trends in Antidepressant Use and Expenditure in Six Major Cities in China from 2013 to 2018. Front. Psychiatry 11, 551. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dry eye, eye drop, ocular lubricant, artificial tear, sodium hyaluronate, prescription

Citation: Yu Z, Wu X, Zhu J, Jin J, Zhao Y and Yu L (2021) Trends in Topical Prescriptional Therapy for Old Patients With Dry Eye Disease in Six Major Areas of China: 2013–2019. Front. Pharmacol. 12:690640. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.690640

Received: 03 April 2021; Accepted: 30 July 2021;
Published: 10 August 2021.

Edited by:

Ria Benko, University of Szeged, Hungary

Reviewed by:

Konstantin Tihomirov Tachkov, Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria
Yihe Chen, Harvard Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2021 Yu, Wu, Zhu, Jin, Zhao and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yuhua Zhao, zhaoyuhua1987@126.com; Lingyan Yu, lingyanyu@zju.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.