Vishal Jhanji
Isabelle Billig
Gary Hin-Fai Yam- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Corneal opacification is the fourth most common cause of blindness globally behind cataracts, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. The standard treatment of serious corneal scarring is corneal transplantation. Though it is effective for restoring vision, the treatment outcome is not optimal, due to limitations such as long-term graft survival, lifelong use of immunosuppressants, and a loss of corneal strength. Regulation of corneal stromal wound healing, along with inhibition or downregulation of corneal scarring is a promising approach to prevent corneal opacification. Pharmacological approaches have been suggested, however these are fraught with side effects. Tissue healing is an intricate process that involves cell death, proliferation, differentiation, and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Current research on stromal wound healing is focused on corneal characteristics such as the immune response, angiogenesis, and cell signaling. Indeed, promising new technologies with the potential to modulate wound healing are under development. In this review, we provide an overview of cell-free strategies and some approaches under development that have the potential to control stromal fibrosis and scarring, especially in the context of early intervention.
Introduction
The cornea is the clear window of the eyes. The rays of light pass through the cornea before reaching the retina. Its main functions include 1) mechanical protection of inner eye tissues from physical, chemical, and UV damages, 2) an optically clear structure for the undisturbed passage of light, 3) a highly refractive medium (providing two-thirds of the eye’s refractive power) to converge the incident light rays through the pupil and focus on the fovea, and 4) an immune barrier (formed by the corneal epithelium and tear film) from external agents. Anatomically, the cornea has three cellular layers (epithelium, stroma, and endothelium) in a sandwich with two acellular layers: the Bowman’s layer and Descemet’s membrane. The corneal stroma forms about 90% of the overall corneal thickness, giving the strength and structural integrity of the cornea. The cornea’s transparency is maintained by the regular alignment of collagen fibers and the relative dehydration status inside the stroma. Besides, corneal transparency is associated with corneal avascularity and the self-renewal of corneal epithelium.
Corneal transparency is critical for optimal vision. Damage to the cornea by trauma or infection can cause irreversible reduction of transparency, leading to distorted vision and eventually blindness. Corneal blindness is a leading cause of vision loss, with 4.2 million people worldwide affected by corneal opacities (World Report on Vision, World Health Organization, 2019). Affected individuals lose their independence and have a poor quality of life. Treatment for corneal injury is determined by several factors that include etiology, location, and severity of the injury. First-line treatments for corneal abrasions are antibiotics and lubricants, while mild to moderate pain can be controlled with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. When corneal pathologies cause severe and irreversible scarring, a corneal transplant often is the best solution. In a global survey, more than 180,000 cases of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) were conducted in 116 countries and 284,000 corneas were procured in 2012 (Gain et al., 2016). An Australian study of 18,686 penetrating corneal grafts reported that more than 70% of patients with multiple indications showed visual improvement in short-term outcome, however, universal attrition of visual acuity was observed in a follow-up study of patients up to 22°years post-transplant (Williams et al., 2008). Reasons for treatment failures include irreversible graft rejection (34%), corneal endothelial failure or glaucoma (24%), and infection (14%). By 2°years post-surgery, only 45% of grafted eyes showed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/12 or better and 26% had BCVA less than 6/60. Even more problematic, the global shortage of transplantable donor corneal tissues has greatly hindered the availability of corneal transplantation. In fact, as of now, only one cornea is available for every 70 patients worldwide (Gain et al., 2016).
After more than a century of full-thickness corneal transplantation on patients (the first surgery by Dr. Eduard Zirm in 1905 (Zirm, 1906)), the clinical practice has been tremendously improved with advances in microsurgical techniques and instrumentation, and the use of surgical lasers (excimer and femtosecond lasers). This has resulted in different forms of selective lamellar keratoplasty (removal of the diseased corneal layer only) (Jhanji et al., 2012; Chamberlain, 2019). Specifically, anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) replaces the epithelium and anterior stroma, while retaining the healthy posterior stroma and endothelium. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is performed when the stroma has to be replaced but the healthy recipient endothelium is maintained (Luengo-Gimeno et al., 2011; Arundhati et al., 2020). Compared with PK, ALK and DALK achieve better clinical outcomes, since they preserve the host corneal endothelium, thereby avoiding graft rejection due to endothelial failure. Lamellar techniques can also rescue failed penetrating grafts over successive PK, hence reducing the intraoperative risks and promoting visual recovery (Hos et al., 2019; Alio Del Barrio et al., 2021). Nonetheless, these approaches require transplantable corneal tissues, and there is an unmet need for donor corneas worldwide.
Along with recent advances in tissue engineering and scaffold biology, the discovery of corneal stromal stem cells (CSSC) presents a potentially new approach to treat corneal stromal disorders (Du et al., 2009; Basu et al., 2014; Shojaati et al., 2018). An interventional trial of CSSC to improve corneal clarity for patients with scarred corneas is underway in India (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02948023). Another clinical trial showed that the stromal implantation of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells improved the pachymetric and visual parameters in patients with advanced keratoconus (El Zarif et al., 2021). Different reviews have described the development of these cell-based therapeutic modalities and discussed their potential to substitute keratoplasty for corneal scarring (Fuest et al., 2016; Alio Del Barrio and Alio, 2018).
In this review, we provide an overview of conventional cell-free medications and new strategies that can be developed to control corneal fibrosis and scarring. Some of these could be applied as an early intervention to stimulate native tissue regeneration or work in combination with other treatments to enhance vision recovery.
Corneal Stroma and Response to Injury
The corneal stroma is composed of specialized extracellular matrix (ECM) components and collagen fibrils. These fibrils are mainly type I and V collagens and are organized in parallel bundles that are aligned into layers, or lamellae. About 300 to 500 collagen lamellae are positioned in perpendicular orientations to comprise the stroma, establishing the mechanical strength and optical properties of the cornea (Meek and Knupp, 2015). Keratocytes, the dominant cell type inside the corneal stroma, are quiescent and locate between collagen lamellae (Yam et al., 2020). They produce collagens and synthesize keratan sulfate proteoglycans (KSPG; lumican, keratocan, and mimecan) that regulate collagen fibril alignment and spacing, hence keratocyte activities are crucial for the stromal organization and transparency. When the corneal stromal injury involves both epithelial and stromal elements, the release of inflammatory cytokines (mainly interleukin-1, IL-1) from the damaged epithelium induces keratocytes in the anterior stroma to undergo apoptosis (Wilson et al., 2007). Surviving keratocytes are activated and transform into proliferative fibroblastic cells, the stromal fibroblasts (SF), with repair phenotypes that initiate wound healing responses (Fini, 1999). Stimulated by serum factors, chemokines, and cytokines (e.g. transforming growth factor-beta, TGF-β; basic fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor, PDGF), the cells mediate Smad and non-Smad-dependent pathways, such as phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)-independent Akt and JNK signaling. SF express fibronectin receptors, produce and deposit repair-type ECM proteins (e.g. fibronectin and SPARC), and collagenases to promote tissue remodeling (Carlson et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2009; Yam et al., 2020). SF lose keratocyte phenotypes and become migratory, with the cytoskeletal arrangement and focal adhesion changes regulated by PI3K/Rac1/Rho pathways (Sloniecka et al., 2016). The presence of pro-inflammatory and chemotactic factors, such as IL-8, attracts neutrophil infiltration, further stimulating SF generation and repopulation via the P-selectin pathway (Lam et al., 2015). Studies have shown that SF express G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane span receptor CXCR4 and respond to its ligand α-chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), possibly mediating the recruitment of dendritic cells into injured corneas during inflammation, and also promote angiogenesis (Bourcier et al., 2003; Lopez et al., 2018). The activation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis controls cell cycle and regulates apoptosis via the effector molecules, such as NFκB (Helbig et al., 2003; Bamdad et al., 2017). SF further transform into highly contractile myofibroblasts, which express fibronectin receptors (α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins), that promote the assembly of fibronectin fibrils to conduct mechanical force during wound matrix contraction (Jester et al., 1999). Myofibroblasts have altered KSPG synthesis compared with keratocytes, and produce excessive and abnormal ECM components (for example, collagen I, fibronectin, and biglycan) that are deposited in a disorganized manner. Overproduction of abnormal ECM compromises corneal transparency. In addition, myofibroblasts can be generated from bone marrow-derived fibrocytes (de Oliveira and Wilson, 2020). These cells may retain steroid sensitivity, giving a lineage of steroid-responsive myofibroblasts, whereas steroid-resistant cells could be derived from SF or keratocyte-related precursors (Wilson, 2012). However, this hypothesis needs to be validated with more experiments.
Fibrosis occurs when myofibroblasts appear and produce excessive and disorganized ECM, which interferes or blocks the light passage. Transient haze from corneal abrasion or ultraviolet (UV)-mediated riboflavin crosslinking can be reversed by the regeneration of damaged epithelium and basement membrane, which usually occurs within days (Santhanam et al., 2017; Wilson, 2019). The healed epithelium reduces the supply of secreted TGFβ and PDGF, limiting the viability of myofibroblasts and their precursors, ultimately triggering apoptosis before they accumulate inside the stroma and deposit disorganized ECM (Wilson et al., 2007). In a rabbit model of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), restoring basement membrane structure and function generated spotty areas of clear “lacunae” within the fibrotic opacity, indicating the withdrawal of myofibroblasts (Marino et al., 2017). Subsequent repopulation of keratocytes then induced the paracrine IL-1α-mediated apoptosis of myofibroblasts and remodeling of disorganized ECM to restore the transparency (Kaur et al., 2009). The resolution of corneal fibrosis can occur over months to years and produce either partial or complete recovery of corneal transparency (Torricelli et al., 2016; Wilson et al., 2017). If the epithelium and basement membrane do not regenerate quickly, stromal metabolism becomes dysregulated, leading to keratolysis, collagen fibril disorganization, and eventually corneal fibrosis and scarring. The continuous presence of pro-fibrotic cytokines from prolonged and severe inflammation or infection will promote the differentiation of myofibroblasts, resulting in chronic scarring. If this occurs in the visual axis, vision will be impaired. In this case, corneal tissue replacement becomes necessary to restore vision (Deshmukh et al., 2020).
Pathological conditions in the cornea also affect innervation. Corneal nerves produce neurotrophic factors such as substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, epidermal growth factor, nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neurotrophins (Shaheen et al., 2014), that maintain normal cornea and contribute to corneal wound healing (neurotrophic functions). Corneal damages affecting the supply of supportive neuropeptides or directly disrupting the neural circuit lead to neurotrophic keratopathy. This corneal nerve impairment results in epithelial defects, stromal ulceration, and scarring (neurotrophic keratitis) (Shaheen et al., 2014). Abnormal nerve regeneration often predisposes patients to pain, dry eye, and vision loss. This has been demonstrated by the interplay between corneal nerves and immune cells (Sarkar et al., 2013; Seyed-Razavi et al., 2014), between nerves and corneal epithelium (Beuerman and Schimmelpfennig, 1980), and the interaction between nerves and keratocytes, fibroblasts or myofibroblasts. In several reports, human SF (but not keratocytes) promoted neurite outgrowth in a cultured chick dorsal root ganglion cell model, while myofibroblasts delayed neurite growth (Jeon et al., 2018; Yam et al., 2017). The elongating neurites made contacts with myofibroblasts (but not SF), mediated by the phosphorylation of collapsin response mediating protein 2 caused by myofibroblast-secreted TGFβ1 (Jeon et al., 2018). On the other hand, mitomycin C (MMC) treatment after PRK decreased myofibroblast differentiation and resulted in rapid neuronal regeneration (Jeon et al., 2018). Hence, blocking myofibroblast differentiation during early wound healing is critical for restoring corneal innervation to the epithelium and stroma. Further studies identifying molecules involved in this regulation by SF versus myofibroblasts and their associated glia (non-myelinating Schwann cells) could provide new insights into stromal nerve regeneration.
Topical Corticosteroids
Topical corticosteroids, such as prednisone acetate ophthalmic eye drops, minimize fibrosis through its downregulating TGFβ-mediated inflammatory and fibrotic events (Wen et al., 2002). The scar tissue deposition after PRK was reduced by steroid treatment (Tuft et al., 1993). In injured corneal tissues, the application of corticosteroids prevented macrophage and lymphocyte accumulation, and reduced collagen deposition by fibroblasts (Wangoo et al., 1997). Steroids also act as an immune-suppressant to block the release of inflammatory mediators and inhibit cytokine production (Nur Akkaya and Erbas, 2019). However, the use of steroids has been controversial in active cases of corneal fibrosis associated with bacterial infection. Early treatment can result in uncontrolled infection and worsening of the disease (Herretes et al., 2014). Hence, the infection must be adequately controlled prior to steroid treatment. Frequent instances of abuse and misuse also cause serious local and systemic side effects. Absorption of steroids may increase the risk of developing steroid-induced glaucoma, cataract, and delayed wound healing (Weijtens et al., 2002). Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the patients carefully before steroid treatment.
Topical Mitomycin C (MMC)
MMC is a classical DNA damaging agent, that forms covalent linkage with DNA, inhibiting DNA replication, transcription, and protein synthesis, causing irreversible senescence of cells (McKenna et al., 2012). For years, it has been used as an anti-cancer drug. In ophthalmology, topical MMC is widely used intraoperatively or shortly after injury to inhibit TGFβ and PDGF-driven proliferation of myofibroblasts and precursors, resulting in apoptosis and retarding the development of fibrosis, such as preventing post-ablation haze after PRK (Teus et al., 2009; Kwok et al., 2019). In addition, MMC is used to prevent the recurrence of pterygium after excision surgery and to treat ocular surface neoplasia (Prabhasawat et al., 2005; Young et al., 2013; Chan et al., 2015). It is applied before, during, or after the excision of neoplasia or pterygium. The intraoperative use is usually in the form of MMC solution soaked in a sponge whereas the subconjunctival injections or eye drops can be performed postoperatively. It is noteworthy that the increased MMC exposure to corneas has a higher risk of complications, such as delayed epithelialization, scleral calcification, ulceration, necrotizing scleritis, and damage to the corneal endothelium and ciliary body (Nassiri et al., 2008; Kam et al., 2015).
SMAD Signaling Blockers
TGFβ isoforms (β1 and β2) regulate fibrosis and scarring through the differential activation of canonical TGFβ/Smad signaling (Walton et al., 2017). Ligand binding activates TGFβ receptors through dimerization and trans-autophosphorylation, after which the cytoplasmic effectors are phosphorylated. These include Smad2/3 proteins, which translocate to the nucleus and activate gene transcription associated with fibrosis and cell metabolism. Rosiglitazone, a small molecule agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), blocks the nuclear translocation of Smad2, reducing TGFβ-mediated fibrosis and myofibroblast development (Burgess et al., 2005; Saika et al., 2007). In a feline PRK study, topical rosiglitazone reduced the backscattering of anterior stroma and corneal reflectivity as assessed by optical coherent tomography and decreased myofibroblast density (detected by reduced expression of α-smooth muscle actin, αSMA), without affecting corneal re-epithelialization or stromal recovery (Huxlin et al., 2013). However, as rosiglitazone also acts as an insulin sensitizer for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment, there could be risks of systemic effects, such as congestive heart failure and bladder cancer (Komajda et al., 2010). On the other hand, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) extracted from autologous blood has been reported to enhance corneal wound healing and stimulate epithelial regeneration (Tanidir et al., 2010; Etxebarria et al., 2017). PRP contains high concentrations of essential growth factors and cell adhesion molecules that contribute to tissue healing. Different studies have shown that topical PRP successfully treated dormant ulcers (hard-to-heal epithelial defects), dry eye syndromes, and ocular surface syndrome post Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), as well as promoted surface reconstruction after corneal perforation associated with amnion transplantation (Alio et al., 2012; Alio et al., 2017; Rechichi et al., 2020). However, for stromal wound healing in a rat model, PRP treatment suppressed stromal cell apoptosis and increased myofibroblast generation by TGFβ/SMAD3 activation (Koulikovska et al., 2015). Hence, PRP seems to be effective in enhancing epithelial wound healing and promoting ocular surface regeneration in different pathological conditions. However, it has a controversial ability on stromal scar management. Though PRP preparation with low content of leukocytes and red blood cells can be standardized following the guidelines of good clinical practice, the biological contents, such as growth factors, vary widely among different sources (Gomez et al., 2015). This limitation warrants further exploration to optimize and quantify the beneficial PRP-derived cytokines and growth factors for their potential application in regenerative medicine.
Vitamin C
Vitamin C (sodium ascorbate) has been known to facilitate collagen synthesis and deposition by keratocytes and to produce parallel arrays of ECM fibrils (Grobe and Reichl, 2013). Its anti-oxidant property reduces corneal neovascularization (Lee and Chung, 2012). In a clinical trial of patients with infectious keratitis, intravenous vitamin C treatment improved corneal epithelial wound healing and reduced haze in terms of density and size (Cho et al., 2014). However, differing outcomes were achieved in patients with laser-induced corneal injury. While Stojanovic et al. (2003) observed a prophylactic effect against haze development after PRK by oral ascorbic acid, Yulish et al. (2012) reported a null effect, in addition to the perioperative MMC (Stojanovic et al., 2003; Yulish et al., 2012). This suggests that the treatment effect may depend on the disease etiology and the underlying mechanisms of how ascorbate modifies corneal haze in different conditions need to be further investigated. Although there is a lack of randomized clinical trials to support the use of ascorbate in clinical practice, oral vitamin C is prescribed to patients after PRK and ocular chemical injury to promote epithelial wound healing.
Recombinant Proteins and Inhibitors
The cornea is an ideal tissue for gene and protein therapies, as it is easily accessible by topical application or injection via subconjunctival, intracameral, or intrastromal routes. Regarding particular mechanisms of action, protein-based pharmaceuticals can address corneal surface integrity, tear composition, wound healing, inflammation, haze and scarring, nerve regeneration, and neovascularization. The topical administration of drug usually has a lower risk of systemic side effects due to the limited absorption into the bloodstream, as opposed to intravenous or intramuscular injections. In a rabbit keratectomy model, topical application of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-7 suppressed TGFβ-related fibrosis, as observed by the reduced differentiation of αSMA-positive myofibroblasts (Chung et al., 2017). As a member of TGFβ superfamily, BMP7 mediates Smad-1/5/8 signaling, suppressing Smad2 phosphorylation to counteract the fibrotic effect of TGFβ/Smad signaling. Other studies have also reported that BMP7 upregulation via DNA-coated gold nanoparticles or adenoviral vectors inhibited corneal fibrosis and suppressed myofibroblast proliferation after alkali injury on corneas (Saika et al., 2005; Tandon et al., 2013).
In a murine model of microbial keratitis, topical decorin reduced corneal opacities, with the downregulation of αSMA, fibronectin, and laminin, and the treatment promoted the healing of damaged epithelium (Hill et al., 2018). Decorin is a small leucine-rich proteoglycan that is naturally present inside the corneal stroma. This molecule binds with high affinity to collagen fibrils and regulates the fibrillar spacing in maintaining corneal transparency (Kalamajski and Oldberg, 2010; Mohan et al., 2011). Moreover, decorin binds TGFβ and sequesters it in the ECM, potentially inhibiting the pro-fibrotic TGFβ activity. Decorin also modulates the action of growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and PDGF, hence modulating the initiation and progression of neovascularization and haze (Grisanti et al., 2005). Its regulation of MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase could also trigger fibrolysis, affecting scar formation (Ahmed et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2015).
Immunoglobulin CD147, also known as ECM-MMP inducer (EMMPRIN) or basigin, promotes TGFβ-mediated myofibroblast differentiation (Huet et al., 2011). This molecule is predominantly expressed in the corneal epithelium but is markedly induced in the anterior stroma of ulcerated corneas, and induced MMP expression (including MMP-1, 2, and 9) at the epithelio-stromal boundary (Gabison et al., 2005). Sustained upregulation of EMMPRIN and MMPs could lead to excessive matrix degradation, delayed wound healing, and may even result in corneal melts. Topical administration of EMMPRIN inhibitor, SP-8356, suppressed the myofibroblast population and the deposition of abnormal ECM products (e.g. MMP9, Col3, and Col5) in a rat model of corneal alkali injury, hence reducing corneal haze and fibrosis (Joung et al., 2020). Moreover, green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), was reported to restrain EMMPRIN and MMP-9 expression via 67-kD laminin receptor pathway in a PMA-induced macrophage system (Wang et al., 2016). From different studies, EGCG has a profound safety profile and bioavailability in cells and animal tissues and is known to suppress a variety of inflammatory and angiogenic factors, including NF-κB, IL-1β, COX2, VEGF, and MMPs (Lee et al., 2011; Sanchez-Huerta et al., 2011; Miyagawa et al., 2020). Therefore, the administration of EGCG to corneal wounds may represent a therapeutic alternative to suppress corneal inflammation and fibrosis. In a mouse model of acute alkali burn, topical application of EGCG to the damaged corneas significantly reduced inflammation, edema, opacities, and neovascularization while promoting corneal epithelial healing (Gulias-Canizo et al., 2019).
Blocking myofibroblast proliferation could be a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent corneal fibrosis. Intermediate-conductance calmodulin/calcium-activated potassium channel 3.1 (KCa3.1) regulates cell cycle progression and proliferation. Its expression has been reported in the development of fibrosis of the cornea and different organs (Huang et al., 2013; Roach et al., 2015). Treatment with the KCa3.1 inhibitor, TRAM-34, reduced the expression of pro-fibrotic markers, such as αSMA, in the corneal stroma (Anumanthan et al., 2018).
Regenerative Cytokines
Early re-routing of the scar-forming process could be beneficial for scar-free healing and should occur a short time after injury, ideally before the scarring process initiates. The process of wound healing can be described as changes of the microenvironment that involve a multitude of dynamic and interactive molecular and phenotypic events initiated after injury (Figure 1). This process represents a continuous and overlapping spectrum of interactions between cells (including resident cells and infiltrating cells), and extracellular regions that constantly change over time (collectively termed as micro-niches, represented by circles in Figure 1). After injury, pathways preferentially spanning through these micro-niches result in scar formation. Even though conventional injury management could alter the routes, the tissue still develops a similar final scarring phenotype. If early intervention is given soon after injury (e.g. to inhibit inflammation and fibrosis), it has the potential to “re-direct” the healing response towards a scar-reducing or scar-free phenotype. This strategy can be made possible by establishing high levels of anti-scarring cytokines (or therapeutic proteins) relative to the levels of pro-scarring molecules. In different tissues (including the cornea), members of the TGFβ family can activate or inhibit fibrosis, mechanistically acting through both canonical TGFβ/Smad and non-Smad pathways. Among them, TGFβ1 and β2 isoforms promote fibrosis and scarring, whereas TGFβ3 inhibits scarring and drives scar-free healing effects (Penn et al., 2012; Gilbert et al., 2016). Our group has reported that human CSSC produce TGFβ3 when they were applied to acute corneal wounds, hence restoring clear cornea tissues (Weng et al., 2020). CSSC with TGFβ3 knockdown by small interfering RNA method lost this scar-reducing effect. Other studies have also shown that TGFβ3 stimulates the non-fibrotic stromal matrix production in corneas and maintained consistent collagen fibril organization and spacing (Karamichos et al., 2011; Karamichos et al., 2013). Scarless healing is well documented in amphibians, which can regenerate tissues and even limbs following injury or amputation. In fact, skin wounds in mammalian embryos at the early gestation stage can heal without scarring and regenerate native dermal matrix, while scar-forming healing happens in late gestation and afterward (Satish and Kathju, 2010). Such scarless healing is associated with an increased expression level of anti-fibrotic TGFβ3 relative to the pro-fibrotic TGFβ1 (Eslami et al., 2009). While the ratio is high in fetal tissues that heal without scarring, it is lower in tissues with scar-forming healing. A higher TGFβ3/β1 ratio is also found in postnatal oral mucosa, which heals rapidly and without scarring (Schrementi et al., 2008). Hence, methods to increase TGFβ3/β1 ratio soon after injury have merit to control the onset of scarring and could re-direct tissue healing towards a scar-reducing or scarless pathway. After injury, the activation of latent pro-fibrotic TGFβ occurs at different time points: immediately after wounding and during re-epithelialization. Infiltrating cytokines from the damaged corneal epithelium and Bowman’s layer are the primary sources of active TGFβ immediately after injury. These molecules act as potent chemo-attractants for inflammatory cells and macrophages to invade into the wound site, further activating the latent TGFβ during re-epithelialization, which usually occurs within hours to a few days. Hence, the immediate phase after injury represents a possibly unique opportunity to control pro-fibrotic TGFβ, and this could influence the healing outcome. If their bioavailability can be suppressed early enough, the pathways leading to tissue inflammation and fibrosis could be redirected to a less-fibrotic or even a non-fibrotic repair (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1. A schematic diagram illustrating the early intervention therapy to re-route the wound healing and scarring response. A continuous spectrum of micro-niches (circles) that represent molecular and phenotypic events that constantly changes over time after injury. The route passes through these processes and the final phenotypic outcome is dependent upon the micro-niches in which resident and infiltrating cells are interacting with the extracellular regions. In adult tissue, upon injury, the normal transition through these sequential micro-niches usually ends up in scar formation (dark line). In corneas, this will block the light passage and results in vision loss. Medications modulating minor pathways could alter the micro-niches, but still results in similar phenotypic outcome of scar formation (blue line). Intervention at early time after wounding could alter the wound microenvironment and produce a “re-routing” through a different series of processes that could result in scar improvement or scar-free healing, and regeneration of native tissues (yellow line). This can improve the corneal clarity and restore vision.
Pro-fibrotic TGFβ informs could be controlled by the use of synthetic inhibitors that interfere with TGFβ bioavailability, ligand/receptor interaction, and/or receptor kinase activity (Huynh et al., 2019). However, these interventions could broadly affect the activity of all ligands that act through the transmembrane TβRI and TβRII receptors, including TGFβ3. Hence, a need exists for an orthogonal means of downregulating pro-fibrotic TGFβ. One option is the soluble amnion membrane extract (AME). In vitro stromal keratocyte culture studies have shown that the human amnion matrix and its soluble protein extract reduced TGFβ1 and β2-related signaling (Tseng et al., 1999; Espana et al., 2003; Kawakita et al., 2005; Yam et al., 2015; Fenner et al., 2019). Cultured keratocytes had a minimal transition to fibroblastic phenotypes during early passages, even in the presence of serum. AME also suppresses cell apoptosis, angiogenesis, and microbial growth, and it promotes immune responses that are advantageous for tissue regeneration (Dua et al., 2004; Shay et al., 2011). Results of a clinical trial using AME eye drops (NCT02746848) have shown its beneficial outcomes in promoting corneal wound healing, pain relief, and anti-inflammatory activity (Murri et al., 2018).
Moreover, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is an anti-fibrotic molecule that reduces fibrosis in various organs (Okayama et al., 2012; Miyagi et al., 2018). In a murine lung fibrosis model, its administration triggered myofibroblasts to undergo apoptosis by degrading the ECM-myofibroblast anchors through MMP activation (Mizuno et al., 2005). HGF activates Smad7 to prevent Smad2 phosphorylation, hence inhibiting pro-fibrotic TGFβ signaling. In the eye, HGF is expressed in corneal epithelium, stroma, and endothelium, as well as the lacrimal gland. Mittal et al. (2016) have reported that administration of exogenous HGF restored corneal transparency in a murine corneal wound model. Whether HGF could reduce or even reverse corneal scarring needs to be investigated.
Anti-Fibrotic microRNAs and CSSC Exosomes
MicroRNA therapeutics is becoming an important field in medical research, due to the pleiotropic nature of microRNAs, which make them particularly attractive as candidate targets for diseases with a multifactorial origin and no effective treatment. A growing number of reports support the use of miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis, and drug intervention (Recchioni et al., 2013; Scott et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2015; Reid et al., 2016; Montastier et al., 2019). MicroRNAs (miRs) are a class of small non-coding RNA with about 21-22 nucleotides in length. They regulate target gene expression by complementary binding to the 5’ or 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of target mRNAs. In cases of high to complete base-pairing between miRNAs and target mRNAs, argonaute-2 in the RNA-induced silencing complex cleaves the target mRNA strands, resulting in gene silencing. When complementarity is lower, miRNA binding can suppress the translation efficiency to downregulate target gene expression. Several reports have described miRNA changes in corneal disorders. The expression of miR-133b was correlated with pro-fibrotic genes in rabbit corneas following excimer laser ablation (Robinson et al., 2013). Signature miRNAs have been identified to associate with corneal neovascularization (Mukwaya et al., 2019). While many articles have extensively reviewed miRNAs in fibrosis of different tissues and summarized their potential regulation of signaling pathways that regulate fibrosis events (Bardin et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2010; O'Reilly, 2016; Patel and Noureddine, 2012; Vettori et al., 2012), we pay special attention to miRNAs in corneal stromal fibrosis. In a recent study using murine wound corneas, extracellular vesicles (EV) or exosomes derived from human CSSC showed a therapeutic correction of corneal scarring (Shojaati et al., 2019). When CSSC-derived EV were depleted of miRNA content using Alix knockdown to reduce ESCRT (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) pathway in exosome maturation, they were ineffective to block corneal scarring and lost their regenerative function. It is possible that miRNAs inside EV could affect the paracrine function (Sun et al., 2018). Precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA)-bound processing complex (such as Dicer, argonaute, and TRBP) are found inside EV, where they continue to generate mature miRNAs (Tran, 2016). This could establish the source of miRNAs inside EV. Hence, CSSC could produce and deliver miRNAs with the anti-fibrotic capability to regenerate transparent corneal tissue after injury. Using Nanostring analysis, Funderburgh et al. have identified a list of miRNAs present in CSSC-derived EV (Table 1) and filed in WIPO (PCT) WO2019169380A1 (Stem cell-derived exosomes for treatment of corneal scarring. 2019. Inventors: Deng SX and Funderburgh JL) (https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2019169380).
TABLE 1. Lists of microRNAs present in exosomes derived from human corneal stromal cells that function to reduce corneal scarring.
We anticipate that not every miRNA identified in CSSC-EV will influence fibrosis and scar reduction. Some miRNAs can be redundant, while miRNAs with relevant activity may work in groups or combinations. This makes the identification of specific miRNAs difficult and complicated, as well as costly in setting up experiments for validation. Bioinformatics approaches, such as target gene search and enriched pathway prediction, should be employed to identify single or groups of miRNAs that regulate inflammation, fibrosis, and/or immune responses to subsequently validate using in vitro and in vivo models. Target gene search for each miRNA is available using online databases, such as TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) and miRDB (http://mirdb.org/). Since each platform uses proprietary algorithms in calculating the binding score to a target sequence, the use of more than 1 platform can increase the confidence in hits identified independently while compensating for the limitations of each approach. The top list of genes shared in the output from both platforms can then be selected for enriched pathway analyses. Since one or several miRNAs could mediate gene regulatory effects, the gene lists from different miRNA candidates should be combined and imported for enriched gene ontology terms and pathway analysis using tools, such as DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integration Discovery) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) and IMPALA (Integrated Molecular Pathway Level Analysis) (http://impala.molgen.mpg.de/). After the removal of non-coding genes, the remaining gene candidates will be examined for over-representation in specific signaling pathways, biological processes, and phenotypes.
Due to the vast number of miRNAs upregulated in CSSC EV that reduce corneal scarring (Table 1 and filed in WIPO (PCT) WO2019169380A1), we select several candidates to discuss their potential roles in tissue fibrosis.
miR-29
The expression level of miR-29 in tissue is low during embryonic stages but increases with age, reaching a high level in the mature tissues, such as liver, kidney, lung, and heart (Cushing et al., 2011; Kamran et al., 2015). Multiple factors can regulate miR-29 expression, at both transcriptional and post-translational levels. NFκB transcription factor YY1 and c-Myc directly bind to miR-29b2/c promoter, inhibiting miR-29 expression (Mott et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2008). Various pro-fibrotic cytokines also regulate miR-29 expression (Cushing et al., 2011; Maurer et al., 2010; Ogawa et al., 2010). In lung and cardiac fibroblasts, TGFβ and PDGF downregulated miR-29, possibly mediated via Smad3 pathway (Divakaran et al., 2009; Maurer et al., 2010). Hence, miR-29 is considered as a “master fibro-miRNA” regulator with organ specificity, and reduced miR-29 expression has been found in the fibrosis of multiple organs (Bian et al., 2014; Deng et al., 2017). The human miR-29 family has 3 members, miR-29a, b, and c, encoded by 2 gene clusters (chr. 7q32.3 and chr. 1q32.2 in humans). They share common seed sequences and are predicted to target largely overlapping sets of genes. However, they exhibit differential regulation, depending on their subcellular distribution. miR-29a is primarily localized in the cytoplasm with some nuclear presence. In contrast, miR-29b is significantly enriched inside the nucleus (Hwang et al., 2007). It remains to be shown whether regional differences of miRNA expression level are related to their interaction with different proteins and whether those differences elicit biological effects. At least 16 ECM genes are the direct targets of miR-29, providing a dramatic example of a single miRNA targeting a large group of functionally related genes. They code for key proteins involved in the physiological or pathological formation of ECM, including a number of collagen isoforms, laminin γ1, fibrilin 1, elastin, MMP-2, and integrin β1 (Kwon et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2010; van Rooij et al., 2008). Knockdown of miR-29 in canine atrial fibroblasts significantly upregulated Col1A1, 3A1 and fibronectin (Dawson et al., 2013). However, the overexpression or knockdown of miR-29 did not alter αSMA expression or cell number of myofibroblasts (Qin et al., 2011). Thus, the miR-29 family negatively regulates fibrosis by targeting collagen matrix synthesis rather than by inhibiting myofibroblast. Table 2 summarizes miR-29 expression in different fibrotic diseases. However, limited studies about miR-29 regulation were conducted in corneas. Downregulated miR-29 level was detected in clinical Fuchs’ corneal endothelial dystrophy (FECD) specimens while a wide range of miR-29 target genes was upregulated, suggesting a role of miR-29-related deposition of ECM in the pathogenesis of FECD (Matthaei et al., 2020). Overexpression of miR-29b suppressed ECM-related Col1A1, Col4A1, and laminin C1 expression in human corneal endothelial cells (Toyono et al., 2016).
TABLE 2. miR-29 expression in fibrotic diseases.
miR-107
It belongs to a rare class of miRNAs that are proposed to regulate other miRNAs. In a study of multiple miRNA interactions, miR-107 was found to directly interact with let-7 and form an internal loop of let-7/miR-107 duplex, stabilizing let-7 activity and facilitating its target downregulation. The let-7 family has been shown to regulate IL-13 in cultured T-cells and a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. Suppressing let-7 family-induced inflammatory responses (Kumar et al., 2011). In corneas and dry eye disorders, keratoconjunctivitis was associated with up-regulated IL levels, including IL-13 (Pflugfelder et al., 2013; Imai et al., 2017), which promotes fibrosis (Doherty and Broide, 2007). We hypothesize that the inflammation- and fibrosis-related IL-13 expression can be regulated by let-7, which is stabilized by miR-107. Moreover, miR-107 was downregulated in response to pro-inflammatory LPS treatment, probably due to toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling in macrophages, leading to increased cell adhesion via CDK6 (Hennessy et al., 2011). In corneas, miR-107 negatively regulated p38/AP-1 pathway via its targeting on mitogen-activated protein kinase 7 and promoted the differentiation of limbal epithelial cells (Park et al., 2015).
miR-155
Following the exposure of immune cells to inflammatory cues, signals are sent to cell nuclei resulting in dynamic transcriptional changes of immune responsive genes, which constitutes the first step of coordinated inflammatory responses. Besides the altered protein expression, there are changes in miRNA-producing transcripts (O'Connell et al., 2012). miR-155 is identified as an inflammatory miRNA that is upregulated by NFκB through TLR signaling (O'Connell et al., 2007; Kurowska-Stolarska et al., 2011). Its genomic location is mapped within a region known as the B-cell integration cluster on chr. 21 (Faraoni et al., 2009). The expression of miR-155 regulates the inflammatory mediators in macrophages to promote plaque formation and rupture and downregulates the negative regulators SHIP1 and SOCS1, thus activating AKT and interferon (IFN) response genes (Androulidaki et al., 2009). MiR-155 also enhanced the expression of p-STAT and PDCD4, and IL-6 and TNFα production. These findings suggest that miR-155 might mediate inflammation via the SOCS1-STAT3-PDCD4 axis. Mice with miR-155 knockout had a defect in inflammatory T-cell development, possibly mediated by cMaf expression (O'Connell et al., 2010). Higher expression of cMaf after miR-155 knockout could hinder the development of Th1 or Th17 cell types, regulating the inflammatory response (Rodriguez et al., 2007). In silico analysis also showed that PU.1, a miR-155 target gene, was important for the early activation, maturation, and regulation of B cells in hematopoiesis. Hence, a strategy to modify intracellular miR-155 levels could have a therapeutic potential to regulate inflammation and immune responses. In corneas of fungal keratitis, the dysregulation of miR-155-5p has suggested the involvement of TLR pathway in tissue healing (Boomiraj et al., 2015).
miR-381
As the first line of defense, innate immunity plays a key role in preventing invasion by pathogens. TLRs can directly sense the foreign invaders through microbial components (e.g. lipopolysaccharides) and trigger an innate immune response (Kesar and Odin, 2014). TLR signaling activates NF-𝜅B, which upregulates inflammatory cytokines. NF-𝜅B activation requires the phosphorylation and degradation of inhibitor 𝜅B (I𝜅B) proteins, including two kinases, I𝜅Bα and I𝜅Bα. I𝜅Bα can bind the NF𝜅B p65 subunit, which is prevented from nuclear translocation and induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. MiR-381 regulates NF𝜅B signaling by targeting I𝜅Bα, thereby regulating pro-inflammatory TNFα, IL-6 and COX-2 (Xu et al., 2015). Blocking the NF𝜅B pathway has been shown to suppress corneal inflammation and angiogenesis (Lennikov et al., 2018). However, the expression of miR-381 in corneal tissue has not been reported.
miR-543
This miRNA clusters on chr. 14q and targets the epigenetic regulator Tet1 and Tet2, which play a direct role in DNA methylation and gene activation. It also has an indirect role in protein acetylation. TET enzymes convert 5-methylcytosine (5hmC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA. Tet1 and Tet2 are Oct4-regulated enzymes that sustain 5hmC in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) and are induced concomitantly with 5hmC during the reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. ESC depleted of Tet1 by RNAi treatment had reduced expression of Nodal antagonist Lefty1, and displayed hyperactive Nodal signaling and skewed differentiation into the endoderm-mesoderm lineage in embryoid bodies in vitro (Fuentes-Mattei et al., 2020). Their expression was regulated by Oct4/Sox2 complex, hence in association with stem cell pluripotency, and the depletion of Tet1 impaired the self-renewal and differentiation of ESC (Koh et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2011). The presence of Tet1 and Tet2 maintains the homeostasis of mesenchymal stem cells through demethylation of P2rX7 to control exosome and miRNA release (Yang et al., 2018). Human CSSC express and release miR-543 via exosomes. However, the action of this miRNA on target stromal tissue regeneration or on any other administered CSSC in terms of cell survival, differentiation, and maintenance in host tissue needs to be further investigated.
Perspectives and Challenges of Developing Therapeutic microRNAs
Many reports have illustrated the changes or dysregulation of miRNAs in different types of disorders, including cancers, tissue injuries, and age-related diseases (Iorio and Croce, 2012; Nies et al., 2021; Pinel et al., 2019). There has been growing interest in developing miRNA therapeutics via miRNA binding and regulating target gene expression, which modulates the disease-associated cellular events. Currently, the therapeutic uses of small molecule inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies have shown promise in manipulating specific gene expression (Jamilloux et al., 2019; Zarrin et al., 2021). However, there are many genes that are not “druggable” with these methods. Therapy with miRNAs offers the ability to target different genes in a given pathway. For example, miR-29 targets a broad spectrum of ECM and pro-fibrotic molecules, including multiple types of collagen, PDGF, thrombospondin, and SPARC, suggesting that miR-29 could broadly regulate tissue fibrosis and ECM remodeling (Cushing et al., 2011). In regulating target gene expression, the use of specific antagomirs (or anti-miRs), which are chemically synthesized oligonucleotides with complementary binding to a specific miRNA, achieves miRNA silencing. On the other hand, miRNA mimics increase the expression level of a particular miRNA, downregulating the expression of target genes, such as oncogenes in carcinogenesis.
Though miRNAs have features that can be developed for drug design and efficacy, there are challenges that need to be overcome before considering this strategy for clinical uses. A major obstacle is that miRNAs exhibit pleiotropy in multiple senses (one miRNA can regulate multiple genes and a given gene can be regulated by more than one miRNA), making their therapeutic use potentially very complex (Yang et al., 2018). Complex miRNA targeting could in turn affect the regulation of different mRNA molecules. Hence, more defined information on miRNA-involved cellular processes, including a clear picture of regulatory networks of miRNAs and target genes, is required. The short length of miRNAs makes them highly prone to degradation by nucleases upon their addition to the biological systems (O'Brien et al., 2018). The rapid clearance of naked RNAs leads to a short life and instability. Chemically engineered miRNA modifications would be necessary to protect miRNAs from degradation and promote long-lasting potency (Segal et al., 2020). On the other hand, potential off-target effects of miRNAs (due to the imperfect complementarity with the 3’ UTR of target genes) might cause undesirable silencing of other genes, potential toxicity, and reduced therapeutic efficacy. In addition, double-stranded RNAs (miRNA duplexes) can be recognized as pathogens by the host immune system, triggering inflammatory cytokine release and IFN pathways (Yu et al., 2018). The choice of a suitable delivery vehicle for miRNA should ideally inhibit immune response, improve targeting to the correct tissues and allow control over dosing. Different studies have described the administration of miRNAs in conjugation with modified cationic nanoparticles to enhance tissue penetrance, and escape from endosomal entrapping and degradation by lysosomes (Lee et al., 2019; Salah et al., 2019). In corneas, aside from nanoparticles, miRNAs can be packaged and delivered via exosomes as CSSC-derived EV have been shown to inhibit or reverse corneal scarring (Shojaati et al., 2019). This represents a valuable alternative to tissue- or cell-based therapies due to the minimal risk of rejection. Eye drop formulation and frequency can be adjusted according to the patient’s needs, including the injury type and recovery status.
Summary
The current standard for treating severe and irreversible corneal scarring in the visual axis often entails a corneal transplant, which carries risks of rejection, infection, and graft failure. Complications also include prolonged rehabilitation, lifelong use of immunosuppressants, and loss of corneal strength, with a considerable human and financial cost. In addition, the worldwide shortage of donor materials has greatly hampered the applicability of corneal transplantations, in particular in under-developed and developing countries. If the density of corneal opacities can be reduced, then other non-surgical therapies (such as the use of contact lenses) can correct corneal astigmatism and provide visual rehabilitation. This will lessen the demand for transplantable donor grafts, which can be reserved for treating serious and dense scars. Early intervention would thus be a valuable approach to delay visual deterioration, and reduce complications, ideally decreasing the need for corneal transplantation. A desirable approach to delay scarring would be to stabilize the wound soon after injury and redirect the healing process to reduce inflammation and fibrosis. The use of regenerative cytokines as a first-line treatment would elevate the expression of anti-fibrotic cytokines and suppress cytokines, reducing tissue inflammation and fibrosis, hence potentially stimulating regeneration of clear stroma. If successful, this would also improve the effectiveness of subsequent treatments to recover visual acuity. On the other hand, different microRNAs with anti-fibrotic activity have been identified, however, their use to reverse or reduce tissue fibrosis is still under investigation. Their specific actions and potential side-effects or contraindications need to be clarified before any of these molecules can be developed for miRNA therapeutics. Besides, these miRNAs can be potentially applied for cell product screening. In cell-based therapy, the cell stocks for clinical application must be stringently selected and quality controlled. Only cells that are carefully screened for correct phenotypes and functions can be released for patient uses. If a panel of CSSC-EV-derived miRNAs with anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties were characterized, they could be used to define the release criteria for therapeutic CSSC. Their detection in the secretome will have minimal influence on the cell manufacturing process and does not require extra cells for the assays. This will assist medical professionals to justify the use of high-quality cell products for patients.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: VJ, GY, data curation, writing–review and editing: VJ, IB, GY; funding acquisition: GY. All authors approved the manuscript.
Funding
Supported in part by NIH CORE Grant P30 EY08098 to the Department of Ophthalmology, the Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh, and from an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY. Pilot experiment funded by UPMC Immune Transplant Immunotherapy Centre, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (Grant number 04.29889).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Ahmed, Z., Bansal, D., Tizzard, K., Surey, S., Esmaeili, M., Gonzalez, A. M., et al. (2014). Decorin Blocks Scarring and Cystic Cavitation in Acute and Induces Scar Dissolution in Chronic Spinal Cord Wounds. Neurobiol. Dis. 64, 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.008
Alió del Barrio, J. L., and Alió, J. L. (2018). Cellular Therapy of the Corneal Stroma: a New Type of Corneal Surgery for Keratoconus and Corneal Dystrophies. Eye Vis. 5, 28. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0122-1
Alió del Barrio, J. L., Bhogal, M., Ang, M., Ziaei, M., Robbie, S., Montesel, A., et al. (2021). Corneal Transplantation after Failed Grafts: Options and Outcomes. Surv. Ophthalmol. 66, 20–40. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.10.003
Alio, J. L., Arnalich-Montiel, F., and Rodriguez, A. E. (2012). The Role of "eye Platelet Rich Plasma" (E-PRP) for Wound Healing in Ophthalmology. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 13, 1257–1265. doi:10.2174/138920112800624355
Alio, J. L., Rodriguez, A. E., Abdelghany, A. A., and Oliveira, R. F. (2017). Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for the Treatment of Post-LASIK Chronic Ocular Surface Syndrome. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 1–6. doi:10.1155/2017/2457620
Androulidaki, A., Iliopoulos, D., Arranz, A., Doxaki, C., Schworer, S., Zacharioudaki, V., et al. (2009). The Kinase Akt1 Controls Macrophage Response to Lipopolysaccharide by Regulating microRNAs. Immunity 31, 220–231. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.024
Anumanthan, G., Gupta, S., Fink, M. K., Hesemann, N. P., Bowles, D. K., McDaniel, L. M., et al. (2018). KCa3.1 Ion Channel: A Novel Therapeutic Target for Corneal Fibrosis. PLoS One 13, e0192145. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192145
Arundhati, A., Chew, M. C., Lim, L., Mehta, J. S., Lang, S. S., Htoon, H. M., et al. (2021). Comparative Study of Long-Term Graft Survival Between Penetrating Keratoplasty and Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 224, 207–216. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.006
Bamdad, S., Khademi, B., Chenari, N., Taseh, A., and Razmkhah, M. (2017). Stromal Cell Derived Factor-1, CXCR4 and CXCR7 Gene Transcripts in Pterygia. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 29, 28–32. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2016.10.006
Bardin, P., Sonneville, F., Corvol, H., and Tabary, O. (2018). Emerging microRNA Therapeutic Approaches for Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1113. doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01113
Basu, S., Hertsenberg, A. J., Funderburgh, M. L., Burrow, M. K., Mann, M. M., Du, Y., et al. (2014). Human Limbal Biopsy-Derived Stromal Stem Cells Prevent Corneal Scarring. Sci. Translational Med. 6, 266ra172. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009644
Beuerman, R. W., and Schimmelpfennig, B. (1980). Sensory Denervation of the Rabbit Cornea Affects Epithelial Properties. Exp. Neurol. 69, 196–201. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(80)90154-5
Bian, E.-B., Li, J., and Zhao, B. (2014). miR-29, a Potential Therapeutic Target for Liver Fibrosis. Gene 544, 259–260. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.04.076
Boomiraj, H., Mohankumar, V., Lalitha, P., and Devarajan, B. (2015). Human Corneal MicroRNA Expression Profile in Fungal Keratitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56, 7939–7946. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17619
Bourcier, T., Berbar, T., Paquet, S., Rondeau, N., Thomas, F., Borderie, V., et al. (2003). Characterization and Functionality of CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor and SDF-1 in Human Corneal Fibroblasts. Mol. Vis. 9, 96–102.
Burgess, H. A., Daugherty, L. E., Thatcher, T. H., Lakatos, H. F., Ray, D. M., Redonnet, M., et al. (2005). PPARγ Agonists Inhibit TGF-β Induced Pulmonary Myofibroblast Differentiation and Collagen Production: Implications for Therapy of Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiology-Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 288, L1146–L1153. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00383.2004
Carlson, E. C., Wang, I. J., Liu, C. Y., Brannan, P., Kao, C. W., and Kao, W. W. (2003). Altered KSPG Expression by Keratocytes Following Corneal Injury. Mol. Vis. 9, 615–623.
Chamberlain, W. D. (2019). Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 30, 256–263. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000574
Chan, T. C. Y., Wong, R. L. M., Li, E. Y. M., Yuen, H. K. L., Yeung, E. F. Y., Jhanji, V., et al. (2015). Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 1–6. doi:10.1155/2015/891582
Chen, J., Guerriero, E., Sado, Y., and SundarRaj, N. (2009). Rho-Mediated Regulation of TGF-β1- and FGF-2-Induced Activation of Corneal Stromal Keratocytes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 3662–3670. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3276
Cho, Y.-W., Yoo, W.-S., Kim, S.-J., Chung, I.-Y., Seo, S.-W., and Yoo, J.-M. (2014). Efficacy of Systemic Vitamin C Supplementation in Reducing Corneal Opacity Resulting from Infectious Keratitis. Medicine (Baltimore) 93, e125. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000125
Chung, J. K., Park, S. A., Hwang, H. S., Kim, K. S., Cho, Y. J., You, Y. S., et al. (2017). Effects of Exogenous Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-7 on the Corneal Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Fibrosis. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 10, 329–335. doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.03.01
Ciechomska, M., O’Reilly, S., Suwara, M., Bogunia-Kubik, K., and van Laar, J. M. (2014). MiR-29a Reduces TIMP-1 Production by Dermal Fibroblasts via Targeting TGF-β Activated Kinase 1 Binding Protein 1, Implications for Systemic Sclerosis. PLoS One 9, e115596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115596
Cushing, L., Kuang, P. P., Qian, J., Shao, F., Wu, J., Little, F., et al. (2011). miR-29 Is a Major Regulator of Genes Associated with Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol. 45, 287–294. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2010-0323OC
Dawson, K., Wakili, R., Ördög, B., Clauss, S., Chen, Y., Iwasaki, Y., et al. (2013). MicroRNA29. Circulation 127, 1466–1475. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001207
de Oliveira, R. C., and Wilson, S. E. (2020). Fibrocytes, Wound Healing, and Corneal Fibrosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61, 28. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.2.28
Deng, Z., He, Y., Yang, X., Shi, H., Shi, A., Lu, L., et al. (2017). MicroRNA-29: A Crucial Player in Fibrotic Disease. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 21, 285–294. doi:10.1007/s40291-016-0253-9
Deshmukh, R., Reddy, J. C., Rapuano, C. J., and Vaddavalli, P. K. (2020). Phototherapeutic Keratectomy: Indications, Methods and Decision Making. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 68, 2856–2866. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1524_20
Divakaran, V., Adrogue, J., Ishiyama, M., Entman, M. L., Haudek, S., Sivasubramanian, N., et al. (2009). Adaptive and Maladptive Effects of SMAD3 Signaling in the Adult Heart after Hemodynamic Pressure Overloading. Circ. Heart Fail. 2, 633–642. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.823070
Doherty, T., and Broide, D. (2007). Cytokines and Growth Factors in Airway Remodeling in Asthma. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 676–680. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.017
Du, Y., Carlson, E. C., Funderburgh, M. L., Birk, D. E., Pearlman, E., Guo, N., et al. (2009). Stem Cell Therapy Restores Transparency to Defective Murine Corneas. Stem Cells 27, 1635–1642. doi:10.1002/stem.91
Dua, H. S., Gomes, J. A. P., King, A. J., and Maharajan, V. S. (2004). The Amniotic Membrane in Ophthalmology. Surv. Ophthalmol. 49, 51–77. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.10.004
El Zarif, M., Alió, J. L., Alió del Barrio, J. L., Abdul Jawad, K., Palazón-Bru, A., Abdul Jawad, Z., et al. (2021). Corneal Stromal Regeneration Therapy for Advanced Keratoconus: Long-Term Outcomes at 3 Years. Cornea 40, 741–754. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002646
Eslami, A., Gallant-Behm, C. L., Hart, D. A., Wiebe, C., Honardoust, D., Gardner, H., et al. (2009). Expression of Integrin αvβ6 and TGF-β in Scarless vs Scar-Forming Wound Healing. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 57, 543–557. doi:10.1369/jhc.2009.952572
Espana, E. M., He, H., Kawakita, T., Di Pascuale, M. A., Raju, V. K., Liu, C.-Y., et al. (2003). Human Keratocytes Cultured on Amniotic Membrane Stroma Preserve Morphology and Express Keratocan. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 5136–5141. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0484
Etxebarria, J., Sanz-Lázaro, S., Hernáez-Moya, R., Freire, V., Durán, J. A., Morales, M.-C., et al. (2017). Serum from Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Regenerates Rabbit Corneas by Promoting Cell Proliferation, Migration, Differentiation, Adhesion and Limbal Stemness. Acta Ophthalmol. 95, e693–e705. doi:10.1111/aos.13371
Faraoni, I., Antonetti, F. R., Cardone, J., and Bonmassar, E. (2009). miR-155 Gene: A Typical Multifunctional microRNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis. 1792, 497–505. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.02.013
Fenner, B. J., Yusoff, N. Z. B. M., Fuest, M., Zhou, L., Bandeira, F., Cajucom-Uy, H. Y., et al. (2019). A Cellular and Proteomic Approach to Assess Proteins Extracted from Cryopreserved Human Amnion in the Cultivation of Corneal Stromal Keratocytes for Stromal Cell Therapy. Eye Vis. 6, 30. doi:10.1186/s40662-019-0155-0
Fini, M. (1999). Keratocyte and Fibroblast Phenotypes in the Repairing Cornea. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 18, 529–551. doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(98)00033-0
Fuentes-Mattei, E., Bayraktar, R., Manshouri, T., Silva, A. M., Ivan, C., Gulei, D., et al. (2020). miR-543 Regulates the Epigenetic Landscape of Myelofibrosis by Targeting TET1 and TET2. JCI Insight 5, e121781. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.121781
Fuest, M., Yam, G. H.-F., Peh, G. S.-L., and Mehta, J. S. (2016). Advances in Corneal Cell Therapy. Regenerative Med. 11, 601–615. doi:10.2217/rme-2016-0054
Gabison, E. E., Mourah, S., Steinfels, E., Yan, L., Hoang-Xuan, T., Watsky, M. A., et al. (2005). Differential Expression of Extracellular Matrix Metalloproteinase Inducer (CD147) in Normal and Ulcerated Corneas. Am. J. Pathol. 166, 209–219. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62245-6
Gain, P., Jullienne, R., He, Z., Aldossary, M., Acquart, S., Cognasse, F., et al. (2016). Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 134, 167–173. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776
Gallant-Behm, C. L., Piper, J., Lynch, J. M., Seto, A. G., Hong, S. J., Mustoe, T. A., et al. (2019). A MicroRNA-29 Mimic (Remlarsen) Represses Extracellular Matrix Expression and Fibroplasia in the Skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 1073–1081. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.11.007
Gilbert, R., Vickaryous, M., and Viloria-Petit, A. (2016). Signalling by Transforming Growth Factor Beta Isoforms in Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration. J. Dev. Biol. 4, 21. doi:10.3390/jdb4020021
Gomez, L. A., Escobar, M., and Penuela, O. (2015). Standardization of Protocol for Obtaining Platelet Rich Plasma from Blood Donors; a Tool for Tissue Regeneration Procedures. Clin. Lab. 61, 973–980. doi:10.7754/clin.lab.2015.141141
Gondaliya, P., P. Dasare, A., Jash, K., Tekade, R. K., Srivastava, A., and Kalia, K. (2020). miR-29b Attenuates Histone Deacetylase-4 Mediated Podocyte Dysfunction and Renal Fibrosis in Diabetic Nephropathy. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 19, 13–27. doi:10.1007/s40200-019-00469-0
Grisanti, S., Szurman, P., Warga, M., Kaczmarek, R., Ziemssen, F., Tatar, O., et al. (2005). Decorin Modulates Wound Healing in Experimental Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: a Pilot Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 191–196. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0902
Grobe, G. M., and Reichl, S. (2013). Characterization of Vitamin C-Induced Cell Sheets Formed from Primary and Immortalized Human Corneal Stromal Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications. Cells Tissues Organs 197, 283–297. doi:10.1159/000346172
Gulias-Cañizo, R., Lagunes-Guillén, A., González-Robles, A., Sánchez-Guzmán, E., and Castro-Muñozledo, F. (2019). (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, Reduces Corneal Damage Secondary from Experimental Grade II Alkali burns in Mice. Burns 45, 398–412. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.021
Helbig, G., Christopherson, K. W., Bhat-Nakshatri, P., Kumar, S., Kishimoto, H., Miller, K. D., et al. (2003). NF-κ B Promotes Breast Cancer Cell Migration and Metastasis by Inducing the Expression of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR4. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21631–21638. doi:10.1074/jbc.M300609200
Hennessy, E. J., Sheedy, F. J., Santamaria, D., Barbacid, M., and O'Neill, L. A. J. (2011). Toll-like Receptor-4 (TLR4) Down-Regulates microRNA-107, Increasing Macrophage Adhesion via Cyclin-dependent Kinase 6. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 25531–25539. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.256206
Herretes, S., Wang, X., and Reyes, J. M. (2014). Topical Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy for Bacterial Keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10, CD005430. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005430.pub3
Hill, L. J., Mead, B., Blanch, R. J., Ahmed, Z., De Cogan, F., Morgan-Warren, P. J., et al. (2015). Decorin Reduces Intraocular Pressure and Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in Rodents Through Fibrolysis of the Scarred Trabecular Meshwork. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56, 3743–3757. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15622
Hill, L. J., Moakes, R. J. A., Vareechon, C., Butt, G., Ng, A., Brock, K., et al. (2018). Sustained Release of Decorin to the Surface of the Eye Enables Scarless Corneal Regeneration. NPJ Regen. Med. 3, 23. doi:10.1038/s41536-018-0061-4
Hos, D., Matthaei, M., Bock, F., Maruyama, K., Notara, M., Clahsen, T., et al. (2019). Immune Reactions after Modern Lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus Conventional Penetrating Corneal Transplantation. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 73, 100768. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001
Huang, C., Shen, S., Ma, Q., Chen, J., Gill, A., Pollock, C. A., et al. (2013). Blockade of KCa3.1 Ameliorates Renal Fibrosis Through the TGF-β1/Smad Pathway in Diabetic Mice. Diabetes 62, 2923–2934. doi:10.2337/db13-0135
Huet, E., Vallée, B., Delbé, J., Mourah, S., Prulière-Escabasse, V., Tremouilleres, M., et al. (2011). EMMPRIN Modulates Epithelial Barrier Function through a MMP-Mediated Occludin Cleavage. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 1278–1286. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.036
Huxlin, K. R., Hindman, H. B., Jeon, K.-I., Bühren, J., MacRae, S., DeMagistris, M., et al. (2013). Topical Rosiglitazone Is an Effective Anti-scarring Agent in the Cornea. PLoS One 8, e70785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070785
Huynh, L., Hipolito, C., and Ten Dijke, P. (2019). A Perspective on the Development of TGF-β Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment. Biomolecules 9, 743. doi:10.3390/biom9110743
Hwang, H.-W., Wentzel, E. A., and Mendell, J. T. (2007). A Hexanucleotide Element Directs microRNA Nuclear Import. Science 315, 97–100. doi:10.1126/science.1136235
Imai, Y., Hosotani, Y., Ishikawa, H., Yasuda, K., Nagai, M., Jitsukawa, O., et al. (2017). Expression of IL-33 in Ocular Surface Epithelium Induces Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis with Activation of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 10053. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10227-y
Iorio, M. V., and Croce, C. M. (2012). Causes and Consequences of microRNA Dysregulation. Cancer J. 18, 215–222. doi:10.1097/PPO.0b013e318250c001
Jafarinejad-Farsangi, S., Farazmand, A., Mahmoudi, M., Gharibdoost, F., Karimizadeh, E., Noorbakhsh, F., et al. (2015). MicroRNA-29a Induces Apoptosis via Increasing the Bax:Bcl-2 Ratio in Dermal Fibroblasts of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis. Autoimmunity 48, 369–378. doi:10.3109/08916934.2015.1030616
Jamilloux, Y., El Jammal, T., Vuitton, L., Gerfaud-Valentin, M., Kerever, S., and Sève, P. (2019). JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 18, 102390. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102390
Jeon, K.-I., Hindman, H. B., Bubel, T., McDaniel, T., DeMagistris, M., Callan, C., et al. (2018). Corneal Myofibroblasts Inhibit Regenerating Nerves during Wound Healing. Sci. Rep. 8, 12945. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30964-y
Jester, J. V., Moller-Pedersen, T., Huang, J., Sax, C. M., Kays, W. T., Cavangh, H. D., et al. (1999). The Cellular Basis of Corneal Transparency: Evidence for 'corneal Crystallins. J. Cel Sci. 112 (Pt 5), 613–622. doi:10.1242/jcs.112.5.613
Jhanji, V., Mehta, J. S., Sharma, N., Sharma, B., and Vajpayee, R. B. (2012). Targeted Corneal Transplantation. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 23, 324–329. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835484a1
Jiang, X., Tsitsiou, E., Herrick, S. E., and Lindsay, M. A. (2010). MicroRNAs and the Regulation of Fibrosis. FEBS J. 277, 2015–2021. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07632.x
Joung, C., Noh, H., Jung, J., Song, H. Y., Bae, H., Pahk, K., et al. (2020). A Novel CD147 Inhibitor, SP-8356, Attenuates Pathological Fibrosis in Alkali-Burned Rat Cornea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2990. doi:10.3390/ijms21082990
Kalamajski, S., and Oldberg, A. (2010). The Role of Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans in Collagen Fibrillogenesis. Matrix Biol. 29, 248–253. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2010.01.001
Kam, K. W., Belin, M. W., and Young, A. L. (2015). Monitoring Corneal Densities Following Primary Pterygium Excision With Adjuvant Topical Mitomycin-C Application-An Observational Study of Corneal Scar Changes. Cornea 34, 530–534. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000400
Kamran, F., Andrade, A. C., Nella, A. A., Clokie, S. J., Rezvani, G., Nilsson, O., et al. (2015). Evidence That Up-Regulation of MicroRNA-29 Contributes to Postnatal Body Growth Deceleration. Mol. Endocrinol. 29, 921–932. doi:10.1210/me.2015-1047
Karamichos, D., Hutcheon, A. E. K., and Zieske, J. D. (2011). Transforming Growth Factor-β3 Regulates Assembly of a Non-fibrotic Matrix in a 3D Corneal Model. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 5, e228–e238. doi:10.1002/term.429
Karamichos, D., Rich, C. B., Zareian, R., Hutcheon, A. E. K., Ruberti, J. W., Trinkaus-Randall, V., et al. (2013). TGF-β3 Stimulates Stromal Matrix Assembly by Human Corneal Keratocyte-Like Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 6612–6619. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12861
Kaur, H., Chaurasia, S. S., Agrawal, V., Suto, C., and Wilson, S. E. (2009). Corneal Myofibroblast Viability: Opposing Effects of IL-1 and TGF β1. Exp. Eye Res. 89, 152–158. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2009.03.001
Kawakita, T., Espana, E. M., He, H., Hornia, A., Yeh, L.-K., Ouyang, J., et al. (2005). Keratocan Expression of Murine Keratocytes Is Maintained on Amniotic Membrane by Down-Regulating Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 27085–27092. doi:10.1074/jbc.M409567200
Kesar, V., and Odin, J. A. (2014). Toll-like Receptors and Liver Disease. Liver Int. 34, 184–196. doi:10.1111/liv.12315
Koh, K. P., Yabuuchi, A., Rao, S., Huang, Y., Cunniff, K., Nardone, J., et al. (2011). Tet1 and Tet2 Regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Production and Cell Lineage Specification in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 8, 200–213. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.01.008
Komajda, M., McMurray, J. J. V., Beck-Nielsen, H., Gomis, R., Hanefeld, M., Pocock, S. J., et al. (2010). Heart Failure Events with Rosiglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the RECORD Clinical Trial. Eur. Heart J. 31, 824–831. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp604
Koulikovska, M., Szymanowski, O., Lagali, N., and Fagerholm, P. (2015). Platelet-Rich Plasma Prolongs Myofibroblast Accumulation in Corneal Stroma with Incisional Wound. Curr. Eye Res. 40, 1102–1110. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.978478
Kumar, M., Ahmad, T., Sharma, A., Mabalirajan, U., Kulshreshtha, A., Agrawal, A., et al. (2011). Let-7 microRNA-Mediated Regulation of IL-13 and Allergic Airway Inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 128, 1077–1085. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.034
Kurowska-Stolarska, M., Alivernini, S., Ballantine, L. E., Asquith, D. L., Millar, N. L., Gilchrist, D. S., et al. (2011). MicroRNA-155 as a Proinflammatory Regulator in Clinical and Experimental Arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 11193–11198. doi:10.1073/pnas.1019536108
Kwiecinski, M., Elfimova, N., Noetel, A., Töx, U., Steffen, H.-M., Hacker, U., et al. (2012). Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-C and Insulin-like Growth Factor I in Hepatic Stellate Cells Is Inhibited by miR-29. Lab. Invest. 92, 978–987. doi:10.1038/labinvest.2012.70
Kwok, S. S., Shih, K. C., Bu, Y., Lo, A. C.-Y., Chan, T. C.-Y., Lai, J. S.-M., et al. (2019). Systematic Review on Therapeutic Strategies to Minimize Corneal Stromal Scarring After Injury. Eye Contact Lens 45, 347–355. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000584
Kwon, J. J., Factora, T. D., Dey, S., and Kota, J. (2019). A Systematic Review of miR-29 in Cancer. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 12, 173–194. doi:10.1016/j.omto.2018.12.011
Lam, F. W., Phillips, J., Landry, P., Magadi, S., Smith, C. W., Rumbaut, R. E., et al. (2015). Platelet Recruitment Promotes Keratocyte Repopulation Following Corneal Epithelial Abrasion in the Mouse. PLoS One 10, e0118950. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118950
Lee, H. S., Chauhan, S. K., Okanobo, A., Nallasamy, N., and Dana, R. (2011). Therapeutic Efficacy of Topical Epigallocatechin Gallate in Murine Dry Eye. Cornea 30, 1465–1472. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821c9b5a
Lee, M. Y., and Chung, S. K. (2012). Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization by Topical Application of Ascorbic Acid in the Rabbit Model. Cornea 31, 1165–1169. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318241433b
Lee, S. W. L., Paoletti, C., Campisi, M., Osaki, T., Adriani, G., Kamm, R. D., et al. (2019). MicroRNA Delivery through Nanoparticles. J. Controlled Release 313, 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007
Lennikov, A., Mirabelli, P., Mukwaya, A., Schaupper, M., Thangavelu, M., Lachota, M., et al. (2018). Selective IKK2 Inhibitor IMD0354 Disrupts NF-κB Signaling to Suppress Corneal Inflammation and Angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 21, 267–285. doi:10.1007/s10456-018-9594-9
Li, M., Wang, N., Zhang, J., He, H.-P., Gong, H.-Q., Zhang, R., et al. (2016). MicroRNA-29a-3p Attenuates ET-1-Induced Hypertrophic Responses in H9c2 Cardiomyocytes. Gene 585, 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2016.03.015
Liu, Y., Taylor, N. E., Lu, L., Usa, K., Cowley, A. W., Ferreri, N. R., et al. (2010). Renal Medullary MicroRNAs in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats. Hypertension 55, 974–982. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.144428
Lopez, M. J., Seyed-Razavi, Y., Jamali, A., Harris, D. L., and Hamrah, P. (2018). The Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Mediates Recruitment of CD11c+Conventional Dendritic Cells Into the Inflamed Murine Cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 5671–5681. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25084
Luengo-Gimeno, F., Tan, D. T., and Mehta, J. S. (2011). Evolution of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK). Ocul. Surf. 9, 98–110. doi:10.1016/s1542-0124(11)70017-9
Marino, G. K., Santhiago, M. R., Santhanam, A., Torricelli, A. A. M., and Wilson, S. E. (2017). Regeneration of Defective Epithelial Basement Membrane and Restoration of Corneal Transparency After Photorefractive Keratectomy. J. Refract Surg. 33, 337–346. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170126-02
Matsumoto, Y., Itami, S., Kuroda, M., Yoshizato, K., Kawada, N., and Murakami, Y. (2016). MiR-29a Assists in Preventing the Activation of Human Stellate Cells and Promotes Recovery From Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Mol. Ther. 24, 1848–1859. doi:10.1038/mt.2016.127
Matthaei, M., Clahsen, T., Buttner, C., Ekici, A., Siebelmann, S., Bachmann, B., et al. (2020). MiR-29 Related Deposition of Extracellular Matrix in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61, 1185. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12689
Maurer, B., Stanczyk, J., Jüngel, A., Akhmetshina, A., Trenkmann, M., Brock, M., et al. (2010). MicroRNA-29, a Key Regulator of Collagen Expression in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 1733–1743. doi:10.1002/art.27443
McKenna, E., Traganos, F., Zhao, H., and Darzynkiewicz, Z. (2012). Persistent DNA Damage Caused by Low Levels of Mitomycin C Induces Irreversible Cell Senescence. Cell Cycle 11, 3132–3140. doi:10.4161/cc.21506
Meek, K. M., and Knupp, C. (2015). Corneal Structure and Transparency. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 49, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001
Mittal, S. K., Omoto, M., Amouzegar, A., Sahu, A., Rezazadeh, A., Katikireddy, K. R., et al. (2016). Restoration of Corneal Transparency by Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cel Rep. 7, 583–590. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.09.001
Miyagawa, T., Chen, Z.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., Chen, K.-H., Wang, Y.-K., Liu, G.-S., et al. (2020). Topical Application of Hyaluronic Acid-RGD Peptide-Coated Gelatin/Epigallocatechin-3 Gallate (EGCG) Nanoparticles Inhibits Corneal Neovascularization Via Inhibition of VEGF Production. Pharmaceutics 12, 404. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12050404
Miyagi, H., Thomasy, S. M., Russell, P., and Murphy, C. J. (2018). The Role of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Corneal Wound Healing. Exp. Eye Res. 166, 49–55. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2017.10.006
Mizuno, S., Matsumoto, K., Li, M.-Y., and Nakamura, T. (2005). HGF Reduces Advancing Lung Fibrosis in Mice: a Potential Role for MMP-dependent Myofibroblast Apoptosis. FASEB j. 19, 1–18. doi:10.1096/fj.04-1535fje
Mohan, R. R., Tovey, J. C., Gupta, R., Sharma, A., and Tandon, A. (2011). Decorin Biology, Expression, Function and Therapy in the Cornea. Curr. Mol. Med. 11, 110–128. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2010.05.01310.2174/156652411794859241
Montastier, E., Beuzelin, D., Martins, F., Mir, L., Marqués, M.-A., Thalamas, C., et al. (2019). Niacin Induces miR-502-3p Expression Which Impairs Insulin Sensitivity in Human Adipocytes. Int. J. Obes. 43, 1485–1490. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0260-5
Mott, J. L., Kurita, S., Cazanave, S. C., Bronk, S. F., Werneburg, N. W., and Fernandez-Zapico, M. E. (2010). Transcriptional Suppression of Mir-29b-1/mir-29a Promoter by C-Myc, Hedgehog, and NF-kappaB. J. Cel. Biochem. 110, 1155–1164. doi:10.1002/jcb.22630
Mukwaya, A., Jensen, L., Peebo, B., and Lagali, N. (2019). MicroRNAs in the Cornea: Role and Implications for Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization. Ocul. Surf. 17, 400–411. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.002
Murri, M. S., Moshirfar, M., Birdsong, O. C., Ronquillo, Y., Ding, Y., and Hoopes, P. C. (2018). Amniotic Membrane Extract and Eye Drops: a Review of Literature and Clinical Application. Clin. Ophthalmol. 12, 1105–1112. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S165553
Nassiri, N., Farahangiz, S., Rahnavardi, M., Rahmani, L., and Nassiri, N. (2008). Corneal Endothelial Cell Injury Induced by Mitomycin-C in Photorefractive Keratectomy: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 34, 902–908. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.007
Nur Akkaya, P., and Erbas, O. (2019). Corneal Transplantation and Immunosuppressants. J. Transplant. 4, 1–10. doi:10.5606/dsufnjt.2019.001
O'Brien, J., Hayder, H., Zayed, Y., and Peng, C. (2018). Overview of microRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 9, 402. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00402
O'Connell, R. M., Kahn, D., Gibson, W. S. J., Round, J. L., Scholz, R. L., Chaudhuri, A. A., et al. (2010). MicroRNA-155 Promotes Autoimmune Inflammation by Enhancing Inflammatory T Cell Development. Immunity 33, 607–619. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.09.009
O'Connell, R. M., Rao, D. S., and Baltimore, D. (2012). microRNA Regulation of Inflammatory Responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 295–312. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075013
O'Connell, R. M., Taganov, K. D., Boldin, M. P., Cheng, G., and Baltimore, D. (2007). MicroRNA-155 Is Induced during the Macrophage Inflammatory Response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 1604–1609. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610731104
O'Reilly, S. (2016). MicroRNAs in Fibrosis: Opportunities and Challenges. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 11. doi:10.1186/s13075-016-0929-x
Ogawa, T., Iizuka, M., Sekiya, Y., Yoshizato, K., Ikeda, K., and Kawada, N. (2010). Suppression of Type I Collagen Production by microRNA-29b in Cultured Human Stellate Cells. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 391, 316–321. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.056
Okayama, K., Azuma, J., Dosaka, N., Iekushi, K., Sanada, F., Kusunoki, H., et al. (2012). Hepatocyte Growth Factor Reduces Cardiac Fibrosis by Inhibiting Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Hypertension 59, 958–965. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.183905
Park, J. K., Yang, W., Katsnelson, J., Lavker, R. M., and Peng, H. (2015). MicroRNAs Enhance Keratinocyte Proliferative Capacity in a Stem Cell-Enriched Epithelium. PLoS One 10, e0134853. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134853
Patel, V., and Noureddine, L. (2012). MicroRNAs and Fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 21, 410–416. doi:10.1097/MNH.0b013e328354e559
Penn, J. W., Grobbelaar, A. O., and Rolfe, K. J. (2012). The Role of the TGF-β Family in Wound Healing, burns and Scarring: a Review. Int. J. Burns Trauma 2, 18–28.
Pflugfelder, S. C., Corrales, R. M., and de Paiva, C. S. (2013). T Helper Cytokines in Dry Eye Disease. Exp. Eye Res. 117, 118–125. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.08.013
Pinel, K., Diver, L., White, K., McDonald, R., and Baker, A. (2019). Substantial Dysregulation of miRNA Passenger Strands Underlies the Vascular Response to Injury. Cells 8, 83. doi:10.3390/cells8020083
Prabhasawat, P., Tarinvorakup, P., Tesavibul, N., Uiprasertkul, M., Kosrirukvongs, P., Booranapong, W., et al. (2005). Topical 0.002% Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Conjunctival-Corneal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cornea 24, 443–448. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000148314.86557.6a
Qin, W., Chung, A. C. K., Huang, X. R., Meng, X.-M., Hui, D. S. C., Yu, C.-M., et al. (2011). TGF-β/Smad3 Signaling Promotes Renal Fibrosis by Inhibiting miR-29. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22, 1462–1474. doi:10.1681/ASN.2010121308
Recchioni, R., Marcheselli, F., Olivieri, F., Ricci, S., Procopio, A. D., and Antonicelli, R. (2013). Conventional and Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers of Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Promising Role for Circulating microRNAs. Biomarkers 18, 547–558. doi:10.3109/1354750X.2013.833294
Rechichi, M., Ferrise, M., Romano, F., Gallelli, L., Toschi, V., Dominijanni, A., et al. (2020). Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Refractory Corneal Ulcers: A Case Report. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 20, 100838. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100838
Reid, G., Kao, S. C., Pavlakis, N., Brahmbhatt, H., MacDiarmid, J., Clarke, S., et al. (2016). Clinical Development of TargomiRs, a miRNA Mimic-Based Treatment for Patients with Recurrent Thoracic Cancer. Epigenomics 8, 1079–1085. doi:10.2217/epi-2016-0035
Roach, K. M., Feghali-Bostwick, C., Wulff, H., Amrani, Y., and Bradding, P. (2015). Human Lung Myofibroblast TGFβ1-dependent Smad2/3 Signalling Is Ca2+-dependent and Regulated by KCa3.1 K+ Channels. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 8, 5. doi:10.1186/s13069-015-0022-0
Robinson, P. M., Chuang, T.-D., Sriram, S., Pi, L., Luo, X. P., Petersen, B. E., et al. (2013). MicroRNA Signature in Wound Healing Following Excimer Laser Ablation: Role of miR-133b on TGFβ1, CTGF, SMA, and COL1A1 Expression Levels in Rabbit Corneal Fibroblasts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 6944–6951. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12621
Rodriguez, A., Vigorito, E., Clare, S., Warren, M. V., Couttet, P., Soond, D. R., et al. (2007). Requirement of bic/microRNA-155 for normal Immune Function. Science 316, 608–611. doi:10.1126/science.1139253
Saika, S., Ikeda, K., Yamanaka, O., Flanders, K. C., Nakajima, Y., Miyamoto, T., et al. (2005). Therapeutic Effects of Adenoviral Gene Transfer of Bone Morphogenic Protein-7 on a Corneal Alkali Injury Model in Mice. Lab. Invest. 85, 474–486. doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700247
Saika, S., Yamanaka, O., Okada, Y., Miyamoto, T., Kitano, A., Flanders, K. C., et al. (2007). Effect of Overexpression of Pparγ on the Healing Process of Corneal Alkali Burn in Mice. Am. J. Physiology-Cell Physiol. 293, C75–C86. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00332.2006
Salah, Z., Abd El Azeem, E. M., Youssef, H. F., Gamal-Eldeen, A. M., Farrag, A. R., El-Meliegy, E., et al. (2019). Effect of Tumor Suppressor MiR-34a Loaded on ZSM-5 Nanozeolite in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: In Vitro and In Vivo Approach. Curr. Gene. Ther. 19, 342–354. doi:10.2174/1566523219666191108103739
Sánchez-Huerta, V., Gutiérrez-Sánchez, L., and Flores-Estrada, J. (2011). (−)-Epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) at the Ocular Surface Inhibits Corneal Neovascularization. Med. Hypotheses 76, 311–313. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.09.020
Santhanam, A., Marino, G. K., Torricelli, A. A., and Wilson, S. E. (2017). EBM Regeneration and Changes in EBM Component mRNA Expression in Stromal Cells after Corneal Injury. Mol. Vis. 23, 39–51.
Sarkar, J., Chaudhary, S., Jassim, S. H., Ozturk, O., Chamon, W., Ganesh, B., et al. (2013). CD11b+GR1+ Myeloid Cells Secrete NGF and Promote Trigeminal Ganglion Neurite Growth: Implications for Corneal Nerve Regeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 5920–5936. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12237
Satish, L., and Kathju, S. (2010). Cellular and Molecular Characteristics of Scarless versus Fibrotic Wound Healing. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2010, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2010/790234
Schrementi, M. E., Ferreira, A. M., Zender, C., and DiPietro, L. A. (2008). Site-specific Production of TGF-β in Oral Mucosal and Cutaneous Wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 16, 80–86. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00320.x
Scott, K. A., Hoban, A. E., Clarke, G., Moloney, G. M., Dinan, T. G., and Cryan, J. F. (2015). Thinking Small: towards microRNA-Based Therapeutics for Anxiety Disorders. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 24, 529–542. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2011.11.00510.1517/13543784.2014.997873
Segal, M., Biscans, A., Gilles, M.-E., Anastasiadou, E., De Luca, R., Lim, J., et al. (2020). Hydrophobically Modified Let-7b miRNA Enhances Biodistribution to NSCLC and Downregulates HMGA2 In Vivo. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 19, 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.008
Seyed-Razavi, Y., Chinnery, H. R., and McMenamin, P. G. (2014). A Novel Association between Resident Tissue Macrophages and Nerves in the Peripheral Stroma of the Murine Cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 1313–1320. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12995
Shaheen, B. S., Bakir, M., and Jain, S. (2014). Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease. Surv. Ophthalmol. 59, 263–285. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.09.002
Shay, E., He, H., Sakurai, S., and Tseng, S. C. G. (2011). Inhibition of Angiogenesis by HC·HA, a Complex of Hyaluronan and the Heavy Chain of Inter-α-Inhibitor, Purified from Human Amniotic Membrane. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2669–2678. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5888
Shojaati, G., Khandaker, I., Funderburgh, M. L., Mann, M. M., Basu, R., Stolz, D. B., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Corneal Fibrosis and Inflammation via Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Delivery of miRNA. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 1192–1201. doi:10.1002/sctm.18-0297
Shojaati, G., Khandaker, I., Sylakowski, K., Funderburgh, M. L., Du, Y., and Funderburgh, J. L. (2018). Compressed Collagen Enhances Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Scarring. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 7, 487–494. doi:10.1002/sctm.17-0258
Solé, C., Cortés-Hernández, J., Felip, M. L., Vidal, M., and Ordi-Ros, J. (2015). miR-29c in Urinary Exosomes as Predictor of Early Renal Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 30, 1488–1496. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfv128
Stojanovic, A., Ringvold, A., and Nitter, T. (2003). Ascorbate Prophylaxis for Corneal Haze after Photorefractive Keratectomy. J. Refract Surg. 19, 338–343. doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20030501-11
Sun, X.-y., Lu, J., Zhang, L., Song, H.-t., Zhao, L., Fan, H.-m., et al. (2015). Aberrant microRNA Expression in Peripheral Plasma and Mononuclear Cells as Specific Blood-Based Biomarkers in Schizophrenia Patients. J. Clin. Neurosci. 22, 570–574. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.018
Sun, Z., Shi, K., Yang, S., Liu, J., Zhou, Q., Wang, G., et al. (2018). Effect of Exosomal miRNA on Cancer Biology and Clinical Applications. Mol. Cancer 17, 147. doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0897-7
Słoniecka, M., Le Roux, S., Zhou, Q., and Danielson, P. (2016). Substance P Enhances Keratocyte Migration and Neutrophil Recruitment through Interleukin-8. Mol. Pharmacol. 89, 215–225. doi:10.1124/mol.115.101014
Tandon, A., Sharma, A., Rodier, J. T., Klibanov, A. M., Rieger, F. G., and Mohan, R. R. (2013). BMP7 Gene Transfer via Gold Nanoparticles into Stroma Inhibits Corneal Fibrosis In Vivo. PLoS One 8, e66434. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066434
Tanidir, S. T., Yuksel, N., Altintas, O., Yildiz, D. K., Sener, E., and Caglar, Y. (2010). The Effect of Subconjunctival Platelet-Rich Plasma on Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing. Cornea 29, 664–669. doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e3181c29633
Teus, M. A., de Benito-Llopis, L., and Alió, J. L. (2009). Mitomycin C in Corneal Refractive Surgery. Surv. Ophthalmol. 54, 487–502. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.04.002
Torricelli, A. A. M., Santhanam, A., Wu, J., Singh, V., and Wilson, S. E. (2016). The Corneal Fibrosis Response to Epithelial-Stromal Injury. Exp. Eye Res. 142, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2014.09.012
Toyono, T., Usui, T., Villarreal, G., Kallay, L., Matthaei, M., Vianna, L. M. M., et al. (2016). MicroRNA-29b Overexpression Decreases Extracellular Matrix mRNA and Protein Production in Human Corneal Endothelial Cells. Cornea 35, 1466–1470. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000954
Tran, N. (2016). Cancer Exosomes as miRNA Factories. Trends Cancer 2, 329–331. doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2016.05.008
Tseng, S. C., Li, D. Q., and Ma, X. (1999). Suppression of Transforming Growth Factor-B Isoforms, TGF-Beta Receptor Type II, and Myofibroblast Differentiation in Cultured Human Corneal and Limbal Fibroblasts by Amniotic Membrane Matrix. J. Cel Physiol 179, 325–335. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199906)179:3<325::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-X
Tuft, S. J., Gartry, D. S., Rawe, I. M., and Meek, K. M. (1993). Photorefractive Keratectomy: Implications of Corneal Wound Healing. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 77, 243–247. doi:10.1136/bjo.77.4.243
van Rooij, E., Sutherland, L. B., Thatcher, J. E., DiMaio, J. M., Naseem, R. H., Marshall, W. S., et al. (2008). Dysregulation of microRNAs after Myocardial Infarction Reveals a Role of miR-29 in Cardiac Fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 13027–13032. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805038105
Vettori, S., Gay, S., and Distler, O. (2012). Role of MicroRNAs in Fibrosis. Open. Rheumatol. J. 6, 130–139. doi:10.2174/1874312901206010130
Walton, K. L., Johnson, K. E., and Harrison, C. A. (2017). Targeting TGF-β Mediated SMAD Signaling for the Prevention of Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 461. doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00461
Wang, H., Garzon, R., Sun, H., Ladner, K. J., Singh, R., Dahlman, J., et al. (2008). NF-κB-YY1-miR-29 Regulatory Circuitry in Skeletal Myogenesis and Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Cell 14, 369–381. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.006
Wang, Q.-M., Wang, H., Li, Y.-F., Xie, Z.-Y., Ma, Y., Yan, J.-J., et al. (2016). Inhibition of EMMPRIN and MMP-9 Expression by Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate through 67-kDa Laminin Receptor in PMA-Induced Macrophages. Cell Physiol Biochem. 39, 2308–2319. doi:10.1159/000447923
Wangoo, A., Laban, C., Cook, H. T., Glenville, B., and Shaw, R. J. (1997). Interleukin-10- and Corticosteroid-Induced Reduction in Type I Procollagen in a Human Ex Vivo Scar Culture. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 78, 33–41. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2613.1997.d01-241.x
Weijtens, O., Schoemaker, R. C., Romijn, F. P. H. T. M., Cohen, A. F., Lentjes, E. G. W. M., and van Meurs, J. C. (2002). Intraocular Penetration and Systemic Absorption after Topical Application of Dexamethasone Disodium Phosphate. Ophthalmology 109, 1887–1891. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01176-4
Wen, F.-Q., Kohyama, T., Sköld, C. M., Zhu, Y. K., Liu, X., Romberger, D. J., et al. (2002). Glucocorticoids Modulate TGFb Production. Inflammation 26, 279–290. doi:10.1023/a:1021412601538
Weng, L., Funderburgh, J. L., Khandaker, I., Geary, M. L., Yang, T., Basu, R., et al. (2020). The Anti-scarring Effect of Corneal Stromal Stem Cell Therapy Is Mediated by Transforming Growth Factor β3. Eye Vis. 7, 52. doi:10.1186/s40662-020-00217-z
Williams, K. A., Lowe, M., Bartlett, C., Kelly, T.-L., Coster, D. J., and All, C. (2008). Risk Factors for Human Corneal Graft Failure within the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Transplantation 86, 1720–1724. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181903b0a
Williams, K., Christensen, J., Pedersen, M. T., Johansen, J. V., Cloos, P. A. C., Rappsilber, J., et al. (2011). TET1 and Hydroxymethylcytosine in Transcription and DNA Methylation Fidelity. Nature 473, 343–348. doi:10.1038/nature10066
Wilson, S. E., Chaurasia, S. S., and Medeiros, F. W. (2007). Apoptosis in the Initiation, Modulation and Termination of the Corneal Wound Healing Response. Exp. Eye Res. 85, 305–311. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.009
Wilson, S. E. (2019). Coordinated Modulation of Corneal Scarring by the Epithelial Basement Membrane and Descemet's Basement Membrane. J. Refract Surg. 35, 506–516. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190625-02
Wilson, S. E. (2012). Corneal Myofibroblast Biology and Pathobiology: Generation, Persistence, and Transparency. Exp. Eye Res. 99, 78–88. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2012.03.018
Wilson, S. E., Marino, G. K., Torricelli, A. A. M., and Medeiros, C. S. (2017). Injury and Defective Regeneration of the Epithelial Basement Membrane in Corneal Fibrosis: A Paradigm for Fibrosis in Other Organs?. Matrix Biol. 64, 17–26. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2017.06.003
Xu, Z., Dong, D., Chen, X., Huang, H., and Wen, S. (2015). MicroRNA-381 Negatively Regulates TLR4 Signaling in A549 Cells in Response to LPS Stimulation. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/849475
Yam, G. H.-F., Yusoff, N. Z. B. M., Kadaba, A., Tian, D., Myint, H. H., Beuerman, R. W., et al. (2015). Ex Vivo propagation of Human Corneal Stromal "activated Keratocytes" for Tissue Engineering. Cel Transpl. 24, 1845–1861. doi:10.3727/096368914X685069
Yam, G. H. F., Riau, A. K., Funderburgh, M. L., Mehta, J. S., and Jhanji, V. (2020). Keratocyte Biology. Exp. Eye Res. 196, 108062. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2020.108062
Yang, R., Yu, T., Kou, X., Gao, X., Chen, C., Liu, D., et al. (2018). Tet1 and Tet2 Maintain Mesenchymal Stem Cell Homeostasis via Demethylation of the P2rX7 Promoter. Nat. Commun. 9, 2143. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04464-6
Ye, Y., Hu, Z., Lin, Y., Zhang, C., and Perez-Polo, J. R. (2010). Downregulation of microRNA-29 by Antisense Inhibitors and a PPAR-γ Agonist Protects against Myocardial Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 87, 535–544. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq053
Young, A. L., Ho, M., Jhanji, V., and Cheng, L. L. (2013). Ten-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 0.02% Mitomycin C and Limbal Conjunctival Autograft in Pterygium Surgery. Ophthalmology 120, 2390–2395. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.033
Yu, H.-R., Huang, L.-H., and Li, S.-C. (2018). Roles of microRNA in the Immature Immune System of Neonates. Cancer Lett. 433, 99–106. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2018.06.014
Yulish, M., Beiran, I., Miller, B., and Pikkel, J. (2012). Ascorbate Prophylaxis with Mitomycin-C for Corneal Haze after Laser-Assisted Sub-epithelial Keratectomy. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 14, 382–385.
Zarrin, A. A., Bao, K., Lupardus, P., and Vucic, D. (2021). Kinase Inhibition in Autoimmunity and Inflammation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 39–63. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0082-8
Zhang, G.-Y., Wu, L.-C., Liao, T., Chen, G.-C., Chen, Y.-H., Zhao, Y.-X., et al. (2016). A Novel Regulatory Function for miR-29a in Keloid Fibrogenesis. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 41, 341–345. doi:10.1111/ced.12734
Zhou, L., Wang, L., Lu, L., Jiang, P., Sun, H., and Wang, H. (2012). Inhibition of miR-29 by TGF-Beta-Smad3 Signaling through Dual Mechanisms Promotes Transdifferentiation of Mouse Myoblasts into Myofibroblasts. PLoS One 7, e33766. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033766
Keywords: cornea, wound healing, fibrosis, protein therapy, microRNAs
Citation: Jhanji V, Billig I and Yam GH-F (2021) Cell-Free Biological Approach for Corneal Stromal Wound Healing. Front. Pharmacol. 12:671405. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.671405
Received: 23 February 2021; Accepted: 17 May 2021;
Published: 28 May 2021.
Edited by:
Viridiana Kocaba, Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, NetherlandsCopyright © 2021 Jhanji, Billig and Yam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gary Hin-Fai Yam, yamg@pitt.edu.